BBQ and fight thread

[QUOTE=Zomby;2930760]"Lame" does not mean useless.

"Lame" does not mean "contains no information".

"Lame" does not mean false.

Something that is "lame" can still be used to help making a decision. There is no inconsistency in this.[/QUOTE]I guess I was using the Lame slang definitions of "Unconvincing", "Unbelievable", "Uninteresting", "Irrelevant" when it was called Lame. I guess none of these definitions qualify for any of the ones you listed. One question though, by your definitions above wouldn't it be a Lameless story since the antonyms of Lame are convincing (not useless), believable (not false), interesting and relevant (contains information)? Or is there another definition I am missing somewhere?

[QUOTE=KentuckyKatana;2930066]You guys need to like your pussy and talk about something more positive things instead of sounding like some negative ragging bitches! GGGGEeeeeeeZzzzzz.[/QUOTE]Well said. I was planning on saying infantile tantrums surrounding their favorite toy being taken away but this works too.

[QUOTE=FreckleFreak;2931110]I guess I was using the Lame slang definitions of "Unconvincing", "Unbelievable", "Uninteresting", "Irrelevant" when it was called Lame. I guess none of these definitions qualify for any of the ones you listed. One question though, by your definitions above wouldn't it be a Lameless story since the antonyms of Lame are convincing (not useless), believable (not false), interesting and relevant (contains information)? Or is there another definition I am missing somewhere?[/QUOTE]Feeble, stupid, un-original, weak, lifeless, boring.

None of which which mean useless, un-informative or false.

[QUOTE=MillitaryMan69;2930791]Even though you are still the [B] biggest loser [/B]and I would probably punch you in the face if we met.[/QUOTE]When you come to Indy next week. There is a strip club called Brads and it's well known and I would be happy to meet you there or anywhere you prefer. Just be aware I will not fight back because I don't believe that a war of words on a board are worth actual violence. For a matter of fact I would turn my cheek and let you go at it again. Then I would laugh and say I proved my point and walk away. Of course you did say "Probably" which is probably the only reason A2 hasn't sanctioned you yet for threatening another member on the board.

Yes MM69 you are angry and obviously have violent tendencies. I'm sure now some members can see this in you. I may be a looser but I would never stoop to your level of violence unless the life of someone was threatened.

[QUOTE=Zomby;2931248]Feeble, stupid, un-original, weak, lifeless, boring.

None of which which mean useless, un-informative or false.[/QUOTE]So since it's both, by your definitions here and before, then it's a Lame and a Lameless story. Makes sense now. I appreciate the input.

But A2's probably going to stop the car if you guys keep this threatening shit up.

[QUOTE=FirstHalf;2931398]But A2's probably going to stop the car if you guys keep this threatening shit up.[/QUOTE]A war of words and varying personalities is not worth violence of any type. This has gone too far, too push someone to the brink of threatening violence is wrong even if they have issues and cannot help themselves. I do not torture animals or any other being to the point of becoming violent. I am backing out of this war of words because I no longer wish to participate by affecting another human being in this manner. A2 has stepped in and I am going to help him by removing myself from the situation. We all make choices in our life and this is my choice.

Now is there any good freckled pussy in L'ville?

[QUOTE=KentuckyKatana;2930066]You guys need to like your pussy and talk about something more positive things instead of sounding like some negative ragging bitches! GGGGEeeeeeeZzzzzz.[/QUOTE]Wipe. Not like. Everyone needs to wipe their vaginas and stop arguing.

[QUOTE=KentuckyKatana;2931754]Wipe. Not like. Everyone needs to wipe their vaginas and stop arguing.[/QUOTE]In their case more like potty training and diapers. I need to see you katana.

I do have an option, but like buttholes (a couple of you are buttholes) all people do and some of them stink. I like to read this board, and am friends with several of the people on here. A couple of guys are assholes and are a waste of time. Use that bad energy on finding pussy, crazy good! If you can find it. I have been so busy, TPHFB and riding my HD I don't have time to waste on negative BS.

BG,

Have fun, play safe, give and get respect, do your research, find some crazy good and TPHFB!

