Printable View
[QUOTE=BFDeal; 1386918]Let's hope he's put away for awhile and let's also the "provider" in question is busted as well. It was an obvious set-up. A hobbyist getting pistol-whipped, now that's the true definition of TOFTT. Louisville must be getting worse.
BFDeal[/QUOTE]She has had one two many of two way sessions with the former Lanny / Aaliyah to not have contracted Herpes or Hepatitis. Stay away from that *****.
[QUOTE=Joelouky;1387480]Have any of you used the auction site Priceline when doing outcalls? Do you save enough money to justify not knowing which hotel you will get?[/QUOTE]I always use Hotwire and have figured out which hotel I will get most of the time. Once compared it with Priceline and then Hotwire was a better deal. For instance 3. 5 star in the Airport / Expo area is the Executive Inn / Crown plaza hotel. The 3 star in the Jeffersontown West area is the Best Western Envoy. Downtown the 4 star has always been the Galt House or the Hyatt, the 4. 5 star is the Brown. I wouldn't go below 2. 5 stars it could get ugly. But I might be wrong.
I have used price line a couple of times when traveling out of town and, had good luck at it. It is helpful to do some research before you make a bid though. If I'm not mistaken, once you specify the amount you are willing to pay you can not adjust the amount but can reduce the lowest rating (stars) of the hotels you are looking for. There are some forums / list of hotels at [url]http://biddingfortravel.com/[/url] To give you an idea of the hotels and price range.
[QUOTE=Legal Eagle; 1386478]Rather than attributing postings to perceived motivations, Golf, why not simply evaluate them for accuracy? For my part, I stated (in summary,) that:
1. There existed a social and business relationship history between Troy and Ivan.
2. That issues regarding the stadium arose during the investigation into My1501.
3. That Deleon and Kaufmann would be charged, and.
4. That law enforcement was watching both My1501 (and its later incarnations) and the stadium as a result of the pending criminal investigations.
Which of those assertions proved false, Golf? *[/QUOTE]One would not post four assertions from the past and ask if any have been proven false if any had been. I don't see the point to the challenge; also that an assertion or contention has not been proven false is no proof it is true. It awaits being proven true.
I doubt the assertions about the 1501 investigation are based on personal knowledge. Thinking is not knowing. My doubt comes from the contentions being so wide, deep and numerous, and attracted much acrimony among the competing posters. This looks like a formula for exaggeration. If ego is not the right word substitute a more appropriate one.
BustyGirl posted the attention is causing uneasiness among the provider ranks. I don't know that is true but given the bandwidth of this topic it seems to me it would. How they view this should be important to us. They are invested here also. The hobby is not all about us.
[QUOTE=Golfcart;1389282]My doubt comes from the contentions being so wide, deep and numerous, and attracted much acrimony among the competing posters. This looks like a formula for exaggeration. If ego is not the right word substitute a more appropriate one. [b]BustyGirl posted the attention is causing uneasiness among the provider ranks.[/b] [u]I don't know that is true but given the bandwidth of this topic it seems to me it would.[/u] [b]How they view this should be important to us. They are invested here also. The hobby is not all about us.[/b][/QUOTE]I agree that how providers view the "hobby" & this board is important: & raising an unnecessary ruckus draws unwanted attention from the public; but I must also comment to the issue that when persons post on here as self-proclaimed "experts" [b] & [u]then offer dangerous[/u]ly incorrect advice, [/b] [u]or counsel co[/u]mp[u]lacen[/u]cy[u] + willfull ignorance of the nuances & subtleties of law-enforcement-[/u]op[u]eration[/u]s p[u]ertaining to clients [/u]& providers: then those who know the risk that this erroneous or false information poses must sometimes demonstrate the motivation that the purveyor of this biased or dangerous advice has (for offering it) in order to convince innocent readers of what they would be exposed to if they accept it at face-value!
I heartily commend LegalEagle for his service & endorse his attempts to educate us & thereby keep us safer! I also salute JimTrueBlue, who was driven off this board by the hostility of certain malefactors in this drama, for his efforts on all our behalfs! I also lament the loss, prior to all this, of our wise legal-counsel Track!
