General Reports

Gentlemen, if you intend to hobby, do your due diligence check list.

Before you even sign in to this site, or any other, check the arrest reports from the county in which you intend to play daily.

Be aware of the fact that soliciting is not the only charge that may used for an arrest.

Read, Google, read, Google again. Google phone numbers, Google pictures, Google the content of the ad. Google everything.

If you happen upon a familiar face among the mugshots, invest in a new burn phone. Inexpensive solution to any anxiety that could be experienced.

Then, and only then, come to this site and ask the other members if they have any information.

If you do not know how to search for this kind of information, ie. County arrest reports / mugshots, spend some time to figure it out.

Brass

County resort watchers may have noticed this. A 29 yo female is busted today for F4 promoting prostitution charge, along with M3 soliciting and M1 possessing criminal tools.

She looks pretty but she is not familiar to me. And she does not have prior not only in Montgomery but in all Miami Valley counties. She was arrested on Stanley, but way off from that Hell Motel.

What do you think, watchers? M3 Soliciting suggests she is a provider herself. Then what about promoting charge? I did not see another girl arrested along with her.

G2

[QUOTE=Goodson2000; 1841410]County resort watchers may have noticed this. A 29 yo female is busted today for F4 promoting prostitution charge, along with M3 soliciting and M1 possessing criminal tools.

She looks pretty but she is not familiar to me. And she does not have prior not only in Montgomery but in all Miami Valley counties. She was arrested on Stanley, but way off from that Hell Motel.

What do you think, watchers? M3 Soliciting suggests she is a provider herself. Then what about promoting charge? I did not see another girl arrested along with her.

G2[/QUOTE]I think the following news report answers your question:

[url]http://www.whiotv.com/news/news/crime-law/caterer-arrested-for-alleged-prostitution/nZKjg/[/url]

Damn, a young lady with a good idea can't even open a business in the city of dayton.

TOFTT with UTR Bianca. Holy shit.

[url]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?3993-General-Reports&p=1839750&viewfull=1#post1839750[/url]

I haven't been participating in the Cincinnati boards movie quote trivia contest because looking shit up on the web is too easy and accurate. But there's one movie quote that stands out in this case."there's one thing I learned in all my years. Sometimes you just got to say, 'What the fuck, make your move. '"

I have never taken this kind of leap of faith before. However, as I was referred by another trusted senior and as he seemed fairly convinced this was not an LE setup I said "what the fuck?"

I was uneasy about communicating with a handler who has yet to be reported on. Such was the case with Bianca. I worked this out over a couple of days with several phone calls and built my confidence this was not LE. He even permitted me to have a brief conversation with Bianca. Instincts clearly defined her as absolutely not LE as a result. Conversation was cordial but not precisely specific so I was still on guard.

But once I got to her room, everything changed and my guard disappears. This was the real deal. This young woman is stunningly beautiful. A true Southern European exotic look with silky long straight hair, the softest skin, and yet a firm body of a teenager. Beyond all of the above, Bianca is the absolute sweetest little thing and the epitome of GFE.

She delved into a level of passion I have only found with newbie UTR's. I knew prior to my dream that she was fresh and new. This was a privilege.

Anyone who would dare question the $.6 hour doesn't deserve to be with this precious lovely little gem of a most generous and pampering provider. Want to feel like the center of someone's world? One word: Bianca.

Everything on the menu except Greek play. Great DFK, FIV, CFS, and all else. I cannot express the sheer delight this little girl can generate in a man. I was laughing out loud frequently from the pleasure I got just from looking at this chick's beautiful face and supple and firm teenager body.

I believe the number of her "coach" has already been posted on this board. But I think it has been taken down. I will pass on digits only as long as you're Senior in great standing where you've posted great and honest reports. If that's the case for you I am confident you'll have the opportunity to connect with Bianca's handler. Non-seniors need not PM. A rare situation like this is precisely why it's worth investing into a track record and senior status.

Again, will definitely repeat.

The Mongernator

Visited Libby again today and had a very nice BBBJTCWS DT. For .3 it's the best bargain for an incall I have found. And she really knows how to take it all in.

So if any seniors are looking for an older, drama free SP with great skils and a clean incall, hmu for the digits.

[QUOTE=Cartog; 1841914]I think the following news report answers your question:

[url]http://www.whiotv.com/news/news/crime-law/caterer-arrested-for-alleged-prostitution/nZKjg/[/url]

Damn, a young lady with a good idea can't even open a business in the city of dayton.[/QUOTE]Right on, thank you Cartog.

Like we saw Michelle Baby's case last week, her bf (or co-star of porn film, pimp or whatever) who simply dropped Michelle off at a client (undercover for this instance) was arrested for promoting prostitution. (the charge was dropped later, it seems, though)

Now this young lady is charged for the same because of, what? Getting her permanent premises for her massaging business? Will this charge stand? I will see.

I'm wondering, will DPD utilize this felony charge as new vehicle to crack down our hobby. Mongering related charges are misdemeanors, thus they can't do much about it unless they catch the crime (duh) on site. No warrant involved. No arrest retrospectively.

But if DPD uses the felony charge, they can. That's a problem. A simple text message to a girlfriend like 'I gave your digit to my friend, he will call you' may invite a felony investigation. The charge may be dropped later, but damage will be done.

Is it an abuse of power by law enforcement? I think so, but they might decided to do this. I'll keep watching what they going to do.

G2

I recently found myself working a new job on N. Main street at night.

While I can't name all of them, the hour or much else yet (I will soon) their are still plenty of SW's sitting, walking, standing along N. Main.

