Thinking of giving her a try. She's got some reviews on another site, but they are mostly old. Is she good?
Printable View
Thinking of giving her a try. She's got some reviews on another site, but they are mostly old. Is she good?
[QUOTE=TitsMcfloppin;2457904]YES! AMBER can do IT good. With her I have to book 2 hrs and that's 1 for the BBBJ and 1 for doing IT. She talks alot so you just got to make the 1st move sometimes and do the DATY mid sentance![/QUOTE]True she was a little talkative but that did not slow things down too much. I forgot to mention nice tasting kitty too. Good point on getting the 2nd hour, I will take your advice on that.
[QUOTE=LoveToLick1;2436041]Thanks for the reply. Rose sure has lovely lips![/QUOTE]I tried to set something up with Rose but she is only taking outcalls this week. Just got off the phone with her. If I can work it out to see her next week when she doing some "incall" I will report. Sounds like she might be some fun. Seemed friendly enough on the phone and her new pics look more promising than some of the workout / gym pics that she has been posting the past couple of months.
[QUOTE=TJfun;2458431]Thinking of giving her a try. She's got some reviews on another site, but they are mostly old. Is she good?[/QUOTE]I have seen her four times over the years, but it has been a while since I have seen her. Pictures are (or were) accurate, definitely has the porn star look, tall big breasted blonde, and the entire menu is included in the donation. She seemed to be into it each time we met, which certainly makes it a better visit in my opinion. Like some of the previous discussions on this forum, the back door thing is not really something that I am into, so that is not much of an incentive for me. As always YMMV, but I would recommend seeing her at least once.
[QUOTE=TitsMcfloppin;2457904]YES! AMBER can do IT good. With her I have to book 2 hrs and that's 1 for the BBBJ and 1 for doing IT. She talks alot so you just got to make the 1st move sometimes and do the DATY mid sentance![/QUOTE]Surely she shut up while that BONER was in her mouth, Tits! If she kept talking straight through the BBBJ, your reputation here is going to take a major hit!
[QUOTE=UpForItNow;2459826]Surely she shut up while that BONER was in her mouth, Tits! If she kept talking straight through the BBBJ, your reputation here is going to take a major hit![/QUOTE]NO there is no hooker I ever seen who can talk with my boner in thier mouth! BUT my avice is don't start to conversate with her during the BBBJ or she will take your boner out of her mouth and talk to you wile she holds your boner in her hand. And there is nothing worser then being talked to with your boner in a hookers hand when you want it in her mouth. So don't say nothing during the BBBJ that is more then OO BABY MMM.
[QUOTE=SpareTime70;2458485]True she was a little talkative but that did not slow things down too much. I forgot to mention nice tasting kitty too. Good point on getting the 2nd hour, I will take your advice on that.[/QUOTE]YES! Her pussy is some good eatin!
: Texted Candance around 9 am, got back with her and she had Chelsea setup for 11:30. When I got to apartment, she was there and ready to go. We went to bedroom and talked a little, then started some kissing and removed clothes. She is thin, but in a good way, nice tits and nips, fun to suck and play with. She started by sucking, and then went to riding for quite a while. After that we went to letting her suck me and just more messing around. In the end she finished by hand. Had a good time and will repeat when time permits. AS I have said before, the place is very safe and you can't go wrong with this agency.
I'm sure that some of you already know this, but just to add my two cents:
I got to see Kali this morning for the first time, and this lady is on a whole other level. She is friendly, smart, passionate and Drop dead gorgeous. Her skills match those of anyone I've ever seen, if not superseding them. The big thing for me is that her whole world revolves around you while you're with her. I can't wait till I get the chance to bring Juliette into the equation. That is a guaranteed session of a lifetime.
[QUOTE=RichardRuth;2459736]I tried to set something up with Rose but she is only taking outcalls this week. Just got off the phone with her. If I can work it out to see her next week when she doing some "incall" I will report. Sounds like she might be some fun. Seemed friendly enough on the phone and her new pics look more promising than some of the workout / gym pics that she has been posting the past couple of months.[/QUOTE]Ill be interested to know how this turns out. I saw her in the airport one time with her dog and her demeanor seemed a little unusual.
[QUOTE=RedRover1969;2460047]I'm sure that some of you already know this, but just to add my two cents:
I got to see Kali this morning for the first time, and this lady is on a whole other level. She is friendly, smart, passionate and Drop dead gorgeous. Her skills match those of anyone I've ever seen, if not superseding them. The big thing for me is that her whole world revolves around you while you're with her. I can't wait till I get the chance to bring Juliette into the equation. That is a guaranteed session of a lifetime.[/QUOTE]Kali is a sweetheart. Always. Has been. Oh, on the 3 sum, eat wheaties. LOL.
