Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Brutus01; 1111656]His cock was not large. Just took pictures from an angle that embellished it's size. Not unlike his stories.

His "conquest stories" pretty much screamed out loud."HEY LOOK AT ME, PORN ADDICTS NATIONWIDE,

FAWN OVER MY "WORK" AND MAKE ME FEEL IMPORTANT." So pathetic.

For those out of town folks who miss him, invite him to post in your respective fora, or better yet, check out keezmovies. Com, pornhub. Com, tube8. Com or many other free video porn sites to get your fill of free porn. Quit cluttering the Philly board with your sympathetic eulogies for SuperEgo. [/QUOTE]You are either too chicken so you have to use an allias, or you don't even have posts on the forum. So which is it?

[QUOTE=StormRanger; 1111854]Ouch,"CookieJar The Honest" caught in a blatant LIE! Why would you do this? You have everything going for you, why would you lie about this? I just don't understand, and now you have no credibility.

See where it says "You may not post in each other's designated threads"? Remember these rules that you have blantanly and continuously broken. ? Wow, what an ego to not see the hipocracy. SuperE rubbed some (or many) people the wrong way, but you just wouldn't stop stirring things up with him. I saw many times recently where you broke the rules and attacked and he kept his cool.

[/QUOTE]StormRanger,

I do not expect you to understand this – it's a gentlemen's agreement.

[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1037204]I don't know why Jackson chooses to intervene right at this point. I have much respect for the Admin, his is a tough job. However, I think his solution is way too harsh. I don't want to be banned, but there is no way that I am going to be able to keep to the restrictions as currently set by Jackson. I hope he will give me some leeway.

I am a grown man. I can control myself. There is no need to send me to the 'Time-out corner. '

SuperEloquent and I walk the same streets, date many of the same women and many of our encounters verify each other's post. Telling us not to mention each other's name or comment on each other's post is very similar to a punishment I would give my kids when their arguing got on my nerves.

I know how to play nice. I will honor the underlying essence of Jackson's restrictions and hope that he will forgive me for not following them to the letter. SuperEloquent's choice to keep these restrictions to the letter is his own.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

I know I got pretty close to the line once or twice. I have tried hard to keep to the essence of Jackson's restrictions.

Some of what I have recently posted will read like Superelouent bashing. It is not meant to be bashing. I was attempting to show why some Philadelphia members did not like Superelouent and what may have prompted Dark Phoenix to take such harsh action.

CookyJar.

PS: There were a number of things that SuperEloquent and I agreed on. One was, "You cannot please everybody."

As one who has appreciated these boards not only the informational posts on my local boards, but also the images from around the US. I have especially enjoyed SEs pix. (Don't YOU enjoy perusing the Photo Gallery"? And NO, it is NOT the same as surfing porn sites. These are presented as real experiences, posted by one's fellow mongers.)

I cannot fathom the complaints I hear against SE except as a pissing contest out of posting jealousy. This virulent exchange of attacks has exacted serious collateral damage on the entire board. There is evidence of more "super egos" than just SE here. CJ, DarkPhoenix and Davey have damaged themselves with their malicious posts. I still hope to hear from Jackson that outing of any mongers not only will be immediately deleted, but the posters of such personal info about other mongers will be banned from the board. It is despicable.

I am completely fed up with the continuing sniping which continues, even after SE has taken a hiatus. LET IT GO. To coin a phrase, SHEEEESH.

StormRanger reprinted a post from Jackson which bears reposting AGAIN. It is astonishing that its essence has been completely ignored in the current melee. Comon' "SuperSenior" members, you owe it to the board to stop this self immolation. Below, again, are the words of wisdom from Jackson. "Let's get back to the subject!":

"To: Supereloquent, Cookyjar, and all aliases.

Effective immediately, you are both prohibited from referring to each other in any of your reports.

This means that.

- You may not address or reference each other in any report.

- You may not quote each other in any report.

- You may not post in each other's designated threads.

- You may not mention, either directly or by reference, each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

- You may not post your opinions regarding each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

Violate this restriction one time, and I'll ban the perpetrator (and all of his aliases) without comment.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Sincerely,

Jackson"

Although there's usually a multitude of meltdowns and hissy fits when I post an opinion (although everyone else does without that reaction) , I have to say this girl is terrific and it's what we're meant to be finding and, if possible, sharing. No filthy socks, no perma-stained ass, no track marks, no Auschwitz limbs. Well done.

[QUOTE=Supereloquent;1107068]There were SO many good "cutesy" pics of her that it was hard to narrow it down to just one, but here is a favorite from the last batch.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Giani;1112004]As one who has appreciated these boards not only the informational posts on my local boards, but also the images from around the US. I have especially enjoyed SEs pix. (Don't YOU enjoy perusing the Photo Gallery"? And NO, it is NOT the same as surfing porn sites. These are presented as real experiences, posted by one's fellow mongers.)[/QUOTE]The point is that SE posted many fictional accounts and embellished stories, as well as pics of girls who are not or who have never been SW's. Whenever anyone dared to question him in his thread or on other threads, his response was venomous and unrelenting. Keep in mind that those who challenged him were doing so based on FACTUAL evidence-such as the infamous "tan lines" controversy or the dates of pictures.

