For 2011 "Crazy Nicole," is sporting a pair of long lanky well shaped legs, a nice small bubble butt, a pair of firm perky breast and the face of a glamour model. And, that's not the only change. She is no longer crazy, IMHO.
CookyJar
Printable View
For 2011 "Crazy Nicole," is sporting a pair of long lanky well shaped legs, a nice small bubble butt, a pair of firm perky breast and the face of a glamour model. And, that's not the only change. She is no longer crazy, IMHO.
CookyJar
My previous date with "Crazy Nicole" was a threesome with Katie. That date registered a 9. 5 on the Richter scale. Nicole's participation was superb. She did everything I asked and matched Katie step for step. She was great and anything but crazy.
Click on this link to go to: [Size=3][b][Post=1044894]”Katie & Nikki and Threeways Are the Way to Go”[/post][/b][/size] and read my report on Nicole and Katie. She wasn't acting crazy on that date.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1161843]...meaning no disrespect to you Old School62, but; maybe it's time you tried out another Nicole. Fortunately we have a ton of Nicoles for you to pick from.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]OldSchool62,
I recommend Crazy Nicole. (I hope Davey decides to change her name. "Crazy" no longer fits. I prefer "Tall Blonde Nicole." Anything would be better than "Crazy." I am finding it hard to recommend someone named "Crazy.")
:)
FYI: Duke has her listed in his PhotoIndex as [u]"Slender Nicole."[/u]
Nicole does have a boyfriend. He can be problematic. He is not a threat or anything like that. He sometimes follows her around like a puppy. He does try to be a cock blocker. If she is out there it means they need the money for rent, food or drugs and usually he will let her go. I have not seen him around for awhile but I believe he is still in the pictures. Most of these girls keep somebody around for protection. But, this guy sometimes acts like a love sick boyfriend.
Remember. YMMV.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Davey1965;1162526]If I haven't spent countless hours with her pinned under my fat ass looking at that heart tattoo, I would have never known. LOL![/QUOTE]That's sounds like another endorsement.
Davey, do you still see Nicole out there acting crazy, spastic, you know what I mean, nutty?
CookyJar
Tall Blonde Nicole is a beauty.
[b]JMHO[/b]
CookyJar
PS: Davey, one more question. [u]Is Nicole a natural Blonde?[/u] If anyone knows - you know. LOL
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1162595]For 2011 "Crazy Nicole," is sporting a pair of long lanky well shaped legs, a nice small bubble butt, a pair of firm perky breast and the face of a glamour model. And, that's not the only change. She is no longer crazy, IMHO.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]Yeah, its weird how for being so skinny, she still has such a fat looking ass.
That weight gain differently looks good on her
[QUOTE=Jicarlo;1163263]That weight gain differently looks good on her[/QUOTE]I'm in total agreement with Jicarlo's comment! BTW, my date with her a while back was very pleasant. Didn't note anything that resembled "Crazy" at all.
I have lurked here for a long time but the bullshit and hate and inaccuracies and chest puffing are really piling up too deep. I was never a big fan of SE. He was full of himself and his stuff was hard to swallow. But the good outweighed the bad IMHO and you didn't have to read him. He had his own corner of the world which was easily ignored.
SE is now gone but you wouldn't know it from the posts here. He is quoted and his pics and reports are linked. He posted a lot of shit. Like it or not much of it was valuable information even for occasional visitors to Philly like me. He is still often maligned. Sometimes that is done accurately but mostly it is not. There seem to be a few people in here who just can't pass up an opportunity to piss on his grave. The golden rule is a good one. I suggest that the pissers think hard about the old saying that what goes around comes around.
Why did I erupt with this out of nowhere? I guess I believe in being fair. Like SE or not let's be fair to him. I would want the same for me or anyone for that matter. CJ accused him of spreading rumors and that CJ only deals in facts? According to who? CJ and his ho sources? So the information from SE's SW source was a rumor but CJ's SW sources only provide facts? Let's please not get carried away with searches for the truth from SWs about anything.
I got a kick out of the so-called research for Crazy Nicole's nickname by Akaloc and pinning it on SE. I am not going to look up all the times that SE mentioned that he didn't know where the nick came from. You do it if you are interested. But I do remember in the fall that he suggested a better alternate nick as well as mentioning all the nicks he had seen applied to her. Don't quote that one. It must have been a rumor.
CookyJar,
In 2 years I'm glad she finally put a little meat on them bones. Good shots.
Misfit
Nichole is fairly hot. Just wish we had some action like Nichole in SD. We have had only 1 good SW so far this year.
[QUOTE=Lurker3; 1163656]...I believe in being fair. Like SE or not let's be fair to him. I would want the same for me or anyone for that matter. CJ accused him of spreading rumors and that CJ only deals in facts? According to who? CJ and his ho sources? So the information from SE's SW source was a rumor but CJ's SW sources only provide facts? Let's please not get carried away with searches for the truth from SWs about anything.
