Holy shit, did you just threaten ALL your current clients....
AND ALL of your potential ones too ?!? You sound like a good one to stay the hell away from. Thanks for letting your true colors shine through :)
[QUOTE=Asophie44]And if it really comes to it don't think we don't know who you guys are and have your name and numbers. And we can tell the public and your wives your dirty little secrets, telling people what really happens during your session.[/QUOTE]
Wow, thanks for the warning Madis, er, "Sophie". lol
[QUOTE=Asophie44]And if it really comes to it don't think we don't know who you guys are and have your name and numbers. And we can tell the public and your wives your dirty little secrets, telling people what really happens during your session. I know some of you would feel a little embarassed if people knew more details on your part.[/QUOTE]The above was obviously written by Madison, not Sophie, but that doesn't really matter, since the hoebag Madison has obviously taken over. Yeah, honey, despite your later takeback attempt, that was a threat. And some of your original post seemed directed at what I said in response to T Birdy, so I'll respond, not to his defense, but to be sure your clients know what kind of dirtbag you are.
I've seen you both. Sophie is hot, as T Birdy made clear w/ lots of praise below. 'Not sure why Sophie would read that good review and come back so pissed, so that's why the responses are obviously from Madihoe. Madihoe is nowhere close to Sophie, which is probably the reason for the jealousy going on here. In fact, she couldn't pay ME to see her naked again. Nasty. The looks match the attitude here.
But as much as I liked Sophie, the whole place needs a recommendation against due to high price, lack of anything but a HJ (despite the misleading allusion to extras below), and the obvious risk to indiscretion this place is threatening. Sorry, Sophie, but you screwed yourself bringing on this hoebag.
Good luck to you. You'll need it after this. And before you think this place doesn't influence, know that I lurked this place for about three years before recently throwing in my first post. It's much more influential than you bargained for.
I was actually a Potential Client
I have never posted here before, have always enjoyed viewing the reviews, I have thought most of the reviews on here as enlightening. (Sophie probably lost a lot of clients like myself). I hadn't visited her yet because I wanted more feedback, But I just got it from the Horses mouth so I know to stay the hell away. Service lately in the Indy area has been on a steady decline. AMP service has even been at an all time low for me. I moved back to this area from my stay out in the Phoenix and Denver areas so there is no comparison to out that way. Guess I have to find providers from another service since CL is starting to become a joke.
Good Luck with your business Sophie, think could have handled your frustration differently.
Not so fast Madis..., er, Sophie.
[QUOTE=Asophie44]And no if you read it right I am not threatening ANY of my clients because I have no need for disrespectful clients and if you have actually ever seen me and are my regular trust me they won't be worried about it.[/QUOTE]Well, I for one have seen you, had scheduled to do so again, and I won't be doing so again in the future (since you know so much about us, consider this my notice of cancellation--if you can't figure it out, I'm the no-show).
Deny it all you want, but that was definitely an uncalled for threat of indiscretion. But I'll forgive Sophie, who was as hot as she was friendly when I saw her, because I assume the messages below were written by Madison. Why else would you attack T Birdy after he complimented Sophie? She's the hot one, and Madison is decidedly not (you couldn't pay me for a massage from Madison). All TBirdy did was point that out. Now he doesn't really need me defending him, but I'm using those facts to point out that Madison is (as he stated) plainly doing the talking here and ruining Sophie's biz.
And for the record, more people will read this and stay away from you than you are aware. I've been lurking this site for over 3 years and taken the advice strongly, only recently registering to post. To Sophie: Good luck. Make it obvious when Madison is no longer associated w/ you, and we'll be back. Until then, adieu.
I gotta throw in on this - a different take.
I deliberated for awhile about throwing in on this and, hell, I just have to. Let me slip into suit and tie and "lawyer up" for a minute.
I am a little suprised that Sophie/Madison would be so much up in arms about Tbirdy's exposure of the business friction between the two of them and not so much concerned about his exposure of the other kind of "business friction" they are involved in. So, bearing this in mind, it does seem strange the over the top defense of Madison. Frankly, thats just talk, although it is from a valuable and reliable source. It wasn't until their virtual confirmation via over reaction that made one think it actually was true. Just a bad decision to respond, but when one is threatened, the heart is exposed, and it is there from which they speak. And it is from there we will continue the discussion.
The threat to expose the client is unwise and must be taken somewhat seriously. Again, another poor decision, but it is a threat that is unlikely to have teeth. It just doesn't pay for them to do it and they would destroy themselves. It's maybe best for them/her to let this go.
For a moment, however, let us assume this is actually Sophie. Just for illustrative purposes. She obviously has been rattled herself, enough, in fact, to say things she may not really mean. Why? Well, boiling it down, it is for one reason. A trust has been broken. We continue from here.
Then, this would lead us to the other hand, the devil's advocate portion of the discussion. The one that counteracts everyone's justified concern over Sophie's threat but seem oblivious to why it occurred and who really originally broke our "gentlemen's agreement"- our "partnership" with a provider whom Tbirdy himself said brought him back for more. I don't think Sophie/Madison is wholly responsible for this turmoil. I beleive Tbirdy bears some responsibility as well. After all, who was (not "would have been" but "was") the one "outing" who first? I must harkin back to post #791 and then Tbirdy's original post that inspired it.
Who was the one initially "exposed" both professionally, then personally?
If there ever was a real world example of my concern in post #791 these previous posts have testified directly to it. The concern in #791 was about detail that outlined providers specific actions and specific compensation for said actions.
It is no "do or die" situation for me, in the very end, what happens here. I can simply not "log in" and walk away from the forum. After all, if one were to review, this concern was why I lurked initially and didn't post. However, there is value here. People like Tbirdy, Cable Man, Two Nutts and, to a much lesser extent, myself, have a lot of great interesting stories and information to tell. This incident gives us a proving ground on what the best way to go about that really is. This is why I am throwing in here. Not to "force" my opinions on others, which someone, I think, ludicrously proclaimed I was trying to do (I suppose it had to be me? ). Just to persuade through evidence and this latest, and hopefully final, example. Let's think for a moment, there is a fork in the road here. Everyone is welcome in either direction. Lets just be sure we choose the correct one. And which one is correct, you ask? Well, either is really, after all, its our forum, not mine, not Tbirdys but all of ours. Lets consider for awhile, forget all this and move on, hell, and honestly, I think now might be the BEST time to give Sophie a call.
Damn, I'm almost afraid to post
Me and my small penis was wondering if any of you guys or gals, have a "friend" or contact in the Ft Wayne area for this week.I'll be there 5 days. (PM)
Thanks,
Two Nutts (& S.P.)