Printable View
Not sure how long ago I dated her but she was much better looking then and had a very nice personality. But she was also very thin.
I am not any kind of an expert on boobs but always observed (from pornos) that along with the increase in size came the tell-tale scars underneath. I did not see any sign of that in your pics, including the ones where she is upside down. As you stated, very nice job indeed!!!
[QUOTE=Texaco Tim]Not sure how long ago I dated her but she was much better looking then and had a very nice personality. But she was also very thin.
I am not any kind of an expert on boobs but always observed (from pornos) that along with the increase in size came the tell-tale scars underneath. I did not see any sign of that in your pics, including the ones where she is upside down. As you stated, very nice job indeed!!![/QUOTE]
I also dated her back then. She was a fixture around Letterly. Some things have not changed; she had a nice personality then, she has a nice personality now. Along with the invisible scarring, they feel so natural. Craftsmanship like that has got to cost plenty of money. There is no way I’d put out that kind of money on a girl just to have her leave me a few months later.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar]To the guy who paid for Amy's implants: I would like to suggest a few other girls who would benefits from your generosity.
Some girls I’d like to see enhanced.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]
CJ, don't be selfish. There are those of us who LOVE those 'itty bitty titties'. I'm one of them. :D
[QUOTE=Seva Lurker]CJ, don't be selfish. There are those of us who LOVE those 'itty bitty titties'. I'm one of them. :D[/QUOTE]
You are sooooooo right! I personally prefer a smaller firm perky tit. (More than a mouth full is a waste, anyway.) What I don’t like are saggy breast with nipples pointing down at her feet. But, and this is an important but, a nice personality and attitude can overcome must physical distractions.
Notice that I didn’t say I don’t like “Big Boobs,” they are fun and nice to play with. Amy’s were especially nice and because of her personality and the fact that she was so proud of them – I had a wonderful time. Boobs like hers (fake or real), on a body like hers are rare. Usually, natural boobs that size can only be found on bigger girls.
I guess when I really think about it, I can get along with any size as long as they don’t sag, have a nice shape and feel to them. I am not a real fan a fakes. Most fakes look and feel like fakes – Blah.
(What I was trying to suggest to the guy who helped Amy out, was that he could have possibly made a better choice picking out one of younger, prettier girls who were available at the time. IMHO, he likely choose Amy for her personality and other attributes and not her facial appearance. She is cute and was even cutier a little while back, but a younger girl might have held up better.)
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Texaco Tim] I am not any kind of an expert on boobs but always observed (from pornos) that along with the increase in size came the tell-tale scars underneath. I did not see any sign of that in your pics, including the ones where she is upside down.[/QUOTE]
I think they can go in through the nipple as well as the armpit? She looks like she has some scars around the nipple which leads me to believe this is the case. You have to figure that someone with enough money to give this kind of gift to a SW would have found someone much younger and more worthy. Shame of it is she will probably be pencil thin in a couple months with those prized gems looking really wierd.
JB
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1071941]I really miss good ole [b]Davey1965[/b]. This would be right up his alley. Davey knew everything that happened down on Kensington Avenue. If anyone would know, it would be Davey1965. CookyJar[/QUOTE]Well one thing I do know is that wasn't me peeping. Although having peep access to the Carlyle or other spots could.
Be very funny to say the least. The stories heard over the years are funny.
Now Cooky, maybe you can help with something I don't know. I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one.
Of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. I know it's not "little Jamie" or one of the twins as I spoke with both of them yesterday and although the heard.
Of the situation as well they don't know who it was. I do have a feeling of a recent relapse by that name who hung out at the house, but just doing my homework first.
[QUOTE=Davey1965;1073290]...Now Cooky, maybe you can help with something I don't know. I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. [/QUOTE]No! I don't know which Jamie.
I heard the same story. I didn't believe it. I was waiting to verify it myself with a visit. I also heard this story from a SW. She claimed that LE was keeping the house on their radar. I am waiting for things to calm down before visiting by myself. I don't want to perpetuate an unsubstantiated rumor. I don't like messing with anyone's money.
The place is a dump, but it has one redeeming positive feature. The owner – I half trusted the owner, he is not a user. Most of the other $10 spots are run by users and double as shooting galleries. You cannot trust users. The owner of that particular $10 spot is just a lonely dude trying to make some extra bucks.
JMHO.
CookyJar
PS: Nice to see you're still around.
[QUOTE=Scoundrel;1073362]Sucks doesn't it! Evidently there no longer is a general photo gallery so now we can not view the thumbnail pics as they are posted. I used to like the easy access and the ability to click on the thread button to read of the adventure. Now it seems you need to visit each forum separate to search out new pics then there is no longer a thumb view, you have to click on the link. I hope Jackson does something with it.[/QUOTE]The photo gallery and thumbnails were one of the best navigational tools. If you saw a picture you liked, you could click on the link and read the post. Now the process has reversed, you've got to read the review and if the girl sounds nice, click on the link. The problem is: Often the link will be to a blurry distance recon picture with no details, a picture of some guy's dick, a gapping asshole or pussy, or some ugly undesirable girl. It's like shooting blind. Picture viewing in this format is going to be hit and miss.
