AMP economics 101 (continued)...
[QUOTE=Terra Sancta]I could not agree more. Look at the effect of high prices of gas, it did not affect the demand. We need to stop the $20 standard tuition practice, so we can make a gap between the skanks and the gyms.
I propose going to a $15--$25 structure, and eliminate the $20 standard tuition. If the economy hits harder, then we should go to a $10--$30 structure.[/QUOTE]
Terra Sancta,
You're missing the point. The demand curve is what it is and is normally is not affected by the supply curve. In fact they do not affect each other at all. What they do eventually do is that they intersect. And it is at that point (all other things being equal) that consumers are willing and able to purchase the good or service.
The price that they can get for their product provides incentive for producers or suppliers to do what they do (produce or provide) the good or service. If these people can do what they do, cover their costs, and make a reasonable profit, they will do it. If not, they will take their capital and other investments and apply them elsewhere. In the case of SW's, we're talking about pimps. In the case of AMP's, we're talking about those with enough money to rent a space, convert it (if not already converted) to AMP usage, and hire some staff.
The labor to help management build, upgrade, and operate an AMP are building and improvement contractors and AMP workers. Both the management and the staff take into account the risk factor. Management risks losing their entire investment if the government (LE) were to shut them down before they at least recover their investment. For a new AMP, this has to be at least a couple hundred $K. Let's just say $250,000. This number could go up in an area with restrictive licensing requirements or (God forbid) where they may have to pay off police, licensing officials, and other government agencies. Management also faces the risk that they may go to jail. However the risk of this happening for management is far less than it is for the workers. The reason for this is that management (and here I'm really talking about the owner/operators of the spa) makes it a point to stay out of the place once it's up and running.
So (in the case of the AMP industry) we are talking about some very smart business people (Koreans) who have to decide whether the investment required to create and operate a spa are going to pay off and justify the economic and other risks, or whether they would be better off opening a car dealership, restaurant, dry-cleaning establishment, or one of the other myriad business opportunities available to them in this country or perhaps in some other country. With Koreans, you have to keep in mind that if they have the funds, they could conceivably open some kind of business in Korea.
For the AMP workers (Korean women who don't possess the knowledge, skill, or capital of the people who own/operate the spa), they need to decide if it is worth it for them to risk going to jail, getting hurt or killed on the job, having to live and work in the same place, day-in, day-out in order to make whatever they are going to make in a spa. I've done the calculations on this. And while it's theoretically possible for a hard-charging, good looking gal to make up to $200,000 per annum, it's more likely that she is going to make about half that. We have to keep in mind that these are, after all, human beings with the same frail bodies and psyches that most humans have. Believe it or not, you can't fuck ten or twelve times a day, seven days a week, without it taking some sort of toll on you.
Therefore the one thing that makes this industry different from most other industries is the risk factor. We also have to admit that the customers face a small risk. That is the risk inherent in their engagement in this market place. For the AMP customer, this risk is much smaller than if he were to buy a different service, say the one offered by SW's.
One risk the consumer faces is the risk of being arrested. When AMP's get busted, it's very unusual for the customer to get busted. But we have to imagine that it does happen. Another risk (one which probably happens more frequenty) is that he'll spend a lot of money and not get what he came for. Although in a market with with a good number of spa's, the ones that stay in business tend to learn that they can't work this way and continue to make money.
So there you have it. All the players in this game face the same dilemma. Do I submit myself to the risks inherent in this market place in order to possibly get what motivates me to take part in it? For the owners, they face risks for the possible reward of making a profit. For the workers, they risk a lot for the possible reward of making a decent income. For the consumer of the service, they risk spending a lot of money and maybe some time in jail for the possibility of satisfying their intense need for sexual satisfaction and intimacy.
Where the curves representing these two activities meet, is where the transaction will take place.
LexLuther
ECN101 Continued -- University of Wilkens Avenue
[QUOTE=LexLuther]Terra Sancta,
You're missing the point. The demand curve is what it is and is normally is not affected by the supply curve. In fact they do not affect each other at all. What they do eventually do is that they intersect. And it is at that point (all other things being equal) that consumers are willing and able to purchase the good or service.[/QUOTE]Thank you for explaining your theory, but I have a question for you.
If your income is $120K and mine is $60K/year, we both go to Wilkens and see Angela who charges my proposed $25 fee, and Liz who is 5/10 on SW scale. I compare prices, hesitate, drive few more rounds, while you fork the $25 and pick up Angela in a heartbeat. Then I go to Liz and say I got $15 for a BJ, take it or leave it.
The quality of SWs is not the same, why should the fee be the same. Why do I care if they need to have one client or 5 to make enough money for a dose or 2.
Think of it as the plants in your yard which get to grow first, then everything else has to grwo weak under their shadow. Or the big fish which is now faster, so it can get the first frog, or something :)
Today, I went to WW but did not find a SW to meet my criteria, so I left. I was willing to pay $50 for some one who does. There were propably 3 SWs who meet my criteria, but were picked up by clients paying $20, but by the time I got there, they were in some dark alley.
What if I started paying the $25, and I was approaching behind tow other $20 who were there first? who would the SW get int he car with? What if the CraigsList $120 chick who gets one client a day leaned that she can get 4 on WW for $50 each.
My whole point is that there is a gap in pricing. Please look how this was resolved in 2 places: 1. Go to Wikipedia and type PROSTITUTION, you will see a picture of prostitute vans in Leon-France, you will get the picture. 2. The other exampl is from Corona-NY where Latin chicks work from home, with guys distributing busiiness cards on busy streets. In either case, you get the price range I am talking about. Something to fill the price/quality curve gap.
In either case, even drugs are subject to the supply/deman curve. Why should prostituion be any different. My need for a SW is no different than a SW need for Heroin.
A Date with a Crack *****
Here is a familiar scene.
[url]http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=34b_1172510340[/url]
Enjoy!
1 photos
Fuck a Tranny Ad on USAsexGUIDE
I just noticed this -- now confused!
I guess when it comes to revenue, principles change.
[blue]=============================================
Terra Sancta,
My principles haven't changed. The ads are not selected by me, they are displayed at random. However, if you send me an email with the ad title and/or the link in the ad, I can set the ad program to permanently reject that ad.
Thanks,
Jackson[/blue]