[QUOTE=KaintuckMan;2932664]In their case more like potty training and diapers. I need to see you katana.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2947425]A) because you're not a Sr. B) I will not even PM information to Sr's anymore as I found out at great cost to one of my lady friends that there's a Sr. On Louisville boards that is LEO. C) It wouldn't do you any good as the do not post a number in their ad, you have to respond via CL email link and then they will eventually share digits.[/QUOTE]


[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2948258]In some cases the phone number is disguised in the ads so the email thing can be avoided. Sometimes it may not include the area code but for example if it's in the Louisville ads it's relatively safe to assume the area code is 502. As far as sharing info goes, I will continue to share with mongers that I have confidence in being cool especially if they are senior members. As far as most newbs goes if it's general info I'm cool with sharing, if it's info about a particular girl you're most likely SOL. If you want to get down to the nuts and bolts of the matter anything we say on this forum or through pm's is just hearsay with virtually no validity in a courtroom. A2 wrote really good post about that very thing just a short time ago.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2948270]There is no phone number disguised in ad, I'm not an idiot. As far as shared information goes said LEO contacted girl whose number I gave him, made date with girl and arrested her and that my friend has plenty of validity in courtroom.[/QUOTE]I'm no idiot either, there are numbers hid in SOME CL ads. I've seen them and I've used them myself. I don't know your friend and really don't give a shit either but if you actually read what I wrote I said anything we say on the forum or in a PM is hearsay. I didn't say a damn word about your friend. As far as I'm concerned if you don't want to share information there's no fucking reason for you to be on this site.

I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. I am Spartacus. LOL.

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2948464]I'm no idiot either, there are numbers hid in SOME CL ads. I've seen them and I've used them myself. I don't know your friend and really don't give a shit either but if you actually read what I wrote I said anything we say on the forum or in a PM is hearsay. I didn't say a damn word about your friend. As far as I'm concerned if you don't want to share information there's no fucking reason for you to be on this site.[/QUOTE]Thanks for pointing out the obvious, any idiot that can't figure out 5 oh2 nine4 blah, blah is a disguised phone number in an ad probably shouldn't be doing this in the first place. Will still review etc. Just will not share unpublished numbers for UTR's as there is LEO among us, had I saved my PM's I could maybe figure out who but I didn't so I don't have any idea.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2948824]Thanks for pointing out the obvious, any idiot that can't figure out 5 oh2 nine4 blah, blah is a disguised phone number in an ad probably shouldn't be doing this in the first place. Will still review etc. Just will not share unpublished numbers for UTR's as there is LEO among us, had I saved my PM's I could maybe figure out who but I didn't so I don't have any idea.[/QUOTE]I would have waited before posting a LEO presence on here, if any. You could have set him UP and figured it out. Now you can't. I am Spartacus. No, I am Spartacus. Oh well.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2948824]Thanks for pointing out the obvious, any idiot that can't figure out 5 oh2 nine4 blah, blah is a disguised phone number in an ad probably shouldn't be doing this in the first place. Will still review etc. Just will not share unpublished numbers for UTR's as there is LEO among us, had I saved my PM's I could maybe figure out who but I didn't so I don't have any idea.[/QUOTE]You first said there is no number in CL ad and now you say any idiot can figure it out? That takes you past being an idiot and all the way to being a stupid dumbass. Going forward try closely reading a post before you start shooting your mouth off.

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2948872]You first said there is no number in CL ad and now you say any idiot can figure it out? That takes you past being an idiot and all the way to being a stupid dumbass. Going forward try closely reading a post before you start shooting your mouth off.[/QUOTE]Read your on post, you were trying to tell me that the number might be disguised in there and I might not be seeing it. Give some useful advice.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2948968]Give some useful advice.[/QUOTE]Go fuck yourself dickhead.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2948968]Read your on post, you were trying to tell me that the number might be disguised in there and I might not be seeing it. Give some useful advice.[/QUOTE]You are the same guy saying A) You supposedly led a undercover senior member to a UTR lady. B) Said lady was subsequently arrested. C) You have no clue who this senior member is? D) You have the nerve to criticize others for not giving 'useful advise'.

Seriously?

Answer: What I care about what any of you think.

Out.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2950391]What I care about what any of you think.

Out.[/QUOTE][URL]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOGWVSNankA[/URL]

Compounding mistakes. It usually comes in 3's. It did.

[QUOTE=KaintuckMan;2948834]I would have waited before posting a LEO presence on here, if any. You could have set him UP and figured it out. Now you can't. I am Spartacus. No, I am Spartacus. Oh well.[/QUOTE]That is fucking genius, why didn't I think of that.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2950990]That is fucking genius, why didn't I think of that.[/QUOTE]Anger.

Anger makes unwise decisions.

Yeah dude, for somebody like you that is always ranting and raving about other members not posting info up that you want you sure don't seem to get any pussy. Maybe you need to go join some hate forum where you can really enjoy yourself.

