Printable View
[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]My assumption is that you would be expected to pay for that hour also. I'm sure there are exceptions but I would think that would be the norm.
[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]I would expect to pay for the hour especially if I did not know the girl but at a reduced rate.
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.
*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*
I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.
You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,
Santa Claus.
PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged. If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him? The article you posted only has a first name and a common one. Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me. Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money. I think you have an agenda on here. Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to. If T is a bad man he never showed it around us. You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.
So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.
Have a wonderful day
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.
*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*
I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.
You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,
Santa Claus.
PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]After having given Lawdoc a standing ovation for authoring a masterpiece, I am thinking I may have been a bit premature (hate when that happens. I mean I have heard that it happens to others. I have no problems. Honest. I don't. No, really.)
Sorry. Lost my focus. I am thankful for yet another very entertaining submission by Legal. The time and effort you put into you work does not go unnoticed.
If I may add my 3 cents. (I am a big spender compared to most.) I have heard from more than one provider that T is a dog that never gives up the chase. I have had dreams where I was lying naked in an oh so comfy bed with a true beauty worshipping my existence only to be woken up by not one, not two, but three calls from T. When I asked my companion why he would be calling her, she said that he had been chasing her for years and trying to make his dreams a reality with her. She swore on the bedside bible (Thanks Gideon) that he does this with a lot of the talent.
Don't know him. Don't want to.
Sport,
[QUOTE=TheSportScout;1399501]She swore on the bedside bible (Thanks Gideon)[/QUOTE]Brilliant, all I can say, have not posted much lately, but just been dreaming with regulars, but Zone Jane was a very nice dream, but the BP post has been chaotic, don't know what is going on.
Be smart and stay safe
[QUOTE=MissFancy;1399158]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged.[/QUOTE]Sweet T has not been charged. Yet.
[QUOTE]If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him?[/QUOTE]Because law enforcement has this terrible habit of gathering evidence first and then charging people.
[QUOTE]The article you posted only has a first name and a common one.[/QUOTE]I did not post the article; that was a contribution of another board member. Credit where credit is due."Troy" is surely a common name. If you have read other information on this board about Troy recruiting on Deleon's behalf and combine that with Troy's acknowledgement of his personal relationship with Deleon, it is not difficult to identify the "Troy" to which the article refers. The world, particularly this world, is smaller than you think.
[QUOTE]Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me.[/QUOTE]No doubt the Earth being round and rainfall in Spring amazes you as well. Those things, much like The Troy's negative contributions to our local game, are undeniable facts.
[QUOTE]Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money.[/QUOTE]No, you clearly do not know about his personal life and definitely know even less about his business acumen. As for his eagerness to see you earn money, most landlords want their tenants gainfully employed. Do not take it as a personal endorsement. It is not.
[QUOTE]I think you have an agenda on here.[/QUOTE]It only took you one visit to the board to start parroting your benefactor. I am certain this is coincidental.
[QUOTE]Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to.[/QUOTE]This subject just casually arose during your completely unrelated conversations with random law enforcement officers, did it? Kind of them to exonerate someone who had yet to be publicly accused. If it helps you any, Miss Guided (I mean, Miss Fancy,) The Troy used the same relativistic argument about "other" locations during his earlier defense. A pros_ute calling other women wh_res does not transform her into a princess. Nice try, though.
[QUOTE]If T is a bad man he never showed it around us.[/QUOTE]I did not quantify The Troy one way or the other, Miss Fancy; I simply pointed out a personal and business relationship which he (through other board guises) first denied and then later limited to strictly personal. The proof of what he is may be established through a review of his conduct on this board since that time. Your opinion about The Troy is your own, as is mine.
[QUOTE]You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.[/QUOTE]Because he told you so, right? He told StoptheBS the same thing. Have you considered that he might not be sharing his private business information with the girls who "do not work for him," much less girls who work at "places he for sure 100% does not own?" As you pause to consider this, Miss Fancy, ask yourself a simple question: Why would he?
[QUOTE]So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.[/QUOTE]Time is the best indicator of what is true and untrue, Miss Fancy. I offered information, and you and others may judge for yourselves whether that information proved accurate. I would offer the same cautionary language about relying on the assertions of a first-time poster coming to the defense of a man who has manipulated this board, lied about his associations and clearly misrepresented the risk posed to his locations and his providers owing to his conduct.
Troy will need alibi witnesses as the law enforcement investigation proceeds, Miss Fancy. If you are as certain of your information as you suggest, then testify on his behalf. Let the courtroom test the accuracy of your assertions. I stand on the accuracy of the information coming out in the investigation.
[QUOTE]Have a wonderful day[/QUOTE]You do the same, Miss Fancy.
If you have no objection, Miss Fancy, might we relocate this debate to the LEGAL DISCUSSION thread? The membership has previously voiced their concern about muddying up the waters with this issue outside that location. I'll be happy to debate with you there if you like.
[QUOTE=LuvMyAsians;1398753]Going out of town for a few days. I am going to find a date. I thought I would like to do dinner with her as well. My question is twofold. Is this a good idea and am I going to buy the dinner time as well even if we go to a nice place for dinner? Sorry, I'm cheap.[/QUOTE]I always pay for that time as well. Good investment with class providers in my opinion.
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle;1399585]If you have no objection, Miss Fancy, might we relocate this debate to the LEGAL DISCUSSION thread? The membership has previously voiced their concern about muddying up the waters with this issue outside that location. I'll be happy to debate with you there if you like.[/QUOTE]Well Said Legal.