Knowledge is power: play safe & stay safe; sincerely: A K
It is not a situation, Golf, wherein the assertions have yet to be proven "false" and are therefore assumed to be true. Rather, when I offered that the assertions were true, Troy and company denied such. I then pointed out that those suggesting my information was untrue had motives for saying so-motives that Troy and his cohorts denied. Now information from an objective third-party source clarified the matter. It is not a question of ego, as I neither gain nor lose anything in the process of vetting the information. My point was to share what I had learned and leave it to each of you to factor the information into your decision-making process regarding the approach to particular studios. As Sunycide and Sports Scourt pointed out, I never suggested that mongers avoid these locations; I simply counseled caution in the approach because of the focus of LEO on these studios. Please understand that I am not playing "King of the Hill," Golf. The point is to share relevant information. If it helps one monger avoid what I went through, it was worth sharing.
Thanks to you, Kyowa, for your endorsement and support. My goal from the beginning was to open an additional channel of information to the board to compliment the volume of information shared among the mongers. I am still relatively new here, so I do not intend to step on any toes in the process of contributing to this board. If I did that unintentionally, please accept my apology.
Hi Guys,
Anybody tried MissySquirtz Oral skills recently? She said a while back she had been working on them. Just wondered if she had improved.
[QUOTE=Ky Comfort; 1393165]Hi Guys,
Anybody tried MissySquirtz Oral skills recently? She said a while back she had been working on them. Just wondered if she had improved.[/QUOTE]They were fine.
I've decided to quit the mongering business. Altho I didn't post much, I enjoyed reading the many observations and posts by you! USG saved me many times!
Thank You!
[QUOTE=Snoot;1393744]I would like to know what the thoughts are on the state of the hobby. Especially Legal. Legislation is up in Frankfort regarding human trafficking. BP has been associated with this for awhile and if this passes and I'm sure it will - then the state will be in our backyard in a way we don't wish. I feel we have very few venus to monger in.[/QUOTE]Your question could not be more prescient, Snoot. The wind is up in many local jurisdictions regarding adoption and enforcement of adult entertainment legislation in the more populated counties. Law enforcement is being backed into corners due to the seeming prevalence of adult-oriented entertainment in many communities. This is in fact nothing new, of course. What is new, however, is the volume of providers promoting themselves in many of the publications frequented by hobbyists. The push by legislators is not so much to eliminate adult entertainment as to streamline it among traceable companies and organizations. Getting everyone in the business affiliated with established companies seems to be the focus of the legislation. This allows the government to tax the organizations (in the form of licensing fees and corporate taxes) and weed out the less sophisticated operations. City leaders can handle a few well-organized companies providing adult entertainment (in whatever form.) What they cannot seem to handle is business that they cannot track or tax.
In the final analysis, what we are seeing is posturing, mongers. City leaders need to feign genuine concern over adult entertainment to satisfy their more conservative constituents. Periodic sweeps of the type we are witnessing are the appeasement necessary to maintain stability and order. If we want to maintain our game and help maintain availability of providers, encourage them to comply with local licensing and registration ordinances. Depending upon their menu, licensing can and should range from LMT to exotic dancer to escort. If they do this, oversight shifts from law enforcement to administrative agencies. This means less-frequent visits by government workers and a substantial drop in concern of city leaders. It will make it marginally more expensive for us to play, but it will make it safer for everyone involved. Law enforcement does not genuinely care about the practice of adult entertainment; they do care about appearances.
[QUOTE=Snoot;1394659]Adj. 1. prescient. Perceiving the significance of events before they occur. Yes I had to go look it up. LOL[/QUOTE]You must not have read the Dune series of books, in the second or third one that word was used about 1, 000 times. The thing that always gets me, especially in Southern Indiana, is the selective enforcement, or lack thereof, in regard to the ordinaces and laws. That has always made me believe that government is extremly reactive and no so proactive or the price of protection (like my cable bill) tends to go up frequently and when you decide enough is enough they shut you down. Being of the mind that everything has a price, I believe that later is the case.