-
Nice trick
[QUOTE=Cls9637;3411631]Once again, RTFF. There are many pictures from me, some as recently as a couple of months ago. There are also recent pictures from others. I don't find the most recent picture from BolloBellgrande to be blurry at all.[/QUOTE]You happen to repost the same photos from a year ago, and then claim that they were only taken a couple months ago? I've noticed you've done this same trick time and again with other girls with photos that are years old. Of course this is not always the case, and you must have an impressive collection of SWs, but please don't tell me year old photos are recent by only a couple of months.
-
Some funny stuff
[QUOTE=EasyLuvr;3411673]Spied her in front of the church at Millington and Wilkens and with none of my regulars out, I scooped her and headed to the rent a bed. We got naked and I noticed while she had a nice body, she had a thatch that hadn't been trimmed for quite a while. Not letting that stop the little guy, I covered her and proceeded to stuff her. I noticed that it was hard to get inside and she said "hold up", rolling out from under me. She removed her stash from her cooch and put it in her purse! First time that a SW has ever tried to fuck me with her rocks inside too! She crawled back onto the bed and guided me back in. She got wet immediately and got into it. Didn't take long for me to bust a nut in her, cleaning up and dropping her back in the same area. No digits and standard tuition.[/QUOTE]I wonder if any of those pebbles had burst inside of her, if she would have caught a buzz that way, orally it works, but inside of a Kitty, that would be a first, LOL.
-
[QUOTE=Indigo456;3411758]I wonder if any of those pebbles had burst inside of her, if she would have caught a buzz that way, orally it works, but inside of a Kitty, that would be a first, LOL.[/QUOTE]No lie! Wonder if I would have gotten a buzz as well?
-
It's either Megalomania,
[QUOTE=Chucklin;3409811] Et tu Shune [/QUOTE]Or a simple case of geriatric folly.
A word of advise to anyone asking for information on this forum. Be polite as you would anywhere else in life, and don't act as if you are entitled. Like the old saying goes "you get more with sugar, then you would with vinegar. ".
With that being said, however, there are sociopaths out there that are beyond any hope of redemption. They lurk, and they troll like a diseased varmint.
At best, these sociopaths propagate aggravation to forum members with their irrational and childlike open posts, then sends privet messages laden with cowardly tantrums. But that's nothing compared to the physical harm these diseased varmints can potentially inflict on the girls they meet.
So be warned, and do not share any information with theses worthless trolls.
-
Esi
Gents lets talk about ESI or electronically stored information.
I understand that some of you want to share your hunt photos, and videos and so on. BUT please clean the damn files before posting online. Every picture (unless taken on old school Polaroid camera) has lots of metadata info. This includes GPS info, device info, and in some cases even account info. There are lots of ways and software to "clean' the ESI and simple google search will teach you how to clean ESI from metadata. I received number of pictures from members in inbox that basically told me who they were, where they drive, and etc. Now if I can do that so can uncle and guys and I am not even an IT pro. Thus, no matter what you share, clean the damn thing or you might as well post your drivers license and Ady on here. Same thing with forum photos, most of them have that metadata intact. I am not saying not to share, but be smart about it because boys at Meade are cataloging and filling UTah database like you would not believe, and you never know where that data will end up. Think about it! If amazon can track you across the web, and know your shoes size, what can Uncle do at Meade?
Rant over, but seriously know what you are doing or don't put your self out there like that. Remember metadata was what got DPR caught, and it was not even his doing, some guy he was associated with dropped a ball, and then they followed the ESI trail until they caught him with his laptop open in the library. Heck another member on this forum was speaking to me about this and he is a lawyer and ran this data through E-Discovery tools (soft lawyers use to process huge amounts of data in ESI discovery phase of litigation and filter it down to relevant things) his firm uses and you would not believe types of info he got out of it. Granted he will never do anything with it, but somebody else might.
[blue]That's not how DPR was discovered. Ulbricht was spamming sites before Silk Road was popular trying to drive traffic there. This doofus from the FBI used google to find some of the earliest references to Silk Road on the web (google indexes everything) and then was able to tie this altoid guy doing the spamming, to an email Ulbricht used to do freelance programming which he was still using for non-silk road stuff. Then when they busted him (laptop open) he had all the data in the world they needed on his laptop, which he was using in a public space, to convict him.
A2[/blue]
-
[QUOTE=Sirgela;3412014]Gents lets talk about ESI or electronically stored information.
