Kison

Yes, check out my review. Confirmed they are the same person.

[QUOTE=Sukebegai;2588334]Lisa and Kelly are the same girl as far as I know. I believe Raiden commented that he only caught a glimpse of her the first time so one can understand if his description was a little off. Also might've been just after she returned from her brief stint at Golden so it might've seemed like she was a new arrival.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Kisaku1218;2586302]For anyone never been to Kison, which provider would an experienced monger suggest? I had experience with MF, Empire, Rose, Gogo, Hula, and Happiness. Personally I love lux and similar experience, Nara in rose was great too.[/QUOTE]It really depends on what you care about most. Lux and Nara are one type of experience and is not what they specialize in at Kison. I would say that these girls are the full package. Great in looks, service and attitude. Among the top actually in combined score. Lux is in her 20's. Nara is older, but pretty attractive.

Many guys who are picky about how good looking a girl is may have a hard time with many of the girls at Kison. If you are especially into younger, hot looking girls, then Kison is not for you. The young ones they do get provide sub par service relative to the alternatives. Kison is a BBFS place. That's what you go there for.

I would say try Paula. She would be more like Nara. I've seen Paula 3 or more times (I forget the number). But some guys don't like her body type.

Many guys like Sharon, but I honestly don't find her attractive and I didn't like her service much.

Connie, if she comes back, is an all star and would fit your needs. I like Connie more than both Nara and Lux by a lot.

Wara (formerly of Hula and Empire) would meet your needs as she is more like Lux. And she is in her 20's. Not sure where she will turn up again. She was supposed to be here until the end of August, but she went home early due to Empire closing. 2 close calls with closings and she probably thought there was too much heat here.

[QUOTE=Enona1;2586658]I remember the name but can't remember her reviews. Can anyone tell me how she looks and how her service is?[/QUOTE]Pretty, not super young but younger than the average kison girl, hard fake tits, nice fit body (like almost fitness model type bod). Service wise hot and cold. Dfk, BBBJ, I don't recall BBFS (not really my thing so I ask for cover anyway), no Greek, and does CIM. For me I really like this girl but like I said hot and cold but when it's hot it's hot.

[QUOTE=OkiChimpo;2588750]Pretty, not super young but younger than the average kison girl, hard fake tits, nice fit body (like almost fitness model type bod). Service wise hot and cold. Dfk, BBBJ, I don't recall BBFS (not really my thing so I ask for cover anyway), no Greek, and does CIM. For me I really like this girl but like I said hot and cold but when it's hot it's hot.[/QUOTE]Is Naomi the hapa girl that was at Kison a couple of years ago?

[QUOTE=Atagg510;2588397]Through the years, I have been with some of the all-stars, but Sharon is something special. Though it may effect my time with her, I think she deserves more attention. Anyone that truly enjoys the GFE has to spend a night with her. As I said before, treat her right and she will take care of you. Physically, I think she's perfect. Large see's, nice squeezable ass and a soft, not flabby / meaty, body. I hug her and I don't want to let go. She also has a "girl next door" personality. It's like finding out the hot girl you've been lusting after is also the sweetest girl you've ever met.

The only thing different about tonight is that we're getting to know each other better and that makes the experience better. I came back from my shower and she was there waiting for me. I laid beside her and she immediately wrapped her legs around mine and we started LFK and DFK. After about 15 minutes, it was down to business. I know they all read this, so I won't go into detail beyond that.

Though YMMV, I honestly believe if you give her the BFE, she will respond accordingly. All we needed to do was change the setting and it would have been like laying beside my actual girlfriend. She is amazing.[/QUOTE]How does she look compared to Connie? Connie is thick young and gorgeous in my opinion.

She has a beautiful ass. Is Sharon the same? Younger or older than Connie?

[QUOTE=VanDeventer;2588794]Is Naomi the hapa girl that was at Kison a couple of years ago?[/QUOTE]Not sure. I don't think she looks hapa but I see things differently than most.

[QUOTE=VanDeventer;2588794]Is Naomi the hapa girl that was at Kison a couple of years ago?[/QUOTE]Yup! That's her! I was one of her first customers. It was one of the most wonderful GF Experiences I'd ever had. I wrote a detailed review and you swines all read it and paid her a visit. When I went back a couple weeks later, she was so burnt out that I hardly recognized her. Don't get me wrong- she is still super sweet, and she has learned to pace herself! Great girl!

[QUOTE=WomenLover2;2588847]How does she look compared to Connie? Connie is thick young and gorgeous in my opinion.

She has a beautiful ass. Is Sharon the same? Younger or older than Connie?[/QUOTE]Imo connie is quite attractive and built like a MILF meaning curvy but hwp. Sharon is similar but not as curvy but hwp and older if that makes any sense. Connie slightly better looks wise but sharon is not far behind.

[QUOTE=Opelu;2589810]Imo connie is quite attractive and built like a MILF meaning curvy but hwp. Sharon is similar but not as curvy but hwp and older if that makes any sense. Connie slightly better looks wise but sharon is not far behind.[/QUOTE]I agree that Connie is full bodied and curvy, but I would not classify her as HWP. She is a 3 peat girl and the minute she returns, I am there. Connie could do well in any AMP. She has a very pretty face. So much so that she was featured in one of the only pictures ever used to promote Kison.

