Printable View
Pics are her. She is vivacious and lots of fun. We are lucky to have her.
[QUOTE=Gbrand;6895037]Has anyone seen her yet? Pictures and stats look awesome (but we know how that goes). No results from a reverse image search I could find. Thanks in advance.[/QUOTE]
Ellie has passed through here before. I saw her a few months ago. Very accommodating BBBJCIM.
Ellie is thicker than pictured. Not fat, but she does have very grabbable ass and titties. Handfuls of tittues, too. I laid on the bed while she went down on me BBBJ and played with those titties like stress balls. They felt like implants when I squeezed them, but when I just held them and juggled them, they felt very natural.
Anyway. She's probably around 5'6-5'8. She did have heels on. I told her that I wanted BBBJ only. She asked if I was going to finish in her mouth, then she gave the OK. We laid on the bed. She put her hair up in a hair clip, then she went to work. 10 minutes of moans, slurps, and slobbers went by before she pulled off and started massaging her jaws. I felt bad, so I started stroking myself and told her to suck on my balls. She swiped my hand away and said, "I can do it. ".
Good girl.
10 more minutes, she alternated between stroking and sucking. She knew when to stroke and sucked again when the strokes started drying out.
I blasted the back of her throat. Quick rinse and went on my merry way.
Fun experience. I'd give her an 9/10. I like it when they lay on their back and let me throat fuck them until I CIM. She insisted that I laid down instead.
Very repeatable. Very satisfied.
[QUOTE=ArrogantBstrd;6895442]Ellie has passed through here before. I saw her a few months ago. Very accommodating BBBJCIM.
Ellie is thicker than pictured. Not fat, but she does have very grabbable ass and titties. Handfuls of tittues, too. I laid on the bed while she went down on me BBBJ and played with those titties like stress balls. They felt like implants when I squeezed them, but when I just held them and juggled them, they felt very natural.
Anyway. She's probably around 5'6-5'8. She did have heels on. .[/QUOTE]Good description for Ellie, that's about right. Those titties are nice, all natural my guess and she is slight thick for asian but very sexy and fun session. Without the heels, guess she about 5'3-5'5.
Honey as S99 now great body and pics acccurate, new Thai girl and worth visit.
[QUOTE=GG1234;6888796]While browsing the OC forums, I [B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31130-Korean-Agency-BB&p=6887327&highlight=skparadise#post6887327]noticed[/url][/B] a new k-org serving both OC and SD: SKParadise.
[B][url=https://www.skparadise.com/]https://www.skparadise.com/[/url][/B][/QUOTE]I've used them twice in SD and once in OC. Positive experience each time. Has anyone tried Mimi yet? I have an appointment for tomorrow. She's supposed to give great head.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6895147]Pics are her. She is vivacious and lots of fun. We are lucky to have her.[/QUOTE]I was thinking about seeing her this week, but I'm undecided. I couldn't find any reviews of her. Could you provide a bit more detail? Face, ass, tits, would you consider her a service queen etc. Feel free to send me a message. Thanks in advance!
Her pics posted at SDAG looks familiar. I can't recall website but I think I have seen before.
[QUOTE=TrickOrTreat68;6896645]I was thinking about seeing her this week, but I'm undecided. I couldn't find any reviews of her. Could you provide a bit more detail? Face, ass, tits, would you consider her a service queen etc. Feel free to send me a message. Thanks in advance![/QUOTE]
Just saw Mimi at SK Paradise. Total spinner, pretty face, probably early 30's? Delivered on a great BBBJ with excellent technique. Nice tight pussy for the second pop. I plan to book again mid-week, provided she's still here. I've been a little frustrated with how quick these girls head to the next town. Find one you like and the meter starts running too quick. Anyways, definitely recommend and hope she gets enough business to stay awhile.
[QUOTE=GentleSun;6896403]I've used them twice in SD and once in OC. Positive experience each time. Has anyone tried Mimi yet? I have an appointment for tomorrow. She's supposed to give great head.[/QUOTE]Haven't seen Mimi, but saw her roommate Helen and she is a nympho. Made a more detailed review in TER, but she basically just used me to get off and it was great. Lots of DFK, BBBJ, BLS, BBFS, and CIP. She gets gushing wet and gets off pretty easily. She had to actually wipe me down with a hand towel mid session. Surprised there aren't more reviews of her. Perhaps the more senior mongers know her other aliases? Looks wise, older than what's in the pics, but still cute and body slender enough. I wanted to see Mimi, but she had mixed reviews regarding her body with other mongers basically calling her fat. So, I too would like to know about any recent experiences with her and how she looks. As always, YMMV.