I been knowing this sexy lady for years and she is my ATF.
[QUOTE=Mike1701;2460444]Kali is a sweetheart. Always. Has been. Oh, on the 3 sum, eat wheaties. LOL.
I been knowing this sexy lady for years and she is my ATF.[/QUOTE]When I think of great beauty, great intelligence, and someone that gives you the feeling of being the most important man in the world, Kali has no peer!. I suggest no slight to the other amazing women of Nashville, but only praise to one I have found to be both consistent / exceptional and the epitome of the.
Ultimate girlfriend experience.
[QUOTE=RedRover1969;2460047]I'm sure that some of you already know this, but just to add my two cents:
I got to see Kali this morning for the first time, and this lady is on a whole other level. She is friendly, smart, passionate and Drop dead gorgeous. Her skills match those of anyone I've ever seen, if not superseding them. The big thing for me is that her whole world revolves around you while you're with her. I can't wait till I get the chance to bring Juliette into the equation. That is a guaranteed session of a lifetime.[/QUOTE]Thank you my dear. It was certainly my pleasure to meet you!
[QUOTE=Mike1701;2460444]Kali is a sweetheart. Always. Has been. Oh, on the 3 sum, eat wheaties. LOL.
I been knowing this sexy lady for years and she is my ATF.[/QUOTE]Thanks love-aka my bfe.
So we had the big AMP bust in Franklin and now a hot looking Latina gets busted! You hobbiest south of Nashville are holding out on the rest of the middle TN area!
Does anyone have the details on this hot taco?
[QUOTE=BlackHawk101;2461222]So we had the big AMP bust in Franklin and now a hot looking Latina gets busted! You hobbiest south of Nashville are holding out on the rest of the middle TN area!
Does anyone have the details on this hot taco?[/QUOTE]Here's the media release. Note that her bond is $7 k, the lowest I've seen in a while in the southern county. Maybe she will be back in action soon?
I would suggest that providers and clients should avoid the extended-stay place mentioned in the report!
[URL]http://franklinpdnews.com/2015/05/07/more-prostitution-arrests-in-franklin/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2461479]Here's the media release. Note that her bond is $7 k, the lowest I've seen in a while in the southern county. Maybe she will be back in action soon?
I would suggest that providers and clients should avoid the extended-stay place mentioned in the report!
[URL]http://franklinpdnews.com/2015/05/07/more-prostitution-arrests-in-franklin/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Was she any good! I didn't see any reports!
A friend of mine told me he met Cherisha Starr recently. She may have already left Nashville, not sure. Cherisha is mid 20's, tall, curvy, blonde, blue eyes, pretty and bootylicious. My friend mentioned a complete menu that would make almost anyone happy. Her info is easy to find on the web and there are reviews on the EC site. If trusted seniors, even with 1 star, would like more info, I'm happy to provide what I can. Sorry, but I'm not going to reply to anyone else.
[QUOTE=Chiatrimmer;2461934]A friend of mine told me he met Cherisha Starr recently. She may have already left Nashville, not sure. Cherisha is mid 20's, tall, curvy, blonde, blue eyes, pretty and bootylicious. My friend mentioned a complete menu that would make almost anyone happy. Her info is easy to find on the web and there are reviews on the EC site. If trusted seniors, even with 1 star, would like more info, I'm happy to provide what I can. Sorry, but I'm not going to reply to anyone else.[/QUOTE]I've stayed away because I heard her screening process is pretty tough. Multiple references in addition to a P411 with several OK's.
[URL]http://www.lamourxxx.com[/URL]
Best of the best! My top 2 out of thousands!
Does anyone else find the barrage of NR ads by Lexi nexis a bit odd? I inquired about an appt this week, and not only was it ridiculously easy to schedule, she gave me an actual street address. I understand from reading what little there is about her, that the pics are fake. My spider sense is tingling.
[URL]http://www.**************.com/companions/lexi-nexis-nashville-white-female[/URL]
[QUOTE=RonSwanson;2462247]I've stayed away because I heard her screening process is pretty tough. Multiple references in addition to a P411 with several OK's.[/QUOTE]I will admit is has been a while since I was first screened by Cherisha Star, but I don't recall her screening process being that difficult and she verified me solely on P411. I do have several oks on P411, so maybe that made a difference for her, but I did not have to provide additional provider references, and certainly not provide my name, race number, employments, etc that a couple of the ladies require to meet. I appreciate safety and discretion, I am very easily spooked, but it sort of defeats the purpose of the boards and verification sites to reveal your entire identity to a provider, whose identity remains anonymous.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2461479]Here's the media release. Note that her bond is $7 k, the lowest I've seen in a while in the southern county. Maybe she will be back in action soon?
