Too Much, Enough, Bored With BS About DS
Enough. Please consider this request to refrain from any more "repetitive" DS input for a awhile in this particular "reports" thread. Please voluntarily move back-and-forth-DS-exchanges to the other thread for providers and customers to exchange info. Yard, I luv ya, and your posts, but, please, no more knightly DS-cheerleader stuff. I hope DS has bartered extensively with you for the promo of her and your charming ongoing defense of her. DS, I know that you will be opposed to the concept espoused in this post, because there is little traffic to that other thread, so, you will be removed from the primary radar screen.
OK, you hobbyists can all do the math. It has gotten BORING with over 40% of the most recent 25 posts in this thread being from DS and to/about DS. Go back not too far, and, sometimes it is over 70%. Good for DS (Deanna Santana) as she is getting good free advertising, but, BAD for this forum because after the core message was clearly conveyed it has detracted from the overall forum by being boringly repetitive with the repetitive message and exchanges of messages.
I prefer to wish to read non-DS posts about fresh subjects from fellow hobbyists, and to hear absolutely nothing from any providers on a more than never/infrequent basis. DS is a mere, though apparently cute and tasty, provider. It is likely a harsh reality for DS based on her continuous messages trying to make herself feel good about her chosen line of work, but when it comes down to it, she is just another escort; some are good, some are not as good, some YMMV, and all have varying stories for why they are in the business. For those reasons, none have exclusive hobby customers because the hobbyists are out looking for and getting serviced by, covered and uncovered, others.
DS has many attractors, and several detractors, on several forum websites. So, there is nothing or little more to be said. Too much of a good thing is a turn off. Deanna, hun, sorry, but this is my perspective about this thread. No, your post about basically "just block people's posts if you do not want to read them" is way off mark and makes me believe there is some credence to your detractors. Of course, DS will likely post something of a negative reply to this post, because she obviously likes the advertising and wishes it to continue; if exchanges with her appear in the other forum, it can continue to exist, over there.
(BTW, I actually fall on the side of the fence that says, overall, it sounds like DS is worth seeing.) Please do not make assumptions and flame based on my post count, as, that does not reflect the whole story. Also, a review is forthcoming in a different thread.
Now, let's get on to the primary focus of this forum thread. To educate each other as hobbyists!
Another Member Is Bored-What A Shame!
[QUOTE=Fuhgetaboudit]Enough. Please consider this request to refrain from any more "repetitive" DS input for a awhile in this particular "reports" thread. Please voluntarily move back-and-forth-DS-exchanges to the other thread for providers and customers to exchange info. Yard, I luv ya, and your posts, but, please, no more knightly DS-cheerleader stuff.[/QUOTE]
Unlike say a newspaper where there is finite space dedicated to daily news stories this site offers almost unlimited bandwidth for posting of reviews, commentary, opinions etc. Thus it is irrelevant to use % ratios as an underlining basis for your argument. I think what the numbers really reflect is the lack of reviews on other providers. Members are either:
A: not seeing other providers (highly unlikely)
B: not writing reviews and back channeling information instead
C: lurking on the site and just reading
In any event what is needed is more reporting on other women period.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion on here. I know some members have a problem with girls being active on this site. A valid argument can be made that their presence here may inhibit some clients from posting negative information about their experiences. I for one find it refreshing to have some of the ladies posting. It is educational to hear their perspective. The exchange of information is what this site is supposed to be all about. There is certainly a lot of nonsense on these boards. Some members comment on almost every previous post with what may appear to be useless babble. I may not agree with everything and try to look at it this way. One person's post however seemingly irrelevant or trivial may provide a nugget of information that stimulates more conversation and results in valuable intel. There is another review site which is heavily censored. As a result my input there is limited and one of the reasons I like this forum is because I would rather have an unlimited free exchange of ideas however boring or nonsensical they may appear.
