Korean Agency BB

That just tells me there are about 30 mongers who like to try new potential HYA just like me. If just 3 or 4 of those comrades review regularly, gate keeping won't be possible in SoCal. May the new year brings more HYAs and Bros.

Subak77 just shows how easy it is to ruin the gate keeping. I appreciate review of new potential HYAs and Babies cause when a booker markets a girl as premium or young and attractive, Boner is not far behind. False advertisements of MILF as Baby / HYA won't fly long if we care to react.

[QUOTE=AlexisDavis;6732785]She is fully booked for 3 days already and she just got listed. Information must be going around about her somewhere that isn't here.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6733993]Supposedly her last working day in another state was today. It appears she will be back in LA on 1/7 with SweetAsianGem as Lynn. IIRC that's her new name.[/QUOTE]Any idea if she only going to be booked with sag or if she will be on other booker? If not I'm going to have to get verified with sag!

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6733552]Looks like something got lost in translation. Where did you hear that she was the queen of tits? I made such a statement [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=6664249&viewfull=1#post6664249]HERE[/URL] but was referring to Ooyu / Baby Yoyo / Dorothy. Also, I made a list of big tits over in the OC forum [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=6648546&viewfull=1#post6648546] HERE[/URL] that included her when she went by the name of Larsa. Although I did note that she didn't have the biggest but the most visually appealing from that list.[/QUOTE]Asha's tits are pretty f'ing great, IMO. Not D or DD or whatever the ad says. But definitely a full C, and they are beautifully done. Her surgeon is an artist of the highest order. Add her fun personality and high skill level into the mix, and I'd say she's solid ATF material for guys in their 40's, 50's, etc. If you prefer a true 20-something girl, then yeah, maybe you're looking elsewhere. But I'd say for most dudes who want a good combination of looks and skill, Asha is a killer k-girl. I always leave her place happy and exhausted!

[QUOTE=AlexisDavis;6732785]She is fully booked for 3 days already and she just got listed. Information must be going around about her somewhere that isn't here.[/QUOTE]She's booked for like a week, more then 3 days like at least 5 LOL.

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6733983]I thought DailyFantasy reviewed a different Candy. I haven't seen any of them but the really P.S. Pics of CGLA Candy had some similarity in eyes, lips, and smile that made me remembered her other pics. She had other names I forget. She used to be BBFSCIP all inclusive then went upcharge, then went back to BB special. General consensus seemed to be curvy, decently looking and probably not MILF yet with good service. YMMV. Never saw her cause I was looking for HYA but I think she's worth a try with BB special.[/QUOTE]I saw her as Candy last visit when in LA. If you like her pictures you won't be disappointed as those are her real photos but photo shopped younger and hotter (SOP for all advertising). She was great with me, no attitude and was actually very accommodating, seemed fine checking off all boxes but can't remember if she RIM because it was some time ago. BBFSCIP for sure and I found her attractive but beauty is in the eye of beholder. For example, Boner posted a pic of a girl's ass last time. Some mongers might say that ass was juicy perfect, others would say thic, but I'd probably say that same girl was fat and never even try to book her.

I always appreciate your intel and inputs. Ahhh my expectations were blurred with the many conversation of titties with Asha and Ooyu. I will continue my search for the biggest. Never give up and got to catch them all.

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6733552]Looks like something got lost in translation. Where did you hear that she was the queen of tits? I made such a statement [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?33078-Hot-Young-Asian-Girls&p=6664249&viewfull=1#post6664249]HERE[/URL] but was referring to Ooyu / Baby Yoyo / Dorothy. Also, I made a list of big tits over in the OC forum [URL=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31240-Asian-PLEASER-discussion-forum-(please-post-reviews-in-the-review-forum)&p=6648546&viewfull=1#post6648546] HERE[/URL] that included her when she went by the name of Larsa. Although I did note that she didn't have the biggest but the most visually appealing from that list.[/QUOTE]

Thank you, KGA. I am relieved to hear this.

[QUOTE=KGirlAddict;6734192]I saw her as Candy last visit when in LA. If you like her pictures you won't be disappointed as those are her real photos but photo shopped younger and hotter (SOP for all advertising). She was great with me, no attitude and was actually very accommodating, seemed fine checking off all boxes but can't remember if she RIM because it was some time ago. BBFSCIP for sure and I found her attractive but beauty is in the eye of beholder. For example, Boner posted a pic of a girl's ass last time. Some mongers might say that ass was juicy perfect, others would say thic, but I'd probably say that same girl was fat and never even try to book her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=BonerAppetitty;6734003]Member2210 is generally reliable but I guess he had different opinion on WLA Sophia. I had some interest in MW Sophia who just got a good review: [URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sophi[/URL]. I had no interest in WLA Sophi3 cause of fake pics and then she got bad review: [URL]https://www.candygirlla.com/portfolio-1/sophi3[/URL].