[/QUOTE]Then be fair. I said I didn't know where the name came from. Besides, it was all in jest. Humor. A little fun. Ease up. It's the internet for Christ sake. Nobody should be taking this shit that serious.
Please do me a favor. Go to Supereloquent's report,[size=3][b][post=965627]Crazy Nicole[/post][/b][/size]. Read it! Pay special attention to the second paragraph, first sentence, and fourth word. [u]Supereloquent, called it a rumor.[/u] Continue to read, paying special attention to that portion of his writings concerning the aforementioned rumor.
I felt that Supereloquent's comments, while not of any special concern to me personally, were important enough to be referenced in my latest report on Nicole. If you cannot see that importance, that is your problem and not mine.
I will continue to treat Supereloquent and his reports just as I always have, with the respect and caution they deserve.
[b] ...The facts as I understand them are; everyone is a potential STD carrier. [size=3][color=red]Wrap that Wrascal.[/color][/size])[/b]
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1163722]Then be fair. I said I didn't know where the name came from. Besides, it was all in jest. Humor. A little fun. Ease up. It's the internet for Christ sake. Nobody should be taking this shit that serious.
Please do me a favor. Go to Supereloquent's report, Continue to read, paying special attention to that portion of his writings concerning the aforementioned rumor.
I felt that Supereloquent's comments, while not of any special concern to me personally, were important enough to be referenced in my latest report on Nicole. If you cannot see that importance, that is your problem and not mine.
I will continue to treat Supereloquent and his reports just as I always have, with the respect and caution they deserve.
I wasn't beefing with you about the source of the nickname for Nicole. That was inaccurately brought up by Akaloc. But you did give him an attaboy for pointing it out. So please take a little of the blame.
I agree that this stuff shouldn't be so serious. But trashing another monger inaccurately who is already dead and buried isn't fair and it isn't funny. Humor has its place and you said you wanted to be fair.
I read the report that you suggested I read. It very carefully points out the nature of the rumor and its source. This is a lot more than most posters do here. My comment still stands that I would never take anything a SW told anyone to the bank no matter who the source is.
Treating reports with respect and caution is a good thing and I will try to do the same to yours. I have always liked your stuff and my initial burst of commentary should not be taken as anything personal toward you. I would take issue with Akaloc and his shoddy research but it's not like we are perfect in here or anywhere else.
One thing is for sure and that is to
[QUOTE=Fbtom;1163518]Didn't note anything that resembled "Crazy" at all.[/QUOTE]You should have seen her around Somerset last night. LOL! I think if I could have captured her on vid and put her on Youtube it would have gone viral. Call her what you want but I'll stick with Crazy Nichole. Or after seeing her old self in action last night maybe just plain old "fucking nuts". I do say this in a good way though as the crazier they are usually the better in bed and it definetely holds true with her.
[QUOTE=Lurker3;1163740]
I wasn't beefing with you about the source of the nickname for Nicole. That was inaccurately brought up by Akaloc. But you did give him an attaboy for pointing it out. So please take a little of the blame.
I agree that this stuff shouldn't be so serious. But trashing another monger inaccurately who is already dead and buried isn't fair and it isn't funny. Humor has its place and you said you wanted to be fair.
I read the report that you suggested I read. It very carefully points out the nature of the rumor and its source. This is a lot more than most posters do here. My comment still stands that I would never take anything a SW told anyone to the bank no matter who the source is.
Treating reports with respect and caution is a good thing and I will try to do the same to yours. I have always liked your stuff and my initial burst of commentary should not be taken as anything personal toward you. I would take issue with Akaloc and his shoddy research but it's not like we are perfect in here or anywhere else.
One thing is for sure and that is to[/QUOTE]
Akaloc deserved an “Attaboy.” He did a little research, no one else did. Blame?? What blame? Akaloc did not give her the nickname “Crazy Nicole,” and neither did Supereloquent. I didn’t give her the nickname. Even so, what’s to be blamed.
You are still taking this crap to serious. Nobody is dead and no one is buried. No one’s inaccuracies were trashed. The jesting I was referring too was the game I was playing with Davey, Mike80 and the rest of the forum.
I am not a saint. Neither is Supereloquent. He is not dead so stopping trying to canonize him.
If you read his report, then you know that he very carefully pointed out that it was a rumor he got from a SW friend, who heard it from someone else, who supposedly heard it from Nicole. IMHO, this is how rumors get started. Someone hears something from someone who heard it from someone and then passes it on to someone. In Supereloquent’s and Akaloc’s defense, due to the subject matter of the rumor, it did warrant comment. In my own defense, I stand by my original assertion, [b] I don’t deal in rumors. I rely on facts. The facts as I understand them are; everyone is a potential STD carrier. [size=3][color=red]Wrap that Wrascal.[/color][/size])[/b]
No one is perfect. I am not and neither is Supereloquent. He is not dead. His reports are still a valuable resource. If he is not dead and not a saint, why are people trying to make him a martyr?
CookyJar