Kison

[QUOTE=Makiki;2590424]Thanks Goser for giving info on Sharon's looks. I agree that Connie is pretty so if Sharon is a frumpy 6, I'll pass. I can't get hard for any face below an 8. Just my own opinion and malfunction.[/QUOTE]Concur. Was with Sharon last week, 40's 5'4-5" 135#, looked to me natural ceee with nice size suckables, shaved pussy except small strip. She has a soft pouche, thick soft thighs and ass, aims to please though, nice chick, english pretty good. BBBJ needs work, looks concur with 6-6. 5 range. Sometimes I don't see how other rate these massage girls so high. To each his own I guess.

[QUOTE=Goser;2589836]I agree that Connie is full bodied and curvy, but I would not classify her as HWP. She is a 3 peat girl and the minute she returns, I am there. Connie could do well in any AMP. She has a very pretty face. So much so that she was featured in one of the only pictures ever used to promote Kison.

Sharon is not a 3 peat girl to me. In fact, I'd say she is a bit frumpy. A young guy would not likely think her very attractive unless he is into GILFs. She was nice enough and provided good service, but I was not attracted to her and her boobs are not natural. Sharon's best place is in a specialty AMP like Kison. She will be perfect for the Kison client base.

I'd rate Connie around a 9 in looks and Sharon about a 6. There is significant separation to me in looks between the 2 girls. Both provide similar service.[/QUOTE]I personally would not rate connie a 9 if 5 is average.

[QUOTE=Opelu;2591421]I personally would not rate connie a 9 if 5 is average.[/QUOTE]Who would you rate as a 9? We all have our own tastes and it is informative to see who rates who at a high level because guys who like one guys 9's will like their other 9's as well.

I don't want to waste my time in the beef thread, but just felt like I had to chime in here. Enough piling on Sharon already. You guys who are down on her looks have made your point, although I think grading her a 6 and calling her "frumpy" is overdoing it a bit. I'm pretty sure those that have been with her can agree that her service is excellent - just what you would expect from Kison. In that context she's right where she belongs. There are a lot of other AMPs with young hotties who will gladly take your money and service you poorly.

[QUOTE=Sukebegai;2591431]I don't want to waste my time in the beef thread, but just felt like I had to chime in here. Enough piling on Sharon already. You guys who are down on her looks have made your point, although I think grading her a 6 and calling her "frumpy" is overdoing it a bit. I'm pretty sure those that have been with her can agree that her service is excellent - just what you would expect from Kison. In that context she's right where she belongs. There are a lot of other AMPs with young hotties who will gladly take your money and service you poorly.[/QUOTE]Yup! Couldn't agree more. Saw her at the other place she worked, and had a great time. She may not be a car model, but she's damn fine, and was very comfy to the touch.

[QUOTE=Sukebegai;2591431]I don't want to waste my time in the beef thread, but just felt like I had to chime in here. Enough piling on Sharon already. You guys who are down on her looks have made your point, although I think grading her a 6 and calling her "frumpy" is overdoing it a bit. I'm pretty sure those that have been with her can agree that her service is excellent - just what you would expect from Kison. In that context she's right where she belongs. There are a lot of other AMPs with young hotties who will gladly take your money and service you poorly.[/QUOTE]I have to agree with you. Sharon is my ATF. Since day 1, I have never left Kison unsatisfied. Even after a long day at work, for me, she is worth the drive and the money. To each his own, but I think she's gorgeous and if you're you're looking for a GFE, it doesn't get much better.

[QUOTE=Sukebegai;2591431]I don't want to waste my time in the beef thread, but just felt like I had to chime in here. Enough piling on Sharon already. You guys who are down on her looks have made your point, although I think grading her a 6 and calling her "frumpy" is overdoing it a bit. I'm pretty sure those that have been with her can agree that her service is excellent - just what you would expect from Kison. In that context she's right where she belongs. There are a lot of other AMPs with young hotties who will gladly take your money and service you poorly.[/QUOTE]Thanks for saying what I was about to say! TEHO as always. If she's not your type fine, been there, done that and move on. No need to keep piling.

[QUOTE=Nutmaker;2591450]Yup! Couldn't agree more. Saw her at the other place she worked, and had a great time. She may not be a car model, but she's damn fine, and was very comfy to the touch.[/QUOTE]Yeah no need to put this girl down as though she is the worst you could ever see she is alright.

[QUOTE=Sukebegai;2591431]I don't want to waste my time in the beef thread, but just felt like I had to chime in here. Enough piling on Sharon already. You guys who are down on her looks have made your point, although I think grading her a 6 and calling her "frumpy" is overdoing it a bit. I'm pretty sure those that have been with her can agree that her service is excellent - just what you would expect from Kison. In that context she's right where she belongs. There are a lot of other AMPs with young hotties who will gladly take your money and service you poorly.[/QUOTE]I think it's just the opposite. Kison is a good AMP with a specialty. If you like that specialty, then this is one of the best places to get it anywhere in the USA. Some guys think that Kison is just chock full of GILFs. Not true. There are some fine girls who have come from this AMP. It's worth pointing them out in finer detail so that others who wouldn't normally go to Kison will give it a try.

Connie, Bonnie, Naomi, Sugar, Happy are among the best providers I have seen in Hawaii and they have looks that even the young bucks would consider worthy even if they have a more advanced age.

In addition, there are other AMPs with girls who provide service better than Kison and with girls in their 20's. Most of those girls are not publicized as much so that certain mongers can keep them for themselves. For example, Empire had many of them although most were promoted in the open. Interestingly, Ivy early on promoted BBFS with some of her girls who offered it. Melody, Yuko and Sugar are examples. But, later on, she tried to discourage it because her client base had many who were against it. Even then, girls provided it.

