Printable View
[QUOTE=Ejent;7675522]I don't believe LEO is able to lure you in by showing you a tittie or a genital while on video call. So exchanging a peek is how a lot of these girls do a LEO check prior to sending address. I could be wrong but anyone who's asked has not been a cop yet LOL.[/QUOTE]Everytime I see a prostitution arrest I go on the county website and pull the arrest report.
A few months ago saw one where a girl did a video call check in HSCO showed a fake D for the "LEO check" haha.
[QUOTE=Tampa30;7676952]I think I recall Ejent giving her a glowing review back 5-6 months ago. As I recall my only hesitation was her price as by the time I read his report (and he has great taste) her demand had gone up and her price did as well.[/QUOTE]Thanks, might need to reach out.
Just wanted to see if anyone had any experience with either of these ladies. Both are close to where I work and figured I would see if there was something better to do than sit in rush hour traffic sometimes. Have not found reviews for either in forums. Jessi has some reviews on LC but you know how that can be. Feel free to PM me if you prefer not posting in the forum. Thanks.
FancySweets.
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/8133686961/1[/URL]
Jessi.
[URL]https://escortbabylon.net/posts_list/8136479041/1[/URL]
[QUOTE=Henry462;7677027]Thanks, might need to reach out.[/QUOTE]Like I said, her price point is up there, but I think you should be pleased with her.
If the other afrolatina named Luna was around, she would also fit your desired inquiry. She's another of ejents girls and I've seen her before. She was an apprentice under Sarah. I personally enjoyed Luna more than Sarah bit both are awesome. Luna was newer and wanted to keep going way past our time together. Smelled awesome, like tropical coconut lotion which I love and I think menu was open. Was into a variety of alphabet services.
Her picture might be on Sarah ad from earlier this yr.
[QUOTE=FeedEmNutz;7676269]I've never seen her but I remember her having numerous reviews and over 90% of them were trash. Unless you are hearing something through the grape vine or seeing something I'm not, what would have changed? I get some like her look and will hop regardless, but I'm not sure what else the forum would give you that you haven't already received. Just my $. 02.[/QUOTE]Just her location mainly, really convenient. Her most recent ads show her in a decent light and I know often people can change in this hobby, usually for the worst. Was hoping to get "good news" because she was cute enough and not out of my way. Thanks for your input on the others tho!
[QUOTE=JahStoney;7677248]Just her location mainly, really convenient. Her most recent ads show her in a decent light and I know often people can change in this hobby, usually for the worst. Was hoping to get "good news" because she was cute enough and not out of my way. Thanks for your input on the others tho![/QUOTE]Amber has had mixed reviews. Some complained that her kitty smelled, other said it didn't.
She's been on candy before as she's been popped for it, but can't tell you if she's on it now.
She's down in the Westshore area, or last I read.
She does have a BF now and has done doubles with a variety of girls. Looks like she's got a bit more cushion in themid section, but personally, I'm fine with it. Have reached out before, but never actually met for a variety of reasons.
Her hhr rates have creeped up from 150, to 180 now. Rent is higher in Westshore / Gandy area I guess. Many of the pictures are old, but some are newer. Supposedly, she's sisters with Gabi Rose who is advertising a facial recording session currently.
I suggest you TOFTT and to post.
[QUOTE=JahStoney;7677248]Just her location mainly, really convenient. Her most recent ads show her in a decent light and I know often people can change in this hobby, usually for the worst. Was hoping to get "good news" because she was cute enough and not out of my way. Thanks for your input on the others tho![/QUOTE]One of the biggest reasons I keep scrolling past her is that I've repeatedly read that her place was nasty. There were several other warning signs as well from multiple different sources. I completely get that this is a game of to each his own, but I've come to generally trust consensus on this forum.
[QUOTE=RTPeckerman;7675957]Has Sandra returned to us? She's not responding to the same digits used for years. Perhaps a new number?
DM preferred.
RT.[/QUOTE]Nope she won't get out till November, I asked grok to do the math from 180 days from her arrest date it comes out to the first week of November. So we probably won't see here till mid Novemberish or December unfortunately.
[QUOTE=RobinStPete;7676794]Do you all really think law enforcement is stupid? Really? Here's a clue, they know every single girl in every hotel in town. The owners share their registries and their cameras. Do you really think they don't know every girl in town and where they are, even the private ones? Really? Have any of you ever heard of confidential informants? Here's the scenario and it's easy. Guy gets busted. Guy gets a lighter sentence or immunity. He's given cash, goes right in, does the date, does whatever he wants to. He's given immunity from prosecution. It's not entrapment and they can bust these girls anytime they want to. Except other than for politically expediency, why bother? The only interest law enforcement might have is when these girls become a problem to them. You don't think they can access the same sites we do? You don't think they can buy a 40 dollar phone and turn it on with cash at Walmart? You don't think law enforcement blatantly lies all the time? If they're busting these girls it's for bigger fish, not for a 250 dollar solicitation charge! So get over yourselves. You're not fooling anyone!
And every strip club in town, every aromatherapy shop, every Asian massage parlor! Oh come on. Why do people write such absolute blatant stupidity! It's like these idiotic girls using the term donation. Really, you think using $$ matters?[/QUOTE]Please let's keep it respectful, we are both adults here, no need to berate anybody for saying anything on the forum haha. Man if you were to ever meet yourself, you would understand how much of a fun time you are. But the situation you just described is entrapment. Maybe your lawyer might not be as good as mine but mine has gotten me out of sticky situations.
Has anyone seen this Tania?
[URL]https://escortalligator.com.listcrawler.eu/post/escorts/usa/florida/tampa/212596219[/URL]
Burrito. Here are a few more. Not sure you wanted one of me going in her mouth but neither male nor female leopards change their spots hehe.
Before anyone responds. I have no contact info. Just a little nostalgia.
[QUOTE=RoadMonger;7670996]I looked on LC but no posts. Do you have her contact info. Is she still using old number ending 8604.[/QUOTE]Michelle has now reached out to me several times. We have a channel of communication. She is apparently not the same woman she once was. She has already contacted all the guys she would be interested in playing or partying with. Apparently she is not advertising. I have no further info. I just hope she makes peace. This life was killing her.
Smitty had inquired about her. She works out of the same house as Chantel in T&C. Anyone seen her? She looks pretty from her ad. Type in her name to pull up her ad.
I 100% agree. I never allow a picture of my face to be shared bc you never know if it is LEO or a blackmailer. Send her a dick pic via a burner app and if that isn't good enough then find a new hoe.
[QUOTE=FeedEmNutz;7676278]Is it your understanding cops can't show privates at all or is there some special stipulation for a video call? Are we really at the point where we are coordinating arrangements based on the understanding of hookers for what Unk can and can't do? Yea bro I'll pass.
I guess it basically comes down to risk tolerance. I don't want my face, voice, background, etc. Being transmitted over any medium as I'm setting up an arrangement with a new friend. I'll stick to burner phone text apps minus any pic trading. Maybe I'm paranoid. Again, it comes down to risk tolerance and I trust these broads about as much I believe anything that comes out of their mouths. Not much.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=RoudiAudi;7678255]Smitty had inquired about her. She works out of the same house as Chantel in T&C. Anyone seen her? She looks pretty from her ad. Type in her name to pull up her ad.[/QUOTE]She had quoted me a 200 qv. I told her that was too high. She asked how much and I said 120. She sorta countered 150 but I said no. That was the end of our convo.