The only thing I don't like about the Forum
The only thing I don't like about the Forum is Hobbyist being made to feel like this, which is from a newbie post about Rikki: "I was going to keep this one to myself since she can do no wrong to some of you guys and I didn't want the flak. " Similar things have happened to many of us, including me.
Guys, honest evaluations and posts are what this Forum is all about and we all know our experiences can differ with the same girl, even differ from time to time, depending on their need for money, substance issues, time of the month, etc etc. YMMV right? So can we take all the intel and make up our own minds without personally attacking someone? All bets are off of course with the obvious dump shit girls writing their own reviews or some shill doing it for them, which are usually pretty obvious and get pointed out quickly and I like it when A2 publicly spanks them!! In Rikki's case, we have newbies and seniors reporting less than stellar performances. I have seen her many times and reported on good experiences but I also don't see her very often and haven't seen her for a couple of weeks or more. Things change rapidly in this hobby and the girls change even faster. Lets address the message, not the messenger, shall we?
[blue]A2 publicly endorses this view. Post your info and then members can weigh it on whatever merits they feel it has. A2 is in talks with el Jeffe about adding a "White Knight" infraction. That flag would mostly be thrown when somebody attacks the messenger, not the message. And EVERY fucking time a report started off with the words "I talked to X and this is what she said."
A2[/blue]
Not our job to police other members' opinions
[QUOTE=PlayTiem;2463163]I agree that ad hominem attacks are generally pretty useless, but we're talking about credibility here, right? I'm not exactly the newest kid on the block when it comes to providers trying to pull some shit, BUT: There was a case where a provider that I had seen claimed things went one way, and a new poster claimed otherwise. I had posted positive things after positive visits, and absolutely trashed her after some shit she pulled. I still believed her about that particular circumstance, even though there were any number of other things that she could've said that I would have immediately written off as false.
I'm just saying that "I talked to X and this is what she said" shouldn't automatically relegate someone's comment to White Knight status.[/QUOTE]PT, you just essentially wrote "I believed her this time, so I challenged the new poster's credibility using what she said. " Now maybe his credibility WAS suspect, but so were your motives. Why get in the middle of it at all? Do you feel some genuine affection for the girl? Are you hoping to get into her good graces or for preferential treatment? Has she asked you to help? Any one of these things, or some combination of them, is possible. It's also natural to develop affection for people with whom we spend a lot of time in intimate encounters, but it can also skew our views. For these reasons and others, the credibility of any guy mounting a vigorous defense of a provider is also very suspect and enough of that type of activity can really jam up the free flow of intel provided on a board like this.
But even if your willingness to defend the girl stems from nothing other than righteous altruism, as unlikely as that is, he was there and you were not. That means that his information is firsthand and yours isn't. If she disagrees with something posted about a anything she did or said, then she can always come on here and dispute it herself.
If you're outside in the public arena, you are correct
[QUOTE=RobertNsg;2463992]When I worked for a local agency, the task force (ones enforcing prostitution) submitted a purchase request for one of the expensive, life-like latex dildos to use when the girls would tell them to do a LEO check. SO, if any ladies are reading this, please beware this tactic may not work for you to prove they aren't uncle.
Guys, if a woman asks you for an LEO check and you pull it out, if she is an undercover, they will arrest you for exposing yourself. And that is a crime that can get you a sexual offender designation, not just a misdemeanor solicitation charge.
Be safe out there.
I had originally posted this in the Backpage advertisers section but feel it may be seen by more members here. Sorry for the double post.[/QUOTE]As far as indecent exposure. However, if you're in a hotel room, it wouldn't be as there is no potential for exposure of sexual organs in a hotel room to the public. As far as dildo is concerned, even if the undercover allowed the girl to suck him off, he (LEO) can still deny it to the judge. All he is going to tell the hooker is, "who do you think the judge will believe, you or me?" I'm not saying it's right but cops do and can lie; in some cases, as I'm sure you know, it's legal for them to lie. A client's best and most effective defense is to never discuss money and sex in the same conversation.