I would suggest that providers and clients should avoid the extended-stay place mentioned in the report!
[URL]http://franklinpdnews.com/2015/05/07/more-prostitution-arrests-in-franklin/[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Excuse my ignorance, but how is this happening without someone on the inside? How does LE know what is actually taking place once inside the room? I thought they had to witness actual money and services exchanged or offered. I would like to know so to stay safe myself.
Thanks.
Mark.
[QUOTE=VanillaStick;2465082]Excuse my ignorance, but how is this happening without someone on the inside? How does LE know what is actually taking place once inside the room? I thought they had to witness actual money and services exchanged or offered. I would like to know so to stay safe myself.
Thanks.
Mark.[/QUOTE]It appears that in most of the cases where a provider was busted, it mentions that police were "acting on a tip" so someone most likely noticed mongers going in and out of same room and reported it. My guess is the tip came from a bored but alert 'security guy'. Also notice that in most cases regarding Franklin police, the media reports all are worded very similarly. They don't give the juicy details as to how LEO figured out what was going on in the room but all that is discovered once they have a strong suspicion what is taking place. They put things together and go 'take a look', if you will. During questioning and searching for evidence, the suspicions are confirmed. In most cases, providers probably overstayed at the hotel and drew attention to themselves. Smart providers will only stay at a certain place for a day or two and move on.
Very astute observation Mr. R. Kuntz. Thank you.
[QUOTE=RustyKuntz;2465348]It appears that in most of the cases where a provider was busted, it mentions that police were "acting on a tip" so someone most likely noticed mongers going in and out of same room and reported it. My guess is the tip came from a bored but alert 'security guy'. Also notice that in most cases regarding Franklin police, the media reports all are worded very similarly. They don't give the juicy details as to how LEO figured out what was going on in the room but all that is discovered once they have a strong suspicion what is taking place. They put things together and go 'take a look', if you will. During questioning and searching for evidence, the suspicions are confirmed. In most cases, providers probably overstayed at the hotel and drew attention to themselves. Smart providers will only stay at a certain place for a day or two and move on.[/QUOTE]In each of the Franklin cases the providers were staying at motels with outside room entrances. It was easy for LEO to watch the comings and goings of all involved.
Hotel rooms with inside hallways are somewhat more difficult to observe.
-Jeepster1.
What up Nashvegas mongers I was doing a little lurking over on the Memphis forum and came across this review. As the title states the details our fellow hobbyist gives about his encounter are humorous (at least to me). As I read the details I could only picture myself being in the predicament this hobbyist experienced. I'm almost certain he wasn't trying to get a laugh but I chuckled. My hat goes of to him though because at least he did a review and hopefully saved another brother. Ok Nashvegas mongers stay safe and I'm out.
Toftt Sunday.
[URL]http://memphis.backpage.com/FemaleEs...29851/11942342[/URL]
As I love slim chicks I seen her ad and I like a cute face. Get to her notel on Lamar and I'm like you aren't the girl in the pic. She said I'm not the first chick but the other three. The other girl was some where else, sure. Dark skinned with the mo-hawk. Okay visit at first BBBJ then the drama. She bent over for k9 but didn't wet herself or no lube. I was like it's not going to fit dry. Her reply I don't want to get wet this is for money not for enjoyment. Ah crap my day keeps getting worse. Tried mish but dry pussy won't do for me so I was like fuck it. Nice body, okay face, tight box and descent BBBJ. And wouldn't let me wet it either. Tried to talk some sense into her but no luck. She doesn't want to like having sex for money. Okay cool with me but you just wasted an hr of my time and. 8 of my cash. Whoever is putting some of these ladies in the game done fucked their heads up. It's a damn shame, time to stick to the tried and true. No review no call from me. No more toftt.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2465709]In each of the Franklin cases the providers were staying at motels with outside room entrances. It was easy for LEO to watch the comings and goings of all involved.
Hotel rooms with inside hallways are somewhat more difficult to observe.
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]True about what you say Jeepster, I did fail to mention that in my post.
