BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=Steve42]This is my first post here. I have a regular provider I see but was thinking about trying something new.

I am still afraid of LEO. LOL. Any advice to how to detect LEO and/or setup would be appreciated.

Anyway here is the link she provided and the backpage phone # etc for little Miss Kitty Kat:

[url]http://NuCiti.com/kat/kittykat.htm[/url]

Post ID: 4095092 on Backpage

Phone # (813) 802-3485

She looks and sounds too good to be true. And you know that makes me suspicious.

Thanks ahead of time

Steve[/QUOTE]Steve,

I do not believe she is LEO either as I have seen pictures of her that showed parts of her vagina, and she has posted different ones over the past few months. You should always take the normal precautions anyway as reviews can be faked, but one approach I have taken is that I call them and ask them to snap a picture bare chested showing their tits and instruct them to write a specific phrase on the paper. Then I ask them to email it to my monger email address, some will do it some won't. I want to see her as well, but I already splurged my monger budget for the month.

Shoot me a PM or post a review if you do see her, she is on my short list. I will do the same if I see her before you do.

Thanks.

[QUOTE=Troop]I finally got around to seeing Kay. She is a provider we talked about six pages ago. She told me that other providers were calling her and yelling that she was putting them out of business with her $ an hour rate. That , she said, is the reason she raised her rate for an hour. She also said she gives her regulars the $ rate for up to an hour. Those were her words.

Kay has a great body. Fit, tight and tanned. She is prettier than her posted pictures. She is also older than her posted age. Not by a great amount. She is clean and smells good.
One pop. BBJ, DATY,covered FS in all positions.

As reported, she is friendly and VERY talkative. I liked her.[/QUOTE]
I just saw an review of Kay on TER that uses the exact wording that I used in my review here. WTF ? Its not my review.

This appeared on BP this morning and great job to the lone consumer affairs reporter! This is one for everyone to learn from!

[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-blonde-waiting-to-give-you-that-ultimate-gfe-right-now-43/4047307[/url]

[QUOTE=Troop]I just saw an review of Kay on TER that uses the exact wording that I used in my review here. WTF ? Its not my review.[/QUOTE]Just saw that; too similar to be a coincidence. And notice this was injected upfront:

"She has a nice apartment in the Rocky Point area. That is nice so you won't have to worry about getting robed. She has fantastic rates and you can't go wrong with her 30 min special. "

Nice advert to put into a review. Personally I like to be robed when I see a girl. What I hate is being robbed.

To me, this looks like she read your review here and posted her own review on another site (or had someone do it for her). It's no secret that some providers fabricate reviews. I don't have a VIP membership so I can't see if the another site reviewer has any history or other reviews.

I think you have 3 options:

1) Let it slide, since the review seems to reflect your experience, it isn't going to mislead anyone.

2) Call her up and call her out for it. She'll either cop to it and agree to take it down, or claim she doesn't know anything about it

3) Report it to another site, referencing your review on this site and see if they'll take it down for a fake. I've heard when they catch girls posting fake reviews they de-list them, so that might be the nuclear option which wouldn't be good for her.

If it were me, I wouldn't go down the path of #3, because I don't like to get involved in drama with providers. Besides, the people that run another site are sleazy anyway, and there's always a chance someone there is pulling shenanigans.

[QUOTE=Troop]I just saw an review of Kay on TER that uses the exact wording that I used in my review here. WTF ? Its not my review.[/QUOTE]

Someone obviously wanted to garner a few free days of ter vip membership so they 'borrowed' your previous experiences and reported as their own.

You could probably report it to ter but I doubt they would do anything about it.

My experience with Kay has not been as positive as Troop's and that of others. After too many failed attempts and too much wasted time, I reluctantly have to relegate her to the unreliable bin and move on.

Like some others, this is one where you MUST get an active confirmation of your appointment before you leave. If you cannot get in touch with her, you don't have an appointment. You will be driving and waiting for nothing. I ended up doing a lot of that.

Too bad, she's cute and if the reports are true, she would have had a new regular.

[QUOTE=Travelrr 433]This appeared on BP this morning and great job to the lone consumer affairs reporter! This is one for everyone to learn from!

[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/FemaleEscorts/hot-blonde-waiting-to-give-you-that-ultimate-gfe-right-now-43/4047307[/url][/QUOTE]
I recognized her from some NM & V2 lingerie shop ads going way back. She, not too long ago, had ads on eros with the same pics from a decade ago. Then the pics on BP which showed a skinny-crackish look, I was not interested.

[QUOTE=Originalwook]Someone obviously wanted to garner a few free days of ter vip membership so they 'borrowed' your previous experiences and reported as their own.

You could probably report it to ter but I doubt they would do anything about it.[/QUOTE]
I guess Im not really mad. I posted the review so folks might use it. Well some one did. I would think they could use a little imagination when posting the review. Not just cut and paste. If its not mikemamulas own review, then in my eyes its not honest. Hey did he play for the EAGLES ?