Be careful who you give out numbers to in a PM. Let's work together and solve this mystery senior. Keep an eye out on who pm's for numbers. He or they surely posts on here too.

[QUOTE=KaintuckMan;2951316]Be careful who you give out numbers to in a PM. Let's work together and solve this mystery senior. Keep an eye out on who pm's for numbers. He or they surely posts on here too.[/QUOTE]And exactly why I posted that there is a LEO among the Sr's right off the bat. I was very careful in sharing digits and screened posts of Sr's I don't know from interaction on here so this guy is at least established on here to the point of posting reviews as well as information otherwise I wouldn't have shared digits. I posted so that others would be aware of who they are sharing numbers with so that they will be even more careful. As I have said before I clear out my inbox and sent box due to mailbox limits so unfortunately I can't provide a list of usernames that I gave the number to on here. Again, if you were a Sr. And PM'ed me for the number and I didn't know you from previous interaction I screened your posts and was very careful and this still happened. Sorry for harsh reaction but this is why I posted so quickly rather than holding back and I really don't see any way of trying to "set this guy up" without putting another provider or monger in a potential legal quagmire.

I don't when you ask for seniors to pm you or what thread. Go thru them and maybe he posted something on that thread. You might narrow the list down. Just a thought. Also say no to drugs is what LEO wants.

[QUOTE=KaintuckMan;2951316]Be careful who you give out numbers to in a PM. Let's work together and solve this mystery senior. Keep an eye out on who pm's for numbers. He or they surely posts on here too.[/QUOTE]It should be doable, now that everyone is aware, to eventually figure it out. Surely they had a number of posts on record. It can be tricky though, I always check a guy's post when they PM me, to get a feel who I am dealing with. But even that could all be forged. Maybe this narc had real reports on girls as if he had seen them. No real way to prove any of us have seen the girls we say we have, unless you dig deeper and grill the guy. Honestly though, none of it makes sense to me. Not saying I don't believe Ohboy, but maybe the girl in question was busted coincidentally and Ohboy is assuming it was by the guy he gave number too. There is a guy on here, I can't remember his handle, but he would get on here and give very accurate and timely heads up on when and where police stings were going to be. Makes him suspect in my book, but I don't want to get into witch-burning mentality either.

Don't have a dog in this fight and not sure if I read back far enough. If I didn't disreg this.

Was any info posted as to when, where and how this utr was busted. LEO usually doesn5 set up just one when doing a sting unless probably drugs would be involved. Seems to me if LEO was on the thread then more than one lady would have been got. Why go after one utr when you have all these informative reviews and cast suspicion? If they have infiltrated why blow cover for one.

Just my thoughts.

[QUOTE=BnT69;2951453]It should be doable, now that everyone is aware, to eventually figure it out. Surely they had a number of posts on record. It can be tricky though, I always check a guy's post when they PM me, to get a feel who I am dealing with. But even that could all be forged. Maybe this narc had real reports on girls as if he had seen them. No real way to prove any of us have seen the girls we say we have, unless you dig deeper and grill the guy. Honestly though, none of it makes sense to me. Not saying I don't believe Ohboy, but maybe the girl in question was busted coincidentally and Ohboy is assuming it was by the guy he gave number too. There is a guy on here, I can't remember his handle, but he would get on here and give very accurate and timely heads up on when and where police stings were going to be. Makes him suspect in my book, but I don't want to get into witch-burning mentality either.[/QUOTE]Yes whoever he is he has posts of both reviews and info. I wouldn't have sent her digits to him if he didn't have at least that. And yes he definitely got the number from me as I had anyone using it telling her they got the number from me as he did. She texted me from the cage to tell me that a NARC had gotten her number from me on here and I have since talked to her on jail phone and he had taken her phone and erased all of her texts before he took her to jail so she didn't have number. I think the guy you are referring to that always posts about stings is tips tips tips and yes always suspicious but not interested in witch hunt.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2951719]Yes whoever he is he has posts of both reviews and info. I wouldn't have sent her digits to him if he didn't have at least that. And yes he definitely got the number from me as I had anyone using it telling her they got the number from me as he did. She texted me from the cage to tell me that a NARC had gotten her number from me on here and I have since talked to her on jail phone and he had taken her phone and erased all of her texts before he took her to jail so she didn't have number. I think the guy you are referring to that always posts about stings is tips tips tips and yes always suspicious but not interested in witch hunt.[/QUOTE]Now you not only want us to believe you inconveniently deleted a record of who you were in contact with but that the NARC " had taken her phone and erased all of her texts before he took her to jail so she didn't have number. " So you are saying the NARC deleted evidence before booking her? Hmmmm.

