Like Beef Lolo?

Quit trying to change the narrative now. We all know what you wrote and how this all started. Brah, you brought this upon yourself! Your a loser, plain and simple. My supicions about you are confirmed.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3938748]Thank You John, I agree with you. All my post are reports about girls and AMPs, with the exception of defending the truth in this Beef Thread are focused on girls. I try to post positives and constructive criticism when reporting about a girl or AMP. Some people will defend what's false even if true. A prime example is the Jackie at Happiness case. I was simply agreeing with on monger regarding his post as he referenced Jackie has a manly face. If reporting and acknowledging the truth hurts the feelings of others then what good is this forum? Everyone has their own experiences and they should be able to share those experiences about those girls and AMPs whether good or bad.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=UglyOldGuy;3938767]I just want to be clear sir. You are saying that even with providers who normally do BBFS, you specifically request cover? For example Leii, Sasha, Rebecca, Yuna, Miki, etc. I seem to recall you even had numerous posts strongly implying you got BBFS service even from providers who normally don't do bb. Just want you to clarify things here. The other poster seems to have made a very strong case.[/QUOTE]Thank you OldUglyGuy. Yes everyone has a choice. I prefer CFS, especially if they are not my real GF. BBFS should be saved for that special significant other. Lets make this clear, I am NOT saying you should not do BFFS, its your choice. Neither am I saying you should do CFS, its up to you and the girl. GFE definition can vary from girl to girl. There is no right or wrong answer. The answer and choice is up to you. OldUglyGuy did you have BBFS with any of those girls that you’ve mentioned?

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3938734]Find one post that shows I wrote I had BBFS other than with my GF or ex-GFs. Real GF is different; they are not like meeting a girl in the AMP. Youre a troll and liar. Go read the post again; I agreed with Leia regarding her definition of GFE. However I do not know if everyone agrees or disagrees with that definition.[/QUOTE]Hahahaha. Doc you're even more stupid than you look. You have numerous posts bragging about getting BBFS. Who are you trying to fool? Just another example of your compulsive lying.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3762703]This is exactly the reason why I've always said and know with one hundred percent certainty that all CFS Girls have their favorites that they do BBFS with. Check out the CFS thread. I know with 100 percent certainty because Ive experienced first hand the higher end of YMMV.[/QUOTE]Here is another where you reply to Thor that you might have to check out Linda if its true she does BBFS. Why would you want to if you don't like BBFS? Idiot.

[QUOTE=Thor5541;3701955]Now that Linda is that happiness will she do BBFS Or BBBJCIM. I wonder if she would do a duo with Naomi. I had a BBFS MSOG duo with yuna and Naomi few weeks ago and it was awesome.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3702746]Only one way to find out. If that ever happens I might check out Linda myself![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;393874] I try to post positives and constructive criticism when reporting about a girl or AMP. Some people will defend what's false even if true. A prime example is the Jackie at Happiness case. I was simply agreeing with on monger regarding his post as he referenced Jackie has a manly face. If reporting and acknowledging the truth hurts the feelings of others then what good is this forum? Everyone has their own experiences and they should be able to share those experiences about those girls and AMPs whether good or bad.[/QUOTE]Another lie. You were replying to one of your alter egos in one of your self conversations. Everyone knows who profgun69 is. Perfect example of your use of aliases to post shit to further your agenda. Remember the word "probally"? Only you and your other screen names used that word out of tens of thousands of posts since 2015. Profgun69 was one of the five members to use it.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3938734]Find one post that shows I wrote I had BBFS other than with my GF or ex-GFs. Real GF is different; they are not like meeting a girl in the AMP. Youre a troll and liar. Go read the post again; I agreed with Leia regarding her definition of GFE. However I do not know if everyone agrees or disagrees with that definition.[/QUOTE]How about this one:

Two is the majik number, if you don't get BBFS by the second time then it will never happen for you. Sometimes it can happen on the first visit. I know this by first hand experiences. I'm not the super rich guy like Gates either, but I've experienced PRS throughout many sessions with some hot girls that I've never wrote the complete details of our session. A smart guy will not write that hes getting BBFS from a popular girl; I will say this again, keep that information confidential so you don't ruin a good thing. Please do not PM asking me which pretty CFS girls do BBFS and for how much extra; I do not know how much extra, because I'm one of those guys that didn't pay the extra. Your private message will be automatically deleted.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3938224]You don't have any credibility. Most of your reports are only in this Lolo thread. If you had more post about girls and reports about AMP girls, then you might be believable.

White Lava 22 Post.

FleshPrice 26 Post.

SpoodrikBrad1 38 Post.

IctchyAchy 45 Post.

Go read all your post; most are nothing but argumentive. Nothing you wrote contributes any value for this forum. Report something that will enlighten and motivate us. This forum is for reporting and sharing experiences about girls and AMPs.[/QUOTE]As you correctly noted, I have 22 posts to date. As you incorrectly noted "most are nothing but argumentative". Nine of my posts have been in response to your outright lies and dishonest attacks on Jackie! For example stating that she had no positive reviews on the Nirvana thread! She had a bunch and they are still there for anyone to see! Ergo- you are a liar! Just like you are now lying about your views on GFE and BBFS! But let me get to the point: credibility has absolutely nothing to do with number of posts! Credibility has everything to do with telling the truth! You fail miserably in this regard!

[QUOTE=LeiaBaby;3937197]Well, that isn't really safe either LOL how many kids you got? In the real world, I still don't do BBFS unless I been with one person for a while knowing they're not fucking around. STD's spread like wildfire. You can have chlamydia and now you and all your real world girlfriends do too, you know? My question was do you fellas consider GFE to include BBFS? Or am I correct in thinking BBFS and GFE are separate services? Thank you A2 for the CLEAR clarification.

