To good to be true and Pictures
I'm not a professional photographer, but I could probably take photos that good. All it really takes is some prep time, a good setting, good lighting, and yes. A decent camera (which I do have). Maybe that makes me a "near professional"?
I know it has been said that "professional" looking photographs usually scream "scam" or "fake". As a general rule, I would agree. Much of the time the pics of [I]real[/I] girls are quick shots for the purpose of the ads. Many times these are taken with the camera on their phone. Much of the time this results in pics of poor quality.
If I were the girls posting ads, I [I]would[/I] avoid the "glamour shots" type of photo (even if they are nudes or semi-nudes and real). They seem suspicious. Those type of pictures usually don't have a real background and no context. However, I [b][I]really do[/I][/b] think that the girls should post good quality, clear, decent size pictures that show the girl to her best advantage.
In such a highly competitive field, the girls should do whatever they can to make themselves stand out (in a good way, of course *smile*). I'm sure you guys will agree that the pictures are the first thing that we look at after the title of the ad.
To that end I will volunteer to take pictures for those who want them.
[QUOTE=M K Paris]Could you take a photo that nice and focused even with an expensive digital camera? No, that takes a near professional.[/QUOTE]