Supereloquent's Reports - Philadelphia

[QUOTE=Randy1948;1099893]I'll vote for Precious in any category you'll let me.[/QUOTE]I appreciate your voting in my contest, and Precious is, well,"precious," but in order to qualify to vote you must have become a member on this site before the contest was first announced (November 7th) , and you just became a member on November 30th.

We are finished with the special categories and the physical attraction portion of the contest (all except for the OVERALL MISS SW category which is the grand finale and combines ALL the elements of the contest to crown [b]Supereloquent's SW of the Year[/b], the overall winner). So, now we enter the talent portion of the competition. The first part of that will be the all important BJ category. I never fully appreciated just how many good SW cock suckers there are in the Philly area until I started to add up all the good ones I have had. And this was just for 2010! There are 43 nominees in this category: 2 sets of nine and 3 sets of 8. This even exceeds the great number I nominated for the face category, proving the point that you don't need to be exceptionally pretty to give a great BJ.

For most of the nominees I have contributed an action shot, but there were a few who were shy about my capturing that. However, they were still nominated if appropriate. As with any portion of the contest, you can use whatever criteria you want to select your favorite cock sucker. It may be the look on her face with a mouthful of cock or the attractiveness of her body or the description I provided of the BJ experience in my report (s). You decide.

Here are the first group of nine nominees. There are 34 more to "cum."

Here is a mosaic collage of the first nine nominees for best cock sucker. 2010. There are 34 more to come.

When I saw Cephlapod Love's collage of his top 5 choices for the FACE contest, he had labeled each pic in the collage with the SW's name, which made it very convenient to tell them apart. I discovered that it was not such a big deal using my software to add labels, so I am doing that with this one and I most likely will with subsequent collages as well. Imitation IS the sincerest form of flattery.

I wish now that I would have labeled the collages from the beginning of the contest, but better late than never.

Here is the second group of nine nominees for best cock sucker. There are 25 more to "cum."

Here is a mosaic collage of the previous nine nominees for best cock sucker. 2010. The collage is labeled with their names for your ease of recognition and voting convenience.

Here are the next nine nominees for best cock sucker. 2010. There are two more sets of nominees to follow.

Here is a labeled mosaic for the previously posted nine nominees for best cock sucker. 2010.

Here is the fourth set of nominees for best cock sucker. 2010. There is one more set to go.

Here is a labeled mosaic collage of the previous set of SWs nominated for best cock sucker. 2010.

Here is the last group of SW nominees for best cock sucker. 2010, making a grand total of 43 nominees.

Here is the final labeled mosaic of SWs for best cock sucker of 2010. This makes 43 nominees in total.

Hey I like your stuff. I was just joking, sorry. I would be envious but I'm not even in the same playing field. But I do think there is more hot stuff now, whereas before it was very "street" quality, But I guess they are the same girls, you are just emphasizing the better lookers in your contest. I think there is also a direct relationship between socks and relative looks, with socks featuring more with the "grittier" "street" types.

[QUOTE=Crazy Jim Wood;1100095]Hey I like your stuff. I was just joking, sorry. I would be envious but I'm not even in the same playing field. But I do think there is more hot stuff now, whereas before it was very "street" quality, But I guess they are the same girls, you are just emphasizing the better lookers in your contest. I think there is also a direct relationship between socks and relative looks, with socks featuring more with the "grittier" "street" types.[/QUOTE]Thank you for clarifying. 80% of communication is non-verbal and we don't even have intonation in here as a clue, so we are sometimes operating in the dark as to true intent. Words can sometimes be misinterpreted. I apologize if I misconstrued your actual conation.

You are correct that the girls I nominated for the contest are not necessarily all the girls I dated in 2010. They were the best in their respective categories IMHO, and I had the contest both as a remembrance of the year and as an opportunity for all of you to weigh-in on your favorites. It is a testament to the vast variety and quality of SWs in the Philly area that there were so many nominees in certain categories for just one monger like me over the course of one year.

You may be right about the "socks" observation. However, when I pad around my house in my socks they get filthy dirty in the space of an hour, so it doesn't take much. I have contemplated getting some trademark socks for them to wear for me for photo shoots. I love the pair I saw in a pic of my friendsie SluttyP, who loves to wear socks; they were black with grey skulls. If she reads this maybe she will send me a naughty sock fashion show. :)

As far as "street meat" is concerned I have dined in the best restaurants and at the greasiest spoon places. I enjoy the complete spectrum from spinners to chubby gals to MILFs. But, if you are really looking for reports about and pics of the gals who are the fast food of the K, then I defer to Street, who loves to eat SW junk food, and I mean absolutely NO disrespect in that. The streets are what they are. Reality on the K is what it is. Street is a good pal, and he can want what he wants, and he tells and shows it like it is. If that is your taste too, then I would closely follow what he reports.

I wish I had the patience to set up remotely for pics of me fucking a SW, like Bigg Mike or video frame by frame captures of facial splooges like Maxman99, or the video and video frame sucking and fucking that Freak has shared from time to time. My hat is off to them for doing what they do. It is different and interesting, and adds to the panoply of SW photography we have on the Philly and Camden Forums. It is not that I am camera shy in that regard, but, I don't currently have the inclination to be getting into video equipment, or even fancy still cameras, and lugging around the lighting and other paraphernalia. It is burdensome enough when I bring along my monger and kink kits, and my simple point and shoot range-finder camera seems to work out just fine for me. I also don't have a desire to be setting up a tripod or positioning a still or video camera on a flat surface for a remote shot with a timer, or having her "pose" for it in the middle of the act. I don't mind posing her when I am taking the shot, or catching BJ action as it happens, but that is enough for me at the moment. Maybe that will change. I have been known to alter my photography and photo-posting behavior before for what I thought were good reasons. Never say never, but I wouldn't count on it any time soon.

SO, with all that said you will have to rely on my reports or whatever other criteria you want to use when voting for my best SW Fucker of the Year. It could just be that her pics make you want to be able to fuck her. Fuckable appeal is as good a reason as any for a vote. As in every portion of the contest, whatever criteria you think is important is what you may apply in casting your vote.

Here are the first nine nominees. There are 26 more to come, for a total of 35.

Here is a mosaic collage of the first group of nine nominees, labeled for your convenience.