Ind*y Prostitution Discussed on WI*BC's Crime*beat
Fellow Mongoloids,
Not a lot of meat here, but it does make for some interesting reading. If this doesn't fit forum rules Jackson can spank me accordingly.
Briz*zi: Mar*ion County Prosecuter Carl Briz*zi
FUCLE: Female Under Cover Law Enforcement
MUCLE: Male Under Cover Law Enforcement
Wat*ers: Marion County Lieutenant
Woman Prosectutor: Count Prosecuter
Pat Ver*non: Court Watch particpant
Caller: On air caller to show
(): Comments from Buster
Briz*zi: ". Didn't know about CL. "
FUCLE: "We cruise CL everyday as well as others. " (no others mentioned)
Caller: "10th St. Washington St. Where are stings? "
FUCLE: We do both internet and on streets.
MUCLE: Expect more stings since consolidation over.
Briz*zi: More on CL.
Briz*zi: To report prostitution in act. 3*27*38*11
Caller: Fed financed Eye in Sky cameras. Have you prosecuted anyone using them. Blah blah
MUCLE: Yes. One. Drug bust. Mostly deterrent.
Briz*zi: CL AGAIN!
FUCLE: Providers can be tracked when advertising on CL. We respond to ad of therapists using "play on words" regarding types of massage. 9 of 10 in Erotica Section are prostitutes. Plenty of "certified" massage therapists to go to if really needed.
MUCLE: This can also be a setup for robbery.
Caller: Caller Scott calls in and says that the violent crimes and murders in Indy don't justify these 2 LE wasting their time with these lower level crimes? Resource allocation?
Briz*zi: Prostitution leads to other crimes. Drugs, human trafficking etc blah blah.
Caller: Need to be selective. Go after violent felons.
MUCLE: Quallity of life for children who stumble upon those "in act". Or children being mistaken for prostitutes. (WEAK)
FUCLE: When I am undercover people come out and yell and cuss at me to get lost and out of their neighborhood. So people are concerned we need to go afterit. (WEAK)
(Buster's comments. These were extremely weak, even, shockingly weak, reasons behind using anything other than the most modest of resources to police this activity.)
Briz*zi: Quality of life issues. Std's.
WATERS: People come from out of town. To specific areas. 12 warrants are out for felony prostitution on Crimestopper website. Multiple warrant individuals. [url]http: //wibc. Crimetips.org/[/url]. Paying money for tips.
GENERAL ALL: Waters infers Indy SW unattractive. FUCLE much better looking than average SW. Brizzi mentioned seemd like it would be obvious shes LE, FUCLE says guys get engaged and get stupid (inferred).
Briz*zi: Should LE do things differently. Between street level pros and Spitzers Private type prostitution. One less severe than others?
Woman Prosectutor: Well, maybe, but even higher class pros have problems too.
Briz*zi: But those are problems everyone has. Should the 2 be treated differently?
Woman Prosectutor: Maybe we should but uh. Blah.
FUCLE: I agree with WP addiction problems.
Caller: Can't we just clean up this problem entirely.
Briz*zi: Supply and demand problem.
Woman Prosectutor: We have programs to get the Johns too. (Nothing specific mentioned. Weak)
Briz*zi: "The Red Zone" explain how works.
Woman Prosectutor: 1st time Johns busted go through this program. STD testing, face community leaders, clean up city blah blah. Plenty activity North and West side. Indy once had one of highest rates of Syphillis in country.
Caller: From East side "I have found needles and activity. I blocked off alley (isn't this illegal? ). Nearly stopped activity. "
Briz*zi: Price discussed. $20 for Washington Street SW. Barter other things. Jar of crawdads (Hmm I have a spare tube of caulk? ). She accepted. Vague details.
Caller: Cyber prostitution should be legal. Prosecuting SW makes things worse and make them unemployable.
Briz*zi: Humantrafficking is one reason why.
Caller: Victims of this can get out if they try also women sometimes need money for bills.
Woman Prosectutor: Drugs and sometimes murdered and raped. (Using a lot of "if" this happens "then" this can happen logic. More suprisingly weak reasoning). These women are victimizers and victims, we try to make things better. I try to get them to stop their behavior.
Caller: East side "not a victimless crime. We witnessed a cash interaction" (wow. Scarred for life). I have been part of "Red Zone" Meetings with Johns and they say its not our business. Also some people don't show up in court.
Briz*zi: (Blah). Introduce Court Watch and Pat Ver*non.
Pat Ver*non: We go to court and we hold judges accountable for making sure people are taken off the streets. You can volunteer call Briz*zi office and others. (Blah.)
Caller: Noone has talked about the criminalization of prostitution. Other countries house these woman they get health care and its under control. Maybe we should make it legal?
Pat Ver*non: AIDS STDs out of control over there we don't want it here.
Woman Prosectutor: Gone over this possibility many times. Where would these houses be? Where would we put this "Red Light District". Johnson County? These woman are drug addicted here. Are they over there. Drugs are legal there. (Blah)
Briz*zi: These women are buying crack not 401Ks.
Pat Ver*non: We tell these men our feelings during our "impact panels" in "The Red Zone Programs". (Blah)
Briz*zi: We need to take our neighborhood back. Your behaviour is effecting our neighborhood.
Briz*zi: Make a commitment for cracking down on prostitutes through CL (AGAIN! ) and general prostitution especially for Indy 500 time.
No Ill Will //No she won't
[QUOTE=Billy270128]T-Birdy I did not intend to offend you with my post and hopefully I didn't. I did have a chance to scroll back through the posts and I did see where you have posted numerous times about them both. However, I believe, as I am sure you do, that the intention of this board is the sharing of meaningful opinions regarding various providers. I respect your position and your posts as I am sure you can respect mine. I just wanted everyone to know that there may have been, what I consider, a flagrant foul on the providers part, by threatening to expose the client(s), but I have had good luck with Madison. That being said, there is truth in YMMV with the independent providers.
As for Dee Dee, I didnt mean to sound as if I didn't like the services she provided, she just didnt provide what I was looking for. I do agree that she is a very good provider with reasonable prices and good looks to boot.
Just my .02
Billy[/QUOTE]I finally got the courage up to go see Maddison. It was funny though I never saw 1 thing that made me believe that she was anything like she was made out to beLet me do a review how it should be done.
Review: Madison
Date: 325/08
Provider: Madison
Phone or Pager: 317-696-5238
Email Address:madison4unow@yahoo.com
URL / Website:[url]http://indianapolis.nuvo.net/Female...ieds/ViewAd?oid[/url]
City: Indianapolis
State: Indiana
Area / Address: E. 54th, Broadripple near College.
Appointment Type: Incall
Provider Category: Independent
Activities: HJ, Massage
Session Length Scheduled: 1/2
Fee: 50
Total Paid: 180
Was Tipping or Upselling an issue? No
Was the Description you were given accurate? Yes
Hair Color and Length: Blondish , down her back
Age: 24
Race: White
Perfume/Fragrance: Fresh and all Natural
Smoking Status: Could Not Tell Either Way
Where did you hear about this provider? Another usa review
Provider`s Body: She has a pretty smile with seductive eyes. nice body She was a dancer so she was strong in her hands especially, Definately skilled in massage and easy on the eyes. Her pics on her website are accurate. Very cute indeed.
What was the Provider's Attitude like? Happy, friendly.
Would you recommend this Provider to others? Yes