Not defending her buuuuuuuut.
[QUOTE=JohnRichard;3963508][URL]https://www.seeking.com/member/d4e98130-2cf6-d44c-c810-51fc15097393[/URL]
"Before you message me, please make sure you can afford me. I came up with a financial formula for my arrangements. Please have a minimum net worth, "MNW", equal to my net worth ($7 M) plus $5 M for each of the following traits you lack: being a non-smoker, the ability to use drugs / alcohol in moderation, a full head of hair, natural erections, a fairly fit body, kindness, intelligence on par with my own, attentiveness on par with my own, security in a relationship (read lack of jealousy), respect for women (e. G. YOUR WIFE), or attractiveness equal to my own. Have another $1 M for every year of age you have on me. If you have an ex entitled to alimony, double your MNW. If you have 2 -ex wives being supported, you clearly never learn, triple your MNW. If you don't have a sense of humor or can't do word problems, quadruple your MNW. On that note, if you lack empathy, you'll need to be a billionaire to get me on my knees. Even then, I'd probably just bite you (I know, not very empathetic). ".[/QUOTE]This shows you lack filtering skills my brother.
1. she started in 2013 - means she's seen it all, done it all, and if she's still here. She's a pro. End of story.
2. she's 43, anyone over 25, unless they're fat and ugly are going to have unrealistic expectations, a lot of these women think that age is equivalent to experience. Wrong industry honey.
3. her profile is like a mini book, that's a HUGE RED FLAG. This tells me she has a lot to say, which tells me she is very opinionated, and again see # 1 - she's seen it all. So she knows exactly what she wants and could care less what you want.
4. she's not attractive.
So while I think she's delusional to some extent, you can't bash her if she was a * to you, this is the kind of bird you see the profile, and keep on browsing. Hoefully you'll learn from that.