Boston Top Ten

[QUOTE=RazGrizace00;6402111]Great call on Tiffany! She is a must see! She is so damn hot 5'5" tits and a nice ass. She reminds me of [URL]https://www.instagram.com/minlee0880/[/URL] correct me if I'm wrong Mmmmmm69. Good BBBJ she offered rim but I passed. More BBBJ, 69, and then I DATY which she is very responsive, Started in mish and almost blew after 5 minutes so slowed down and cycled through all positions. Went back to mish because I wanted to DFK and fill her up. Dropped a 10 day load in her and I felt that she was close so I continued until she convulsed. Popped out of her and she sucked me dry. Chatted the rest of the session through translator. Showered and kisses goodbye.

Run and see her! She is here until Monday she really likes Boston but she wasn't that busy and she might come back in May. I would see her before she leaves but I don't have the funds at the moment.[/QUOTE]Sounds like a great exp! I'm assuming you opted for extra menu, and was her juice box tight? Last time hers was a bit loose even around early noon, just making sure it wasnt just me.

[QUOTE=IronClad999;6402143]Sounds like a great exp! I'm assuming you opted for extra menu, and was her juice box tight? Last time hers was a bit loose even around early noon, just making sure it wasnt just me.[/QUOTE]Yes, I always go for extra menu if they are available and she was tight.

[QUOTE=RazGrizace00;6402387]Yes, I always go for extra menu if they are available and she was tight.[/QUOTE]If she's here til this Monday 4/10, ill prob miss her this time since ill be crossing boston again on Tuesday which won't meet her deadline LOL. Meanwhile, plenty of other choices in boston to play around before hopping back to NOVA 2-3 days later. Need to try her pussy game when she tours again. Thanks raz.

[QUOTE=RazGrizace00;6402387]Yes, I always go for extra menu if they are available and she was tight.[/QUOTE]It doesn't matter where she goes, if the service doesn't improve or can't attract cllents based on reviews it will end up the same. There's a reason why clients choose who they visit. This isn't just tiffany but kgirls in general; they think rebrand will solve the issue, but it'll just make things worse cas look at how fast Hjin vanish LOL.

I saw Tulip the other day. Unfortunately not the girl in the photos. Still pretty but a bit older. Height, weight and bust were about as advertised but that is all. Unfortunately I'd say she has been my worst experience with BTT. Not terrible by any means but very mechanical and slow gentle paced which is not what I was really into. Shower was uneventful, BBBJ was great but short. And like I said the main event was kind of just boring and she was down for msog. Nice woman, easy and great to talk to but yeah just wasn't the fun time I was hoping for.

I am a 50/50 with BTT so far. Half have been amazing and half have been lackluster. MA angels has been great so far. Not sure if there is a different forum for them. Nicole and Lora Queen (now gone) were both amazing in their own ways.

[QUOTE=Zat1190;6403653]I saw Tulip the other day. Unfortunately not the girl in the photos. Still pretty but a bit older. Height, weight and bust were about as advertised but that is all. Unfortunately I'd say she has been my worst experience with BTT. Not terrible by any means but very mechanical and slow gentle paced which is not what I was really into. Shower was uneventful, BBBJ was great but short. And like I said the main event was kind of just boring and she was down for msog. Nice woman, easy and great to talk to but yeah just wasn't the fun time I was hoping for.

I am a 50/50 with BTT so far. Half have been amazing and half have been lackluster. MA angels has been great so far. Not sure if there is a different forum for them. Nicole and Lora Queen (now gone) were both amazing in their own ways.[/QUOTE]I agree with this. Tulips attractive but the service compared to someone like East Jamie who was here recently was like night and day. Definitely a good time but lacking in some parts. YMMV.

[QUOTE=Zat1190;6403653]I saw Tulip the other day. Unfortunately not the girl in the photos. Still pretty but a bit older. Height, weight and bust were about as advertised but that is all. Unfortunately I'd say she has been my worst experience with BTT. Not terrible by any means but very mechanical and slow gentle paced which is not what I was really into. Shower was uneventful, BBBJ was great but short. And like I said the main event was kind of just boring and she was down for msog. Nice woman, easy and great to talk to but yeah just wasn't the fun time I was hoping for.