That brings me to being honest on this forum. This forum is full of educated, intelligent men. (Im sucking up so I can borrow money from you later) If you lie or embellish too much, someone will call you out.

End of lesson, no charge.

has just one other TER review, in April, of Jinn. I don't think it's Kay self-posting. I think ol' Mike's just a bit of a plagiarist.

Even if you're not a VIP, TER pages are searchable on Google, so just google the username and the reviews will come up.

[QUOTE=Troop]I guess Im not really mad. I posted the review so folks might use it. Well some one did. I would think they could use a little imagination when posting the review. Not just cut and paste. If its not mikemamulas own review, then in my eyes its not honest. Hey did he play for the EAGLES ?

That brings me to being honest on this forum. This forum is full of educated, intelligent men. (Im sucking up so I can borrow money from you later) If you lie or embellish too much, someone will call you out.

End of lesson, no charge.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Originalwook][QUOTE=Troop]I just saw an review of Kay on TER that uses the exact wording that I used in my review here. WTF ? Its not my review.[/QUOTE]
Someone obviously wanted to garner a few free days of ter vip membership so they 'borrowed' your previous experiences and reported as their own.

You could probably report it to ter but I doubt they would do anything about it.[/QUOTE]The same thing happened to me a few years ago with one of my reviews being plagiarized. I reported it to TER and, as expected, nothing was ever done about it. I don't think they really care one way or the other what guys submit as long as they keep the juicy details in the VIP part of the review which their visitors have to pay to see and it can boost their own total review count so that they can seem more comprehensive than they really are (again so that they can sell more VIP memberships).

And, as for the members of TER, some post legitimate albeit somewhat biased reviews of their favorite providers in order to both extend their VIP membership AND to gain favor with those providers in the hope that will mean they'll get better service when they go back. But there are clearly some who will post ANYTHING including stolen reviews made someone else and even fictional accounts of sessions that never even happened in order to come up with enough reviews to secure them VIP access rights.

This is partially why I put so little stock in the reviews I see on that site. The other main reason being that the "Average" rating there is an extremely unlikely 8 out of 10 (to me the average should be 5 and only better than average providers getting more than that), so if just about any provider can rate an 8 what does that even really tell you about how good she really is.

[QUOTE=Chase Star]The same thing happened to me a few years ago with one of my reviews being plagiarized. I reported it to TER and, as expected, nothing was ever done about it. I don't think they really care one way or the other what guys submit as long as they keep the juicy details in the VIP part of the review which their visitors have to pay to see and it can boost their own total review count so that they can seem more comprehensive than they really are (again so that they can sell more VIP memberships).

And, as for the members of TER, some post legitimate albeit somewhat biased reviews of their favorite providers in order to both extend their VIP membership AND to gain favor with those providers in the hope that will mean they'll get better service when they go back. But there are clearly some who will post ANYTHING including stolen reviews made someone else and even fictional accounts of sessions that never even happened in order to come up with enough reviews to secure them VIP access rights.

This is partially why I put so little stock in the reviews I see on that site. The other main reason being that the "Average" rating there is an extremely unlikely 8 out of 10 (to me the average should be 5 and only better than average providers getting more than that), so if just about any provider can rate an 8 what does that even really tell you about how good she really is.[/QUOTE]

And the folks who check the reviews at ter have no problem changing the ratings posted in your review if the provider in question has a long history there. They did that to one of the first reviews that I submitted. They also changed some of the review itself to make her appear better than she actually was.

You can't complain about such things on the discussion boards as they moderate all of the posts and generally won't allow something to be posted that is negative towards ter or their favorite providers. I never thought that I would find a site worse than the old big dog site but ter is.

Speaking of which a soon to be deleted thread in their FL forum is garnering some significant hoopla regarding Samantha's BP perp pics.

Update: It has been deleted.

A couple of ho's and mongers attacked the messenger who, I might add, stood his ground admirably.

Does any one have any information on this one? really interested just concerned with the e-mail only request with a picture

Thanks

Bill




[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/BodyRubs/38dd-blonde-bombshell-4-sensual-massage-31/1468210[/url]

[QUOTE=Billsohorney]Does any one have any information on this one? really interested just concerned with the e-mail only request with a picture

Thanks

Bill




[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/BodyRubs/38dd-blonde-bombshell-4-sensual-massage-31/1468210[/url][/QUOTE]
Thats great. If she likes your looks, then you get to bring your money to her. That rates right up there with "dont waste my time and I wont waste yours." I hate that. I move right on to the next ad.

[QUOTE=Billsohorney]Does any one have any information on this one? really interested just concerned with the e-mail only request with a picture

Thanks

Bill




[url]http://tampa.backpage.com/BodyRubs/38dd-blonde-bombshell-4-sensual-massage-31/1468210[/url][/QUOTE]
She has a TER review under Madison Devon performance is a 2.