BackPage Advertiser Reviews

[QUOTE=BaldOldGuy;3430113]I swear those are pics of "K".[/QUOTE]Makes me want to LMAO!!

Seeing her for years, always a good time. I'll play Who wants to see me cuckold the special K?

My Best Regards.

Clit.

Hey guys. Just saw this ad tonight. Anyone dreamed with her? I remember her from a while back, but she has a new #.

Some of her pics are phenomenal and I'd love to dream myself.

Thanks in advance.

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/call-now-1oo-RE%EA%AD%BFL-upscale-Hi%EA%AE%86HL%EA%AE%8D-addictive-new-in-town/43311758[/URL]

Does anyone have any tips on using SA to find a regular?

[QUOTE=BossBricky;3443282]Does anyone have any tips on using SA to find a regular?[/QUOTE]I have been the memeber for 3 years.

I'm sure it's not the first time I've overpaid, not will it probably be the last. But I did want to update with my most recent visit. She apparently has a spot where she is often (tho not always) available to host. The place was fairly clean. Cluttered but otherwise not bad. Was again able to engage in DFK and FIV, plus with the added privacy also was able to partake in DATY FUTB and FS. Non-rushed experience and we both had a lot of fun. She was happy with the same donation as the last time. Especially with the ability for her to host I am more likely to repeat.

Hope this helps you gents out!

[QUOTE=NewAgain;3440814]Have to agree with Sputty. $ for a car BJ. Wow. Either she will now expect this all the time, or felt like Christmas morning for her. Either way, glad you enjoyed.[/QUOTE]

Not the same as the one that's been discussed here. And they both spell their names as Jamie, not Jaime.

[QUOTE=BigSwedeOO;3442921]Hey guys. Just saw this ad tonight. Anyone dreamed with her? I remember her from a while back, but she has a new #.

Some of her pics are phenomenal and I'd love to dream myself.

Thanks in advance.

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/call-now-1oo-RE%EA%AD%BFL-upscale-Hi%EA%AE%86HL%EA%AE%8D-addictive-new-in-town/43311758[/URL][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=SirLixALot24;3444987]I'm sure it's not the first time I've overpaid, not will it probably be the last. But I did want to update with my most recent visit. She apparently has a spot where she is often (tho not always) available to host. The place was fairly clean. Cluttered but otherwise not bad. Was again able to engage in DFK and FIV, plus with the added privacy also was able to partake in DATY FUTB and FS. Non-rushed experience and we both had a lot of fun. She was happy with the same donation as the last time. Especially with the ability for her to host I am more likely to repeat.

Hope this helps you gents out![/QUOTE]Sounds like a good visit. Now this one was worth the hundred!

[QUOTE=BigSwedeOO;3442921]Hey guys. Just saw this ad tonight. Anyone dreamed with her? I remember her from a while back, but she has a new #.

Some of her pics are phenomenal and I'd love to dream myself.

Thanks in advance.

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/call-now-1oo-RE%EA%AD%BFL-upscale-Hi%EA%AE%86HL%EA%AE%8D-addictive-new-in-town/43311758[/URL][/QUOTE]The pics are definitely 100% fake and likely of an Instagram model.

[URL]http://worcester.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/be-careful-this-is-man/43569148[/URL]

Caution. Don't know how true it is.

[URL]http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/worcester/774-360-3129/6/147451[/URL]

I found this to be too good to be true. 1 hr-8 o / hh-60. Bruh! Timing didn't work out so I never took the chance.

[QUOTE=Timmy909;3447906][URL]http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/worcester/774-360-3129/6/147451[/URL]

I found this to be too good to be true. 1 hr-8 o / hh-60. Bruh! Timing didn't work out so I never took the chance.[/QUOTE]She's really ugly though 2/10.

[URL]http://boston.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/strawberris-touch/40035943[/URL]

She is good but I wouldn't recommend her. For 1 she's ugly 4/10 for looks wise. Also, she is 300 an hour which is way too much. Idk why she is being so mean and doing that.

[URL]http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/worcester/978-868-3154/1/147474[/URL]

She's obviously a drug addict as you can tell but she's's pretty good for conversation. Looks is 4/10 body 5/10. If she wasn't so old and wasn't on drugs she probably could have been decent looking. She has a great personality though like she has ADHD. For hh she would do 60 for me which was ok considering Worcester is really really bad for finding escorts. Just make the trip out to Boston more options.

I definitely would not call Strawberri ugly. I've seen her many times. Solid safe service. No drama or bs, easy to schedule. She's a PAWG with tiny little titties. Treat her right and you'll have a good time.

[QUOTE=SixFive;3448181][URL]http://boston.backpage.com/WomenSeekMen/strawberris-touch/40035943[/URL]

She is good but I wouldn't recommend her. For 1 she's ugly 4/10 for looks wise. Also, she is 300 an hour which is way too much. Idk why she is being so mean and doing that.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Ajf2227;3448395]I definitely would not call Strawberri ugly. I've seen her many times. Solid safe service. No drama or bs, easy to schedule. She's a PAWG with tiny little titties. Treat her right and you'll have a good time.[/QUOTE]I'd avoid Strawberri also. She is not as good looking as she was a couple of years ago, her body has gone downhill.

She charges too much for her lessened service than before. She charges the same but service has diminished compared to before.

There was a discussion about Ks age in the Fitchburg BP forum a little over a year ago [URL]http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/showthread.php?8054-BackPage-Advertiser-Reviews&p=2860764#post2860764[/URL]it would seem according to some that then 52 was about right, 53 as of now.

[QUOTE=BigSwedeOO;3440250]I'm usually an AMP guy but have been checking back page lately and noticed K. I know she is older than she says but does anyone have a guess on actual age?
Also had a few other questions. Hoping some of you guys can fill me in before I pop my "K" cherry.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BigHead;2860904]There are 2 women with the same last name who has lived at K address, Catherine M XXX = 65 and Kathleen M XXX = 52.
Also this police report - "XXX, Kathleen Mary Address: XXX Leominster Dob: 01/11/1964 Charges: Streetwalker, Common".
All have the same last name, it looks like 52 is more likely answer. Any other conclusions? -BH.[/QUOTE]