I am a 50/50 with BTT so far. Half have been amazing and half have been lackluster. MA angels has been great so far. Not sure if there is a different forum for them. Nicole and Lora Queen (now gone) were both amazing in their own ways.[/QUOTE]There is no forum for maangles but I think with 3 k-girls agencies now operating in Boston area we should rename this forum to K-girls agencies or something. It's just weird that we got a thread dedicated to a particular agency at the expense of others. I think it would also further encourage competition between the 3, and encourage all 3 to be more selective about the girls that they bring to Boston.

Let's hope that maangels Lora and Nicole wasn't just the sales pitch and now they're going to turn more chill quality wise.

What is typical damage for BTT. Thinking of trying it out and want to be repaired.

[QUOTE=Bubhidx;6404232]What is typical damage for BTT. Thinking of trying it out and want to be repaired.[/QUOTE]The first thing you need to do is get verified with them and the will explaining everything to you. A lot of it depends on the girl and their menu.

[QUOTE=Nrlmus;6404151]There is no forum for maangles but I think with 3 k-girls agencies now operating in Boston area we should rename this forum to K-girls agencies or something. It's just weird that we got a thread dedicated to a particular agency at the expense of others. I think it would also further encourage competition between the 3, and encourage all 3 to be more selective about the girls that they bring to Boston.

Let's hope that maangels Lora and Nicole wasn't just the sales pitch and now they're going to turn more chill quality wise.[/QUOTE]I really doubt from talking with the booker at BTT that this board or a board for all three agencies is going to have a huge effect on competition or selection. Plus at the end of the day one person's ideal provider is another person's lousy time. Act the end of the day you got to do research here and elsewhere and usually the providers with a longer track record have some reliability to them. I think there is a little more competition in NYC because there are so many more options and maybe some downward pressure on pricing. There is a provider there I have seen multiple times who charges me 100 less than her normal rate but, I usually book 3 hours at a time. I have seen her though at least 15 times now. BTT still has far and away the most different number of girls that come through on a regular basis than KBlossomboston or Maangels. So I don't think you need a whole another forum plus, I think we take for granted the work of the moderator. If you want to do it go ahead but, I don't think the other agencies are big enough or have enough history to merit a larger forum for all three agencies as BTT does.

[QUOTE=LoveVietGirls;6404368]I really doubt from talking with the booker at BTT that this board or a board for all three agencies is going to have a huge effect on competition or selection. Plus at the end of the day one person's ideal provider is another person's lousy time. Act the end of the day you got to do research here and elsewhere and usually the providers with a longer track record have some reliability to them. I think there is a little more competition in NYC because there are so many more options and maybe some downward pressure on pricing. There is a provider there I have seen multiple times who charges me 100 less than her normal rate but, I usually book 3 hours at a time. I have seen her though at least 15 times now. BTT still has far and away the most different number of girls that come through on a regular basis than KBlossomboston or Maangels. So I don't think you need a whole another forum plus, I think we take for granted the work of the moderator. If you want to do it go ahead but, I don't think the other agencies are big enough or have enough history to merit a larger forum for all three agencies as BTT does.[/QUOTE]I don't think we need another forum. I just think that we need to rename this one to reflect the realities that weren't there when it was originally created. I'm dubious on the longevity of the Shu's service but Maanges just entered the Boston market. I have a feeling they're still feeling it out. If they start bringing over more girls are we going to have a separate forum for them too?

I also get a sense that Maangels together with KBlossom already have a positive affect on BTT. There is nothing like competition to boost quality. Capitalism 101. Let's hope it would also have a positive affect on pricing.

[QUOTE=Zat1190;6403653]I saw Tulip the other day. Unfortunately not the girl in the photos. Still pretty but a bit older. Height, weight and bust were about as advertised but that is all. Unfortunately I'd say she has been my worst experience with BTT. Not terrible by any means but very mechanical and slow gentle paced which is not what I was really into. Shower was uneventful, BBBJ was great but short. And like I said the main event was kind of just boring and she was down for msog. Nice woman, easy and great to talk to but yeah just wasn't the fun time I was hoping for.

I am a 50/50 with BTT so far. Half have been amazing and half have been lackluster. MA angels has been great so far. Not sure if there is a different forum for them. Nicole and Lora Queen (now gone) were both amazing in their own ways.[/QUOTE]I choose based on reviews. Currently 5 of the 6 listed girls on BTT site have TER IDs. There are usually enough reviews per girl to get an idea if the girl fits the bill for you. Tulip had less than stellar comments in this forum on 4/4. There are enough options between AMPs, agencies and escorts that one shouldn't choose an option unless there are positive comments in some forum.