... be smart about it because boys at Meade are cataloging and filling UTah database like you would not believe, and you never know where that data will end up. Think about it! If amazon can track you across the web, and know your shoes size, what can Uncle do at Meade? ...[/QUOTE]The police or FBI might care, if you were a big enough fish to land on their radar. But "Uncle at Meade" doesn't give a shit about anyone on this forum, we're way too mundane to be interesting to them.
-
[QUOTE=Noobalicious;3412545]The police or FBI might care, if you were a big enough fish to land on their radar. But "Uncle at Meade" doesn't give a shit about anyone on this forum, we're way too mundane to be interesting to them.[/QUOTE]Actually that's incorrect. The boys in blue & suits do use the information used on sites like this as a source of information.
-
[QUOTE=NiteTimer;3412597]Actually that's incorrect. The boys in blue & suits do use the information used on sites like this as a source of information.[/QUOTE]Fair point. I stand corrected on that part.
I'm sticking to my story about the "Uncle at Meade" though. .
-
[QUOTE=Noobalicious;3412598]Fair point. I stand corrected on that part.
I'm sticking to my story about the "Uncle at Meade" though. .[/QUOTE]I agree with you whole heartedly. Electronic information is still easily tracked & useable.
By almost anybody. Last year it was explained to me that Facebook is easier to crack than a phone number these days.
Love the "cloud" don't you too?
-
ESI part 2
A2 best of my knowledge when first admin was caught that fat guy in middle America DPR had sent him a photo of test sample or package in one of their convo. They matched the digital footprint from metadata of that photo to his stuff and that's how they got onto it. Meaning data linking photo that they knew for sure DPR account sent to admin to data signature found on the laptop in library. Granted this was way before he (DPR) ordered a hit on a guy to a undercover agent that staged the whole thing.
Noobalicious & NiteTimer you are right and wrong. Uncle at meade is not one that does caring dear sirs, They just catalog and save data in MTNs neural link (their version of AI), and when Orgs need it they run through info on this DB first and try to get leads or at least direction to where to look. If they need something and they think you have it, do not think for a second they will not be knocking on your door just because your are small fish. Every time big fish are caught small fish are used as bait, and small fish always end up hurt somehow. It's just a friendly advice obviously you are free to do as you chose. I have my sources that have very intimate inside knowledge of this and I trust what they told me.
Finally as a general PSA there is no such thing as cloud. This magical mystical cloud thing does not exist. It's just somebody else's computer that has your data, such as Facebook servers, Amazon servers (A3), or even Dropbox. Why people hand over their data for free is beyond me, but what's more scary is that some of those servers log every IP connection and you do not need me to tell you how easy it is to trace IP. If anybody thinks that video upload site members use to share videos will not roll over as soon as they receive subpoena than you have not seen how business executives' decision making works. If it comes down to fight with uncle over this and on the line they have their revenue stream vs your privacy do not think for a second they will chose you. Heck same thing could probably happen on this site if Uncle presses hard enough. Mind you Jackson has Florida ady and Godaddy as registrar. Both are within USA Jurisdiction. Heck go daddy founder even went to school in Baltimore.
Anyway I am not advocating to wear a tinfoil nor do I wear one, but all I am saying is be careful and watch yourself. All it takes is one slip.
-
Chuckles
[QUOTE=HcLine;3411402]New guy chuckles was getting on my nerves! Not at all argumentative.[/QUOTE]Yeah, your nerves are not the only ones he's getting on, he's getting on mine and CLS' too I bet. All I can say to chuckles is GTFOOH.
-
[QUOTE=Chucklin;3411657]You happen to repost the same photos from a year ago, and then claim that they were only taken a couple months ago? I've noticed you've done this same trick time and again with other girls with photos that are years old. Of course this is not always the case, and you must have an impressive collection of SWs, but please don't tell me year old photos are recent by only a couple of months.[/QUOTE]This is getting annoying. Once again, RTFF! Search "Heaven" and you will actually see some pictures I did with her a couple of months ago. The ones that are old I identify as such. I don't "claim" they are anything but what they are. RTFF, Chuckles!
This conversation is over.