Hawaii is very unusual because it has such a large market for BBFS. In most markets, it is strictly taboo and really discouraged. If this is your thing, you are in the right place.

I should also point out that for me, 6 is fuckable. Just not repeatable.

[QUOTE=Opelu;2591604]Yeah no need to put this girl down as though she is the worst you could ever see she is alright.[/QUOTE]A 6 is not a bad rating. A 3 is a bad rating which is what I have given to Yoko.

[QUOTE=Goser;2591634]A 6 is not a bad rating. A 3 is a bad rating which is what I have given to Yoko.[/QUOTE]3 is harsh for Yoko. Makes me wonder if A) you have actually laid eyes on her or if B) you've been with her. I have pretty high standards and Yoko is better than decent looks wise. Cute face, above average body and out of this world service. Looks I give Yoko 7. Service is a 10, she does everything and does it well. Attitude is 10.

[QUOTE=Goser;2591620]I think it's just the opposite. Kison is a good AMP with a specialty. If you like that specialty, then this is one of the best places to get it anywhere in the USA. Some guys think that Kison is just chock full of GILFs. Not true. There are some fine girls who have come from this AMP. It's worth pointing them out in finer detail so that others who wouldn't normally go to Kison will give it a try.

Connie, Bonnie, Naomi, Sugar, Happy are among the best providers I have seen in Hawaii and they have looks that even the young bucks would consider worthy even if they have a more advanced age.

In addition, there are other AMPs with girls who provide service better than Kison and with girls in their 20's. Most of those girls are not publicized as much so that certain mongers can keep them for themselves. For example, Empire had many of them although most were promoted in the open. Interestingly, Ivy early on promoted BBFS with some of her girls who offered it. Melody, Yuko and Sugar are examples. But, later on, she tried to discourage it because her client base had many who were against it. Even then, girls provided it.

Hawaii is very unusual because it has such a large market for BBFS. In most markets, it is strictly taboo and really discouraged. If this is your thing, you are in the right place.

I should also point out that for me, 6 is fuckable. Just not repeatable.[/QUOTE]What you have to understand is that this is not an OPED piece. You say you mean no harm by saying 6, but someone already posted they wouldn't see her based on your recommendation she is a frumpy 6. You are doing a disservice to the forum when you do that.

[QUOTE=MuffinStuffer;2592250]What you have to understand is that this is not an OPED piece. You say you mean no harm by saying 6, but someone already posted they wouldn't see her based on your recommendation she is a frumpy 6. You are doing a disservice to the forum when you do that.[/QUOTE]We will have to agree to disagree. According to that poster, I saved him $200. For that, he thanked me and he got a lot out of that recommendation. I wish someone else posted something less glowing about Sharon before I went to see her because I may have chosen to see someone else instead. I don't regret it, but it was'and't one of my best sessions.

It is my honest opinion that she is a 6. I gave 2 girls at Happiness a 6 rating as well. 6 is not bad if the girl is great in attitude and service which is what they can control. Others have chimed in and said she is higher and that she is an ATF. Good for them. Perhaps she will get more business because of those reviews. The reader can see the posters previous reviews to see if they are consistent or not. And, they can weigh the feedback against what others say. If this message board is only about giving glowing reviews of girls then it is not very useful at all. We need to report the good with the bad and not get hurt if a girl we really like gets a bad rating. It happens. It's not any individual review that should be the basis of evaluating a girl but the sum total of all the reviews.

Don't forget Honey!

[QUOTE=Goser;2591620]I think it's just the opposite. Kison is a good AMP with a specialty. If you like that specialty, then this is one of the best places to get it anywhere in the USA. Some guys think that Kison is just chock full of GILFs. Not true. There are some fine girls who have come from this AMP. It's worth pointing them out in finer detail so that others who wouldn't normally go to Kison will give it a try.

Connie, Bonnie, Naomi, Sugar, Happy are among the best providers I have seen in Hawaii and they have looks that even the young bucks would consider worthy even if they have a more advanced age.

In addition, there are other AMPs with girls who provide service better than Kison and with girls in their 20's. Most of those girls are not publicized as much so that certain mongers can keep them for themselves. For example, Empire had many of them although most were promoted in the open. Interestingly, Ivy early on promoted BBFS with some of her girls who offered it. Melody, Yuko and Sugar are examples. But, later on, she tried to discourage it because her client base had many who were against it. Even then, girls provided it.

Hawaii is very unusual because it has such a large market for BBFS. In most markets, it is strictly taboo and really discouraged. If this is your thing, you are in the right place.

I should also point out that for me, 6 is fuckable. Just not repeatable.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MuffinStuffer;2592241]3 is harsh for Yoko. Makes me wonder if A) you have actually laid eyes on her or if B) you've been with her. I have pretty high standards and Yoko is better than decent looks wise. Cute face, above average body and out of this world service. Looks I give Yoko 7. Service is a 10, she does everything and does it well. Attitude is 10.[/QUOTE]My thoughts exactly MS! In fact I just saw her last night. Love her dimples. Just me but I never rate an AMP girl below 5,becuz looks are all relative to a person's idea of good looking. And I don't want to adversely affect her business but giving a really low rating unless she was truly ugly. To me, maybe 8,9,10,looks maybe universal but below that is subjective. 3,is extremely harsh. Yoko is my ATF so I'm prejudiced but I love her whole package.