Above average looking SWs
[QUOTE=Love To Monger]I realize this is subjective. It is hard to find a girl on the street with a face rating over a five. If you find one, get and retain that contact info and hope it stays good.[/QUOTE]
Forgive me if I am a day late and a dollar short in responding to this post but I think all you have to do is troll the K and keep your eyes open to find SWs with above average looking faces. Mongers on here use different rating systems. Some use a rating from 1 to 10. Some, like me, use a rating system like DukePV used for his Photo Index, and like that used for movie ratings, 1 to 5 stars. But above average is above average no matter how one measures it.
This is just a PARTIAL list from memory of SWs I have recently (within the past 6 to 9 months) personally dated that I considered to have faces which were above average: Kimberly, Redheaded Sarah, Melissa (both of them), Lacey, Nicole (all 3 of them), Kelly, Janelle, Chrissy/Krissy (all 3 of them), Samantha, Monique, Nikki, Mandy, Jackie, Dotty, Jessica (Sunshine), Michele, Michelle, Tina, Brittney, Sabrina, Amber, Cathy, Janine, Melanie (both of them), Rachel, Chris, Courtney, Darlene, Sports Patti , Anna, Steffany, Stephanie, Cheryl, Little Bits (even though a PITA!), Redheaded Nicole, Torresdale Cheryl, Backpack Jen, Kitty, Natalie, Selena, Strawberry, Jamie Lynn (Gianna), Jaime, Carol, Tifeny, Crystal, Holly, Ellie, Jerri, Nelly, Colleen and last, but absolutely not least, Tanya.
And that's only my personal experience. Multiply me by at least a dozen or more to find the overall number. If you can't find any SWs on the K with above average faces then you musn't be looking very hard!
Horses for courses and BJ techniques for cocks
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Proper technique includes...deep throat ...while doing this begin to hum and moan. This will send him up the wall. [/QUOTE]Ok I'm with you on most of your instruction but I'd suggest there are other aspects of a prime blowjob that are open to debate or personal preference.
A year or so ago I picked up an older WSW on Boulder Hwy in LV. I tend to agree that MILFs in general give technically the best BBJs overall. This one went on and on about how good she is and how she used to work in one of the well-known NV brothels and has an unusual BJ technique that drives guys wild. Lots of girls say they're the best but this one was really over the top. Unfortunately once she got my dick in her mouth it turned out she did have a technique I'd never had before, but it was so distracting I couldn't cum. Basically the entire time she was sucking me she loudly hummed. I mean LOUD and it was constant. It sounded and felt like my dick was in some motorized contraption. If the suction was decent maybe it would've been ok but her BJ was all about the humming. She seemed so proud and put so much effort into her unique style I didn't have the heart to tell her she was majorly turning me off. ...So anyway, I'm not so sure about that humming part.
In addition to the other recommended to-do's you mention, I personally like noisy, sloppy wet sucking, ball-licking, and licking the shaft while looking up at me. I also like girls who can vary their technique from steady super hoovers like late-night Stacy from down around Letterly to Cumberland to slow and sloppy cock and ball worship. It's always cool to find that rare girl who asks 'how do you want it?' - kind of like customizing your BK whopper.
The "bad" CP shows up again
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]Silly me, Mythbuster. I should have checked your profile before ragging on you. It turns out you just joined the USG this month, so you're a [b]newbie[/b]! Sorry.
So let me be gentler in my explanation. None of your 61 posts, for example the one above, are reports on streetwalker activity, traits, or location. They are simply commentary on and questions about other people's writing. They don't add to the purpose of this thread, which is to provide information about for men who are looking for sex with female streetwalkers in Philadelphia.[/QUOTE]
I can't complain about your bashing of Mythbuster. Of course, I have him on ignore so the only sight of him I see is when someone like you responds to one of his posts. You are rapidly becoming a candidate for the same fate. Whatever small contributions you make to this forum are vastly outweighed by your constant and intentional picking of fights.
You are one to be accusing others of not adding to "information" in the Streetwalker Reports thread and simply making commentary about other people's writing. That seems to be your main purpose in life.
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]We have had occasion in the past to honor those who, like you, enjoy talking a lot. We have awarded them their own thread. A big benefit of that is that the frequent and often lengthy responses to their talking, photo montages, contests, and general sex topics can take place apart from the reports in this thread. Thus we don't have to wade through a lot of stuff here that is off-topic or excessive in its presentation.[/QUOTE]
You seem to often read through and comment on the very threads you condemn. Why don't you "wade through" the SW Reports and SW Photos Threads as your [b]sole[/b] basis for information? Could the reason be that 70% of the new reports and pics of SWs on the K (90 plus % of the pics by volume) are contributed by me and most of the rest are contributed by CJ and practically ALL of the pics and reports from Camden are contributed by CJ? If you don't want this "excessive information" then don't fucking read it and/or comment on it! As you freely admitted, the information is in separate threads and very easy for you to simply ignore. But that really isn't your motivation, is it? A blind man could see you a mile off as a big green monster of envy and jealousy, just itching to make trouble.
[QUOTE=Coconut Poke]So, Mythbuster, I have two suggestions for you:
• Get thee to the threads of SE and CJ where you can talk to your heart's content without bothering those who want to scroll through concise and informative streetwalker reports here. You'll notice that the topic you're commenting above has been moved appropriately to the CJ thread.
• Don't come back here to post until you have made a trip to one of the Philadelphia strolls and are willing to report on your experience with streetwalker(s) you saw or picked up.[/QUOTE]
It's so befitting to have a self-appointed editor who desires "concise" SW Reports and Photos. It's also so admirable to see that the self-appointed editor takes his own advice so well. You will be so proud of me Editor-in-Chief CoconutPUKE, that I moved my reply to my own thread. Don't bother responding or you will reveal to all that you actually peruse the prose in my abysmally excessive thread, which you have made clear you avoid in favor of the tightly edited and policed (by you) reports in your threads of choice.
Re: Nicole, "She's my neighbor"
[QUOTE=Pkgman]Nice find,[/QUOTE]OMG Super! That's the Nicole/Nichole I recently picked up and reported on. I am assuming "Nicole" is the right spelling because you usually get that right? She sure does look and act like the girl next door. Great pix! They will remind me of my date with her. You are one lucky SOB to get her digits. She said she didn't have a phone yet when I had her.
RE: A tale of woe on the Ave
[QUOTE=Supereloquent]Then there is just typically what one might expect when dealing with crackheads, pill poppers and dopers.[/QUOTE]Super, I like you and your pics and reports are terrific, and I am a big fan, but sometimes you are just too nice to some of this street meat. I know you like to talk dirty to them and hear dirty talk back from them, but sometimes it shouldn't only be playin around. They really ARE "cum piggies" and deserve to be treated as such.