All you Pinky and Tiffany fans. Today is your last day to enjoy their massages. Pinky is moving to Mainland, so the shop is closing today at 10pm. So get in your last massage if you're a fan.
Rus
Printable View
All you Pinky and Tiffany fans. Today is your last day to enjoy their massages. Pinky is moving to Mainland, so the shop is closing today at 10pm. So get in your last massage if you're a fan.
Rus
[QUOTE=Mongers Rus; 1185596]All you Pinky and Tiffany fans. Today is your last day to enjoy their massages. Pinky is moving to Mainland, so the shop is closing today at 10pm. So get in your last massage if you're a fan.
Rus[/QUOTE]What about Tiffany, is she moving to the mainland with Pinky?
[QUOTE=Kolonahe;1185758]Sorry for the double post, was unable to edit for some reason.[/QUOTE]Is she & katy working together at same place, or Katy's replacement? The backside look good. Thanks G1
I too thought this was BBW Local Haole Nancy!
[QUOTE=Kamabokos; 1185485]Gargoyles69,
No she is not a BBW. As my description states, she is a 5 in the looks category. I think she is about 5'2" in the 120lb area.
I don't know what you mean about me having the "balls for that." You are a Senior Member. I'm sure you've read about Monica at Kison providing BBFS or Coco at CHM or Katy in downtown or etc, etc. Comments preaching about safe sex are forbidden by the posting guidelines set by Jackson.
I forgot to add, I finished BBBJCIM. She took it all. Thus, the 8's for service and attitude.
I would compare her with the typical CHM provider except she is Chinese instead of Korean. Everytime I've been to CHM, I received extras like BBBJ and BBFS. [/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kamabokos; 1184916]I went to check out Nancy in Downtown. Not much of a looker but service and attitude was good. Medium pressure massage was good. On the flip, provided BBBJ and BBFS in the multiple positions. Damage. 6 plus $.4 tip. L / A/S 5/8/8. Of course, YMMV.
[url]http://honolulu.craigslist.org/oah/thp/2353472633.html[/url][/QUOTE]I taught you said you went BBFS with a provider? That's spooky cause now days don't know what you can get from BB.
[QUOTE=Kolonahe;1185678]Does Nancy's okole look like the pic in her BP MT ad? If so, will have to sample. Mahaloz, Brah.[/QUOTE]The pic in her ad was "borrowed" from a Japanese website: [url]http://hankaku.2chblog.jp/archives/51714767.html[/url] Scroll down to near the bottom.
[QUOTE=Blake123; 1185994]The pic in her ad was "borrowed" from a Japanese website:
[url]http://hankaku.2chblog.jp/archives/51714767.html[/url]
Scroll down to near the bottom. [/QUOTE]Awesome post, mahalos! May I call you 'The Assman' :)?
Are these the kinds of girls at 7 and VIP?
[QUOTE=H Mobius; 1185995]Awesome post, mahalos! May I call you 'The Assman'?
Are these the kinds of girls at 7 and VIP? [/QUOTE]Mahalo M H. My radar always locking on to a nice ass.
[QUOTE=Blake123; 1185994]The pic in her ad was "borrowed" from a Japanese website:
[url]http://hankaku.2chblog.jp/archives/51714767.html[/url]
Scroll down to near the bottom. [/QUOTE]"near the bottom" was pretty funny when talking about asses. That site reminds me of scanlover forums.
[QUOTE=Kamabokos;1184916]I went to check out Nancy in Downtown. Not much of a looker but service and attitude was good. Medium pressure massage was good. On the flip, provided BBBJ and BBFS in the multiple positions. Damage. 6 plus $.4 tip. L / A/S 5/8/8. Of course, YMMV.[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Gargoyles69;1185012]Not much of a looker Hmmm is that bad or good. You hd BBFS? WOw you got balls for that? Is that the BBW Nancy longtime ago?[/QUOTE][QUOTE=Kamabokos; 1185485]Gargoyles69,
No she is not a BBW. As my description states, she is a 5 in the looks category. I think she is about 5'2" in the 120lb area.
