[QUOTE=Max#01;5956328]"Maryland, Maryland" or any "state, state" usually means a scam.[/QUOTE]Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.
Printable View
[QUOTE=Max#01;5956328]"Maryland, Maryland" or any "state, state" usually means a scam.[/QUOTE]Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e2c11010-917c-4e0c-9213-c12a4f4cdc52[/URL]
Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?
[QUOTE=ProCatHunter;5956709][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e2c11010-917c-4e0c-9213-c12a4f4cdc52[/URL]
Trying to figure out how high volume this one is. How many of you mongers out there are tapping this one?[/QUOTE]She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know!
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04d50175-4fd4-4fee-9532-08347e22c853[/URL]
Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?
[QUOTE=Dimples572;5956649]Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.[/QUOTE]Makes sense, guess I was following the conventional wisdom on several SD / SB forums.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;5956649]Not necessarily true. I've had several scenarios where they turned out to be legit, just trying not to specify their location due to privacy concerns.[/QUOTE]Usually-- means often, most of the time, not every time.
One of my hottest coed scores was a Virginia, Virginia listing because one of you assholes all but raped her, so I get the privacy concerns.
State / State usually have other redflags if they are scammers and easy to weed out -- Adjective / Noun user name, profile pics that are revealing, minor grammar / spelling mistakes, quick to move to text.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;5956741]She looks very cute to me, but didn't reply to my messages. Her profile is only 4 days old, so she could be untapped. Good luck! Let us know![/QUOTE]Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.
Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.
[QUOTE=ProCatHunter;5957463]Sadly my luck with her was not as good as it's been with others. Looks like one of our brothers bagged her and took her off the site. Her account has been deleted and I wish I could have said that I had the chance to tap it.
Probably a lurker who took her down and now we will never know the details.[/QUOTE]There are lots of reasons for a SB deleting her profile. She may have found a SD, was turned off by the website, etc.
[QUOTE=ProCatHunter;5957014][URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/04d50175-4fd4-4fee-9532-08347e22c853[/URL]
Just broke up with her boyfriend and is into the revenge fuck. First time I bagged a girl on the first day her profile was up. Not going to repeat. Her armpits aren't shaved. Maybe she will shave them for you?[/QUOTE]I love a little Bush.
Wants $500 to meet and see if we click. Nope, next.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/08b8748a-a776-449f-b7cd-581f3df2f669[/URL]
You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.
Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.
Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.
Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.
Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.
And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.
[QUOTE=HighwayGuy;5958642]You are just getting usernames here rather than links, because I immediately block them without a reply when they say something stupid like wanting to be paid (often a lot) for a M&G. Who does that BTW? I feel like there must be guys in this market that actually agree to pay these girls to meet up without any expectations whatsoever. And there are definitely those paying exorbitant amounts of money for a roll in the hay, which is driving the uptick in expectations for PPM etc. , imo.
Emma.t - time waster. Exchanged a handful of messages but said she never sleeps with anyone on first meet. I said that's fine and I also like to assess chemistry and mutual desire to move forward, so no expectations on m&g but I'm decidedly NOT seeking a platonic arrangement. She went quiet for a few days then replied saying she's no longer interested and prob not a good fit anyway.
Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.
Cutiepiegirl123 - exchanged a handful of sameday messages and acted like she wanted to meet that evening, then said she requires a "first date incentive of $400". Blocked her.
Small handful of others have recently moved to text but then gotten quiet / sporadic with correspondence. Reserving those until I can further determine if they're serious or not. The bowl sure isn't what it was pre-pandemic. The proliferation of catfish, scammers and time wasters is starting to make this feel as fruitless as Tinder.
And for the love of god. Do not tell SBs, providers, SOs or ANY woman about this site. Some of the best contributors to this board (I am admittedly not one of them) have gone virtually silent of late, and I can't help but think it's because of the white knighting that goes on when their solid, valuable reviews get regurgitated back to them by some pissed off chick who was the subject of said review.[/QUOTE]Excellent report Highway. Regarding Scarlettelle98, I always bypassed her profile as it's tagline is "Why spend mine, when I can spend yours?" Ugh. That's really appealing. WTF.
[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5957349]Usually-- means often, most of the time, not every time.
One of my hottest coed scores was a Virginia, Virginia listing because one of you assholes all but raped her, so I get the privacy concerns.
State / State usually have other redflags if they are scammers and easy to weed out -- Adjective / Noun user name, profile pics that are revealing, minor grammar / spelling mistakes, quick to move to text.[/QUOTE]First of all I'm pretty sure I wasn't talking to you. Second of all, check your Merriam Webster:
Definition of Not Necessarily:
: possibly but not certainly —used to say that something is not definitely true.