.[/QUOTE]I think definition of GFE varies. To me the connection between me and the provider dictates what type of experience I received. If a provider f#%ks like a beast but don't say a word during or after a the deed than that would mean PSE. But if you click with her and she made you feel comfortable and special what ever the service was I would consider that GFE. No connection than no GFE. That's why some say they received PSE and GFE. A wild session with connection. Just my opinion of course.

[QUOTE=Thor5541;3701955]Now that Linda is that happiness will she do BBFS Or BBBJCIM. I wonder if she would do a duo with Naomi. I had a BBFS MSOG duo with yuna and Naomi few weeks ago and it was awesome.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3702746]Only one way to find out. If that ever happens I might check out Linda myself![/QUOTE]This never happened for me; I never went to see Linda. This never materialized.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3762703]This is exactly the reason why I've always said and know with one hundred percent certainty that all CFS Girls have their favorites that they do BBFS with. Check out the CFS thread. I know with 100 percent certainty because Ive experienced first hand the higher end of YMMV.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FleshPrince;3939172]Hahahaha. Doc you're even more stupid than you look. You have numerous posts bragging about getting BBFS. Who are you trying to fool? Just another example of your compulsive lying.[/QUOTE]Knowing and doing are two different things. Attaining intel is different from engaging. Unless you were there in the room with me; you are falsely accusing me of something that you're making up.

[QUOTE=FleshPrince;3939195]Another lie. You were replying to one of your alter egos in one of your self conversations. Everyone knows who profgun69 is. Perfect example of your use of aliases to post shit to further your agenda. Remember the word "probally"? Only you and your other screen names used that word out of tens of thousands of posts since 2015. Profgun69 was one of the five members to use it.[/QUOTE]Nope this is the only account I have. I have no time for hardly even posting. You are clearly making stuff up.

[QUOTE=WhiteLava;3939438]How about this one:

Two is the majik number, if you don't get BBFS by the second time then it will never happen for you. Sometimes it can happen on the first visit. I know this by first hand experiences. I'm not the super rich guy like Gates either, but I've experienced PRS throughout many sessions with some hot girls that I've never wrote the complete details of our session. A smart guy will not write that hes getting BBFS from a popular girl; I will say this again, keep that information confidential so you don't ruin a good thing. Please do not PM asking me which pretty CFS girls do BBFS and for how much extra; I do not know how much extra, because I'm one of those guys that didn't pay the extra. Your private message will be automatically deleted.[/QUOTE]Thank you White Lava, I agree with you regarding a smart guy would never state that he got BBFS from a popular provider. I never once wrote "I had BBFS with any provider. Search the forum. I stated I KNOW, but KNOWING is different from DOING. If knowing makes one guilty then everyone who reads these forums regarding mongers that posted BBFS would be guilty, because just by READING the Forum you KNoW.

[QUOTE=WhiteLava;3939517]As you correctly noted, I have 22 posts to date. As you incorrectly noted "most are nothing but argumentative". Nine of my posts have been in response to your outright lies and dishonest attacks on Jackie! For example stating that she had no positive reviews on the Nirvana thread! She had a bunch and they are still there for anyone to see! Ergo- you are a liar! Just like you are now lying about your views on GFE and BBFS! But let me get to the point: credibility has absolutely nothing to do with number of posts! Credibility has everything to do with telling the truth! You fail miserably in this regard![/QUOTE]Thanks White Lava fir bringing Jackie up again. Thank you my bruddah! That post dated approximately in the month of August 2018 is simply agreeing with another monger as to what he stated regarding Jackie's Manly Face. That is why she covers her face with her hair. It has been reported by many mongers that Jackie hides her Manly Face. Someone stated her jaw is like like a man. I was only agreeing with that report. Nothing wrong with agreeing and stating the truth. Why are you so defensive about the truth?

Sinking. All by your own self.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3940271]Thank you White Lava, I agree with you regarding a smart guy would never state that he got BBFS from a popular provider. I never once wrote "I had BBFS with any provider. Search the forum. I stated I KNOW, but KNOWING is different from DOING. If knowing makes one guilty then everyone who reads these forums regarding mongers that posted BBFS would be guilty, because just by READING the Forum you KNoW.[/QUOTE]Awwww. You mean to tell me that ALL THOSE POSTS where you bragged or implied that you got BBFS from popular providers who were cfs with everyone else were made up fiction? I'm shocked and appalled! You eere MY HERO and now you out yourself as just another dickhead with a keyboard. Hahaha. Thats what I thought. Time for you to stop and take a shower. Your vagina is starting to reek.

[QUOTE=DrMajikLuv69;3940279]Thanks White Lava fir bringing Jackie up again. Thank you my bruddah! That post dated approximately in the month of August 2018 is simply agreeing with another monger as to what he stated regarding Jackie's Manly Face. That is why she covers her face with her hair. It has been reported by many mongers that Jackie hides her Manly Face. Someone stated her jaw is like like a man. I was only agreeing with that report. Nothing wrong with agreeing and stating the truth. Why are you so defensive about the truth?[/QUOTE]No- Thank You, Doctor, for responding once again as the passive-aggressive, weak sister that you are! The least you could do is stand up and take credit for the dishonest and malicious crusade you are conducting against Jackie! The "other monger" you were referring to, is one of your "secret" identities, and he was merely responding to a chain of negative attack's that you started in June! At least be man enough to own your petty meanness! But I do thank you for proving my assertion that you are a liar! By the way, I am not your "bruddah", you punk *****! Oh yeah, I'm not a member of your fan club either!