I don't know what you mean about me having the "balls for that." Comments preaching about safe sex are forbidden by the posting guidelines set by Jackson. [/QUOTE][QUOTE=Gargoyles69;1185870]I taught you said you went BBFS with a provider? That's spooky cause now days don't know what you can get from BB.[/QUOTE]In no way do I know either know Gargoyles69, Kamabokos or Kolonahe. Neither do I like / hate any of these mongers or have PM any of them in the past.
I am simply pointing out that what Kolonahe (by his post on the bottom) and maybe even Kolonahe has the opinion that Gargoyles69 was criticizing in his comments.
What are we really talking about, the words "balls" & "spooky?" Really, guys? The word "balls" that's just another word for guts or courage and the word "spooky" that's just saying scary or fearful.
Still just comments or expressions not criticizing IMHO.
I think who Gargoyles was referring to was older haole Nancy from downtown about 3+ years back if memory recalls she was reported to be a "glory hole cum repository," that never changed her sheets, had no A / C in a hot room, no showers for her or you.
You get th picture. Viewed under that context Gargoyles comments makes even more sense but, even if you take haole Nancy out of the picture.
I feel Gargole's comments was in no way infers a criticizing tone or was preaching in anyway.
Gargole even apologize Kamabokos to in post #2992.
So (THE REAL QUESTION) are all mongers supposed to refrain, censor or even pussyfoot from making any comments. Like if I where to say "that's nutz" eh?
If the forum or even Jackson really thinks commenting with words like balls and spooky falls under criticzing then I'm not going to say shit from now on.
Peace to all just want freedom of expression good or bad to have it's place.
Catch.
P.S. To Kolonahe & Kamabokos I apologize in advance if you think I was trying to single you guys out and attack you. I just had a strange sudden urge to vent on a freedom of speech rant. Looking back I don't even really know why...
[QUOTE=Kolonahe; 1185907]"Greetings Everyone,
Forum Members wishing to criticize other Members for not following what they consider to be safe sex procedures may do so only in the Safe Sex Thread. Members may not comment upon, criticize or confront other members on this subject in the general discussion threads. Any such "safe sex complaints" posted in the general discussion threads will be deleted without comment. However.
In addition, Members may not repeatedly post or otherwise taunt other Members regarding their refusal to follow safe sex procedures. Specifically, references to having sex without a condom may be made only by incidental reference and shall not be the focus of any report. Such "safe sex taunting" reports will be deleted without comment.
In other words, I don't want to hear anymore about the subject except in the Safe Sex Thread.
If you want to criticize another member for not following what you consider to be safe sex practices, then send him a PM.
Actually, I've been considering this for quite some time because I believe that it does no good to criticize members for not following what other members may consider to be safe sex practices for the following reasons:
1. It's a disincentive for members to contribute.
2. It never serves to change any one's behavior.
3. It almost always leads to arguments.
4. It provides a "cover" for Serial Antagonists to provoke other members.
Accordingly, I have moved the previous "safe sex complaints" to the Safe Sex Thread.
To address the usual arguments:
1. If a guy wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's his risk and his business.
2. If a girl wants to engage in sex without using a condom, that's her risk and her business.
3. If YOU want to protect yourself from either or both of the aforementioned parties, then YOU should use a condom for sex all the time and thus YOU will be protected from the allegedly unsafe sex practices of the other parties.
Thanks,
Jackson"
Please just let it go, gargoyles69. You're violating forum rules.
Good luck and Aloha,
Kolo[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Mauka;1185616]What about Tiffany, is she moving to the mainland with Pinky?[/QUOTE]My impression when I used to see her in CC is that she has an SO. She typically only work day hours. So maybe she is getting married or something. Just speculation of course.