Streetwalker Reports

What was the damage? And did you catch her name?

[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3913648]I think I no who you talking about about 5 feet tall nice round booty I took her to a motel and fucked her good one night.[/QUOTE]

Stopped at the QT this morning for a bite to eat. I backed up against the wall next to Captain D's and enjoy my biscuit and pepsi. As I was there I noticed a few drug users in the parking lot at Captain D's. 3 males and 2 females. I didn't pay them no mind however I did keep my eye on them. One of the females made her way down to my truck and tried to get me to roll down my window. I declined with a smile and no sooner then she stepped away from my truck an undercover police car pulled up and the cops got out and questioned her and searched her backpack. They never once looked my way though. They didn't arrest her and pulled slowly out the parking lot. I stayed a few more minutes and then decided to leave the area. On the way out heading toward and Tryon I noticed the 2 girls someone mentioned before. A brunette and a blonde wearing the bathing suit top. I kept going.

[QUOTE=OktoberMan1;3913147]I was approached a few days ago by an absolute smoking petite brunette. Young, tight body, early 20's, ponytail, short shorts. She asked me for a couple bucks while I was at an atm. I was on break from work, so I didn't explore opportunities, but she was even girl next door hot, like as good as mens club hot. If anyone partakes, please share.[/QUOTE]I think I saw this one today over off Tryon by McDonalds with Snowy. If it's the same one, she is smoking hot. Definitely doesn't look like the type to walk the streets, but alas there she was. Didn't try to pick her up but tempting. Girl like that must have bad demons if she's on the streets. She could easily marry rich just by looks alone.

During the past few rounds I've either seen no one out at all, or nothing but uglies for the most part.

[B]Woodlawn Area[/B] - Saw one ugly WSW at Captain D's watching LEO parked behind the QT on one round. On the other, I saw nobody out, but LEO driving around very slowly and carefully as to not miss anything.

[B]Eddleman St[/B] - Saw one ugly BSW on one round, and nothing on the next.

[b]Freedom Drive[/b] - At the Wendy's on 3300 Freedom Drive, saw what I thought were 2 ugly BSWs in the Wendy's parking lot on the drive thru side. On the other side of the Wendy's is an LE tower across the street, but on the drive thru side, the LE tower's view is blocked, and this is where I thought I saw 2 ugly BSWs though I was unable to confirm it. I think they were afraid that I might have been a LEO and so didn't act like they were too interested in me, but at the same time, they striked me as looking like hoes. So I don't know if they were BSWs or not, but if they were, it'd make sense for them try to move their activities away from the direct view of the LE tower, of which I think that's what they might have been doing.

[B]Rozzelles Ferry Area[/B] - Saw one ugly BSW on Crigler St by the Race Way gas station on one round. The other round, saw one ugly BSW, and one okay looking BSW. Saw a few LEOs not too far from this area.

[B]Sugar Creek[/B] - Saw a few okay looking WSWs and BSWs. Picked up WSW Liz, and got a room. Enjoyed some nice foreplay, BBBJ, DIY, missionary, and her on top. She had some pretty pointy nipples, and I don't think you can see that well from looking at the photo, but she had some pretty big areaolas too when I first picked her up. Like pancake big, and then when we got the room, and cut the a / c on full blast I think they contracted, or got smaller in response to the drop in temperature, which might explain why they don't look quite as big in the pic. But I still enjoyed them. It's one of those things about a woman's body that I always kinda found odd. Pussy was real nice, and probably enjoyed DIY the most, as I thoroughly enjoyed eating her out. No foul odors or anything. Clean as a whistle down there. Tried picking her up again on a different day, and she did what DeathCarStereo complained about SWs sometimes doing in one of his reports, which was to ignore me when I was trying to get her attention, which I find annoying as hell. Not sure if I'll be seeing her again. I may just have to forget about her even though the first date was kinda nice in some ways. Damage was 0. 40. Also, she has no phone, so no digits. (I asked though.) If interested, you might possibly be able to find her near the McDonalds and Shell on Reagan. That is assuming LE hasn't come out in full force like a dick, and driven everyone into hiding, which is always a possibility.

[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3913648]I think I no who you talking about about 5 feet tall nice round booty I took her to a motel and fucked her good one night.[/QUOTE]That's probably the best strategy for avoiding the risk of LE sneaking up on you while you are middle of taking care of business out somewhere. Particularly since they have been observed taking an interest in checking possible places where a monger might take a date.

