The Woodshed

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;6200363]This post is delusional.

I'll just point out the first quote you made, because it's not my fault your teachers failed to educate you.

"We were energy independent. ".

How do you define this? Because this answer is both true and false. As this columnist said.

[URL]https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2022/10/01/us-energy-independence-has-grown/?sh=646f9e01657e[/URL]

" I am often asked if the USA Is energy independent, or whether we have ever been energy independent. A claim I frequently encounter is that President Trump made us energy independent, and we lost that under President Biden. ".

Before addressing such a claim, you must ensure that everyone is speaking the same language. When someone makes that claim to me, I ask them to define energy independence.

If energy independence means we don't import oil, then that hasn't been true since the 1940's. If it means we export more energy than we import, then we became energy independent in 2019 (following a decade of soaring oil and gas production), but we remain energy independent today.

Others may define energy independence as producing more than we consume. In that case, we reached that milestone in 2020. It was primarily a result of a sharp drop in consumption because of the Covid-19 pandemic, accompanied by a smaller drop in energy production that year. But, that milestone remained intact in 2021. ".

Go turn off Fox News and read a book. Seriously. As the great Dan Quayle once said, "What a waste it is to lose one's mind, or not to have one at all. ".[/QUOTE]It's very refreshing reading an intelligent post for a change. Thanks. The Carlsons and Hannitys of the world have built their mansions spinning half-truths to the gullible. And half-truths of course ultimately mislead and are lies all by their lonesome.

Never believed in masks being a solution or pretty much almost anything else. Here is an interesting article from a very left leaning magazine:

[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/[/URL]

[QUOTE=OnTime877;6201377]It's very refreshing reading an intelligent post for a change. Thanks. The Carlsons and Hannitys of the world have built their mansions spinning half-truths to the gullible. And half-truths of course ultimately mislead and are lies all by their lonesome.[/QUOTE]Oil is a commodity. It is traded and it is less expensive to import to many refineries rather then transport over land. Just because oil was imported, it does not discount the fact the US would be energy independent. Oil companies are willing to produce it as long as they know it is profitable venture. Currently, there is no incentive to produce.

At one time, I worked for BP. I suggest everyone stop posting articles. I assume everyone here knows the media never gets the full story or the correct story.

Petroleum products are expensive because the US Government has decided to put oil companies out of business and to implement terrible foreign policy.

Political discussions rarely do anything except get people pissed. I tried to keep my post with limited political statement, but it's difficult without disclosing the issue.

[QUOTE=MyDarkSide;6201189]LOL let me summarize the article in one sentence: "It is true that we achieved both of those energy independence milestones under President Trump. " The remainder is just blah. Blah. Blah.[/QUOTE]The very next sentence pointed out that we hit independence due to the fracking boom, which Trump had nothing to do with.

This is why I urged you to read a book. You need to work on that attention span.

Donald Trump wants you to learn how to read.

[QUOTE=NbWill;6202239]Never believed in masks being a solution or pretty much almost anything else. Here is an interesting article from a very left leaning magazine:

[URL]https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/[/URL][/QUOTE]The Atlantic is not a left leaning magazine. It likes to think of itself as progressive, but it's so attracted to contrarian hot takes with little evidence that it's hot garbage.

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;6202399]The Atlantic is not a left leaning magazine. It likes to think of itself as progressive, but it's so attracted to contrarian hot takes with little evidence that it's hot garbage.[/QUOTE]That's not what Laurene said.

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;6202398]The very next sentence pointed out that we hit independence due to the fracking boom, which Trump had nothing to do with.

This is why I urged you to read a book. You need to work on that attention span.

Donald Trump wants you to learn how to read.[/QUOTE]One can always tie themselves up in knots explaining and rationalizing why a period of no inflation, Russia staying behind established borders, energy independence, soaring economy and stock markets, and Korea not flying off dozens of missiles, record vax development, no children mutilations, low gas prices, etc etc can suddenly go south in under two years. It's fun to watch the left's excuses. Especially when the very policy that you quote contributed to energy independence is eliminated by this administration. Too funny.

Again, just fact: "energy independence under Trump. " Spin away.

She openly admits to having a past candy issue. I did have lunch with her and she is trying hard to clean her act up. Nice BBBJ. Best thing is the Pitty. He's a dork but nice. Ask her and she will send pics. LOL. No one has ever sent proof she is a thief. She did me right.

[QUOTE=PervNerd48;6251035]That's the highly disputed Mandy Mandy Mandy, who used to be considered one of the most evil thieves ever found in Jacksonville. Lately, there are reports she's been trying to fix her reputation. I don't think anyone here has actually tried to see her and reported a really good time.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Oshmalee;6251053]She openly admits to having a past candy issue. I did have lunch with her and she is trying hard to clean her act up. Nice BBBJ. Best thing is the Pitty. He's a dork but nice. Ask her and she will send pics. LOL. No one has ever sent proof she is a thief. She did me right.[/QUOTE]Several guys, independently reported that she stole from them. How exactly do they need to prove it?

