Streetwalker Reports

I agree with Varoom that the lesions seen (I called them acne) might be from dogfood, even tho she is only 20. But we know that it is not impossible that she has gone that far into "the desert." I chose to call it acne (call me an optimist.) I did not want to call her out for that possible habit on the forum.

But. The next question: is a monger willing to have a date with a junkie? FS, for sure, no. The primary danger from junkies is HIV transmission. Properly covered, there is little risk, but do you want to get that close to an IV drug abuser? While BBBJ carries little risk of transmission, extreme caution should be exerted. NEVER would I do FS, even covered, with a known junkie or a girl that has these suspicious lesions. Look for them also on their arms where, for what ever reason, they cannot stop picking them.

I debated whether to post this, but. But I think the questions are important to mongers.

[QUOTE=Varoom;1479299]That acne appears to be sores associated with "H" drug abuse.[/QUOTE]

Lincoln Ave between Gilbert and Reading. Seen several SWs even as late as 3:30am on Saturdays. Mostly BSW and I am sure there was one trangender dressed like a female. Careful. No LEOs and usually they just driveby unlike standing in a corner as in W. MCM. Wish some WSW would move here.

Made a trip down reading road. In roselawn around 8pm today, saw 3 WSW including what I believed to be the redhead with another WSW walking together. They tried to get my attention by waving (please just give me the look) however a dark haired WSW brunette with a small tattoo on her left calf did give me the look as she looked to be about a 7 or 8 and decent, was gone before I could turn around. Seen no LE.

Be Safe

[QUOTE=Giani; 1479327]I agree with Varoom that the lesions seen (I called them acne) might be from dogfood, even tho she is only 20. But we know that it is not impossible that she has gone that far into "the desert." I chose to call it acne (call me an optimist.) I did not want to call her out for that possible habit on the forum.

But. The next question: is a monger willing to have a date with a junkie? FS, for sure, no. The primary danger from junkies is HIV transmission. Properly covered, there is little risk, but do you want to get that close to an IV drug abuser? While BBBJ carries little risk of transmission, extreme caution should be exerted. NEVER would I do FS, even covered, with a known junkie or a girl that has these suspicious lesions. Look for them also on their arms where, for what ever reason, they cannot stop picking them.

I debated whether to post this, but. But I think the questions are important to mongers.[/QUOTE]Great that Giani elaborated for the benefit of others here, not to the detriment of the female that was previously mentioned. Just generic advice, and excellent advice it is.

Those marks on the arms are often referred as inflictions by the cat scratching them, of course we know better, but few that are feeding on the 'dogfood' are going to admit this. One recently mentioned that she was involved in an accident at her sons ballgame and scratched by the chainlink fence; duh. Well, maybe not hon. As Giani says, be aware of what you see and suspect, and if you suspect any intrusive activity into ones skin best to avoid FS; risk just too high and there are so many other options. Just one of the many risks of this street activity. Be wise.

[QUOTE=Giani; 1479327]I agree with Varoom that the lesions seen (I called them acne) might be from dogfood, even tho she is only 20. But we know that it is not impossible that she has gone that far into "the desert." I chose to call it acne (call me an optimist.) I did not want to call her out for that possible habit on the forum.

But. The next question: is a monger willing to have a date with a junkie? FS, for sure, no. The primary danger from junkies is HIV transmission. Properly covered, there is little risk, but do you want to get that close to an IV drug abuser? While BBBJ carries little risk of transmission, extreme caution should be exerted. NEVER would I do FS, even covered, with a known junkie or a girl that has these suspicious lesions. Look for them also on their arms where, for what ever reason, they cannot stop picking them.

I debated whether to post this, but. But I think the questions are important to mongers.[/QUOTE]How can you look at someone and know weather or not they have HIV? Let me tell you something half the girls down there have HIV. There are risks in getting a BJ uncovered.