I think I've figured out where they've put up cameras at over at the McDonalds on Sugar Creek, and why I haven't seen any SWs hanging out by the side entrance for quite some time. It would appear there is a newly installed TPZ (also known as a Tilt-Pan-Zoom) Camera on one of the light poles on Sugar Creek that faces the side entrance of the McDonalds. Although it's hard to see exactly what the camera's LOS ("Line of Sight") is because the camera is housed within a tinted dome, a logical assumption to make would be that it is set to monitor activity on the side of McDonalds that is facing The Royal Inn. Like where the drive-thru line starts at. I say that because they already have other cameras for monitoring activity directly on Sugar Creek, so I think the purpose of this particular camera would be to monitor McDonalds.

Also, if you go inside, there are two TPZ camears installed up in the ceiling that I would assumed are probably positioned so that the restaurant's management can completely see the whole entire lobby from a backroom monitor. Not that I think that's much of anything to be worried about because plenty of places have that kind of set up. But the TPZ camera from the street that is most likely aimed at where the Drive Thru line starts at is something to be aware of. In short, I think it would probably be best to avoid doing anything over at the McDonalds because it would seem they've got cameras everywhere over there now.

[QUOTE=Jammer434;3917122]I think I've figured out where they've put up cameras at over at the McDonalds on Sugar Creek, and why I haven't seen any SWs hanging out by the side entrance for quite some time. It would appear there is a newly installed TPZ (also known as a Tilt-Pan-Zoom) Camera on one of the light poles on Sugar Creek that faces the side entrance of the McDonalds. Although it's hard to see exactly what the camera's LOS ("Line of Sight") is because the camera is housed within a tinted dome, a logical assumption to make would be that it is set to monitor activity on the side of McDonalds that is facing The Royal Inn. Like where the drive-thru line starts at. I say that because they already have other cameras for monitoring activity directly on Sugar Creek, so I think the purpose of this particular camera would be to monitor McDonalds.

Also, if you go inside, there are two TPZ camears installed up in the ceiling that I would assumed are probably positioned so that the restaurant's management can completely see the whole entire lobby from a backroom monitor. Not that I think that's much of anything to be worried about because plenty of places have that kind of set up. But the TPZ camera from the street that is most likely aimed at where the Drive Thru line starts at is something to be aware of. In short, I think it would probably be best to avoid doing anything over at the McDonalds because it would seem they've got cameras everywhere over there now.[/QUOTE]I'm sure these cameras are a deterrent to our activities. But I don't think a camera should stop you completely. At most, a camera might show you talking to a girl. That's not against the law. If you talk to a girl and decide to take her for a ride that doesn't not prove that any crime is being committed. I would try parking around the building. Walk up, talk to your girl, then walk off with her to your car. Yeah, everybody knows what you're really doing, but like I said no crime is being committed on camera.

Plus, who do you think has time to watch these cameras 24/7? McDonalds? Uncle LEO? I don't think they have time to watch and wait for something to go down. Videos are probably reviewed only after a crime is reported. Robbery etc.

GB40.

[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3918801]It cost ya more to get a room but its worth it bc getting out of jail will cost a lot more.[/QUOTE]I agree, but for those inexperienced with getting a room for their dates that leads to the question of where. The least expensive place that I know of for the night would be Airport Inn at $39.95 a night off of Keeter Drive, but probably any place that offers rooms by the hour would probably be best, and hopefully a little less expensive.

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;3918976]I'm sure these cameras are a deterrent to our activities. But I don't think a camera should stop you completely. At most, a camera might show you talking to a girl. That's not against the law. If you talk to a girl and decide to take her for a ride that doesn't not prove that any crime is being committed. I would try parking around the building. Walk up, talk to your girl, then walk off with her to your car. Yeah, everybody knows what you're really doing, but like I said no crime is being committed on camera.

Plus, who do you think has time to watch these cameras 24/7? McDonalds? Uncle LEO? I don't think they have time to watch and wait for something to go down. Videos are probably reviewed only after a crime is reported. Robbery etc.

GB40.[/QUOTE]More specifically, what I think the cameras do other than serve as a deterrent, is record suspicious activity. LE knows who the SWS are. They see them day and night on their patrols, probably just about everyday, and because of that, the SWs are an easy target for LE harassment on the supply side of the equation. LE doesn't really need cameras to figure out who the SWs are because of this. However, in figuring out who is suspected of picking up SWs, and who to be on the look out for when doing patrols, and to possibly target for harassment on the demand side of the equation, the cameras may provide that information. Particularly if any of the businesses around there wanted to bring it to LE's attention.