White & black, there are a ton of them out their every night and little LEO around from what I'm seeing depending on the night and hour.

I've been to busy being new to the job to be able to take many notes, but I'll try in the future to do so, for those interested.

The known yellow house on L was raided and a lot of casualties.

I'm sure a lot of members made fond memories at there, but it seems it's the end of an era.

G2

[QUOTE=Goodson2000; 1842833]The known yellow house on L was raided and a lot of casualties.

I'm sure a lot of members made fond memories at there, but it seems it's the end of an era.

G2[/QUOTE]Not any real casualties. The 2 occupants had all charges dismissed by either Detective or PROSECUTOR. They are awaiting probation release since the arrest caused a possible probation concern. But I suspect pollice are watching the house!

With recent events clearly still unfolding and some uncertainty as to their outcome, I would like to take this opportunity to begin a discussion.

Should there be a rule, a policy of some sort, whereby, if a provider is known (by proof of public documents) to be incarcerated, that all of her ads should be taken down? I make mention of this purely as a point of discretion. If a provider is no longer in control of her phone, her laptop, who is?

The other sites that we use on occasion, may or may not suspend an account if a member has lost their freedom (for whatever reason). The purpose of this site is for sharing information between adults, adults who must make INFORMED decisions. Since, also as a matter of discretion, we do not post arrest or conviction records, all of the information necessary to make that decision is not available in public format.

Just a Talking Point.

Brass

[QUOTE=Brass1964; 1844057]With recent events clearly still unfolding and some uncertainty as to their outcome, I would like to take this opportunity to begin a discussion.

Should there be a rule, a policy of some sort, whereby, if a provider is known (by proof of public documents) to be incarcerated, that all of her ads should be taken down? I make mention of this purely as a point of discretion. If a provider is no longer in control of her phone, her laptop, who is?

The other sites that we use on occasion, may or may not suspend an account if a member has lost their freedom (for whatever reason). The purpose of this site is for sharing information between adults, adults who must make INFORMED decisions. Since, also as a matter of discretion, we do not post arrest or conviction records, all of the information necessary to make that decision is not available in public format.

Just a Talking Point.

Brass[/QUOTE]Brass, I don't know how the idea could be administered practically or accurately, or the end game.

Suppose a poster knows that a particular girl (under her real name) is incarcerated and suppose the poster has proof of official documents (under her real name). Who passes judgment [I]for the board [/I]that the girl incarcerated is one and the same person as a particular provider handle on the board? And who passes judgment that this same girl is still incarcerated later when the warning post remains up on the board? How and when does all this end?

[QUOTE=Brass1964; 1844057]With recent events clearly still unfolding and some uncertainty as to their outcome, I would like to take this opportunity to begin a discussion.

Should there be a rule, a policy of some sort, whereby, if a provider is known (by proof of public documents) to be incarcerated, that all of her ads should be taken down? I make mention of this purely as a point of discretion. If a provider is no longer in control of her phone, her laptop, who is?

The other sites that we use on occasion, may or may not suspend an account if a member has lost their freedom (for whatever reason). The purpose of this site is for sharing information between adults, adults who must make INFORMED decisions. Since, also as a matter of discretion, we do not post arrest or conviction records, all of the information necessary to make that decision is not available in public format.

Just a Talking Point.

Brass[/QUOTE]If a woman is incarcerated and assuming her cell, laptop and business posts are up, for the safety of the men on the sites, it would behoove the powers that be to remove the posts and ads as it may prevent her business connections from becoming victims through attempted contacts. Seems the only sensible way to protect all concerned but JMO

IMHO the news of an arrest would be ok to post it seems. It is public information and it's a warning to forum members. It also alerts those of us who may be concerned for the well-being of a particular provider. I did not like seeing the post that gloated over one providers arrest and was very happy to see Admin delete it. There is no need to kick a provider when she is down. A simple alert seems adequate without passing judgement. I can't really see the negative there. It could benefit everyone including the provider in the event there is a white knight who wants to help her at the risk of his own peril. Just my two cents.

[QUOTE=Golfcart; 1844085]Brass, I don't know how the idea could be administered practically or accurately, or the end game.

Suppose a poster knows that a particular girl (under her real name) is incarcerated and suppose the poster has proof of official documents (under her real name). Who passes judgment [I]for the board [/I]that the girl incarcerated is one and the same person as a particular provider handle on the board? And who passes judgment that this same girl is still incarcerated later when the warning post remains up on the board? How and when does all this end?[/QUOTE]Good points. What I know is this: I am still getting PMs from trusted members telling me that they have not been able to contact providers that have been incarcerated. That tells me that they are calling or texting the phone number in the ads.

Brass

[QUOTE=Goodson2000; 1842260]Right on, thank you Cartog.

Like we saw Michelle Baby's case last week, her bf (or co-star of porn film, pimp or whatever) who simply dropped Michelle off at a client (undercover for this instance) was arrested for promoting prostitution. (the charge was dropped later, it seems, though)

Now this young lady is charged for the same because of, what? Getting her permanent premises for her massaging business? Will this charge stand? I will see.

I'm wondering, will DPD utilize this felony charge as new vehicle to crack down our hobby. Mongering related charges are misdemeanors, thus they can't do much about it unless they catch the crime (duh) on site. No warrant involved. No arrest retrospectively.

But if DPD uses the felony charge, they can. That's a problem. A simple text message to a girlfriend like 'I gave your digit to my friend, he will call you' may invite a felony investigation. The charge may be dropped later, but damage will be done.

Is it an abuse of power by law enforcement? I think so, but they might decided to do this. I'll keep watching what they going to do.

G2[/QUOTE]Can someone get me her movie?