Clothed; in her bra; nude; doggie; sucking my cock.
Printable View
Clothed; in her bra; nude; doggie; sucking my cock.
Pretty sexy I like a little meat on the bones myself.
A "mosaic" collage of the last ten pics posted.
One of my favorites from the last set of 10 pics posted.
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1084863]Thank you, Freak.
I preferred the way the old software showed thumbnail images rather than just icons when multiple pics were attached to a post. Then again, I also like very much the ability with the new software to attach a very large pic to a post. With this capability, opportunities are presented for more than one way to skin a cat. Even an old technologically challenged dog like me apparently CAN sometimes learn new tricks, and somewhat get around the limitations presented by the new software, and even use it to be better and more varied in certain ways. [/QUOTE]I see you did a collage of a set of pics, after posting the list. Looks like you figured out your own "work around" the new software! Any chance of labeling the pics in the collage? Then again with your new "decriptive" labels it might not be too hard to figure out which one to click on for an enlargement.
Way to go!
[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love;1085463]I see you did a collage of a set of pics, after posting the list. Looks like you figured out your own "work around" the new software![/QUOTE]The free software I downloaded creates pic collages easy-peasy. The mosaic collage took all of a minute to set up: one mouse click to establish it, and the rest of the minute for the software to create and save it. There are many other options too, like a collage that looks like a scattered pile of pics, a framed mosaic, a contact sheet format, a grid and even superimposed exposures. You can drag and drop the pics within the collage to change their position, and you can randomly scramble them and reshuffle the pics within a collage. You can change the background coloring, add pic borders and shadowing and you can change the spacing between the pics in the collage.
[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love]Any chance of labeling the pics in the collage? Then again with your new "decriptive" labels it might not be too hard to figure out which one to click on for an enlargement.[/QUOTE]It is fairly easy to label each pic with text but I think it takes away from the pic, and it makes the collage less visually appealing IMHO. As you noted, the new "descriptive labels" I am using makes it fairly easy to figure out which pics to enlarge and view more closely from the pic icons. This arrangement isn't perfect because you can't click directly on the thumbnails in the collage to open up an individual image, but it is a lot better than blindly selecting from the icons, even with descriptive labeling.
[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love]Way to go![/QUOTE]Thank you. Where there is a will there is often a way. ;)
[QUOTE=Supereloquent; 1085419]Thank you for your compliment, Freak.
I will have to admit that my remarks were substantially inspired by some of the interesting and insightful things that Street recently had to say. [/QUOTE]What I am about to say, SuperE probably knows already, but the rest of you may learn something today.
This how it is done. Any organization, large or small, works best when its members are constantly building on each others ideas, theory's and concepts.
If the management of the Library system from where I onced belonged is reading this-see you did teach me a thing or two. Oh and thanks for that fucking pension. I using it to have unprotected oral sex with convicted Felons, and I hope you don't mind.
Street
[QUOTE=Street Steve;1085587]What I am about to say, SuperE probably knows already, but the rest of you may learn something today.[/QUOTE]You are preaching to the choir, Street. Only the knuckleheads don't know this already, and they don't want to learn anything new. They already know everything. That's why you see them making U-turns right on the Ave to make a pick-up. They have such a sharp brain and keen eyesight that they know where every single LEO (including under-covers) is within a mile of them.
[QUOTE=Street Steve]This how it is done. Any organization, large or small, works best when its members are constantly building on each others ideas, theory's and concepts.[/QUOTE]I used to love the TV series called "Connections," narrated by that odd looking English bloke with a balding, bulbous head, thick black glasses and a strong but understandable Brit accent.
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connections_%28TV_series%29]Connections TV Series[/url]
In each episode, he would start with a major modern invention which had revolutionized the way we live: like television, or computers, or the automobile and the airplane. He would trace back the various interwoven trains of thought and previous inventions to the very roots of the ideas, which, in many cases, occurred centuries ago. In one episode, for example, he suggests that the development of modern telecommunications today can be related back to the Normans using stirrups in their saddles. The series is available on line in DVD form and as a book. I highly recommend both as being very interesting and thought provoking.
[QUOTE=Street Steve]If the management of the Library system from where I onced belonged is reading this-see you did teach me a thing or two. Oh and thanks for that fucking pension. I using it to have unprotected oral sex with convicted Felons, and I hope you don't mind.
Street[/QUOTE]Street, you are a riot, per usual! :)
Many people know about this very odd connection that goes back hundreds of years, but it shows you how one decision/idea can prevail long after it begins:
The USA standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is four feet, eight and a half inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England, and English expatriates built the USA railroads.
Why did the English people build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the prerailroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.
Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.
Why did the wagons use that odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing the wagons would break on some of the old, long-distance roads, because that's the spacing of the old wheel ruts.
So who built these old rutted roads? The first long-distance roads in Europe were built by Imperial Rome for the benefit of its legions. The roads have been used ever since.
And the ruts? Roman war chariots made the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagons. Since the chariots were made for or by Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Thus, the standard USA railroad gauge of four feet, eight and a half inches derives from the specification for an Imperial Roman army war chariot.
Specs and bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse's ass came up with it, you may be exactly right. Because the Imperial Roman chariots were made to be just wide enough to accommodate the back ends of two warhorses.
What does this have to do with mongering on the K? I would refer you to our recent discussion of pricing. Before discovering that there is apparently a very widely known bargain rate of 10 for a BJ, I would have thought that 20 was the standard. Prices are a lot easier to manipulate than railroad gauges, but I think you get my point. What has happened in the past does have a bearing on the present, but it pays to re-evaluate that from time to time.
