Rants Raves and Stupid Shit in Seattle.

[QUOTE=RespectIt;7332636]The hobby fuckin' sucks.

It's the fat whales' fault!

It's the simps' fault!

It's civvy liberal women's fault!

It's the techies' fault!

OK.

Maybe the world is changing around you, but your expectations haven't. Whose fault is that?[/QUOTE]What a stupid comment LMAO. My expectation is to get services for a fair and reasonable price. If I'm paying $400 but getting RBGFE, then that's fine. But if the majority of these GPS wh*s on TNA are charging $500-$700 for nothing except a CBJ and FS, then that's absolute BS.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;7333512]What a stupid comment LMAO. My expectation is to get services for a fair and reasonable price. If I'm paying $400 but getting RBGFE, then that's fine. But if the majority of these GPS wh*s on TNA are charging $500-$700 for nothing except a CBJ and FS, then that's absolute BS.[/QUOTE]Went to Europe a few months ago and in small towns you can get a really hot girl for RBGFE for 160/200 hr. Big cities were more expensive but nothing like here, the most I paid was 350 and she was freaking hot. BBBJ, pussy slide and no rush.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;7333512]What a stupid comment LMAO. My expectation is to get services for a fair and reasonable price. If I'm paying $400 but getting RBGFE, then that's fine. But if the majority of these GPS wh*s on TNA are charging $500-$700 for nothing except a CBJ and FS, then that's absolute BS.[/QUOTE]Who defines "fair and reasonable"?

I just think it's dumb to try to blame certain groups of people for high prices, when it's a combination of many factors that are largely out of individuals' control.

—The Seattle area isn't known for having the hottest women, generally speaking.

—There's an abundance of high paid tech workers who aren't the greatest with women.

—Prices are going up on everything. Between housing and living expenses, it's difficult to afford living here.

—There are a lot of part-time hoes who may only need a few clients (or SD dates) to stay afloat, so they can afford to be selective and charge more per trick.

A "majority" are charging 500-700 for CBJ + FS? A lot are asking for 500+, but you can get decent menus at that price. There are definitely fewer sub-500 options for GFE, but I think "majority" is a bit of an exaggeration.

[QUOTE=Runner2448;7333737]Went to Europe a few months ago and in small towns you can get a really hot girl for RBGFE for 160/200 hr. Big cities were more expensive but nothing like here, the most I paid was 350 and she was freaking hot. BBBJ, pussy slide and no rush.[/QUOTE]What exactly is RBGFE? I know it has something to do with a defunct website but that's it.

[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;7334257]What exactly is RBGFE? I know it has something to do with a defunct website but that's it.[/QUOTE]Google and search are your friend here.

Basically LFK / DFK, BBBJ, CFS, MSOG, DATY (usually).

[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;7334257]What exactly is RBGFE? I know it has something to do with a defunct website but that's it.[/QUOTE]Don't quote me on this, but I believe people use it to mean DFK, BBBJ, DATY, and CFS.

[QUOTE=MorganCreamin;7334257]What exactly is RBGFE? I know it has something to do with a defunct website but that's it.[/QUOTE]Redbook ([URL]myredbook.com[/URL]) as "GFE = girlfriend experience. Typically BBBJ, CFS, DFK, DATY, and MSOG".

The recent posts remind me -- I wish guys would stop with the useless ass reviews on the other board. It's one thing if the provider tells you to limit what you say, but many don't.

Instead, guys attempt to write complete fluff and poetry about how the broad they just saw was one of their most amazing sessions in their inexperienced life. Wouldn't surprise me if some reviews are fake too.

All I really care about is the following:

1. Does she look more or less like her pics?

2. Is she safety, rbgfe, or pse / greek?

3. Anything atypical that stands out in her service or session whether positive or negative.

That's it. Hell, you can put a lot of that info in the title and have an empty review (which would be great, because I usually do a search of those terms). If you're worried about being explicit, just heavily imply it then so any doofus reading it can get the gist.

A big reason why I significantly reduced my usage of the other site is because trying to parse what's available with menus is a pain in the ass and we have to share info here instead.

[QUOTE=HelloThar;7335354]The recent posts remind me -- I wish guys would stop with the useless ass reviews on the other board. It's one thing if the provider tells you to limit what you say, but many don't.

Instead, guys attempt to write complete fluff and poetry about how the broad they just saw was one of their most amazing sessions in their inexperienced life. Wouldn't surprise me if some reviews are fake too.

All I really care about is the following:

1. Does she look more or less like her pics?

2. Is she safety, rbgfe, or pse / greek?

3. Anything atypical that stands out in her service or session whether positive or negative.

That's it. Hell, you can put a lot of that info in the title and have an empty review (which would be great, because I usually do a search of those terms). If you're worried about being explicit, just heavily imply it then so any doofus reading it can get the gist..[/QUOTE]If she's safety, likely not going to bother reviewing -- or really even seeing her.