Sheesh, all this time, I thought you COULD tell by looking if someone is HIV positive. And. Thank you for "telling us something": that half the girls "down there" have HIV. Gee, if one can't tell by looking whether a girl has HIV, how might one know, as you proclaim, that "half the girls ARE HIV positive."

So your point is?

Do you monger? (The evidence from your post is you may be thumping your bible instead of something more enjoyable.) Are there risks to mongering? Of course. Duh. But,"Let me tell you something." The risk of HIV from oral contact is epsilon (look it up). Reports of HIV transmission by female giving head are non-existant (tho theoretically possible if the guy has genital lesions). So is your news flash that you can get clap (etc) by BBBJ? Did you even understand the point of my post?

The "weather" is hot."Knowing weather" does not help "knowing" HIV infection. If you can provide respectable data on the frequency of HIV infection in Cincinnati sex workers, put up or shut up. Really. Again, what IS your point? Let's see you get some history of posting valuable posts and you may repair your credibility.

P. S. To long time posters. I KNOW that I should have let this newbie post float on by like. You know. But, I didn't.

[QUOTE=Joe5543;1481383]How can you look at someone and know weather or not they have HIV? Let me tell you something half the girls down there have HIV. There are risks in getting a BJ uncovered.[/QUOTE]

Saw several LEOs at the intersection of WMcM ave / WMcM st on Tuesday night around 12am arresting few persons. Next day saw LEOs active close to Exit 6 on I-75 today morning around 1 am.

[QUOTE=Joe5543;1481383]How can you look at someone and know weather or not they have HIV? Let me tell you something half the girls down there have HIV. There are risks in getting a BJ uncovered.[/QUOTE]There's an old saying in health care that when it comes to microorganisms,"Your mouth is the dirtiest opening in the body, even dirtier than your butt hole."

Most STD's are passed from mucus membrane to mucus membrane. That means from urinary meatus (peehole) to mouth, vagina, anus or vice versa.

BBBJ, DATY and BBFS are the same risk as far as I can see.

Our hobby is all about risk, but you should learn what the risks are before you decide your comfort level.

Went for a stroll this morning roselawn saw TGTBT redhead on the phone I could have swooped but I just had her last week so I passed the other 2 girls I saw I put out my car for various reasons plus I was going to hook up with a girl I met 2 weeks ago in cov no minutes on her phone. So I cruised mcm saw a few none I wanted picked up a WSW on mcm her right hand was swollen from iv drug use it's a shame because she was nice black hair thin, she also had a pimp white guy so if any of you guys see her with him she is legit just not what I wanted I even gave her. 05 to exit my vehicle. Well I didn't do anything today to much heat and not enough decent ladies.

Be safe guys

[QUOTE=Chief48; 1479742]Made a trip down reading road. In roselawn around 8pm today, saw 3 WSW including what I believed to be the redhead with another WSW walking together. They tried to get my attention by waving (please just give me the look) however a dark haired WSW brunette with a small tattoo on her left calf did give me the look as she looked to be about a 7 or 8 and decent, was gone before I could turn around. Seen no LE.

Be Safe[/QUOTE]This TGTBT redhead: is she older than I'm imagining based on reports here? It was too hot to pick anyone up yesterday but I cruised down Reading just for research purposes. Saw a redhead in a pair of shorts talking on the phone, but didn't know if it was her or not. Like I said. She looked older than the one you all mention.

Wife is out of town tonight and I'm contemplating coming out of retirement. LOL

[QUOTE=Firehousemack; 1482529]There's an old saying in health care that when it comes to microorganisms,"Your mouth is the dirtiest opening in the body, even dirtier than your butt hole."

Most STD's are passed from mucus membrane to mucus membrane. That means from urinary meatus (peehole) to mouth, vagina, anus or vice versa.

BBBJ, DATY and BBFS are the same risk as far as I can see.