[QUOTE=DickLongwood;5952203]This babe has an interesting wish list of sexy clothes, sex toys, and other things. She's a little oder than most, at 42, but she seems cute and horny. Any intel?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/f58ada5a-429f-4a84-9405-d79a6895a833[/URL][/QUOTE]I've been chatting with her as well. I may TOFT next week if I can find a spot in my schedule.
Recently it feels like a lot of girls I chat with and who seem legit stop activity in SA (with or sometimes without deleting their SA) and show up on SB, where they show as active on the regular. Does anyone else see this? I've never used SB because I don't like the pay-to-unlock model, but does anyone find it more effective or feel like it gives better results? Are these girls just playing the odds by using multiple sites or do you think they are finding some advantage over on SB? Notwithstanding the drought of talent and the ridiculous expectations we are seeing, wondering if SB is coming up. Feedback appreciated, and I take full responsibility for any typos.
[QUOTE=Stm001;5959723]Recently it feels like a lot of girls I chat with and who seem legit stop activity in SA (with or sometimes without deleting their SA) and show up on SB, where they show as active on the regular. Does anyone else see this? I've never used SB because I don't like the pay-to-unlock model, but does anyone find it more effective or feel like it gives better results? Are these girls just playing the odds by using multiple sites or do you think they are finding some advantage over on SB? Notwithstanding the drought of talent and the ridiculous expectations we are seeing, wondering if SB is coming up. Feedback appreciated, and I take full responsibility for any typos.[/QUOTE]Girls get overwhelmed by the number of messages they get from guys on seeking.
Guys prefer seeking because it's a buffet style, pay once and message as much as you want.
[QUOTE=Dimples572;5958864]First of all I'm pretty sure I wasn't talking to you. Second of all, check your Merriam Webster:
Definition of Not Necessarily:
: possibly but not certainly used to say that something is not definitely true.[/QUOTE]A. if you aren't posting for any member to review and comment, send a PM to your intended audience.
B. Reading is fundamental. The OP said Usually.
""Maryland, Maryland" or any "state, state" usually means a scam. ".
I was correcting your misinterpretation of Usually not your use of Not Necessarily, and reinforcing the OPs view.
[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;5955606]Anyone have intel on this one? Seems TGTBT, pictures are too good and texting is erratic. Claims to be in Leesburg but I have my doubts. Reverse image search didn't come up with anything.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/16fb3e48-a6ff-48d4-8e9a-d365980c7d1d[/URL][/QUOTE]Def scammer.
[QUOTE=HighwayGuy;5958642]Scarlettelle98 - in her very first reply she said her "first dates typically are typically shopping followed by dinner and drinks". I blocked her.[/QUOTE]ScarlettElle98 - Did a little digging and found out she is a former college cheerleader who sued her University for making her act flirty and sexual with rich, old booster alumni. Pretty ironic she found her way onto a sugar dating website after that. Anyway, she's real and it seems like she has some major GPS. Chunkier in real life as seen on her IG. Would definitely pass on this one.
[QUOTE=TheYoungMonger;5961438]ScarlettElle98 - Did a little digging and found out she is a former college cheerleader who sued her University for making her act flirty and sexual with rich, old booster alumni. Pretty ironic she found her way onto a sugar dating website after that. Anyway, she's real and it seems like she has some major GPS. Chunkier in real life as seen on her IG. Would definitely pass on this one.[/QUOTE]A) didn't know Northwestern was an Ivy League School.
B) made a pdf of her seeking profile and emailed it to the reporter at the Chicago Trib for a follow up story.
[QUOTE=TheYoungMonger;5961438]ScarlettElle98 - Did a little digging and found out she is a former college cheerleader who sued her University for making her act flirty and sexual with rich, old booster alumni. Pretty ironic she found her way onto a sugar dating website after that. Anyway, she's real and it seems like she has some major GPS. Chunkier in real life as seen on her IG. Would definitely pass on this one.[/QUOTE]This article.
[URL]https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a35409602/northwestern-cheer-hayden-richardson-sexual-harassment/[/URL]
[QUOTE]B) made a pdf of her seeking profile and emailed it to the reporter at the Chicago Trib for a follow up story.[/QUOTE]While I understand the sentiment and appreciate your drive, I do not condone pointing reporters to SA for any reason, ever. Especially in relation to a SB in our own backyard.
[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5961498]A) didn't know Northwestern was an Ivy League School.
B) made a pdf of her seeking profile and emailed it to the reporter at the Chicago Trib for a follow up story.[/QUOTE]Technically, Northwestern is not one of the 8 Ivies, but it's elite. US News ranks it tied for 9th with Hopkins, Duke, and Cal Tech. 3 of the Ivies are ranked lower.