[QUOTE=ChipJeep;2951839]Now you not only want us to believe you inconveniently deleted a record of who you were in contact with but that the NARC " had taken her phone and erased all of her texts before he took her to jail so she didn't have number. " So you are saying the NARC deleted evidence before booking her? Hmmmm.[/QUOTE]You're a fucking idiot! He still has his phone you dumbass with all the texts from her number.and I don't know why she would want to make that up. and yes I delete all my PM's if you've ever offered info by PM you would know that you have to due to limited mailbox space. And like I said asshat I really don't give 2 fucks what you thiink or believe. You and Mojo are a couple of useless dipshits. Done with your stupid ass.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2951841]You're a fucking idiot! He still has his phone you dumbass with all the texts from her number.and I don't know why she would want to make that up. and yes I delete all my PM's if you've ever offered info by PM you would know that you have to due to limited mailbox space. And like I said asshat I really don't give 2 fucks what you thiink or believe. You and Mojo are a couple of useless dipshits. Done with your stupid ass.[/QUOTE]I was going to leave you alone but if you insist on continuing the fight I'll be glad to oblige you and the next time I will not be this cordial towards you. Your call.

[QUOTE=MojoGuy;2952045]I was going to leave you alone but if you insist on continuing the fight I'll be glad to oblige you and the next time I will not be this cordial towards you. Your call.[/QUOTE]For mentioning you in that last post responding to that asshat you had not said anything lately and I mentioned you needlessly so my fault and I apologize. I am happy to bury the hatchet as this is really a waste of time anyway.

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;2951554]Don't have a dog in this fight and not sure if I read back far enough. If I didn't disreg this.

Was any info posted as to when, where and how this utr was busted. LEO usually doesn5 set up just one when doing a sting unless probably drugs would be involved. Seems to me if LEO was on the thread then more than one lady would have been got. Why go after one utr when you have all these informative reviews and cast suspicion? If they have infiltrated why blow cover for one.

Just my thoughts.[/QUOTE]Without the details you make a valid point.

[QUOTE=KaintuckMan;2952369]Without the details you make a valid point.[/QUOTE]LEO was NARC looking for exactly what you said, that is what they are after.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2952351]For mentioning you in that last post responding to that asshat you had not said anything lately and I mentioned you needlessly so my fault and I apologize. I am happy to bury the hatchet as this is really a waste of time anyway.[/QUOTE]I'm good with letting bygones be bygones and I apologize for getting carried away in our disagreement. That goes for southhunter as well.

Not trying to beat a dead horse, but did your friend try and look up the NARC's # on her cell phone bill? Just deleting it in the phone obviously doesn't delete all record of the texts or calls. I'm not sure if the customer can access call / text data on burn phones, however. Of course this still wouldn't out the NARC here, but at least the number could be passed around to providers so that they could be safer.

[QUOTE=ChipJeep;2951839]Now you not only want us to believe you inconveniently deleted a record of who you were in contact with but that the NARC " had taken her phone and erased all of her texts before he took her to jail so she didn't have number. " So you are saying the NARC deleted evidence before booking her? Hmmmm.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=LostSole;2953532]Not trying to beat a dead horse, but did your friend try and look up the NARC's # on her cell phone bill? Just deleting it in the phone obviously doesn't delete all record of the texts or calls. I'm not sure if the customer can access call / text data on burn phones, however. Of course this still wouldn't out the NARC here, but at least the number could be passed around to providers so that they could be safer.[/QUOTE]It's a burner and doesn't store numbers on text messages only calls and all contact was via text.

[QUOTE=Ohboy469;2953952]It's a burner and doesn't store numbers on text messages only calls and all contact was via text.[/QUOTE]Just saying: if anyone is giving out [U]confidential-contact-info[/U]' for any gal who is a provider of "pay-to-play"sexual-services, whether by p'm' or by other personal communication, when he knows (or even suspects) [U]that she also often uses &\or could be[/U] "holding" dope or "pot" or illegal-pharmaceuticals or other narcotics then he is putting her in significantly increased danger of getting busted even if the bust or the investigation has nothing to do with any anti-prostitution "sting"operations! L'E'O's will always prefer to make felony busts, such as illegal-drugs, rather than misdemeanor "solicitation" or "unlicensed-massage" busts. _ Sincerely: A' K'.