CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[QUOTE=Pdiddy77; 1282544]Well. Since everybody is so "caring" and know that the girls are "human beings" selling their bodies. Then why the you guys "negotiate" prices. I mean since everybody knows the girls are selling their bodies and it's humiliating for them to do so. Why throw $60 for FS? I mean they're selling their bodies and we all know this and yet everybody is sooooo "caring" everybody throws $60 or $20 or whatever. Please explain why you're not contradicting yourselves? No offense and all.

Thank god I'm not it the game anymore[/QUOTE]These ladies are human beings. My little head is taking control over my bigger head. With that said, it is difficult to watch the these ladies decline as their career progresses. My meetings with Summer was an eye opener. Although it is her choice in life, I can't help but feel that it is a waste. I would love to see her get clean and out of this line of employment. She would be a great catch if she was clean. I could easily see myself with her.

Just my 2 cents. Maybe I am getting too old for this hobby.

Before moving on.

[Quote=Yxxxxx]That isn't the extent of Xxxxx's problems. She has a severe outbreak of Genital Herpes and told me she has tested H I V positive. She attributes this to having unprotected sex on numerous occasions. Yet she continues this practice. I guess it is a catch 22 for someone like her.
It is important the people on here be made aware of this so they can protect themselves with her. She is a very beautiful woman and where there is beauty men tend to throw caution to the wind. She has been with other women with me also. So they are also at risk.[/Quote]

[size=2][b]When [/b][/size] the AIDs virus first became popular here in the U.S., it was on every newscast, on every station. Back when AIDs was known as the “Gay Plague,” it was big news. Now–a-days it’s in everyone’s domain. But, it is mostly the problem of IV drug users, prostitutes and their clients. Aids and it’s close relative HIV is rarely mentioned in the news today. I wonder why. Think about it.
[size=2][b]Yxxxx [/b][/size] wanted me to warn you guys about Xxxxx having HIV. I think it is more important that everyone understand that Aids and HIV is still around. You should be concern about every girl you meet. The pretty one, the ugly ones, the pros and the non-pros; they all are potential STDs carriers. The proper use of condoms is your best bet against getting HIV. Wrap that wrascal.
:)
CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1283539]Before moving on...

I can't tell if you're hinting at a conspiracy or what, but it's plain to me why HIV / AIDS is rarely mentioned. The much touted "aids epidemic" has always been confined to needle users and anal sex receivers, and so the general straight population was never at risk. The much ballyhooed "coming any day now straight-sex aids epidemic" of the 90s was a hoax, trumped up by Gay activists and propogandists. Does anyone else remember all those ridiculous TV ads 20 years ago, where high school Johnny calls Mary on the phone and tells her he's given her HIV? Even back then I knew this was a crock, and just a desperate attempt to get the public scared so that they'd support finding a cure for AIDS. Ditto for all those other bogus reports that HIV is increasing in the "straight" population -- shame on those gay propogandists for lying. Now it's all those years later, and where are all these straight, non IV drug users who have HIV? The answer is clear: there ain't any. We were lied to. Again, what was true at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic is true now: sharing needles and taking a dck up one's azz puts one at risk of getting HIV. 99. 9% of the time, that is how any guy gets HIV.

I think you're half right bout wrapping the rascal, though CBJ's are such a sensual abomination I think it's worth the risk of infection to get a bbbj, and covering is no bar to getting genital herpes.

[QUOTE=Jaydating; 1283947]

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1283539]Before moving on.

I can't tell if you're hinting at a conspiracy or what, but it's plain to me why HIV / AIDS is rarely mentioned. The much touted "aids epidemic" has always been confined to needle users and anal sex receivers, and so the general straight population was never at risk. The much ballyhooed "coming any day now straight-sex aids epidemic" of the 90s was a hoax, trumped up by Gay activists and propogandists. Does anyone else remember all those ridiculous TV ads 20 years ago, where high school Johnny calls Mary on the phone and tells her he's given her HIV? Even back then I knew this was a crock, and just a desperate attempt to get the public scared so that they'd support finding a cure for AIDS. Ditto for all those other bogus reports that HIV is increasing in the "straight" population. Shame on those gay propogandists for lying. Now it's all those years later, and where are all these straight, non IV drug users who have HIV? The answer is clear: there ain't any. We were lied to. Again, what was true at the beginning of the AIDS epidemic is true now: sharing needles and taking a dck up one's azz puts one at risk of getting HIV. 99. 9% of the time, that is how any guy gets HIV.

I think you're half right about wrapping the rascal, though CBJ's are such a sensual abomination I think it's worth the risk of infection to get a BBBJ, and covering is no bar to getting genital herpes.[/QUOTE]A full 30% of HIV diagnosis' in 2009 were heterosexuals. By any measure, it's a long way from your 99. 9% of HIV carriers get it from homosexual acts or IV drug use.

[QUOTE=Jaydating;1283947]...I think you're half right bout wrapping the rascal, though CBJ's are such a sensual abomination I think it's worth the risk of infection to get a bbbj, and covering is no bar to getting genital herpes.[/QUOTE]

[size=2][b]We[/b][/size] are all adults. Do your own research. Come to your own conclusions. Make your own decisions. Personally, I plan to use condoms when having sexual intercourse. I will go bare back for oral sex. That’s my choice. Each of us most analyze the information as we perceive it. We live and die by the decisions that we make; that’s a fact.
;)
CookyJar

[QUOTE=Brucegeoff;1220031]I joined in 2007 after I saw a picture of Suzy you posted. In 4 years she aged 40 years. Drug and street life aged a pretty girl. Hope she will find life not dependent on drug.[/QUOTE]
[size=2][b]Ya’ll[/b][/size] remember this girl; don’t you? That’s one of my long time, ATFs,-Suzy. Some of you may have counted her out after her last photo session, [post=1219512][b](Click Here).[/b][/post] Don’t! Suzy still has a lot of body to offer.
:p
CookyJar

