How or when were the cameras installed?
[QUOTE=ScottyM3;4163334]OMFG, I'm watching the noon news at the moment. They just mentioned that the NE Pats owner was arrested in that sting down south. Dayum. Chit is hitting the fan.[/QUOTE]My biggest concern is how where the cameras installed and who installed them. Was it a trade out between owners and police ("You let us install cameras and we won't arrest you or close you down" or did the police install them without the knowledge of the owners, or what?
P.S. The NE Pats owner was charged with two counts of soliciting for prostitution. By the way, he has his chauffeur drive him to the spa! <g .
Pat's Owner Warrant Issued.
[QUOTE=NoLongerLurker;4163584]My biggest concern is how where the cameras installed and who installed them. Was it a trade out between owners and police ("You let us install cameras and we won't arrest you or close you down" or did the police install them without the knowledge of the owners, or what?
P.S. The NE Pats owner was charged with two counts of soliciting for prostitution. By the way, he has his chauffeur drive him to the spa!.[/QUOTE]Several good questions arise.
1st, in news articles, the police claim the girls actually lived at the parlors, could not leave without supervision.
How did under cover install cameras in side a "room" ? Perhaps, the "therapist " left the room for a few minutes, with modern tech, no wires would be needed and micro camera could be hidden in a non conspicuous spot.
Which Parlor did Pat's Owner visit? Police are not saying (at this time).
How did he (Pat's Owner) get there? Most billionaires have chauffeur AND have employees sign NDAs (Non disclosure agreements).
If a crime, or potential crime is accused, any NDA is null and void. Therefore the chauffeur would be force to testify, cooperate with law enforcement.
Which poses a 3rd question. WHY, with that kind of $ $ $ $, would you not order outcall?
4th Question. With all the trouble his very good friend, POTUS is in (for sexual indiscretions), you would think he may have been a bit more cautious?
Glad I did not visit a "relief " station last fall, while vacationing in South Florida (LOL).
Jamesj.
A bit more to it than that
[QUOTE=PeterNorth9;4164066]Cameras were already in place. They used the existing security system footage for the busts. If this is all what they are saying, the owners kept pretty tight control.[/QUOTE]At the presser in IRC, the VBPD Chief and IRC Sheriff flat out said they obtained surveillance warrants from a judge to install hidden cameras in the shops. So they may have also seized the shops footage or tapped into it as well as you suggested.
IRC Sheriff also hinted they used other means of surveillance but refused to go into detail when asked.
I'd bet a dollar, they had multiple cameras in the parking lots, as well as Stingrays deployed at each shop to capture your cell phone I'd and number from your cell phone, and that stuff of course is logged and time stamped.