So that leads to the question of how the cameras are being used, and whether or not the footage is only being reviewed in cases of robbery, shootings, etc. Or if it is being more closely scrutinized for other purposes, such as for generating a list of suspected mongers for the LEOs to be able to refer back to when starting their shift, or pulling someone over. I do not know the answer to that. I do not believe the McDonalds people, or the Shell people have the time or inclination to review tons of security footage. That's not the business they are in for making money, and personally, probably could care less what we do as long as we are not causing them any sort of problems. As for The Royal Inn people, I don't know. I kinda wonder about them because of the money they're willing to pay "Capitol Special Patrol" (a private security company) to monitor the area. However, if I were to make an educated guess, it would be that LE has the resources to review at least all street-level camera footage if they wanted to based on an annual budget of $272 million (Source #1), and a pool of 1,800 people (Source #2) from which to assign the task to. That and based on what I perceive as "gung ho" attitude about wanting to go after people who only want to have sex, I wouldn't put anything past them despite not knowing the answer to question.

Source 1 - $272 Million CMPD Budget - [URL]http://charlottenc.abalancingact.com/city-of-charlotte-fy-2019-adopted-budget[/URL].

Source 2 - 1,800 People on CMPD Payroll - [URL]https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/article208636479.html[/URL].

So yeah, I'd say it's definitely an effective deterrent because who wants to be a target of LE harassment? That pretty much only leaves a monger with three options I think. Option #1 - Accept that you may become a target for LE harassment if you are seen going into SW areas with cameras often enough. Option #2 - Only go in the SW areas that do not have cameras to do pickups, which would include certain parts of Reagan, and Sugar Creek. The downside to that is seemingly, most of the SW action is where most of the cameras are at. So there's a bit of a trade-off to be made there that may affect the success rate of being able to pick one up. And Option #3 - which is to completely forget about it. The safest, and most sucky of the options I think. For me personally, I'm thinking either Option #2 or Option #3 would be the way to go, but I guess that would really depend on a person's risk tolerance. If the SWs and their handlers get a little smarter, they'll figure out their customers are probably more comfortable doing business in places where they do not feel like they are being watched so closely. The number of cameras they have up in that area, and particularly around The Royal Inn, is just insane.

[QUOTE=Jammer434;3919471]More specifically, what I think the cameras do other than serve as a deterrent, is record suspicious activity. LE knows who the SWS are. They see them day and night on their patrols, probably just about everyday, and because of that, the SWs are an easy target for LE harassment on the supply side of the equation. LE doesn't really need cameras to figure out who the SWs are because of this. However, in figuring out who is suspected of picking up SWs, and who to be on the look out for when doing patrols, and to possibly target for harassment on the demand side of the equation, the cameras may provide that information. Particularly if any of the businesses around there wanted to bring it to LE's attention.

So yeah, I'd say it's definitely an effective deterrent because who wants to be a target of LE harassment? [/QUOTE]One of the main things that will identify you is your car. And your license tag. That's why I suggested parking your car around the building or off camera. Try not to tie the camera image of yourself to your car. If LEO is going to harass you they will be looking for your car. If they keep seeing your car in the area that's a problem for you.

This holds true when you're doing anything where you don't want to be recognized. Hide your car. Park somewhere else. Drive somebody else's car. Take an uber. This makes you a lot harder to track and to harass.

GB40.

[QUOTE=Gigabyte40;3919885]One of the main things that will identify you is your car. And your license tag. That's why I suggested parking your car around the building or off camera. Try not to tie the camera image of yourself to your car. If LEO is going to harass you they will be looking for your car. If they keep seeing your car in the area that's a problem for you.

This holds true when you're doing anything where you don't want to be recognized. Hide your car. Park somewhere else. Drive somebody else's car. Take an uber. This makes you a lot harder to track and to harass.

GB40.[/QUOTE]Technology can really suck, reading your reply it's sad what lengths one has to take nowadays just to shop, let alone play! But I would recommend using extreme caution when parking your car or traveling into conspicuous places, I was once robbed at knife point in a dark hotel parking lot, NOT FUN AT ALL!

[QUOTE=BackpageDude;3919826]Its not illegal to talk to someone or give them a ride but if the police suspect they engage in illegal activity they have the right to pull you over. And if that person has drugs on them the police can charge you also. Just something to think about bc most of the SW'S if not all at least I haven't meet one that's not on drugs and some of them have ether drugs or stems or something on them.[/QUOTE]That's why I always try to discourage them from doing anything that might draw attention while they are with me. I've had some to let their titties out while with me on the road, out in plain view of everybody on the road, in areas that are well known for SW activity. That usually leads to them asking why they can't do this or that, and me thinking to myself, "Man, you really are that dumb" before trying to break it down to them in the simplest of terms.

As for the police being able to charge a non-drug user for drug possession for merely being in the company of someone who is, I am well aware of that, as much as I think of it as bs. And yeah, I'd have to agree that it would seem most SWs are on something. I've picked up a lot of them over the years, and can only think of 1 SW of whom I felt confident was not a drug user. The rest of them seemed to be on something.