Unfortunately for me; my whole purpose for visiting this site were the photos. I posted the photos of the girls I found on the street. I wasn't posting pictures of the girls I found on this site.
Hopefully Jackson is just tinkering with the new software and the gallery and thumbnails will pop-up soon.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Derek Phx;1073533]I sure hope you are right. Like you, I browsed almost daily and would read my local reports and then move on to the photo gallery.[/QUOTE]The Philly forum is a busy spot, especially when it comes to pictures. I hate thinking I am going to have to navigate link by link though every set of pictures posted.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073523]The photo gallery and thumbnails were one of the best navigational tools. If you saw a picture you liked, you could click on the link and read the post. Now the process has reversed, you've got to read the review and if the girl sounds nice, click on the link. .
Hopefully Jackson is just tinkering with the new software and the gallery and thumbnails will pop-up soon.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]I sure hope you are right. For me it's all about the pictures. I love looking at your stuff, I'm sure you have seen what I'm up to as well. Of couse I have nothing like your quantity. I do get some good stuff down here in Tampa from time to time though. Without the picture pages you might miss my posts.
Skip out!
[QUOTE=Davey1965; 1073290]
I heard a girl named Jamie overdosed and died at one of our favorite $10 houses. I haven't had a chance to talk with the owner yet but wondering if you know whom it may be. [/QUOTE]I did a little recon today. It's true; I got it straight from the horse's mouth. A girl named Jamie did die in the house last Friday.
I spoke with the owner, he is OK. I did not want to be too morbid so I did not question him about who the girl was exactly. He did say he was not providing rooms for about two weeks. I suspect that the heat will be on while LE investigates.
There are at least two Jamies and one Jamielynn in Dukes old photo index and SuperEloquent has a Jamey in his favorites photo list. I have one Jamie in my files and one Janie (the search feature wasn't working for me. And there is always the possibility that she was new or an unknown. We may never know for sure.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1073380]I am surmising about the reasoning behind the latest new format of this website, but here is my two cents worth:
1. I like the new format. It is crisper and cleaner with softer hues. It is easier to read and easier on the eyes.
2. I don't think too many serious mongers will miss the photo gallery. It was mostly for guys to ogle pics anyway IMHO than to use to find women for sex, which is the stated purpose of this Forum. It also had to be a bear and costly to maintain, and probably chewed up a lot of memory. Besides, the vast majority of the pics posted in the photo gallery were becoming advertisements by commercial providers, joke postings, posts from the internet, etc. Very, very few were of "real" and available women.
If we get the photo gallery and thumbnails in reports back, terrific. But, I can live with it either way. We shall see. [/QUOTE]
I would rather have seen Jackson place a few restrictions on what pictures and how many pictures could be posted. I would rather have seen a five picture limit for each girl, no ads, no jokes pictures, and SW pictures only. He could have also reduced the required resolution / size.
All 'changes, ' are not necessarily good.
JMHO.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1073777]
There are at least two Jamies and one Jamielynn in Dukes old photo index and SuperEloquent has a Jamey in his favorites photo list. I have one Jamie in my files and one Janie (the search feature wasn't working for me. And there is always the possibility that she was new or an unknown. We may never know for sure.
CookyJar[/QUOTE]Hey Cookie,
Sorry about that girl. Thanks for the run down on the various "Jamies. "
Can you help me out with links? I tried searching with the new website, but can't get it narrowed down enough to find them. Or perhaps some search advice?
[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love; 1073943]Hey Cookie,
Sorry about that girl. Thanks for the run down on the various "Jamies. "
Can you help me out with links? I tried searching with the new website, but can't get it narrowed down enough to find them. Or perhaps some search advice? [/QUOTE]I don't think the search feature has come online. I did a search for Alexus and could not find her by doing a search yet when I strolled down I was able to find her. It is possible that all of the features of the new software have not been added. It is not uncommon for software companies to develop different sections in stages.
I looked in Dukes old Photo Index and SuperEloquent's Favorites Pic Post and found three Jamies. I also checked my personal private file to locate a Jamie and a Janie.
Jackson is probably busy. Hopefully, he will provide us with a list of forum changes and new directions when time permits.
CookyJar
[QUOTE=CookyJar; 1074060]I am having trouble logging on at my other computers. I am able to log on from my lag top. I am not able to log on from my desk tops.
Another one else having log on issues?
CookyJar[/QUOTE]I have a set of pictures which I was preparing for uploading before the software switch. They are cropped, reduced and edited for posting. Unfortunately I cannot log on to USASG from that computer or either one of my other computers. To make matter worse, this lap top is not on the same network as my other computers. What to do? What to do?
Is anyone else having trouble logging on.
CookyJar