General Reports

[QUOTE=CookyJar;1723803]Kate is one of the baddest girls out there. Yes! She's bad. Very bad. Please note that I've said she was a bad girl and not a bad date. There is a huge difference.

If you are looking for a sweet, goody two shoes type; skip pass this one fast. If you are looking for a hardcore good time with lots of twist and turns, kissing and nibbling, licking and sucking, and tons of fun grab hold of Kate and settle in for a wild ride.

Kate is more than a provider; she's a performer. Not an actress or a fake, she's the real deal. She puts out on every level; everything is on the table and upfront. She performs perfectly and in every position. She's a Baddddddd girl.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]I had not seen Kate for a while. Am I glad I stopped her and decided to grab her? You are darn right I am.

When it comes to a flat out good-ole-fashion good time, Kate is the one. She is pretty much down for and capable of almost anything. Her all natural boobs and firm buttocks more than make up for the tiny bit of tummy she has developed. I barely noticed it while hanging on for dear life.

And, on top of all that, she's friendly, funny and easy to talk too. That's what I like about her the most; she's down to earth, and easy to get along with. She can be that sweet and innocent young girl next door that you always wanted to hit or she can be that raunchy little tiger up the block that you've been watching for years and been afraid to approach. With Kate, you get what you ask for and it's always good. She gives an out of this world, deep-throating BBBJ. The pussy isn't too loose and not too tight, but just right from any position. Anal is offered and from where I was standing, it looked mighty inviting.

Just remember; in mongering as in life, you get what you pay for.

I hope this review doesn't sound too much like an advertisement; I'm not her pimp or anything like that. I just like the girl. As always, YMMV!

CookyJar.

[QUOTE=CookyJar;2179204]Unto each his own! Everyone isn't for everybody.

Who doesn't have a few blemishes? I would imagine a lot depends on timing. Most women look better in the morning after applying their make-up. You have to meet them when they're fresh out of the box. No one is going to be at their best after a hard day working outside.

Also a lot depends on the type of date you take them on. You cannot expect an awful lot on a car date. When I take a lady out I always allow them some time to freshen-up, if they want or need it. In some cases that means a quick shower and applying a little powder, eye stuff and lip gloss. Other times it's a piss, dump and wipe. I try never to lose sight of the fact that these are women, people and humans just like everybody else, they have faults.

I totally agree that a freshly picked wound can be a turn-off. I guess I was lucky.

CookyJar.

P.S.: How was the service?[/QUOTE]I'm sorry I should have been more detailed in my report I was in a rush. She had more than a few blemishes they were all over her jawline chin and arms. About 30% of them have little scabs on. I'm pretty sure she is a picker. She could have cleaned herself up a little bit better, She was a little oily. But she did not smell bad. She was friendly and the service was good. Her pussy was tight and I did not last long in it.

Sorry if I'm a little picky we all have our turn offs. She is just not my type she looks much better in cookie jars pictures. As I said before CJ's Photoshop skills are too good. Pictures I have posted I'll never touch. What you see is what you get. I think Stacey is the much better pick of the two.

Good hunting gentlemen.

[QUOTE=ILikePussy;2181145]I'm sorry I should have been more detailed in my report I was in a rush. She had more than a few blemishes they were all over her jawline chin and arms. About 30% of them have little scabs on. I'm pretty sure she is a picker. She could have cleaned herself up a little bit better, She was a little oily. But she did not smell bad. She was friendly and the service was good. Her pussy was tight and I did not last long in it.

Sorry if I'm a little picky we all have our turn offs. She is just not my type she looks much better in cookie jars pictures. As I said before CJ's Photoshop skills are too good. Pictures I have posted I'll never touch. What you see is what you get. I think Stacey is the much better pick of the two.

Good hunting gentlemen.[/QUOTE]I hear, I understand and I agree. I feel as if I somehow let you down.

My point was to you and all USASexGuide Members: There is a built in time delay between the time of my posting and the date the pictures were taken. I do this to avoid having a easily discernible schedule or pattern presented in this open forum. Therefore, even if you picked-up a girl on the exact same day her pictures were posted by me, enough time would have pass for some changes to have taken place.

I've known girls who were flat out beauties upon their release from LA custody and within a week become unrecognizable. It isn't always a matter of photographic skills.

For example, Johnny 49's pictures, which I am assuming were taken after mine, do not show red spots or signs of recent picking and no signs of photographic manipulations.

I am sorry if somehow you were misled and disappointed. Perhaps I should revert back to a lesser skill level or post at least one untouched camera raw photo with each set. In any case, it is always up to the individual to determine if the girl in the flesh is too his liking.

CookyJar.

What I like about CJ's photo shoots are: there is always, for the most part, a head shot of the girl of the day. I like this because I can look at the face and most importantly the eyes and make a judgment on the girl if she is attractive to me. As far as Photoshop-ing the images, I can't really tell. If CJ adjusts the brightness / contrast to enhance an image that's fine. I do the same on many of my submissions. Finally, CJ you had a picture of a red head, Candy, back from 2003 or so. I looked for it and couldn't find it. Any chance when you're up late with nothing better to do, you could locate it and re-share for the board?

[QUOTE=CookyJar;2181521]I hear, I understand and I agree. I feel as if I somehow let you down.

My point was to you and all USASexGuide Members: There is a built in time delay between the time of my posting and the date the pictures were taken. I do this to avoid having a easily discernible schedule or pattern presented in this open forum. Therefore, even if you picked-up a girl on the exact same day her pictures were posted by me, enough time would have pass for some changes to have taken place.