Our hobby is all about risk, but you should learn what the risks are before you decide your comfort level.[/QUOTE]Here are the facts from the Center For Disease Control:

[b]If a person is infected with any of the following STDs, there is a risk they could transmit the infection via oral sex. [/b]

The most common STD transmitted via oral sex is herpes. There are two main types of herpes simplex virus (HSV) : HSV type 1, which usually causes cold sores around the mouth, and HSV type 2, which generally causes sores around the genitals. If a person has HSV type 1 and they give oral sex to another person, the herpes could be transmitted to the genital area of the other person, causing genital sores. This process can also work in reverse, with HSV-2 transmitting from the genitals to the mouth of the other person during oral sex, though this is rare.

Gonorrhea can easily be transmitted via oral sex. The infection is usually passed from infected genitals to a person's throat, but can also be passed from an infected throat to a person's genitals. The body will almost always naturally clear the throat of the bacteria that cause gonorrhea within three months, although infections in the genital tract will usually require antibiotics to cure.

Syphilis is easily transmitted during oral sex if a person's mouth comes into contact with an open sore or a skin rash caused by the infection.

It is possible (but thought to be not very common) for the human papillomavirus, which causes genital warts, to be transmitted through oral sex.

Chlamydia can infect the throat via oral sex, although this is thought to be uncommon. People with chlamydia may not have any symptoms and may not be aware they are infected.

The hepatitis A virus is found in human faeces, and may be passed on during anal-oral sex.

Hepatitis B is contained in sexual fluids and blood and may be transmitted during oral sex in a similar way to HIV (see below).

Hepatitis C is generally only contained in blood, and will only be transmitted if there is blood present during oral sex.

Gastrointestinal infections and parasites may be passed on during oral contact with the anus.

[b]Can HIV be transmitted during oral sex? [/b]

HIV can pose a small risk for both the active (person giving the oral stimulation) and receptive (person receiving oral stimulation) partner.

Transmission from an HIV positive receptive partner to an HIV negative active partner may occur when the active partner gets sexual fluid (semen or vaginal fluid) or blood (from menstruation or a wound somewhere in the genital or anal region) into a cut, sore, ulcer or area of inflammation somewhere in their mouth or throat. The linings of the mouth and throat are very resistant to viral infections such as HIV, so infection is unlikely if they are healthy.

Transmission from an HIV positive active partner to an HIV negative receptive partner is generally believed to be less common. This is because HIV is normally only present in saliva in very low levels that are not sufficient to cause infection. The only risk in this scenario would be from bleeding wounds or gums in the HIV positive person's mouth or on their lips, which may transfer blood onto the mucous membranes of the other person's genitals or anus, or into any cuts or sores they may have.

The risk of HIV transmission from an infected partner through oral sex is much smaller than the risk of HIV transmission from anal or vaginal sex. Because of this, measuring the exact risk of HIV transmission as a result of oral sex is very difficult. In addition, since most sexually active individuals practice oral sex in addition to other forms of sex (such as vaginal and / or anal sex) when transmission occurs, it is difficult to determine whether or not it occurred as a result of oral sex or other more risky sexual activities. Finally, several co-factors can increase the risk of HIV transmission through oral sex, including oral ulcers and wounds, bleeding gums, genital sores, genital or oral piercings, and the presence of other STDs.

When scientists describe the risk of transmitting an infectious disease, like HIV, the term "theoretical risk" is often used. Very simply,"theoretical risk" means that passing an infection from one person to another is possible, even though there may not yet be any actual documented cases."Theoretical risk" is not the same as likelihood. In other words, stating that HIV infection is "theoretically possible" does not necessarily mean it is likely to happen. Only that it might. Documented risk, on the other hand, is used to describe transmission that has actually occurred, been investigated, and documented in the scientific literature.