[QUOTE= Cephlapod Love]Oops, sorry. Wasn't explicit enough. I mean red PLUS the next 3 cars in line! LOL! In other words, if you are the guy in the intersection as the light turns red, the next three behind you are going to go through too! This is especially true with left turners.[/QUOTE]
I would be cautious on this one. While it is a common occurrence to have three cars turn left on yellow, even as or after the light turns red, it is technically illegal to be going through an intersection for any reason if you think you cannot clear it before it turns red, and a LEO can pull you over for it and issue you a ticket. Sometimes LE will cut you some slack if there is a lot of traffic, or if you get hung up in the intersection and it is in the interests of everyone's safety that you clear it, even if the light is red. But that does not give you the legal right to do it. You still might get a ticket. As with many things, it is up to the discretion of LE. If you actually do get a ticket, you might have a good chance that a Philly LEO wouldn't show up in court for such a minor offense, because they have more important things to do, or the judge might cut you some slack and dismiss the ticket or reduce the fine or the points. You could also request a jury trial where there might be much more sympathy for your plight. But, why go through all that hassle just to beat a light? Let the other idiots speed around you and make the left turn, and take the heat if there is any to be taken. If the traffic is heavy, wait for the green and make the next available right turn, and circle the block to go left. Is getting where you want to go so urgent that you can't spend an extra minute or two?
[QUOTE= Cephlapod Love] Now if you were in South Philly, you could double park or park in the center lane of the street. But alas, don't try that sh*t in and Philly unless you want to be towed.[/QUOTE]
I have seen that craziness in South Philly and I don't pretend to understand it. It is clearly illegal, but apparently it is overlooked, or they would be arresting almost everybody who parks there. I have never figured out what the protocol must be if you are stuck on the inside lane of a double parked street.
Sucking my cock.
Grid collage of the final 6 pics of her sucking my cock.
My favorite from the final set of cock sucking pics.
[QUOTE=Jicarlo;1085443]Pretty sexy I like a little meat on the bones myself.[/QUOTE]Variety IS the spice of life IMHO, ESPECIALLY when it comes to SWs.
If you liked Nicole you will probably also like my next encounter as soon as I write my report. She isn't in the "chubby" category, more roundly curvy and Rubenesque, and quite appealingly so.
[QUOTE= Storm Ranger]You guys are right, I should have given her a five for her time.[/QUOTE]Many people are ready to jump in and give you the benefit of "perfect" street advice upon having time to consider and reflect on the situation. I have been known to be guilty of this as well. The reality is that there is no "right" answer. You were there. You were surprised by the circumstances and they were counter to your expectations, and you had to make a snap decision. You can analyze it to death, and get all the advice in the world, and maybe that will prepare you for a different future outcome, and maybe it won't. Smart people tend to learn from what they themselves believe to be mistakes they have made. It all depends on your point of view. Hindsight is always 20/20.
Very early in my mongering I picked up a SW who turned out to have an extremely sour disposition, and I thought better of it. I only drove her a block when I asked her to get out, that I had changed my mind. She demanded "a few bucks" for her trouble I gave her three bucks, figuring I would get rid of her. My guess is that it was so easy to get a few bucks from me that she thought she could play me for more, and she demanded 20. I told her there was no way I was paying her 20, and she proceeded to rifle through the papers in my glove box (a reason I now keep that locked, and also keep nothing else of value inside my vehicle; some lessons you DO learn the hard way), rip them up, and throw them out the window. When I tried to stop her she screamed, and pulled a box cutter from her bag. It was a small but very scary weapon. Luckily I was able to grab her wrist, bang the cutter loose on the dash, and I pinned her to the door as I opened it and shoved her out onto the street. All the while she was trying to bite and punch me. I had my left forearm jammed up under her chin and across the top of her chest, so she had no leverage or opportunity to do either. I could have been severely injured, and, if LE had wandered by, they wouldn't have cared who started the fight. I would have had a serious legal situation to address.
Maybe giving her something in the first place was the wrong decision. Maybe not giving her the 20 was the wrong decision. Picking her up in the first place was certainly the wrong decision. My point remains. Sometimes there are no "right" decisions. You learn from experience. You acquire better street instincts. You try not to repeat mistakes. But, when all is said and done, things will happen that you didn't necessarily anticipate.
[QUOTE= Storm Ranger] Had she been at all pleasant or made eye contact at all, I probably would have thought of it. I was really thrown off by her attitude, I was expecting so much more. She was opening the door to get out before I even stopped. It was just wierd.[/QUOTE]You seem to be a good guy. I know Hottie Nicole and have dated her many times and I know her to have one of the best attitudes on the stroll. BUT, you didn't know her. You just knew her indirectly by reputation. You were expecting one thing, and something quite different happened. It was a spur of the minute thing. It didn't sound like you planned just to get her number, but rather that you wanted to defer your date with her until a time when she was not dope sick (which is what it seemed like to me). You weren't prepared mentally for her to be off her game or that you might prefer a transaction that involved just getting her digits.
You were pissed and you spouted off publicly about her. That probably was an avoidable mistake. Or maybe not. It did arouse some opinions on the subject.
[QUOTE= Storm Ranger] Next time I just want to chat for a minute and get a number, I'll make it clear up front and have a few bucks ready. Thanks for the advice.
SR. [/QUOTE]A few bucks after a pickup would seem appropriate for something in return, like digits. It is also a nice gesture, and might prevent further trouble, if you change your mind. Then again, it might provoke trouble. Maybe the lesson to really be learned is to try to put yourself in the SW's shoes, but also to expect the unexpected when mongering.