Which Sophia were you asking about on 12/13? All I remember is that Sophi3 is more recent than Sophi. Is it possible that Member2210 WLA Sophia moved to MW?[/QUOTE]To your answer, those reviews were before WLA sophie3 showed up on the line up.

Original big tit sophie started in WLA but shortly after moved to MW.

So I believe all reviews were for original sophie who started from WLA then moved to MW.

TBH, each to their own as YMMV but from years of experience, if the original Sophie1 from WLA were popular, she would not move to MW and would have lot more reviews like Ina or Hana or at least Maia, good or bad but review"S", not just two good one and one bad one.

I like big tits and many of them like Iris, Alice, Jun / June are all out there like Sophie but somehow none of them are popular like Ina / Hana / Maia. (IE service, weight, attitude etc).

So I believe that neither MW 1 or WLA Sophia3 are good or at least not enough intel because no one care to write about it. (was never interested in Sophia 3 now in WLA, smaller tits).

Gate keeping is one thing, but look at how Ina blown up? Someone is always going to show off their experience and that's what we are here for (I do my part, I do not gate keep, the busier they get, the longer they stay and more for me too, why gate keep?

Things are tight now so I rather wait and see more reviews but so far big tit Sophie1 at MW is a wait and see type of girl instead of charging ahead and gamble with luck.

I wanted to touch on this topic as it's gotten a lot of traction recently. However, I think that my thoughts regarding this topic is the opposite of most here. Hear me out on this and decide for yourself. Therefore, I want to quash the notion of gatekeeping before it grows into a large and unwieldy abstract construct used to place blame on something that doesn't exist and not address the root of the problem.

Everything stems from the lack of active members who post reviews. There doesn't exist a person or group of people that have the time and wherewithal to see every kgirl that comes through LA / OC AND takes the time to write and post a review. Therefore, a community effort must form to fill that widening gap. However, it needs to consist of an amalgam of mongers with differing tastes and level of adventurousness shall we say. We need the TOFTT'ers, the MILF lovers, the HYA seekers, the adipohiliacs, the caboose chasers, etc. For every category absent, a piece of the total picture disappears and our grasp of the available talent softens. To be blunt, right now, we're a bunch of blind mice reliant on a few who can still see to lead us to cheese.

The natural consequence to this is a lack of information especially regarding new arrivals. As a result, it's misconstrued as gatekeeping when someone finally enlightens us on a gem that may have already been here for days or, god forbid, weeks. I've spoken a lot in the past about the lack of reviewers so I'm not going to beat on a dead horse. However, I do want to or at least try to correct a running theme that has been wrongly attributed to gatekeeping. I trust most of us who do post reviews understand that the pros of doing so outweighs the cons of not. Simply put more business means a longer stay. I'm positive that those who have been seeing kgirls for a good length will attest to having met one stating that they'll stay longer if business is good.

Ultimately, even if we don't get more reviewers, I don't want us pointing fingers and menacingly shaking our fists at imaginary opponents relying on ill-conceived and unnecessary justifications. We can use that energy and time for better things. Like fucking kgirls and reviewing them.

I know you guys invested money in this hobby and want to show off your experiences with others by chit chat and posting a lot of stories. I know I know, you want to make your investment worth it since you love it or try to be cool.

But for simple people like me, I just want to book and see a lot of k girls and chill. My goal is to support my sexual desire and k girls. I want to have as much sex as possible in my lifetime.

If I feel like sharing, I will share. No pressures. Let's take it easy and book an appointment to support K Girls Economy system.

Don't put too much pressure on other people, worry about yourself, and stay in your lane.

Don't over complicate things and think too much about this pay for sex. It's not good for your mentality and you could develop into a stalker yourself LOL.

[QUOTE=AlexisDavis;6732785]She is fully booked for 3 days already and she just got listed. Information must be going around about her somewhere that isn't here.[/QUOTE]It's slim pickings due to holidays, and some mongers need their fix, so they are willing to pay whatever. I will stick to tried and true and get value instead of participating in the rate inflation that has been rapidly growing the past few years, with a short-timer who thinks she should get a raise because she is here a just a certain time period. There are better experiences for less.

