Printable View
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2201605]Have there been any recent Stacey or Maria sightings?
On my last trip I searched and looked, looked and searched and searched and looked some more, without any luck. I had to settle for an excellent date with two other friends.
I don't want to make another trip and be disappointed.
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]Under street walkers I reported that I saw Stacey at Atlantic and Broadway last Monday 8/25. She was in front of the Chinese carry out.
Good hunting gents.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2201605]Have there been any recent Stacey or Maria sightings?
On my last trip I searched and looked, looked and searched and searched and looked some more, without any luck. I had to settle for an excellent date with two other friends.
I don't want to make another trip and be disappointed.
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]Cooky,
I went thru there yesterday afternoon hoping to catch either one of them, but no luck either. I did see Deena, but she disappeared when I circled back. With all the LE reports, I just went through one time, though, hoping to get lucky.
[QUOTE=ArtLang;2201663]Cooky,
I went thru there yesterday afternoon hoping to catch either one of them, but no luck either. I did see Deena, but she disappeared when I circled back. With all the LE reports, I just went through one time, though, hoping to get lucky.[/QUOTE]I guess its not safe to come from AC and have a look?
When I started posting photographs on this site, the images was basically untouched. Over the years I made technical changes in the methods I used while editing. There have been many reasons why I choose to made changes. Most of the changes were a matter of personal preferences and others had to do with the desires and wants of others.
Recently my editing technical preferences were possibly the cause of a fellow monger's dissatisfaction with one of my subjects. In an effort to clarify, I am going to show the before and after modifications used in editing the photographs I post.
Understand that I will not be changing what I do. The editing effects that I use are both pleasing to me and the subjects I photograph. I do not feel that the alterations caused by the effect is enough to hamper the decision making procession of the average discriminating monger. The effects I use are both simple and quick. Cropping, lighting, darkening and other modifications that once had to be done individually can now be done with a single key stroke.
Judge for yourself if the editing effect of the below sample pictures, recently taken, are enough to make Deena an undesirable target.
Deena Camera raw is non-edited, just as the camera saw her. Deena 57 is edited, using a photo editing effect.
[B]Do the slight alterations make all that much of a difference?[/B]
CookyJar.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2202564][B]Do the slight alterations make all that much of a difference?[/B]
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]IMHO, pound for pound, Deena is among the top five when it comes to looks. And! She is among the top three when it comes to service. (There are a number of girls currently on Broadway who give really good service.).
Of cause, YMMV and that's just my humble opinion.
CookyJar.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2202564]When I started posting photographs on this site, the images was basically untouched. Over the years I made technical changes in the methods I used while editing. There have been many reasons why I choose to made changes. Most of the changes were a matter of personal preferences and others had to do with the desires and wants of others.
Recently my editing technical preferences were possibly the cause of a fellow monger's dissatisfaction with one of my subjects. In an effort to clarify, I am going to show the before and after modifications used in editing the photographs I post.
Understand that I will not be changing what I do. The editing effects that I use are both pleasing to me and the subjects I photograph. I do not feel that the alterations caused by the effect is enough to hamper the decision making procession of the average discriminating monger. The effects I use are both simple and quick. Cropping, lighting, darkening and other modifications that once had to be done individually can now be done with a single key stroke.
Judge for yourself if the editing effect of the below sample pictures, recently taken, are enough to make Deena an undesirable target.
Deena Camera raw is non-edited, just as the camera saw her. Deena 57 is edited, using a photo editing effect.