[QUOTE=RustyKuntz;2465348]It appears that in most of the cases where a provider was busted, it mentions that police were "acting on a tip" so someone most likely noticed mongers going in and out of same room and reported it. My guess is the tip came from a bored but alert 'security guy'. Also notice that in most cases regarding Franklin police, the media reports all are worded very similarly. They don't give the juicy details as to how LEO figured out what was going on in the room but all that is discovered once they have a strong suspicion what is taking place. They put things together and go 'take a look', if you will. During questioning and searching for evidence, the suspicions are confirmed. In most cases, providers probably overstayed at the hotel and drew attention to themselves. Smart providers will only stay at a certain place for a day or two and move on.[/QUOTE]I have zero days in law school, but I sure thought there had to be some evidence (as opposed to suspicion) of illegal activity to obtain a warrant. I thought a warrant was required to enter and search. Reminds me of the Lavergne case where an officer at a stop light looked over and noticed a female in another car looked like a face he had seen on backpage so that was a reason to arrest her and then go back to her motel room and arrest her roommate. If that is our legal system, folks, we sure ain't free.
[QUOTE=BnaGuy;2466370]I have zero days in law school, but I sure thought there had to be some evidence (as opposed to suspicion) of illegal activity to obtain a warrant. I thought a warrant was required to enter and search. Reminds me of the Lavergne case where an officer at a stop light looked over and noticed a female in another car looked like a face he had seen on backpage so that was a reason to arrest her and then go back to her motel room and arrest her roommate. If that is our legal system, folks, we sure ain't free.[/QUOTE]An interesting report from RonSwanson might shed some light on the Franklin bust methodology:
[URL]http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1379479[/URL]
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=BnaGuy;2466370]I have zero days in law school, but I sure thought there had to be some evidence (as opposed to suspicion) of illegal activity to obtain a warrant. I thought a warrant was required to enter and search. Reminds me of the Lavergne case where an officer at a stop light looked over and noticed a female in another car looked like a face he had seen on backpage so that was a reason to arrest her and then go back to her motel room and arrest her roommate. If that is our legal system, folks, we sure ain't free.[/QUOTE]As you can see by the Lavergne case, LEO can do just about anything to bust someone. LEO are professionals and are trained to use, in some cases abuse, laws to their advantage. Most people have no clue about law and when confronted by LEO they are in an unfair battle so to speak. They get intimidated by LEO and will basically tell on themselves. Some will just admit what they are doing or give consent to search in hopes that LEO will take it easy on them, therefore no warrant is needed. Also, most people don't have or are not willing to spend the money to hire a good attorney to fight a case. A good attorney can at least get a charge reduced, if not dismissed, and will also be able to get evidence illegally obtained thrown out. I'm sure in the Franklin cases, LEO got some of their info from the mongers.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2466463]An interesting report from RonSwanson might shed some light on the Franklin bust methodology:
[URL]http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1379479[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]Interesting info. Thanks for sharing. I can believe it and I am not the conspiracy theory type. Traveling women are going to have to resort (pun intended) to airBnB.
[QUOTE=BnaGuy;2466370]I have zero days in law school, but I sure thought there had to be some evidence (as opposed to suspicion) of illegal activity to obtain a warrant. I thought a warrant was required to enter and search. Reminds me of the Lavergne case where an officer at a stop light looked over and noticed a female in another car looked like a face he had seen on backpage so that was a reason to arrest her and then go back to her motel room and arrest her roommate. If that is our legal system, folks, we sure ain't free.[/QUOTE]Let's consider the Franklin PD perspective for a moment.
1. This is typically a misdemeanor charge. Perhaps a fairly small amount of proof is enough to make an arrest?
2. Even if a charge is eventually dismissed, an arrest has the desired effect of running a provider out of town (back to Nashville, anyway).
3. Publicized arrests serve as an effective deterrent to other providers who might consider visiting Franklin.
4. An officer with sufficient training can ask leading questions that cause a provider or client to self-incriminate. Simply telling the suspect that "I can get a warrant" may be enough to convince a naive provider to allow a room search.
5. Once in the room, the typical laundry list of evidence (cash, condoms, drugs), combined with a BP ad and multiple observed visitors, should be enough to get a provider arrested. When two providers are found to be traveling together they seem to pile on the trafficking charge, as they are accused of pimping each other out.
So, while LEO activity like this is counter to our interests, it would not appear to be a severe trampling of the detainees' rights.
The trafficking charge, however, seems to be more of a grey area. Does anyone know if an appeals court has looked at the legality of charging peers (not pimps) under the trafficking statutes?
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=RustyKuntz;2466155]True about what you say Jeepster, I did fail to mention that in my post.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the info guys, I guess that makes since about the outside enterance, but doesn't seem legal.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2466463]An interesting report from RonSwanson might shed some light on the Franklin bust methodology:
[URL]http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1379479[/URL]
-Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]That doesn't seem legal either. Also, I travel a lot for work, I'm not asked for my phone number when I check into hotels. If I was I sure as heck wouldn't give it to them.