[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6734763]It's slim pickings due to holidays, and some mongers need their fix, so they are willing to pay whatever. I will stick to tried and true and get value instead of participating in the rate inflation that has been rapidly growing the past few years, with a short-timer who thinks she should get a raise because she is here a just a certain time period. There are better experiences for less.[/QUOTE]To me it would be worth it just to hard XXX her small box and maybe wreck it, LOL.

[TABLE]
[tr]
[td][b]User[/b][/td]
[td][b]Posts[/b][/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]PumpNDump[/td]
[td]366[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Vulcan1009[/td]
[td]320[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]SolarisMan[/td]
[td]303[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]SsStuntCock[/td]
[td]250[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]MiamiHeat2020[/td]
[td]141[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]JoseMan[/td]
[td]134[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]BonerAppetitty[/td]
[td]134[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Christophe1[/td]
[td]114[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]Bastard Chorum[/td]
[td]100[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]HiKeke[/td]
[td]99[/td]
[/tr]
[/TABLE]

Thanks for keeping us informed in 2023.

- [B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=6277387&viewfull=1#post6277387]2022 Results[/url][/B].

[QUOTE=RockItAllNite;6734763]It's slim pickings due to holidays, and some mongers need their fix, so they are willing to pay whatever. I will stick to tried and true and get value instead of participating in the rate inflation that has been rapidly growing the past few years, with a short-timer who thinks she should get a raise because she is here a just a certain time period. There are better experiences for less.[/QUOTE]In term of the LA's stale inventory, the hobby scene in LA is the product of behaviors of the hobbyists in general.

I see the real problem in LA scene because a lot of mongers in LA are constantly warship these stale girls and the bookers in LA by constantly praising the bookers, the girls and buying and promoting the baby brands. So, why wouldn't the bookers and the bosses who always read this board will go to provide a better quality girls? They really don't need to because we are fu**ing anything that opens the door. As for me, I don't see any girl more than 3-4 times and move on but according to some that is being a SIMPS for being indifferent or being low profile.

So, as the saying goes "you made your bed, now lie in it". And as we continue praising these old hags and promoting the fake BABYS, don't expect that 2024 will be any better than 2023. It will be perhaps worse but I guess it is what it is.

Good luck to all and happy hunting.

The MW Sophie. The one everyone gave good reviews. Not the sub par one in WLA.

F: 6. 5 - she cute, she has big teeth kinda? Good smile. Makes really great fuck faces.

B: 7. 5 - Shapely, Big C tits / Small D, a little stomach pouch, good ass, pretty tight body. Smallish 5'2 - 5'3.

A: 9 - Fun, willing to please almost however, great DFK, great cute attitude. Seemed super engaged and made me almost believe she was my girlfriend.

S: 9 - No FIV, FIA. Great DFK / LFK. TIght snatch. I lasted 8 minutes with her. Picked her up and she fucked me so hard. Nice view in doggy, mish was great with all the aural feedback. CG ride - 9. ALmost as good as Rie but she couldn't maintain it as much but fuck she is great.

E: Hardly any english.

Repeat: Absolutely. My new ATF.

[QUOTE=Vulcan1009;6732279]I knew it!! Those couple of raving reviews about her when she 1st started is def far away from what you have with her.

Now I know who not to trust, LOL.

No wonder I didn't see any other new reviews.

Xnaffie:

Just got back from seeing Sophia can agree and vouch. She is fun and has a nice body and tight box. Would repeat and recommend as well.

Booker told me a brand new girl was available so decided to Toftt and try her out. Got the okay and behind the door was Sophia in a sexy black two piece. She is short and tiny. Her skin is tanned. Nice curves to her body. She had good sized C cups and a butt to go with. She led me to her room and helped me undress. We did some DK and she gave me a BBBJ in the shower. Then back to the room she had me sit on the side of the bed and she started to kiss and lick my dick. She sucks like a vacuum. She sucks long and really enjoys sucking dick. As she got into it she started to rub her pussy as she was sucking my dick. She couldn't take it anymore and she told me to fuck her so I had her come up and she rode my dick in cg till we came together. She was ready to fuck me again as she started playing with my dick right away. As I got hard she was happy and started to give me another BBBJ. 2nd round we went through standing doggy and 69 as she sucked all the cum out of me. She kept sucking till I went soft..[/QUOTE]