-
I agree
[QUOTE=Mongerel;3411647]How hard is it to understand that these guys are NOT purposely looking for girls who've gone downhill, rather they are merely stating how far she has gone. This isn't the "Still Hot Streetwalker Reports" forum, kind sir, it covers them all. And showing that she used to be a looker and how far she's deteriorated is, believe it or not, USEFUL information to some.[/QUOTE]You are absolutely correct Mongrel, which is exactly why I asked for something more than a single small blurry photo of a SW with her back turned! Then I get chided with numerous useless "RTFF" responses when I already have as I'm not a newbie, just one that lost the old tag a while ago. In any case, after having "RTFF", there are still no recent pics except for the single one already mentioned. That is my point, and I have no doubt I'll just get more witless "RTFF" responses to this post from the ones who think they are so high and mighty. It was never an intention to start a flame war on this, but others thought otherwise and made it one.
-
Chucklin
He contacted me in reference to obtaining a number of a provider that is only seeing mongers who are known & trusted to her. When I refused he retorted that I was not of senior status! And tried to trade a providers number that I already have. Which I thought was highly suspect. Anyhow after reading his posts which are mostly argumentative and worthless. I will not be sharing any info. Safe mongering Bros!
-
Keep seeing this
[QUOTE=NiteTimer;3412597]Actually that's incorrect. The boys in blue & suits do use the information used on sites like this as a source of information.[/QUOTE]Seriously? Ok, how? How exactly do the cops use the information contained on these pages? They can't use it for warrants, at least not until probable cause is redefined in American Jurisprudence. It can't be used as evidence, not in any way. We know that for two reasons, one theoretical and one empirical. It's hearsay, it's impossible to corroborate (theoretical), if it could be after nearly 2,000,000 posts and 17 years at least one, seriously just fucking one post would have found it's way into court, just one. As of now, and pretty much forever that number is zero.
And then to address the tiresome "oh they read it here and then they follow up in real life" horseshit. I know it makes some of you guys feel more like Tony Montana by adding this element of danger but this shit was in the streetwalker thread. Cops don't use any of our info but even if they did, fucking streetwalkers? Are you kidding me? Cops get paid to do nothing more than drive around for 8 hours keeping up where the chicks are walking. There has never been, not even once, a moment where somebody wrote something about streetwalkers on this forum that the boys in blue didn't already know about it.
[QUOTE=Sirgela;3412694]A2 best of my knowledge when first admin was caught that fat guy in middle America DPR had sent him a photo of test sample or package in one of their convo. They matched the digital footprint from metadata of that photo to his stuff and that's how they got onto it. Meaning data linking photo that they knew for sure DPR account sent to admin to data signature found on the laptop in library. Granted this was way before he (DPR) ordered a hit on a guy to a undercover agent that staged the whole thing.
Noobalicious & NiteTimer you are right and wrong. Uncle at meade is not one that does caring dear sirs, They just catalog and save data in MTNs neural link (their version of AI), and when Orgs need it they run through info on this DB first and try to get leads or at least direction to where to look. If they need something and they think you have it, do not think for a second they will not be knocking on your door just because your are small fish. Every time big fish are caught small fish are used as bait, and small fish always end up hurt somehow. It's just a friendly advice obviously you are free to do as you chose. I have my sources that have very intimate inside knowledge of this and I trust what they told me.[/QUOTE]Nope, from ARS Technica: "But investigations always have many threads to pull. The feds couldn't initially follow the money to Roberts, nor could they find the physical location of his cloaked servers. In the absence of usual digital clues, the feds fell back on a low-tech approach: keep going back in time until you find the first guy to ever talk about the Silk Road. Find that guy and you probably have a person of interest, if not Roberts himself.
So they looked, assigning one agent to conduct "an extensive search of the Internet," in the FBI's words, looking for early Silk Road publicity. The earliest post ever to mention the site appeared on a drug-oriented forum called shroomery. Org, where a user named "altoid" had made a single post. " They found him by goggling his spam. And this is an important thing, to find the Dread Pirate Roberts who was operating the conduit to facilitate millions of dollars worth of narcotics traffic they assigned ONE FUCKING AGENT. There is nobody, seriously nobody looking at any of you guys.
I can't even believe that you guys talk about the NSA. One, if they are looking at you they know how much the shit you took this morning weighed. Seriously, there is no fucking hiding from the NSA. The good news is they aren't looking at you. They also aren't going to be sharing a fucking thing out of that data center in Utah to help Barnie Fife find somebody buying a blowjob.
You guys blow this shit way the fuck up. Yes there are cops looking to bust you for buying a blowjob, yes there will be stings in the street and on backpage, no, nobody is ever going to track you down by your IP address and find you for buying pussy.