[QUOTE=Fun Jersey;1256353]…I've dated her several times. She is a sweetheart and does a great job with no drama. Her name is Dontoma.
…Odd name that I'm sure has caused her much confusion through the years.
…Treat her well![/QUOTE]

[size=2][b]And[/b][/size] ya’ll remember this Brook Shields look-a-like [post=1256292][b](Click Here)[/b][/post]. It’s Donna, one of my newer ATFs.
[size=2][b]I have[/b][/size] trouble remembering her name – especially when she has me aroused and excited. Donna is one of those pretty girls who knows how important it is to provide good service.
:p
CookyJar

[size=2][b]I had[/b][/size] it in my mine to match Kensington Ave with Old York Road. I was thinking of a kind of “East meets West,” or “Country meets City,” kind of a thing.
[size=2][b]The [/b][/size]”Girl on Girl,” stuff was a bust. Neither girl could relax enough to get into it. Donna smiled and tried to warm up to it, but Suzy was her old stand-offish self. However, when it came to pleasing me; they both gave it their all. Suzy even upped her BBBJ game as she tried to match Donna’s efforts. The highlight of the date was Suzy’s request to do the FS riding mesh. She slipped on top of me and tried to fuck me to death. Poor Donna never had a chance. Donna groped with her hands and manipulated what she could but Suzy wasn’t given up the dick. Suzy knew that Donna had out shown her during the BJ phase and wanted to prove herself during the FS phase. Thank God for the little blue pill.
[size=2][b]Out [/b][/size] of loyalty, Suzy will always be on my ATF list. However, it is time for me to move on. Given the choice, I’d take the younger girl, Donna. Donna is a better all-a-round date.
:p
CookyJar

Great set. These ARE two lovelies! Thanks from the rest of us, enviously drooling and wishing we were there.

[QUOTE=Kmakth; 1284002]

[QUOTE=Jaydating; 1283947]A full 30% of HIV diagnosis' in 2009 were heterosexuals. By any measure, it's a long way from your 99. 9% of HIV carriers get it from homosexual acts or IV drug use.[/QUOTE]Heterosexual men, or women? Women can get HIV from sex far easier than men can; even so, where are all these straight women who got HIV from straight sex. Or is that statistic keyed to heterosexual men who shared needles and got HIV that way? Or bi men who were lying about being heterosexual? The point is, the 30% statistic is effectively bogus and extremely misleading if it's meant to imply that straight men are getting HIV from straight sex. As I wrote in the previous post, we've been hearing that "HIV is on the rise in the straight community" for the last 20 years. Sorry, but if that's really the case, where the F are all these straight men who got HIV from straight sex? There simply aren't any, in any numbers to compare with men who are struck by lightening. Jesus H, in the last 20 years there hasn't even been a single straight male porn star who has ever gotten HIV from straight sex! In the last 20 years, there have been millions and millions of sexual encounters, yet, who can anyone name besides Magic Johnson who allegedly got HIV from straight sex? It's this simple: the claim that HIV is a danger to straight men who participate in straight sex is just an urban myth, and the reason why "we don't hear about HIV anymore" is because the gay propoganda lobby's attempt to scare everyone into believing that straight sex can result in HIV has run out of gas.

WHOA, I guess cookyjar has gotten over his "I know this girl" "they're suffering! I care! I care! I care!" "I care so much" phase.

Awesome

[QUOTE=Pdiddy77; 1284553]WHOA, I guess cookyjar has gotten over his "I know this girl" "they're suffering! I care! I care! I care!" "I care so much" phase.

Awesome[/QUOTE]Not to worry Pdiddy77. My memory is in tack. I still know her. I still care. I still post pictures (never stopped). Nothing has changed.
;)
CookyJar

Jackson will tell us to take this discussion to the appropriate Safe Sex board, but evidence is that transmission by consensual (arroused and lubricated females) is relatively difficult. But rough, unlubricated, or FS with concomitant sores is high risk, but the worst is anal because of the tearing of the wall of the rectum which allows penetration of the virus through an otherwise relatively resistant mucous membrane.

[QUOTE=Jaydating; 1284538]

[QUOTE=Kmakth; 1284002]Heterosexual men, or women? Women can get HIV from sex far easier than men can; even so, where are all these straight women who got HIV from straight sex. Or is that statistic keyed to heterosexual men who shared needles and got HIV that way? Or bi men who were lying about being heterosexual? The point is, the 30% statistic is effectively bogus and extremely misleading if it's meant to imply that straight men are getting HIV from straight sex. As I wrote in the previous post, we've been hearing that "HIV is on the rise in the straight community" for the last 20 years. Sorry, but if that's really the case, where the F are all these straight men who got HIV from straight sex? There simply aren't any, in any numbers to compare with men who are struck by lightening. Jesus H, in the last 20 years there hasn't even been a single straight male porn star who has ever gotten HIV from straight sex! In the last 20 years, there have been millions and millions of sexual encounters, yet, who can anyone name besides Magic Johnson who allegedly got HIV from straight sex? It's this simple: the claim that HIV is a danger to straight men who participate in straight sex is just an urban myth, and the reason why "we don't hear about HIV anymore" is because the gay propoganda lobby's attempt to scare everyone into believing that straight sex can result in HIV has run out of gas.[/QUOTE]

Giani you had to bring up the topic what what in the butt butt?

Well, that's not actually my post. I agree with you. To claim men can't / don't get HIV from unprotected sex is ignorance of the highest level.