[B]Do the slight alterations make all that much of a difference?[/B]
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]This all comes from my complaint that the Deena in your pic wad not the Deena I ended up with. I will not debate this further. I don't touch any pics I post. Anyone familiar with WYSIWYG? What you see is what you get. That will always be true with me.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2202564]When I started posting photographs on this site, the images was basically untouched. Over the years I made technical changes in the methods I used while editing. There have been many reasons why I choose to made changes. Most of the changes were a matter of personal preferences and others had to do with the desires and wants of others.Recently my editing technical preferences were possibly the cause of a fellow monger's dissatisfaction with one of my subjects. In an effort to clarify, I am going to show the before and after modifications used in editing the photographs I post.Understand that I will not be changing what I do. The editing effects that I use are both pleasing to me and the subjects I photograph. I do not feel that the alterations caused by the effect is enough to hamper the decision making procession of the average discriminating monger. The effects I use are both simple and quick. Cropping, lighting, darkening and other modifications that once had to be done individually can now be done with a single key stroke.Judge for yourself if the editing effect of the below sample pictures, recently taken, are enough to make Deena an undesirable target.Deena Camera raw is non-edited, just as the camera saw her. Deena 57 is edited, using a photo editing effect.[B]Do the slight alterations make all that much of a difference?[/B]CookyJar.[/QUOTE]I guess it's a matter of personal choice. The edited version is a more pleasing photo as the lighting is better and it hides what appear to be track marks on her right arm. I don't know if those are track marks but to me they look like they are. While Deena is very sexually attractive, if she is a heroin user I would find that a negative in being able to be with her sexually from the disease aspect. That being said, I'd see her at least once if I lived there just because she is so darn hot.
I have had several recent dates with deena and have enjoyed myself everytime, she is very sexual, she is very fun and always seem to be there when I call her.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2201605]Have there been any recent Stacey or Maria sightings?
On my last trip I searched and looked, looked and searched and searched and looked some more, without any luck. I had to settle for an excellent date with two other friends.
I don't want to make another trip and be disappointed.
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]I saw Stacey Tuesday 9/2 around 5 PM. She was at Atlantic and Broadway on front of the Zion church. She looked good.
New article in the NY times about the new Camden Police force and how effective they have been:
[URL]http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/01/nyregion/camden-turns-around-with-new-police-force.html?_r=2[/URL]
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2202573]IMHO, pound for pound, Deena is among the top five when it comes to looks. And! She is among the top three when it comes to service. (There are a number of girls currently on Broadway who give really good service.).
Of cause, YMMV and that's just my humble opinion.
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]She looks very hot!
Using a condom is the best way to protect yourself from disease.
[QUOTE=Chelli4me;2202784]I guess it's a matter of personal choice. The edited version is a more pleasing photo as the lighting is better and it hides what appear to be track marks on her right arm. I don't know if those are track marks but to me they look like they are. While Deena is very sexually attractive, if she is a heroin user I would find that a negative in being able to be with her sexually from the disease aspect. That being said, I'd see her at least once if I lived there just because she is so darn hot.[/QUOTE]I try not to show or reference possible drug use in my pictures. Many Law Enforcement units use signs of fresh drug use as probable cause for their stop and searches. LE have plenty of methods at their disposal, they don't need my help. I feel that what the girls do on their time off is their business.
[b][size=3]The wise monger always assumes that all providers partake of some form of drug use or another. Always protect yourself. Always wear a condom during intercourse.[/size][/b]
CookyJar.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2207332]Using a condom is the best way to protect yourself from disease.
I try not to show or reference possible drug use in my pictures. Many Law Enforcement units use signs of fresh drug use as probable cause for their stop and searches. LE have plenty of methods at their disposal, they don't need my help. I feel that what the girls do on their time off is their business.
[b]The wise monger always assumes that all providers partake of some form of drug use or another. Always protect yourself. Always wear a condom during intercourse.[/b]
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]Great advice to always follow.
She came highly recommend for her willingness to please. She's a little more than I'm usually after, but once again I hit the provider jackpot. Lisa was the perfect complement to offset a threesome with a smaller friend.
CookyJar.
Some of you youngsters out there won't understand this.
Sometimes it's not about the hard firm body. Sometimes it's about the ugh! The Ahhh! The, "That's it baby, right there. " and "Ah sh*t! That's what I'm talking about. ".
CookyJar.