Various scientific studies have been performed around the world to try and document and study instances of HIV transmission through oral sex. A programme in San Francisco studied 198 people, nearly all gay or bisexual men. The subjects stated that they had only had oral sex for a year, from six months preceding the six-month study to its end. 20 per cent of the study participants (39 people) reported performing oral sex on partners they knew to be HIV positive. 35 of those did not use a condom and 16 reported swallowing semen. No one became infected with HIV during the study, although the small number of participants performing oral sex on a person living with HIV meant the researchers could only say that there was a less than 2. 8 per cent chance of infection through oral sex over a year. 1 In 2000, a different San Francisco study of gay men who had recently acquired HIV infection found that 7. 8 per cent of these infections were attributed to oral sex. 2 However, the results of the study have since been called into question due to the reliability of the participants' data.

In June 2002, a study conducted amongst 135 HIV negative Spanish heterosexuals, who were in a sexual relationship with a person who was HIV positive, reported that over 19, 000 instances of unprotected oral sex had not led to any cases of HIV transmission. 3 The study also looked at contributing factors that could affect the potential transmission of HIV through oral sex. They monitored viral load and asked questions such as whether ejaculation in the mouth occurred and how good oral health was. Amongst HIV positive men. 34 per cent had ejaculated into the mouths of their partners. Viral load levels were available for 60 people in the study. 10 per cent of whom had levels over 10, 000 copies. Nearly 16 per cent of the HIV positive people had CD4 counts below 200. The study, conducted over a ten year period between 1990 and 2000, adds to the growing number of studies which suggest varying levels of risk of HIV transmission from oral sex when compared to anal or vaginal intercourse.

At the 4th International Oral AIDS Conference held in South Africa, the risk of transmission through oral sex was estimated to be approximately 0. 04 per cent per contact. 4 This percentage figure is a lot lower than the two American figures, because this figure is a risk per contact percentage, whereas the other figures are percentage risks over much longer time periods. Oral sex is still regarded as a low-risk sexual activity in terms of HIV transmission, but only when more work is done will we be clearer as to the risks of oral sex.

[QUOTE=GentlemanPerv; 1482593]This TGTBT redhead: is she older than I'm imagining based on reports here? It was too hot to pick anyone up yesterday but I cruised down Reading just for research purposes. Saw a redhead in a pair of shorts talking on the phone, but didn't know if it was her or not. Like I said. She looked older than the one you all mention.

Wife is out of town tonight and I'm contemplating coming out of retirement. LOL[/QUOTE]Actually the brunette with tattoo was closer to being TGTBT (7-8) however the redhead was older and some what worn.

Be Safe

[QUOTE=GentlemanPerv; 1482593]This TGTBT redhead: is she older than I'm imagining based on reports here? It was too hot to pick anyone up yesterday but I cruised down Reading just for research purposes. Saw a redhead in a pair of shorts talking on the phone, but didn't know if it was her or not. Like I said. She looked older than the one you all mention.

Wife is out of town tonight and I'm contemplating coming out of retirement. LOL[/QUOTE]Yes she is. I have had several dreams with her. She was excellent in all my dreams.

Saw this blonde in a blue dress this week walking up Dunlap. We all know that TVs frequent Dunlap, generally wihout being hastled by LE (we STILL ask why).

Anyone have 411 on her / him? I had not see this person before, but was suspicious just because of the location.

Drove the mcm loop saw a few WSW settled on one I had before small body spinner type has black hair but is a natural redhead, she wanted me to go back to her place but she has no electricity she said her pimp didn't pay the bill, I suggested the Fulton she said lets get a room at the budget or rest inn so she can get some sleep I declined if anything goes wrong at the hotel then Leo comes looking for me. I also am not getting her pimp a room and I explained that to her it was Fulton or nothing she agreed I can't understand how these girls hook up with these idiot guys this girl is cute but young and impressionable. I did tell her if she let her hair go back to natural red & have the carpet match the drapes she can more than likely get more guys something about those redheads. This girl really got into it cfs. 25 mish & doggy finish no Leo this am.

Good hunting guys.