If she's bb, then you'll read my comments here, not there.

[QUOTE=Markro3000;7335412]If she's safety, likely not going to bother reviewing -- or really even seeing her.

If she's bb, then you'll read my comments here, not there.[/QUOTE]I'm similar in that regard, though it's mainly for those who do write reviews on the board.

If I'm seeing someone full safety, that means I fucked up somewhere along the way because I'd rather rub one out at home.

Honestly, I just hate the white knight and judgemental stuff when services differ. Let people do what they want as long as they're respectful.

[QUOTE=HelloThar;7335354]The recent posts remind me -- I wish guys would stop with the useless ass reviews on the other board. It's one thing if the provider tells you to limit what you say, but many don't.

Instead, guys attempt to write complete fluff and poetry about how the broad they just saw was one of their most amazing sessions in their inexperienced life. Wouldn't surprise me if some reviews are fake too.

All I really care about is the following:

1. Does she look more or less like her pics?

2. Is she safety, rbgfe, or pse / greek?

3. Anything atypical that stands out in her service or session whether positive or negative.

That's it. Hell, you can put a lot of that info in the title and have an empty review (which would be great, because I usually do a search of those terms). If you're worried about being explicit, just heavily imply it then so any doofus reading it can get the gist.

A big reason why I significantly reduced my usage of the other site is because trying to parse what's available with menus is a pain in the ass and we have to share info here instead.[/QUOTE]So one of the rules of TNA is no shilling, yet when you read these reviews with absolutely no information whatsoever, but it's filled with "the most amazing time ever" and "I found my new ATF" the mods consider that a review and not shilling.

When that one guy made his review about Nadia Luv and going to Fogo de Chao, there was no ACTUAL information in that review. It was nothing more than a giant run-on sentence filled with adjectives and adverbs. However, the mod stated that the review would not be removed. If that's not further proof that the mods are providers and part of the GPS Pussy Brigade, I don't know what is.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;7339710]So one of the rules of TNA is no shilling, yet when you read these reviews with absolutely no information whatsoever, but it's filled with "the most amazing time ever" and "I found my new ATF" the mods consider that a review and not shilling.

When that one guy made his review about Nadia Luv and going to Fogo de Chao, there was no ACTUAL information in that review. It was nothing more than a giant run-on sentence filled with adjectives and adverbs. However, the mod stated that the review would not be removed. If that's not further proof that the mods are providers and part of the GPS Pussy Brigade, I don't know what is.[/QUOTE]Not exactly the same thing, but would it be useful (or even entertaining) to have a suspicious review thread here? Anything that looks like a shill or written by the provider themselves? Especially the latter. I see reviews all the time where it seems obvious to me that it's the provider writing the review. They often say things that no man would ever say and are filled with things women would say about themselves.

[QUOTE=BackInSea;7333512]What a stupid comment LMAO. My expectation is to get services for a fair and reasonable price. If I'm paying $400 but getting RBGFE, then that's fine. But if the majority of these GPS wh*s on TNA are charging $500-$700 for nothing except a CBJ and FS, then that's absolute BS.[/QUOTE]If they are charging more than you want to pay, move on to the next.

Not rbgfe. Move on.

Too pricey. Move on.

Too fat. Move on.

Too ugly. Move on.

Not your favor of ethnicity. Move on.

If they don't fit what you want. Move on.

Whining about things out of your control? Whatever, man.

It boggles my mind that some of these providers use the same damn photos on their ads for years.

--KissMeKennedy has got to be one of the worst offenders. Apparently, she joined the board in 2014 and I swear she's used the same pics the entire time.

--Skye has had the same ones up as long as I've been aware of her.

--Chloe's pics are old enough to be her grandchildren.

--PetiteGlamourPNW / Daia will switch it up now and then, but she currently has Christmas photos up LOL.

—HannahWest is also using years-old pics.

—AlinaLove has been using worthless filtered pics for a while now.

—CurvyGirl69.

I'm just speculating here that the combined weight gain of the providers above in the past couple years must be staggering.

[QUOTE=RespectIt;7343369]It boggles my mind that some of these providers use the same damn photos on their ads for years.

--KissMeKennedy has got to be one of the worst offenders. Apparently, she joined the board in 2014 and I swear she's used the same pics the entire time.

--Skye has had the same ones up as long as I've been aware of her.

--Chloe's pics are old enough to be her grandchildren.

--PetiteGlamourPNW / Daia will switch it up now and then, but she currently has Christmas photos up LOL.

HannahWest is also using years-old pics.

AlinaLove has been using worthless filtered pics for a while now.

CurvyGirl69.

I'm just speculating here that the combined weight gain of the providers above in the past couple years must be staggering.[/QUOTE]Either that or weird angles that clearly attempt to hide unflattering parts of them. One reason why I appreciate it when they put up pictures with a piece of paper saying the date and their name or something. Usually it's the ones with the higher rates like the agency girls, but at least you'll know what you're getting.