As far as your comments regarding my defense of Deana. First of all as a disclaimer I now consider her a friend of mine, albeit mindful of the boundaries associated and necessary to separate this friendship from our business relationship. I have always felt that there is more to be gained in my adventures than just sex. I do not have a quid pro quo arrangement with her as you suggested although she has paid for lunch on occasion. You describe my defense of her as cheerleader stuff. My posts on her have all been honest and on the mark. My reports on her from the beginning consist of an initial detailed review, a subsequent mini summation type review after several sessions with her, and yes-a couple of vigourous defenses of her after two members here who have never seen her went into attack mode with false accusations and a disinformation campaign. I would never sit idly by if I feel lies and insults have been directed towards her or any other girl I have seen for that matter. She is not the first girl I have defended on this site. And obviously having seen her as many times as I have I consider myself an expert witness on the subject of "Deana Santana" as it relates to everything relevant on this board. In fact I have been restrained in my reporting of my times with Deana in relation to how many times I have actually visited her.
You presume to know and understand Deana's intentions. You have her stereotyped into your neat little box of how an escort thinks and behaves. In fact you are wrong with most of your assumptions regarding her business. I also think it cowardly of you to attempt and pre-empt a rebuttal from her with your quote "Of course, DS will likely post something of a negative reply to this post, because she obviously likes the advertising and wishes it to continue". You state there is nothing more to be said about her. I do not agree with your premise. There are many girls and spas where trends or habits change and it is always useful to have that information. Nothing is etched in stone in this business. It is important not to presume that there is ever an "end of the line" regarding reporting on a specific provider. This is deja vu to me as at this time a year ago there was a certain spa that was getting extensive coverage in a different thread. Many positive reports were being written one after the other and some members here opined how sick and tired they were of reading about it. Of course these members never actually frequented the establishment. It was as a result of these incessant reviews that I decided to stick my feet into the pool for the first time in this game. In fact my very first post here was a review of this spa. Being new it was important to me to give back and report on what was freely given to me here. I was ridiculed early on for reporting on that spa. How should a new member here feel if he is discouraged or intimidated from writing a review on Deana just because some here may be bored with the subject? Everything written here is subjective and one person's boredom may be another's beginning to new exciting adventures. My advice to anyone new is see a girl and report back here no matter what anyone says. There are no absolute rules here and no members senior or otherwise are in charge contrary to what some of them think.
So you must have known by broaching this subject once again that you were inviting even more commentary. I guess I don't have enough humility to let your comments just pass. That is one of my character defects I will live with. If I see disparaging comments written about me, one of my friends or a provider I have seen my nature is to defend and I will continue to do so.
P.S. I do continue to be a card carrying member of the Deana Santana "Ass Lickers Club". In fact for full disclosure I was licking her sweet little ass this morning as I gave her a massage. Now I said licking her ass and not her asshole. I tried DATO with her before and she was rather indifferent towards it. So there's some new information to be reported in this thread-she loves being massaged and having her ass licked-at least by me-remember YMMV!
Ultimately it is Jackson's decision as to what is relevant here. I suggest anyone who is tired of reading about Deana get busy writing reports. The WORST thing to happen on this forum is for members to feel intimidated or stifled. Let the exchange of information continue as you say to educate each other as hobbyists. I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you will contribute actual reviews here as I see you have just joined last month.
Who's Going To Start Writing New Escort Reviews?
[QUOTE=Icarus02]I agree. She is great, but we heard it already and it is time to move on and read some new reviews.[/QUOTE]
You want to read new reviews here? How about posting some of your own adventures? I'm sure you visited more than the 2 you've posted over the last 13 months. It is so ironic that the recent focus in this thread is desired reporting on escorts other than Deana yet the people weighing in rarely post any reviews of escorts in this forum. Although everyone is entitled to their opinion there seems to be a lack of effort here. Posts of Deana have nothing to do with the lack of reporting on others. They are separate issues. Apparently if there were no Deana reviews the last month or so this thread would be on life support. I'm sure guys on here are seeing agency girls such as RSG as well as the large number of Indy's advertising-the primary issue is members aren't writing reviews.