[QUOTE=VanillaStick;2466725]Thanks for the info guys, I guess that makes since about the outside enterance, but doesn't seem legal.[/QUOTE]Outside entrances make it ridiculously easy to observe activity in a room, without LEO even getting out of their cars.
Further, they can legally stand outside the room (a public area) and listen to any loud activity or conversation through the thin walls; they can legally look in the windows if curtains aren't fully drawn.
The Franklin PD has stated repeatedly that they are aware of hobby activity and will prosecute. A a risky room choice makes their job that much easier.
-Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=VanillaStick;2466728]That doesn't seem legal either. Also, I travel a lot for work, I'm not asked for my phone number when I check into hotels. If I was I sure as heck wouldn't give it to them.[/QUOTE]In general, it's not too unusual to be asked to supply the phone number that's associated with a credit card.
I can't say whether that's common at hotels, though. I usually pre-book so my procedure may be a little different from what the ladies experience.
--Jeepster1.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2466740]In general, it's not too unusual to be asked to supply the phone number that's associated with a credit card.
I can't say whether that's common at hotels, though. I usually pre-book so my procedure may be a little different from what the ladies experience.
--Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I know a provider that has a friend at a motel in Franklin, lets her pay cash, that she called for a room the other day. She was warned not to come. Another provider that usually works down here asked to relocate to the airport. I'm pretty much afraid to do anything down here.
[QUOTE=Jeepster1;2466740]In general, it's not too unusual to be asked to supply the phone number that's associated with a credit card.
I can't say whether that's common at hotels, though. I usually pre-book so my procedure may be a little different from what the ladies experience.
--Jeepster1.[/QUOTE]I called I friend of mine that is a lawyer and asked the legality of this. He said it really is all on the fact that the rooms where outside and in view. Multipul men going in and out of the same room over a day or so is enough "probable cause" for a judge who is on board with a crack down on the hobby to issue one. Now as far as how they are able to prove anything. His guess is they probably ether find drugs or just a nervous guy and push him to tell them what's going on or they will put it all on him. Usually offering him a "deal" with just the sitation off the record so to say. If nothing is confessed there really is nothing they can do. Unless drugs are found. But that leads to a whole nother string of questions / problems. This is some what a fact / his oppinion of what is going on with it.
[QUOTE=RustyKuntz;2466491]As you can see by the Lavergne case, LEO can do just about anything to bust someone. LEO are professionals and are trained to use, in some cases abuse, laws to their advantage. Most people have no clue about law and when confronted by LEO they are in an unfair battle so to speak. They get intimidated by LEO and will basically tell on themselves. Some will just admit what they are doing or give consent to search in hopes that LEO will take it easy on them, therefore no warrant is needed. Also, most people don't have or are not willing to spend the money to hire a good attorney to fight a case. A good attorney can at least get a charge reduced, if not dismissed, and will also be able to get evidence illegally obtained thrown out. I'm sure in the Franklin cases, LEO got some of their info from the mongers.[/QUOTE]This is a quote describing probable cause in a recent Nashville case. Basically the lady was mirandized but talked anyway.
-Jeepster1.
[I]"STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF DAVIDSON
AFFIDAVIT
PROSTITUTION
T.C.A. 39-13-513
Personally appeared before me, the undersigned, (Select one) _x__ Commissioner, ___ Metropolitan General Sessions Judge, the prosecutor named above and made oath in due form of law that (Select one) __x_ he ___ she (Select one) ___ personally observed __x_ has probable cause to believe that the defendant named above on 05/11/2015 in Davidson County, did intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly engage in prostitution. The probable cause is as follows:
Officers responded to 656 xxx xxx Dr, apartment xx in response to a Back page prostitution operation.
Detectives received verbal consent to enter the apartment. After being read her Miranda rights and stating that she understood them, the defendant stated that she had a Back page ad for prostitution. She stated that she conducted a deal earlier today and the customer had gotten angry and left. While on the scene, detectives located the ad on Back page and called the number to the only phone in the room. Detectives received written consent to search the room. A pill bottle was located and she stated it was hers. It contained approximately .3 grams of a white powdery substance. This was field tested with a positive result for cocaine base by Detective Cantrell. Numerous cut plastic straws were located throughout the apartment. These are consistent with snorting illegal narcotics.
ESignature
________________________________________
Prosecutor: Floyd W Brown Jr 00008902"[/I]