[QUOTE=LoveVietGirls;6404368]I really doubt from talking with the booker at BTT that this board or a board for all three agencies is going to have a huge effect on competition or selection. Plus at the end of the day one person's ideal provider is another person's lousy time. Act the end of the day you got to do research here and elsewhere and usually the providers with a longer track record have some reliability to them. I think there is a little more competition in NYC because there are so many more options and maybe some downward pressure on pricing. There is a provider there I have seen multiple times who charges me 100 less than her normal rate but, I usually book 3 hours at a time. I have seen her though at least 15 times now. BTT still has far and away the most different number of girls that come through on a regular basis than KBlossomboston or Maangels. So I don't think you need a whole another forum plus, I think we take for granted the work of the moderator. If you want to do it go ahead but, I don't think the other agencies are big enough or have enough history to merit a larger forum for all three agencies as BTT does.[/QUOTE]What BTT needs to do is stop using fake photos, the photos doesn't have to show face but at least the body has to be real. No matter who comes thru, I am always reluctant to see the girls bc I am gambling on the looks and service. If the photos are accurate, atleast I am gambling only on the service. I had to walk away from a few girls bc they look nothing like the photos, however, this board does help.

[QUOTE=DManExit12;6405033]What BTT needs to do is stop using fake photos, the photos doesn't have to show face but at least the body has to be real. No matter who comes thru, I am always reluctant to see the girls bc I am gambling on the looks and service. If the photos are accurate, atleast I am gambling only on the service. I had to walk away from a few girls bc they look nothing like the photos, however, this board does help.[/QUOTE]Well the booker at BTT will tell you that they don't take the pictures and they are provided to them by the provider. I saw Purple two years ago at BTT and pictures were her but, she was a little heavier. I saw some people complain about that but, she was still pretty hot Russian / Japanese mix and did everything I said and had a great time. Even real photos can be taken in a way to make a girl look hotter than they are. Look at Beauty Island twitter feed or Pink Angel inn queens. Real pictures in the rooms but, when you see them in person not exactly accurate. Bin of tatsexxy in NYC has hot real pictures on her website, great body. In person she is probably pushing 50. Still a great service regardless of the looks. I once saw a short cute street girl in a queens fast house. 60 bucks, inside she took her coat off, a little belly. Still a great time. If accurate looks are that important toy, you can go high end but, at that price point a girl better be top notch and chances are it will not live up to the price. I saw a JAV star BBFS at basically BTT prices. Was incredible. I am considering going high end, there are a couple playboy playmates that can be had for a decent amount of change and service might be whatever but, it might be worth it for me just to check that bucketlist item off. A girl who doesn't look like her pictures doesn't bother me nearly as much as a girl whose services doesn't live up to her reviews. You do the research and while some reviews are schills, you can generally get an idea doing research who has a great combo of looks and service. The nice thing about most BTT girls is many have a TER. Daphne had a lot of YMMV reviews on TER and under her old name and her pictures are dated, I would say her face is not as defined as when she was younger so for some they could blot out face and you could see someone older like Iris or Wren from back inn the day. Both were older but, great. The photo thing doesn't bother me. Would only bother me if it was a total bait and switch. I usually add ten pounds to the listed weight on picture. If I go in and a girl is listed as 110 and she looks like 200 I am walking out. Never has happened though.

[QUOTE=Bubhidx;6404232]What is typical damage for BTT. Thinking of trying it out and want to be repaired.[/QUOTE]Got primary resource from a VIP bud of mine recently that BTT has pushed out some updates regarding the menu on GFE and pse:

"There is no discount for BB, if you get caught making direct deals with girls, we won't accept any more appointments. Also, if you go into GFE and upgrade to BB, please pay first!

GFE:

30 minutes 240

60 minutes 340 (up to 2 pops).

90 minutes 540.

120 minutes 640.

PSE (no cover):

30 minutes 390.

60 minutes (1 pop) 450.

60 minutes (2 pops) 540.

90 minutes 740.

120 minutes 840.

The famous line above the price menu with "no negotiations" is awfully similar to NOVA kpopgirls recent update as well with upcharges upfront and strict rules on no bargains which implies the agency is heavily involved with the providers extra wallet commission. Play at your own risk. YMMV.