Printable View
[QUOTE=London6977]I appreciate your words. I enjoyed our time together and I am glad we had a chance to meet. Now everyone knows I am real. I had a great time and I am glad you enjoyed your trip to London.[/QUOTE]Just had a great time with London. She had my Big Ben going dong-dong-dong. Very pretty, sexy, attentive, and fun to be with. Seemed concerned to make sure I was happy. And either very "responsive", or a great actor! I'll be back!
I decided TOFTT and have a dream about a RCC Escort in Hville. I was a bit disappointed and emailed RCC just to inform them about the situation. It's been several days now and they don't even care enough to reply back to me.
That's said, when I got there the lady was the same as in the pics but didn't look any where near as good. It was obvious that they didn't prepare for my visit. No shower, no make up and fury legs! I won't go into more details on the board because it gets worse but if you want info to make a decision PM me. I really don't like putting up negative information. Because maybe she just had a real bad day. But, when I let RCC know about it and they don't bother to respond it tells us that we should be cautious.
Had a great experience with RCC in Huntsville. Had trouble with verification, but Alicia from Memphis came through for me. I owe her one. I saw Savanna Gates. Very talented woman. Give them a try.
Steve
Thats good to hear, I'm not going to give up on them yet.
[QUOTE=Steve4Action]Had a great experience with RCC in Huntsville. Had trouble with verification, but Alicia from Memphis came through for me. I owe her one. I saw Savanna Gates. Very talented woman. Give them a try.
Steve[/QUOTE]
I see that a bunch of providers advertise they are GFE. However when you get there the rules are: No kissing, BBBJ, DATY, 1 pop etc.
Is there a clear understanding of GFE anywhere?
I consider GFE:
1. Kissing
2. Foreplay
3. BBBJ
4. Passion
I never had a girlfriend I couldn't kiss or touch. LOL
What is the consensus?
My research shows that it always means kissing at least.
Defin on net!
A call girl advertising the provision of a "girlfriend experience" is implying that she provides deep french kissing (DFK), "full service" (intercourse) usually with protection, and fellatio and cunnilingus, both with or without protection. Advertising a "girlfriend experience" is sometimes used by call girls to promote business.
[QUOTE=Blackhawk 101]I see that a bunch of providers advertise they are GFE. However when you get there the rules are: No kissing, BBBJ, DATY, 1 pop etc.
Is there a clear understanding of GFE anywhere?
I consider GFE:
1. Kissing
2. Foreplay
3. BBBJ
4. Passion
I never had a girlfriend I couldn't kiss or touch. LOL
What is the consensus?
My research shows that it always means kissing at least.
Defin on net!
A call girl advertising the provision of a "girlfriend experience" is implying that she provides deep french kissing (DFK), "full service" (intercourse) usually with protection, and fellatio and cunnilingus, both with or without protection. Advertising a "girlfriend experience" is sometimes used by call girls to promote business.[/QUOTE]I agree completely! I see that GFE is on alot of ads, and it should at the very least mean LFK and cuddling. And that is at the least! I wouldn't consider a provider a true GFE unless she offered BBBJ, and CIM is awesome. Basically read the reviews and if they only have one or two reviews wrtten by someone who has only reviewed that provider, don't trust them.
[QUOTE=Blackhawk 101]I see that a bunch of providers advertise they are GFE. However when you get there the rules are: No kissing, BBBJ, DATY, 1 pop etc.
Is there a clear understanding of GFE anywhere?
I consider GFE:
1. Kissing
2. Foreplay
3. BBBJ
4. Passion
I never had a girlfriend I couldn't kiss or touch. LOL
What is the consensus?
My research shows that it always means kissing at least.
Defin on net!
A call girl advertising the provision of a "girlfriend experience" is implying that she provides deep french kissing (DFK), "full service" (intercourse) usually with protection, and fellatio and cunnilingus, both with or without protection. Advertising a "girlfriend experience" is sometimes used by call girls to promote business.[/QUOTE]Someone once asked me if I'd meet for a GFE type encounter at 5 o'clock in the morning. I told him if he truly wanted GFE at that time in the morning, he could come to my place, wake me up for play, and then I'd slap him away and go back to sleep for 4 more hours.
