Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=BastardChorum;6005807]I'll start out by saying I don't like price increases either. And some of the changes in recent years are hard to stomach.

But I also realize it's not a one-sided affair and tried to look at it holistically. The overhead that comes with the operation of a kgirl business and the logistics cost associated with bringing the girls here all affect a portion of the final price charged to mongers. Therefore, regardless of the legality of it all, it is in fact a bona fide business. Of which, business fundamentals can be applied to. More importantly, the forces that affect such fundamentals can help determine how appropriate and fair the hikes in price has been. As a baseline, I have set $250 (the average hour price between LA and OC) as the baseline cost for 2012. Using any CPI-benchmarked inflation calculator, it'll spit out a range between $300-320 in buying power as of 2022.

I just see the rapid increase in recent years as more of a market correction to keep abreast of historic inflation levels. Ideally, commensurate COL adjustments at work should be helping to absorb inflation here and everywhere else. But you know how that goes. I won't go into whether BB should be included in the base price or as an upcharge as it's too contentious a topic and doesn't apply to the point I'm making here.[/QUOTE]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6006134]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation.[/QUOTE]My morning brain read this as cip inflation LOL.

SFK- [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL].

Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

Kbliss- [URL]https://kbliss.net[/URL].

Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.

[QUOTE=NintyNine;6003548]Do you have proof?

I am Asian, and born 1980, and there is no fucking way she is only 4 years old than me. I can tell, because I'm Asian.

1966 I would believe.

Famous Rebecca was probably born 1976, and Pepsi is a lot older in the face.[/QUOTE]Pepsi is Dragon Chinese year. So she will be born 1964 not 1966. I don't think her is 58.1976 seem more right.

Looks like CG finally added another PO x0211. Either that or it's still just the one but double-fisting like it was last call for happy hour.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6006964]Looks like CG finally added another PO x0211. Either that or it's still just the one but double-fisting like it was last call for happy hour.[/QUOTE]It's interesting that they separate it into iphone and android users. Still, I'm impressed that Sophia was able to handle such a large roster while providing prompt back and forth communication. Hopefully, the new PO (if it is someone else), maintains the same standard.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6005737]Meanwhile the Bay only increased 18% during this time span. 220 then, 260 now.[/QUOTE]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.

[QUOTE=BuddhaHead;6006134]Price increases are due mainly to supply / demand, not cpi inflation. When there is an oligopoly like the Kgirl business, and there's a growing demand and limited supply for these type of services, they can raise their prices to whatever the market will bear. You stated this yourself in your next post that some dropped their price because of reduced demand.[/QUOTE]I'm merely arguing that the kgirl model is just like any other business bowing down to the pressure of inflation. Based on that premise, the rates we're seeing today falls in line with an inflation adjusted price point. Regardless of what you think about the price point, I'm just offering an explanation that's both plausible and reasonable.

Attributing price increases to only supply / demand dynamics oversimplifies and takes a lot of nuance away IMO. By that logic, the few years following FOSTA / SESTA and preceding COVID should have seen a massive surge in price as kgirl numbers dwindled and tapered off. Only when COVID was in full force and inflation started to rise dramatically, did we see increases across all agencies. Don't get me wrong, supply / demand plays a huge part but inflation has a sizeable role too.

I'll make the case that inflation is built into the rates already. CPI, the government's measure of inflation as experienced by consumers, comprises of many market baskets. Three of which is directly applicable our situation: Shelter, Housing Supplies, and Transportation (specifically the Motor Fuel subset). I'm not sure if you've ever had the unfortunate and very awkward experience of being at an incall when they are restocking. For one thing, it's unexpected. Secondly, it's jarring how the ajummas are rather nonchalant about the whole thing. I was pretty much ignored while they were hauling up and unloading Kirkland body wash, water bottles, boxes of Okamotos, and other toiletries from a mini-van. I share this as it relates to the Housing Supplies market basket portion of the CPI. All three baskets have been hit hard during COVID. So when property management comes back when your incall lease ends with a take or leave it 10% or more increase in rent, all manner of housing supplies cost more, and fuel prices are at an all time high, the increase in overhead has to go somewhere. The bosses could be feeling charitable and take less of the profit and absorb the cost but that is incredibly unlikely. So the portion the house takes to cover these expenses increase. Consequently, the rate as a whole increases. I would imagine even durable goods (beds, mattress, mirrors, towels, etc.) would be factored in.