[QUOTE=HighwayGuy;5961682]While I understand the sentiment and appreciate your drive, I do not condone pointing reporters to SA for any reason, ever. Especially in relation to a SB in our own backyard.[/QUOTE]Seeking, even with all its flaws, is an awesome website. Learn the game and reap the benefits. As I'm sure the same with many of you, I've enjoyed the last several years banging hot young coeds, MILFs and everything in between. My close friends are jealous AF! Let's stay under the radar.
Almost all of the girls I've met in the past two years end up knowing exaactly who I am. Hard not to figure it out when you're traveling with each other and spending more than just an hour in bed. I also am out in the public domain at times for whatever reason. I shudder at the thought of some girl feeling a little jilted by me posting something about me that identifies me on a reddit board..
[QUOTE=BDM1227;5962502]Almost all of the girls I've met in the past two years end up knowing exaactly who I am. Hard not to figure it out when you're traveling with each other and spending more than just an hour in bed. I also am out in the public domain at times for whatever reason. I shudder at the thought of some girl feeling a little jilted by me posting something about me that identifies me on a reddit board..[/QUOTE]So the topic of whether there's a private SB group that exchanges info on SD's has been discussed, debated, and dismissed a few times on the board. I don't care to reopen the debate publicly, but I now have reason to believe it exists, at least in some form. I don't need perfect anonymity myself, but would rather keep my activities private. A woman scorned will go to great lengths to extract some form of retribution and doxxing is the obvious threat (and whether they have reason to be scorned is entirely up to them of course). I'm also in agreement that this board tends to draw some unnecessary attention with some of what's said, so senior posters can PM me if you would like to exchange notes.
[QUOTE=CarloRogue;5961224]Def scammer.[/QUOTE]She is Real!
[QUOTE=WorkYard;5962857]She is Real![/QUOTE]Can you elaborate?
[QUOTE=ShortMan22;5963290]Can you elaborate?[/QUOTE]I choose not to.
[QUOTE=JimRob;5918941]Seeking membership cost raising like gas prices. Good days of seeking are gone.[/QUOTE]Misstravel still has potential.
[QUOTE=CarloRogue;5962795]So the topic of whether there's a private SB group that exchanges info on SD's has been discussed, debated, and dismissed a few times on the board. I don't care to reopen the debate publicly, but I now have reason to believe it exists, at least in some form. I don't need perfect anonymity myself, but would rather keep my activities private. A woman scorned will go to great lengths to extract some form of retribution and doxxing is the obvious threat (and whether they have reason to be scorned is entirely up to them of course). I'm also in agreement that this board tends to draw some unnecessary attention with some of what's said, so senior posters can PM me if you would like to exchange notes.[/QUOTE]This winter, traveled to South Beach and met up with friends. Sole purpose was to hang out with my buds and to bring not a wife / significant other. Two of the guys in this group for various reasons needed assistance. My SB tapped into her network / group chat / forum and recruited 2 SB's to join us. While I was not able to read the contents of the SB group discussion, I saw pictures of the SB's who joined us and could see that there was discussions on a number of topics. No doubt that SD intel is shared.
[QUOTE=RudyWellz;5963767]This winter, traveled to South Beach and met up with friends. Sole purpose was to hang out with my buds and to bring not a wife / significant other. Two of the guys in this group for various reasons needed assistance. My SB tapped into her network / group chat / forum and recruited 2 SB's to join us. While I was not able to read the contents of the SB group discussion, I saw pictures of the SB's who joined us and could see that there was discussions on a number of topics. No doubt that SD intel is shared.[/QUOTE]So I'm fucking one in another market. She has connected me with two of her friends. They do indeed network.
[QUOTE=BobLobLa;5961498]A) didn't know Northwestern was an Ivy League School.
B) made a pdf of her seeking profile and emailed it to the reporter at the Chicago Trib for a follow up story.[/QUOTE]Why do this? It seems a bit petty and vindictive. Unless she's trying to scam people on SA then I'm all for it.
If she sued because she was truly being used by the university then she was put in the position, possibly under pressure, not by her choice. If she's on seeking, it is likely her choice. That said, I sure as hell wouldn't take the risk to meet her, but without knowing details and truth I don't think doxing her is appropriate. Unless you know more than I realize. Also, not trying to start something, I just truly don't know why involving a reporter would be helpful in any way unless you were somehow impacted by the lawsuit or threatened by her.
Reached out to this one on SA, quickly moved to texting. She command at least 600 per meet. I'm not sure if I want to pay that much. What do you mongers think?
Any details on her?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/30cb9907-93ce-42d6-8fc5-5ca3e9fa918b[/URL]
[QUOTE=ShortMan22;5964768]Reached out to this one on SA, quickly moved to texting. She command at least 600 per meet. I'm not sure if I want to pay that much. What do you mongers think?