Can anyone give any guidance on this woman? She is heading to Fl. in a couple weeks an am trying to determine if she is legit.
Thanks
I am new to the forum, and while searching through, I came upon several posts that are claiming that Abby and Camille are one in the same person.
I can personally vouch that these two ladies are very different as I have spent time with both of them. They are both great looking blondes in their 30's, but are 2 completely different ladies in the bedroom.
As far if Camille's pix are fake, I couldn't tell. They may or may not be, but she actually looked better than the pix that she had posted, so I could have cared less if they were real or not. It definitely wasn't false advertising.
Abby has been in the business a lot longer, but from what I can tell, they both have a long list of great reviews.
Just my 2 cents.
Has anyone seen Jade?
[url]http://www.escorts.com/member/2719937/Jade1966[/url]
So maybe they are different women, but I'm still not convinced (not that I'm gonna go out of my way to find out...). As far as Abby's reviews are concerned, no one can deny that she has a history of flaking and no-showing as well as shorting clients on time paid. Do a web search and you'll find all kinds of reviews on her plus there are a few on e.com as well attesting to that fact. She may not do it ALL THE TIME but the fact that she does it at all should be a warning sign to all. Camille should learn from Abby's mistakes and try to be more professional and reliable before she becomes known for the same negative qualities.
There are lots of beautiful women that comes through town all the time who are reliable and, considering other overheads, much more economical. For what Abby or Camille are asking per hour plus overheads plus time, you can see someone in the $$$$$+/hr range. For those who can afford it, we're talking super model type women here. Glad you had good luck with them, but for the rest of us, why even chance it with ladies that may or may not come through?
Just my 2 cents.
[QUOTE=Nash Gent]I am new to the forum, and while searching through, I came upon several posts that are claiming that Abby and Camille are one in the same person.
I can personally vouch that these two ladies are very different as I have spent time with both of them. They are both great looking blondes in their 30's, but are 2 completely different ladies in the bedroom.
As far if Camille's pix are fake, I couldn't tell. They may or may not be, but she actually looked better than the pix that she had posted, so I could have cared less if they were real or not. It definitely wasn't false advertising.
Abby has been in the business a lot longer, but from what I can tell, they both have a long list of great reviews.
Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]
Her interview says that she requires a facial photo of you as a part of verification. Not something I'd feel comfortable doing again.
She also does "incalls" but it will cost an additional $.5 to cover the hotel...lol
[QUOTE=Commodore]Has anyone seen Jade?
[url]http://www.escorts.com/member/2719937/Jade1966[/url][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Hobbydude]Her interview says that she requires a facial photo of you as a part of verification. Not something I'd feel comfortable doing again.[/QUOTE]
Just my 2 pennies but I would not. I also checked out her rates I think see is dreaming. The weekend girl have been using gives me 48 to 72 hours for a flat rate of 16$. And full weeks when I travel for 25$. And true gfe, which means she will have you work on her car and call you at work when she needs something.
JB
[QUOTE=Hobbydude]Her interview says that she requires a facial photo of you as a part of verification. Not something I'd feel comfortable doing again.[/QUOTE]Send her a fake.
I'm not interested in Jade, but I did send a facial photo to a provider who also required work verification a while back. She later harassed me by repeatedly calling me and leaving messages at my office and threatening to send the LE to my place of employment for an "average" review that was mistakenly left that she wasn't happy about. I was lucky in that case because she didn't want her face known to the world as a provider and I was able to download her photos from her employer's facebook and from her e.com profile and obtain other pertinent information on her to gain leverage. (She claims to have retired, but I wouldn't doubt it if she's planning a comeback under another alias, so beware.) I would NEVER see providers who require that kind of personal information again.
[QUOTE=Commodore]Send her a fake.[/QUOTE]