[QUOTE=GreatCatHunter; 1399534]Brilliant, all I can say, have not posted much lately, but just been dreaming with regulars, but Zone Jane was a very nice dream, but the BP post has been chaotic, don't know what is going on.
Be smart and stay safe[/QUOTE]Who owned the places because I worked there. I know my employers. I took the time last night to read your posts and it's obvious why you are on here. I got on here to put the truth out. Since I was in the business I know from first hand experience. While I was working several law enforcement guys were customers believe or not I have continued that relationship with some and know what I am talking about and not frivolously spewing inaccurate information. I had a personal interest in knowing whether what you were saying was true. It's not.
T sat in the office most days with us and other than the one he dated he never had relations with any of us. He would regularly get calls from other providers wanting to work at the stadium.
Put up or shut up. Show some proof. The other owners and workers have been arrested, if there was proof as you say, he would be too. You argue that you are not involved with the case so how do you know what proof they have? Being a excellent provider as I was we have ways of getting to the real information and I know that they are not concerned about him.
As the other guy said on here about T calling so what? He might be a monger just like you. I guarantee providers aren't turning him away. They will see anyone with a pocket full of money.
Again mongers it is clear there is an agenda with these guys. Legal even threatened T's kids on here. What kind of person does that? They are little kids. Do I have an agenda? Yes. I'm thinking of getting back in the business and want to set the record straight. I have no reason to move to another site because I won't continue to argue with this "man".
[QUOTE=MissFancy; 1399158]I haven't talked to him in awhile so I don't know but have not seen anything saying the stadium owner was charged. If law enforcement has all this on him why not charge him? The article you posted only has a first name and a common one. Your speculation and spewing of the mouth amazes me. Don't know about T's personal life but he was a good person to work for and wanted us all to make money. I think you have an agenda on here. Leo visited sometimes as they do every other place and when I was there we had no issues. I know some Leo who came to visit me outside of their job and our office was never a concern for them. Still isn't from the mouths of some I still talk to. If T is a bad man he never showed it around us. You have accused him of owning another place I worked at and I know 100% he didn't own that.
So men take what he says with a grain of salt. I know what did and didn't go on at all the places I worked.
Have a wonderful day[/QUOTE]It is almost worth getting my account deleted to just post his full name up here so we can get all of that out of the way. 'T', who the hell wants to be called 'T'. Anyway, I think I've already posted it in a way and will completely end any further discussion. You should post your ad up here so we know how we can set an appointment with you, you sound fiesty.
Seems like a while back I saw some discussion on here about the New Albany spa girls moonlighting at the boat. I have looked every time since and only once did I see a group of girls that may have been them.
Any info on how / where to arrange a meeting?
PM is fine.
Thanks,
T2P
BustyGirl posted on here. Has anyone here seen her? Legit? I'm in town for awhile and looking for some fun.
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1398830]Since you "promised," I guess we can simply chalk up the contradictory information possessed by law enforcement to pure conjecture. I, for one, am persuaded by the honesty, candor and depth of feeling apparent in your soliloquy. The very idea, nay the unfounded insinuation, that a man of Sweet T's caliber would instruct women who do not work for him on the fine art of doing things that they are prohibited from doing at the locations he leases but does not own is one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in the history of law enforcement. That Deleon's providers would, in a fit of apparent jealousy, accuse Sweet T of handdebugging them through basic provider training is something we universally condemn. Shame on them, the horny, envious lot. Thank goodness there was former stadium provider to clarify the situation.
*Cue Celine Dion: My Heart Will Go On*
I was all wrong about Sweet T; he is as manly, virulent and fair-minded as all the "girls who do not work for him" portray him. Extend to him my heartfelt apology, and tell him that I writhe naked in shame for all I have said and, ironically, admire him for his determination and integrity. For my part, I thank him for preventing, through simple suggestion I am sure, the "girls who do not work for him" from doing anything they might otherwise be inclined to do as part of the activities he does not control. He clearly does not work with Deleon (the cad!) How anyone could have compared Sweet T and Deleon is, much like who murdered Dr. Black in the study with a candlestick, a sweet mystery of life.
You are quite literally a pearl among oysters, Miss Fancy. Yours truly,
Santa Claus.
PS, It was Colonel Mustard. Expect coal in your stocking this year.[/QUOTE]Not taking anyone's side here, but what is your issue with Troy? I'm a fairly regular hobbiest and have to say that his place is one of my favorites. I have never had any problems there and have talked to several girls that work there and they all seem pretty happy. It would seem that if you are a hobbiest this constant back and forth is not helping the activity in town. I get warning folks, and we have been duely warned, but you seem to be takinging it to a more personal level. IMHO, personal vendettas have no place on this board, they are just static that the rest of us have to wade through.
[QUOTE=Bigtlvr;1401596]Not taking anyone's side here, but what is your issue with Troy? I'm a fairly regular hobbiest and have to say that his place is one of my favorites. I have never had any problems there and have talked to several girls that work there and they all seem pretty happy. It would seem that if you are a hobbiest this constant back and forth is not helping the activity in town. I get warning folks, and we have been duely warned, but you seem to be takinging it to a more personal level. IMHO, personal vendettas have no place on this board, they are just static that the rest of us have to wade through.[/QUOTE]In total agreement. For whatever reason, Legal has an axe to grind with Troy, and it seems personal. From my perspective, the back and forth adds nothing to this board. On a side note, both Legal and now Kylawdoc seem bent on trying to impress us all with their keen with and legal knowledge. I have learned that when someone feels a need to stand on a rooftop and shout "look at how smart I am", there is usually a reason that the listening audiance needs to be convinced.