I get it, she's cleaning up her act, I salute that, if she's working a program and serious about it she will take care of the guys she robbed when she works a 9th step and then they will report that.

Until then report your experiences about her and don't review other mongers reports.

A2.

[QUOTE=Admin2;6251599]Several guys, independently reported that she stole from them. How exactly do they need to prove it?

I get it, she's cleaning up her act, I salute that, if she's working a program and serious about it she will take care of the guys she robbed when she works a 9th step and then they will report that.

Until then report your experiences about her and don't review other mongers reports.

A2.[/QUOTE]The million dollar question that seems to not get an answer.

[QUOTE=Oshmalee;6251053]She openly admits to having a past candy issue. I did have lunch with her and she is trying hard to clean her act up. Nice BBBJ. Best thing is the Pitty. He's a dork but nice. Ask her and she will send pics. LOL. No one has ever sent proof she is a thief. She did me right.[/QUOTE]Um, no. This should read, she hasn't sent proof that she hasn't robbed anyone. Gents, just do a local record search of the surrounding counties and you can see just how much theft, and other "activities" this girl has been caught for. There's no new leaf.

[QUOTE=RAW1978;6252589]Um, no. This should read, she hasn't sent proof that she hasn't robbed anyone. Gents, just do a local record search of the surrounding counties and you can see just how much theft, and other "activities" this girl has been caught for. There's no new leaf.[/QUOTE]Right about the time that BackPage went away, I decided I wanted to try MandyX3. I had seen on SM that at one point, she ran around with Riverside Gina. RG and I were friends on SM and I had visited her half a dozen times so we had a rapport. I asked her if Mandy was a good provider and Gina (Jenn) said "man, it's up to you, but unless you like getting robbed, I'd stay away from her if I was you!

I took that advice and have stayed away! It's a shame because she is hot and has a great body! As for Riverside Gina (Jenn), I do wish she wasn't out west! She was always a good time! She loved her booze and candy but always got into the sessions and took immaculate care of her body.

[QUOTE=Choo83;6292601]Hello gentlemen!

I know she has been reviewed many times before, but wanted to remind everyone that Natalie is back in town for a little bit. She is one of my favorites and I look forward to her visits. If you have never set up and appointment I strongly recommend it.

[URL]https://skipthegames.com/posts/jacksonville/female-escorts/caucasian_w/natalie-fans-in-town-january-1/659842530963[/URL][/QUOTE]Weird, the post said Natalie is back. Mentioned he looks forward to boking an appointment with her, but gave no review on her! Looking at the history, the poster never reviewed Natalie. Weird, no?

Then we are told that we all need to set up an appointment to see rush and see Natalie. Nope, I will not rush to see her, in fact I will avoid her.

Sure sounds like Natalie selfie commercial.

I think I shall avoid Natalie.

[QUOTE=LowBaller;6293043]Weird, the post said Natalie is back. Mentioned he looks forward to boking an appointment with her, but gave no review on her! Looking at the history, the poster never reviewed Natalie. Weird, no?

Then we are told that we all need to set up an appointment to see rush and see Natalie. Nope, I will not rush to see her, in fact I will avoid her.

Sure sounds like Natalie selfie commercial.

I think I shall avoid Natalie.[/QUOTE]Why is she using the same photos from years ago when she first started? That's suspect enough right there. Literally everyone has camera with them for 24/7. When I see an ad with the same photos from years ago, that's a sign for me to stay away.

LOL. You guys are really missing out on this one. Sorry but you are really off base. Unless!! Maybe you don't like a safe environment that she is located, Maybe you don't like clean girls with no stench, Maybe you don't like a real GFE kind of date, or maybe you don't like paying a very reasonable price for someone who is not drugged out and has a damn nice body. I usually visit her every time she is in town and have never been disappointed, and yes she is in town right now. But you guys go ahead and give me all the reasons you will not visit her. I would not want you realize that your wrong in your opinions. I have left plenty of reviews on different gals, cannot even remember if I did one on her or not. If not, my bad, I should have. Consider this to be my review.

She is a great looking young lady who is an unicorn in this town. She is none of the things you all ***** about. Go visit some more stanky girls. I will go see Nat every time.

[QUOTE=LowBaller;6293043]Weird, the post said Natalie is back. Mentioned he looks forward to boking an appointment with her, but gave no review on her! Looking at the history, the poster never reviewed Natalie. Weird, no?

Then we are told that we all need to set up an appointment to see rush and see Natalie. Nope, I will not rush to see her, in fact I will avoid her.

Sure sounds like Natalie selfie commercial.

I think I shall avoid Natalie.[/QUOTE]