What you also fail to realize is that he was very likely posting under other screen names in support of himself-as well as having a following of sycophants who worshiped his writings as if they were gospel. What good is it if somebody embellishes stories and posts fake pics of girls who don't exist in the SW world?

There is no jealousy involved-those who seek the truth and question something which they know is false are not exhibiting envy or ego. I love the pics of actual girls that appear on this site, but I, like most everyone-was sick and annoyed with dozens of excessive dick pics where the dick was the central focus of the frame, not the girl.

This person has had run ins on other boards in the past, and was a highly controversial poster on this board for the past few years. While he contributed some real intel at times, there were many occasions on which he simply engaged in vicious attacks on fellow members who dared comment or criticize anything he wrote or posted.

Let's get real-nobody comes 6-7 times in one afternoon, and SW's who are opiate-addicted rarely are capable of orgasm. So, when somebody makes outrageous claims, it is not a function of jealousy to question such claims.

Enough said-I respect that you are a valuable and long-term contributor to this website. I just don't agree with your take on this matter. I do not agree with the analogy that this has turned into a pissing contest--the thread has become somewhat of a post-mortem for the once-famous SuperEloquent.

For a thread of a 'retired' contributor, there is still a lot of rancor being presented.

I have no personal animosity toward SE, though I will admit his ego and temper were a bit much sometimes.

Those who didn't like him did not have to read his posts. First, they were limited to here and secondly, there is an 'ignore' feature.

Regardless of one's feelings towards SE, the actions of Dark Phoenix are totally reprehensible. To intentionally expose someone because you don't like them or what they've said about you is wrong. I've already expressed my opinion on what should happen to DP (or anyone who intentionally exposes another members identity).

I think the best thing Jackson could do to this thread is lock it so there are no more posts allowed here.

It's time to get back to the intent of the USASG, finding women who'll play for pay.

[QUOTE=CookyJar;1110757]You're wrong!!![/QUOTE]I was right!

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker; 1112231]For a thread of a 'retired' contributor, there is still a lot of rancor being presented.

I have no personal animosity toward SE, though I will admit his ego and temper were a bit much sometimes. [/QUOTE]I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.

As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.

While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.

Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".

FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked.

[QUOTE=Malodr;1112234]I was right![/QUOTE]Damn right you were! And as expected, CookieJar just can't admit it. He lied and is sticking with this "Gentleman's Agreement" excuse when Jackson's words speak for themselves. The admin rules were specific.

I edited out some of what Jackson wrote for brevity, but I see now that shouldn't have done that. Here I will post the full text (from this summer) and you can all judge for yourselves if this was just a "Gentleman's Agreement" with Admin, or if it was a DIRECTIVE to be obeyed. I think it is pretty clear that CookieJar is lying about it, but that is just MHO. I've grown accustomed to this from him, and it only bothers me in the context that he is being hypocritical about it by attacking someone else about supposed lies. Many of the issues here would have been avoided if CookieJar had put SuperE on ignore and vice versa.

Also MHO, if you don't like the majority of someones posts and they piss you off. Put them on 'ignore' or STFU please. I'm going to take my own advice here and STFU about CookieJar now unless I'm specifically asked or challenged about it. Cookie, I love your reports on SW's and your pics. You are awesome, I just think that you are wrong on this issue. Sorry I turned this into a rant.

[QUOTE=Admin]To: Supereloquent, Cookyjar, and all aliases.

I don't know anything about whatever problem you have with each other and I don't care. However.

It has become apparent that these pointless exchanges between Supereloquent (and all of his aliases) and Cookyjar will not stop without my intervention. Therefor, I am unilaterally instituting a permanent ceasefire, as follows:

Effective immediately, you are both prohibited from referring to each other in any of your reports. [/QUOTE]How is this in any way vague?

[QUOTE=Admin]This means that.

- You may not address or reference each other in any report.

- You may not quote each other in any report.

- You may not post in each other's designated threads.

- You may not mention, either directly or by reference, each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in.

- You man not post your opinions regarding each other or any activities that the other party may be involved in. [/QUOTE]These are rules, not an agreement.

[QUOTE=Admin]Violate this restriction one time, and I'll ban the perpetrator (and all of his aliases) without comment.[/QUOTE]Here are the consequences of breaking the rules. For whatever reason, Admin didn't do it.

[QUOTE=Admin]Persuant to this cease fire, I have cleaned up this thread by deleting all posts that are now in violation of this ceasefire. This cleanup process is not perfect, and it's possible that I may have inadvertently deleted a few otherwise legitimate posts. If you find that your own report was also deleted, please don't take it personally.

Whatever the bullshit is, it stops now.

The purpose of this Forum is to provide for the exchange of information between Men on the subject of finding Women for Sex.

Let's get back to the subject.

Sincerely,

Jackson [/QUOTE]

Maybe SE got arrested.

[QUOTE=Chriseff; 1112284]I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.

As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.

While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.

Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".

FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.[/QUOTE]Another nice tactic: infer that whoever disagrees is just another SuperE alias. Maybe you are just a Dark Phoenix alias. Maybe we are all either CookieJar or SuperE aliases.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here[/QUOTE]Mostly those that chose to be offended or were envious. If you are a hateful person, you will find something to hate.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.[/QUOTE]Anyone of us could figure out who the more active mongers are if we talk to the right SW's, research some license plate numbers, etc. The point is that I DON'T WANT TO KNOW who any of you are! You shouldn't want to know who other mongers are. It's a trust thing, you wouldn't understand, LOL jk. Just a play on the "It's a Jeep thing" sticker.

SuperE haters seem to all be writing "Dark Phoenix was wrong, but" What BUT? I don't care how much someone pisses off someone else on here, there is no excuse for outing another monger. That's all. We already knew all the gripes against SuperE, so if you didn't like him you were always free to "ignore". But few, if any, did. Just like Howard Stern haters that listened to him every day LOL.

[QUOTE=StormRanger; 1112379]Mostly those that chose to be offended or were envious. If you are a hateful person, you will find something to hate.

[/QUOTE]I disagree I just think that SE wasnt that nice of a guy.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]I disagree with you-we don't really know if SE is retired-he may be posting under other aliases.[/quote]Fine, but he is NOT posting as Supereloquent.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]As far as rancor is concerned, I don't know why you and others have such a problem. Perhaps many were a bit too enamored with this person and his 2000+ posts-so now it is difficult to accept that he created a lot of enemies and hatred around here.[/quote]If you look at the posts between my post commenting on the "rancor" and this one, you will see what I mean. The in fighting continues. Not only on this thread, but in others as well. The antics are causing a well respected monger to cease posting.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]While we all agree that Dark Phoenix's actions are reprehensible, any person with minimal Internet skills could have simply googled the name "SuperEloquent" and found out this same information. It is quite naive to think that a lot of members on this Board didn't know this information already.[/quote]True. Finding out who a person is is one thing. PUBLICLY POSTING it is something else.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]Nobody needs to express an opinion as to what should happen to Dark Phoenix-it is assumed by everyone on here that he should and will be banned permanently for his post-he basically stated this in what is assumed to be his final post by using the "nuclear option".[/quote]I agree.

[QUOTE=Chriseff;1112284]FINALLY-I agree with you 100% that the thread should be locked.[/QUOTE]AMEN.

These acrimonious exchanges can only be destructive to the USASG.

Perhaps all of us who have been around for a while have been occasionallly sucked into incidents of flaming. I plead guilty in past years to being seduced into picking up the flaming gauntlet, and engaging in flame throwing contests. (Fortunately not so much recently.) But these flamings are my least proud moments. The resulting immolations cause significant "collateral damage."

I for one, continue to be grateful for and appreciate the board especially for its informational posts. I also have enjoyed posts which contain pix taking by the poster of his 'dates'. Mind you, I have no tolerance for posters ripping off pix and posting them as their own or fabricated totally from fantasy (think Amishmade), but I have not seen any implication that is the situation here. The repost of your response last summer to infighting seems right on, but in need of reinforcement. Not looking to get anyone kicked off the board at this point, but SOME regulation needs to be applied where violations are occurring.

The longer this melee continues, the greater the negative effect on the board.

Would you care to step in and remind us to get back to what the board is about? I do NOT think I am missing the point.

Giani

P. S. What is with posters who pose as experts, but have less than a handful of posts? What can be done about cleansing the board of destructive posts from alias-bearers who do not have the courage to post in their 'real' names. I suggest that any brand new poster who posts nothing but rancorous posts be warned, then eliminated.

[QUOTE=Giani; 1112590]These acrimonious exchanges can only be destructive to the USASG.

Perhaps all of us who have been around for a while have been occasionallly sucked into incidents of flaming. I plead guilty in past years to being seduced into picking up the flaming gauntlet, and engaging in flame throwing contests. (Fortunately not so much recently.) But these flamings are my least proud moments. The resulting immolations cause significant "collateral damage."

I for one, continue to be grateful for and appreciate the board especially for its informational posts. I also have enjoyed posts which contain pix taking by the poster of his 'dates'. Mind you, I have no tolerance for posters ripping off pix and posting them as their own or fabricated totally from fantasy (think Amishmade) , but I have not seen any implication that is the situation here. The repost of your response last summer to infighting seems right on, but in need of reinforcement. Not looking to get anyone kicked off the board at this point, but SOME regulation needs to be applied where violations are occurring.

The longer this melee continues, the greater the negative effect on the board.

Would you care to step in and remind us to get back to what the board is about? I do NOT think I am missing the point.

Giani.

P. S. What is with posters who pose as experts, but have less than a handful of posts? What can be done about cleansing the board of destructive posts from alias-bearers who do not have the courage to post in their 'real' names. I suggest that any brand new poster who posts nothing but rancorous posts be warned, then eliminated. [/QUOTE]Okay already with your BS complaining on what really is a matter in the PHILLY Forum! Eventhough I was Shocked but not really surprised by what happened I just kept my mouth shut about the ongoing events surrounding a great contributor to the philly mongering scene. USASG as a whole is not & will not be affected because of what's going on in our Philly forum so stop crying.