Any details on her?
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/30cb9907-93ce-42d6-8fc5-5ca3e9fa918b[/URL][/QUOTE]Had a meet and greet with her. Nice person, but definitely not six hundo material. Pictures better than real life appearance.
[QUOTE=CuriousVaMan;5955606]Anyone have intel on this one? Seems TGTBT, pictures are too good and texting is erratic. Claims to be in Leesburg but I have my doubts. Reverse image search didn't come up with anything.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/16fb3e48-a6ff-48d4-8e9a-d365980c7d1d[/URL][/QUOTE]At the last minute she will ask for an advance deposit via cash app Bitcoin.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/36dccd56-b78f-4328-b104-4ee4b0b6d120[/URL]
Scammer. The maryland maryland tag should've given it away, but I gave it a shot anyway.
She wants a small fee to meet up for gas.
Time to report these scam accounts and get them off the site.
[QUOTE=TomFordModel;5913536]5 and covered. Have at it.[/QUOTE]She's now asking between 750 - 1 k. Jfc.
Lots of new profiles, lots of old profiles getting reactivated.
Like shooting fish in a barrel.
I just shared a lot of SB profiles in Maryland that I have personally verified. So, I might as well do the same for my Virginia friends, too.
This data dump began as I saw too many users failing to communicate or assist others. I have met each of these ladies within the last two months, so enjoy:
Caitiee Baby.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/255b590d-9722-4d4b-a2a4-0f0a7deec071[/URL]
She was my go to before we lost contact during my vacation. Great booty. A bit selective. $$ 5.
InnocentTemptress.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/e7164584-5e5f-4c4f-b4dd-0e6bbaad05fe[/URL]
GPS. Booty from heaven. Very selective, but definitely worth it. I had to put in genuine effort with this one. $2-5 k month.
MidtownBaby.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/a72fceaa-b472-4414-8033-08bbdea9a48d[/URL]
Spinner. Dark humor when she completely opens up. Shy at first. Everything covered. $$.
SweetLoverCC.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/788c329c-5569-4968-836c-a47617c08b80[/URL]
I believe someone reported a bad experience with this one. My experience was average. She is a bit overweight, but DTF and takes direction well. $$. 5.
Pretti Lexi.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/72365be2-8357-4dac-9d8b-ee1094e676e5[/URL]
Semi-pro and mentally disconnected from a past trauma. Reported several time before. Wanted $2 k month, but can be convinced with subtle effort during meeting.
MysteriousItGirl.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/7b4baabb-e6be-4e15-af55-a1ebaff78298[/URL]
Small bbw. Great boobs. Good oral skills and pleasant girl, but not everyone's taste. She does have a friend. Treat her well. $$.
BaybeeRay98.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/00e1f865-9aa1-4cc5-ab0f-82a78f6763f4[/URL]
Have not met yet, but should meet this weekend.
DancingSara.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c4a72604-1209-4f82-b456-56702128383c[/URL]
Very nice young lady that's new to this despite her experience. DTF, covered. $$.
KylaB.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/5b1deeac-2af0-4981-a3b0-71321a15a09a[/URL]
We never met because I flaked due to traffic accident.
Victoria8816.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8b965d19-b73f-4c4b-b94c-3d15d515f060[/URL]
Semi-pro. Sexy lady that gives a great massage. $$.
LexusFox.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1ed5edb4-5f56-4dda-8d23-e73453a60a5c[/URL]
We never met because she responds too slow. I should be meeting her on Friday.
Summer.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/8b69d9d4-a952-4574-ade4-32bb4845035e[/URL]
Just met her today. Quick to meet. DTF covered. Seems pse type of pro.
Monique89.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/1af785cb-20e8-577d-5304-97ba98c21a50[/URL]
She is a winner. DTF, covered and no greek. I met her this past weekend, and her curves are man-made but still nice. $$.
DCDoll.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/c3692e57-8da6-4146-875e-b0a986760f7f[/URL]
Quality over quantity. High-priced and worth it. $$ 5.
KatanaJ0y.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/75ff1987-4e5c-4c21-9af6-02d18320b9c8[/URL]
We just met last week. Seemed TGTBT at first. She wants only one SD, so have fun. I don't travel down to Richmond any longer. $2 k month, negotiable.
InnocentDiva.
[URL]https://members.seeking.com/member/3e776b13-d18c-4ef6-afe6-89d77d875afd[/URL]
We met in the past and she remembered me, but I barely remember her. I did not sample, but she was a sweetie.
This was a bit too long, but I need to spark some teamwork between mongers here. Be safe, have fun, share, and collaborate to make this site better for everyone.