I've known girls who were flat out beauties upon their release from LA custody and within a week become unrecognizable. It isn't always a matter of photographic skills.

For example, Johnny 49's pictures, which I am assuming were taken after mine, do not show red spots or signs of recent picking and no signs of photographic manipulations.

I am sorry if somehow you were misled and disappointed. Perhaps I should revert back to a lesser skill level or post at least one untouched camera raw photo with each set. In any case, it is always up to the individual to determine if the girl in the flesh is too his liking.

CookyJar.[/QUOTE]

Taken this past Friday. Had a great date. I am not Brad Pitt and I appreciate that she is willing to hang out with me.

[QUOTE=Johnny49;2181605]Taken this past Friday. Had a great date. I am not Brad Pitt and I appreciate that she is willing to hang out with me.[/QUOTE]Well I am Brad Pitt. I have seen her with her legs spread before me. I have been very intimately close. Maybe it was a bad day idk but she had many of these little scabbed bumps I'm talking about. Not mad at CJ or here to debate anyone about her. Just giving my review. I saw her about a week later walking Broadway and she looked very unkempt. I wish she was as clean as these pics when I had her.

[QUOTE=GMalav;2181540]CJ you had a picture of a red head, Candy, back from 2003 or so. I looked for it and couldn't find it. Any chance when you're up late with nothing better to do, you could locate it and re-share for the board?[/QUOTE]I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.

[QUOTE=CookyJar;2182174]I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.[/QUOTE]Love your pictures, CookyJar, keep them coming.

[QUOTE=CookyJar;2182174]I don't remember a red-head by the name of Candy. Could we be talking about Cherry (aka Julie). I don't like re-posting photographs of girls so long gone from the scene. With any luck at all she's long out of the business. Although! With her looks, she could be in Vegas, Hollywood or somewhere.

I guess there is no harm in posting a little eye-candy.

CookyJar.

PS: Absolutely no touch-up work on these.[/QUOTE]That's her! Thanks for doing the photo research and sharing on the site. Is there nothing in the world of mongering that you can't do?

Does anyone know who the girl in the picture with Deena is? A couple of us have asked Johnny boy who it is and he has not replied.

[QUOTE=GMalav;2182359]That's her! Thanks for doing the photo research and sharing on the site. Is there nothing in the world of mongering that you can't do?[/QUOTE]Now that the subject has come up; I wonder whatever happened to her.

For awhile, after she left Broadway, she was working for a agency in NJ. Anyone have any further knowledge about her. I sure hope she made it out.

CookyJar.

[QUOTE=ILikePussy;2182425]Does anyone know who the girl in the picture with Deena is? A couple of us have asked Johnny boy who it is and he has not replied.[/QUOTE]Just a friend and a non-pro.

[QUOTE=GreatExpecta;2179318] I finally blew my load and cleaned up and she then started using the toys on me to hit my prostate. Don't knock it guys. The prostate is the male g-spot. I finally came again and it was getting late so we decided to get dressed...[/QUOTE]I pulled this Quote from a Virginia thread. It got me to thinking about a subject that has been coming up more and more, with more girls than I though was usual.

It all started while on a double date, earlier this summer, when one girl nonchalantly asked her friend if she preformed asshole licking. She was not asking her to lick her ass or my ass or anyone's ass at the time. They were simply comparing each other's repertoire. The one girl said, "No," she didn't. The other girl then commented that she did lick asshole and stated, "A lot of men like it. " This was the first occasion .

On another date, with two altogether different girls, the subject came up again. While in the middle of a very hot and steamy session, the dirty talk was flowing. I was fucking one girl doggie style while she was sucking the nipples of the other girl, when that previous conversation popped in my head. I asked the girl who was laying on her back having her nipples sucked, if she, Toss Salad. She answered, "What. " I inquired again, "Do you toss salad. " I was purposely being vague, not asking, "Do you lick asshole. " I was laying a trap. She looked up at me, questioning, "What?" Sucking air and grunting, I continued and asked, "You don't know what tossing salad is, do you?" Then I said to the girl I was doggie fucking, "She doesn't know about tossing salad. Want to show her?" The girl I was fucking looked back at me and smiled a devilish smile. I told our young apprentice to flip over.

Here the scene: I'm standing on the side of the bed doggie fucking one girl, while she's licking the ass of another girl, who has her face buried in a pillar, twitching and shaking. "Ah shit, you like that, don't you, you little twitching *****," was just one of the many comments spoken in the heat of that moment. This was the second occasion.

Which brings me back to Great Expecta's quote. My question is, should we be more specific in our reports. Is it enough to say a girl performs a good BBBJ, FS, Anal and is a freak. Should we announce the girl's entire list of known performance activities. And, just as important to the conversation, how many guys would be willing, like Great Expecta, to express their likes, dislikes and preferences in the open forum.

Most girls are willing to suck dick and fuck and most are aware of the high rewards for offering up their assholes. For a lot of girls it doesn't end there. They are willing to do a lot more. The question is, how much do we want to know about these girls. Would it bother you to know that the sweet innocent little thing that you've just finished DFK'ing, recently had her face buried deep between an ass crack.

CookyJar.

Kate was in rare form during this one...no holes barred.

CookyJar.

Take a look at this photo. What do you see? What comes to mind?

[INDENT] Me: That's great Kate, now wrap your legs around hers and hold that little squirming ***** down while I lube-up her asshole.

Kate: Yeah, you little *****, don't move. Take his dick up you ass. You're gonna love his hot nut shooting up your butt.

Angela: WTF, Nooooooo! Not that big dick! Not in my ass! [/INDENT]

And then I woke up. It was just my imagination.


CookyJar.