Now these are just observations and musings of a random monger and may or may not accurately reflect what is really is happening. I'm just connecting the dots of what I see of the scene, my buying experiences, and publicly available data points about the current economy. This could be very much be utterly useless and worth jack shit to some but I hope that others can appreciate a better understanding of or at least an approximation of the what may be happening behind the scene. Personally, I find it satisfying when I can piece together a puzzle that makes sense to me even if I'm completely wrong about it. Take of it what you will.

[QUOTE=JoyTraveller;6006744]SFK- [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/models[/URL].

Dana, Tiana, Lucy, and Lina.

Kbliss- [URL]https://kbliss.net[/URL].

Angel, Tiana, Lucy, Jessica.[/QUOTE]Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?

[QUOTE=GardenBae;6008202]Does this mean the other ladies that are listed on the site and not on this list are not available? For example, you don't Viki or Alli's name for SFK. Does that mean they are not available?[/QUOTE]It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.

I have been looking to her when I read her reviews under her previous identity of Jennie. The damage is done and my money wasted. Her plastic surgeon does nice work in masking her age. Estimating her age to be close to 35; however, her augmented face and youthful body appearance does achieve lower guessing. Her looks. I was not disappointed. The service. Was a grave disappointment and found reviews to be inflated. Be prepared to suck her tongue and not her lips. Dining at the why as she lay flat in a lazy manner hurt this ego. I went through the motions as fast as possible. She is not the worst provider I have had the pleasure of seeing, it just lacked any connection. My complaint is her cost does not match the expectation. Use of the term YMMV is warranted.

New org entry and I read reporting on another chat. The tattoo art covering many parts of her body was new to find on an rather skinny Asian provider. If you fantasize Anime girls, her looks will not disappoint. Her service is so so. She does not enjoy well endowed man. I was not disappointed but the rather high price did not match expectations. It was like being with a girl who is part of the Yakuza. Interesting experience. Recommend for Anime fans.

Remi is another provider I am trying to see with this booker. Timing was not my friend for Remi, Yara was recommended by the booker. This lower price comforts my chance in seeing someone with low reviews. Pleasantly surprised with Yara and our DFK fest led to a passionate experience. There was action from the minute we entered her room. I had to pee and did not realize her restroom was located just outside the room. She escorted me and wiped me clean after. Girls should Escort us more often. Her pleasing attitude continued and she gave me a naughty wink during BBBJ. 2 pops and I think she would have gone for 3 if time permitted. Great time for the price and I would return.

[QUOTE=EyceeRaw;6008207]It's always the best to just ask the booker. Honestly, I don't find these lineup posts helpful. The intention is good, but they're never going to be as accurate as simply messaging the booker yourself.[/QUOTE]I asked because SFK still has Joah on their list. When I asked about her, booker said she was gone. Like not even on vacation gone. Thought maybe the OP had inside info but yeah, imma just ask the booker myself.

[QUOTE=Kent747;6007740]Bay Area guys always were tough on price increases. $200 was the norm for very long time there. Several attempts to $250 were unsuccessful as guys were not kind to ones who tried to increase prices. Meanwhile a good number of LA guys were bragging about tips to girls as they felt spending more was cool and noble.[/QUOTE]This forum -like others- is a locker room, so I'm less critical about dudes tryna look cool. But noble? Big yikes. That's a no for for me dawg. Still, even if dudes were hush about flashing cash, the girls would not be.