Sharon is not a 3 peat girl to me. In fact, I'd say she is a bit frumpy. A young guy would not likely think her very attractive unless he is into GILFs. She was nice enough and provided good service, but I was not attracted to her and her boobs are not natural. Sharon's best place is in a specialty AMP like Kison. She will be perfect for the Kison client base.

I'd rate Connie around a 9 in looks and Sharon about a 6. There is significant separation to me in looks between the 2 girls. Both provide similar service.

[QUOTE=Goser;2589836]I agree that Connie is full bodied and curvy, but I would not classify her as HWP. She is a 3 peat girl and the minute she returns, I am there. Connie could do well in any AMP. She has a very pretty face. So much so that she was featured in one of the only pictures ever used to promote Kison.

Sharon is not a 3 peat girl to me. In fact, I'd say she is a bit frumpy. A young guy would not likely think her very attractive unless he is into GILFs. She was nice enough and provided good service, but I was not attracted to her and her boobs are not natural. Sharon's best place is in a specialty AMP like Kison. She will be perfect for the Kison client base.

I'd rate Connie around a 9 in looks and Sharon about a 6. There is significant separation to me in looks between the 2 girls. Both provide similar service.[/QUOTE]Imo pics of connie were outdated and I'd say full and curvy but that sounds misleading and some may take it for fat which she is not. Imo hourglass figure but service wise I found her to be a dead fish yet attractive. Sharon has some weird thing going on with her nipples like its inverted or something but as far as looks wise I saw worse there.

Read the old reviews and saw she runs hot and cold. Decided to try the Pepsi challenge. Pretty girl, slim body, fake Cs. A bit stand offish. She came in and started asking questions. Seemed nervous. Not a fuck monster. While she likes to talk she is all business. BBBJ, CFS, CIM. She was ok but I will not repeat.

[QUOTE=Opelu;2590008]Imo pics of connie were outdated and I'd say full and curvy but that sounds misleading and some may take it for fat which she is not. Imo hourglass figure but service wise I found her to be a dead fish yet attractive. Sharon has some weird thing going on with her nipples like its inverted or something but as far as looks wise I saw worse there.[/QUOTE]Just me, but IMHO Sharon's nipples were just fine when I saw her. Perfect nibble sucking size LOL. And I'm pretty sure her boobs are real. They're pretty big and they feel real. They're kinda soft and they sag a bit. Like real boobs. When I squeezed them they felt soft and squishy. Like real ones. And when she's on her back they flatten out like real one's so to me they're genuine.

IMHO Sharon is YMMV like any other girl. And she's GFE style. Guys looking for fuck monsters will be disappointed. If the chemistry is right, she's great. TEHO as always. Just wanted to add my 2 cents.

[QUOTE=Raiden;2590354]Just me, but IMHO Sharon's nipples were just fine when I saw her. Perfect nibble sucking size LOL. And I'm pretty sure her boobs are real. They're pretty big and they feel real. They're kinda soft and they sag a bit. Like real boobs. When I squeezed them they felt soft and squishy. Like real ones. And when she's on her back they flatten out like real one's so to me they're genuine.

IMHO Sharon is YMMV like any other girl. And she's GFE style. Guys looking for fuck monsters will be disappointed. If the chemistry is right, she's great. TEHO as always. Just wanted to add my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]I think they are fake. Her nipple gets sort of sucked in it looks strange. Yeah sharon is YMMV like everyone else. I wouldn't say she is unattractive though. But that too is in the eye of the beholder.

[QUOTE=Goser;2589836]I agree that Connie is full bodied and curvy, but I would not classify her as HWP. She is a 3 peat girl and the minute she returns, I am there. Connie could do well in any AMP. She has a very pretty face. So much so that she was featured in one of the only pictures ever used to promote Kison.

Sharon is not a 3 peat girl to me. In fact, I'd say she is a bit frumpy. A young guy would not likely think her very attractive unless he is into GILFs. She was nice enough and provided good service, but I was not attracted to her and her boobs are not natural. Sharon's best place is in a specialty AMP like Kison. She will be perfect for the Kison client base.

I'd rate Connie around a 9 in looks and Sharon about a 6. There is significant separation to me in looks between the 2 girls. Both provide similar service.[/QUOTE]Thanks Goser for giving info on Sharon's looks. I agree that Connie is pretty so if Sharon is a frumpy 6, I'll pass. I can't get hard for any face below an 8. Just my own opinion and malfunction.

[QUOTE=Opelu;2590389]I think they are fake. Her nipple gets sort of sucked in it looks strange. Yeah sharon is YMMV like everyone else. I wouldn't say she is unattractive though. But that too is in the eye of the beholder.[/QUOTE]Sharon's tits are fake. I can't believe the number of guys who can't tell the difference between real and fake tits. Just go to see Bin at Top. Those are naturals.