Those pics are def touched up and reflect probably 50% of her. The photos don't show her tattoos on her left shoulder, belly, and tramp stamp.
Service was decent as she aims to please, although I'd say she does talk a lot. Her English is above average for a K-provider.
Overall, I'd say it was a good session, with LFK, BBBJ, CG, ACG, missionary & doggy.
[QUOTE=BKane80;6897385]Haven't seen Mimi, but saw her roommate Helen and she is a nympho. Made a more detailed review in TER, but she basically just used me to get off and it was great. Lots of DFK, BBBJ, BLS, BBFS, and CIP. She gets gushing wet and gets off pretty easily. She had to actually wipe me down with a hand towel mid session. Surprised there aren't more reviews of her. Perhaps the more senior mongers know her other aliases? Looks wise, older than what's in the pics, but still cute and body slender enough. I wanted to see Mimi, but she had mixed reviews regarding her body with other mongers basically calling her fat. So, I too would like to know about any recent experiences with her and how she looks. As always, YMMV.[/QUOTE]No, she's definitely not fat by anyone's definition. Total spinner, pretty face, and even reasonably athletic / toned. I'm going to see her again Wednesday or Thursday this week.
Anyone have intel on Drea? Particularly interested in more info about her looks. Is she as skinny as her pics? Is her face pretty?
[QUOTE=GentleSun;6897731]No, she's definitely not fat by anyone's definition. Total spinner, pretty face, and even reasonably athletic / toned. I'm going to see her again Wednesday or Thursday this week.[/QUOTE]Awesome. Thanks for the info. Wonder why those mongers on TER called her fat. Anyways, I'd see her too this week if I didn't just spend my cash on Helen LOL. Hope she stays here a while.
Whoa, you lucky bastards.
Looks like Hera is starting in San Diego this week huh? [URL]https://www.xoxo-club.com/hera[/URL].
She's been in OC for a while and also in legendary LSC in bayarea as their top girl.
I'm definitely going to miss her up here.
She's a tight spinner, young, pretty, and has a great attitude and service. I do hope this is a temporary thing and she comes back up here soon.
Cheers boys, treat her right.
Well damn finally had my first Asian agency provider. Screening and set up was a breeze with sandra99. There was a bit of a wait before I got the door code and unit number for the mission valley apartment incall but no biggie. Had a 10 AM appointment. From researching I found out its best to go early as possibly while the lady is still fresh and during the weekday early when the neighbors are gone for school / work. Anyways once inside honey greeted with a hug and kiss. She is definitely the girl in the pics but I can't guess age. She was sexy AF regardless. Hit the room more hugs and kiss while I took care of the paperwork (240 for 45 minutes). I undressed and helped her take off her black panties and bra kissing her body sucking on her big man mades with dark brown eraser nipples as she stood naked in front of me. Now to the shower had my first ever blue toast LOL. In the shower we groped and washed each other. No BJ in the shower but she did give a HJ while DFK and soaping my already stiff cock. Back in the room we layed down she applied some lube or lotion to my dick I'm guessing flavored and started a nice BJ and Toung flicking the head. Rubber applied and started in doggy, loved her sweet moans while I was beating it up. Then we moved to mish with plenty of DFK and neck kissing. She claimed she had an O but I'm not sure, I blasted in the rubber shortly after. I'm spent and she is Cuddling with me giving me kisses telling me that she likes how soft my lips are and my dick was the perfect size for her. We also talked about how much longer she would be in SD (2 more days), she even taught me how to say hello in Thai she was so sweet and affectionate. Before time was up back to the bathroom for another blue toast and shower. Plenty of kisses in the shower. Upon leaving she gave me water, candy and one last DFK as she wished me a great day and asked me to see her if she comes back to SD. Damn the session was fire! Haven't had GFE like that in a while. I know sandra99 gets a lot of mixed reviews but the whole experience was great and I will use them again. The incall was very clean, the bed / towels were very clean, and I really like how sanitized everything was with the 2 blue toast (with disposable cups) and 2 showers. I also got screened into diamonds88 so will try them next in north county SD. Be safe monger on.
[QUOTE=IkeBuny;6897913]Whoa, you lucky bastards.
Looks like Hera is starting in San Diego this week huh? [URL]https://www.xoxo-club.com/hera[/URL].
She's been in OC for a while and also in legendary LSC in bayarea as their top girl.
I'm definitely going to miss her up here.
She's a tight spinner, young, pretty, and has a great attitude and service. I do hope this is a temporary thing and she comes back up here soon.
Cheers boys, treat her right.[/QUOTE]Hello IkeBuny. Could you give your opinion on how Hera's actual looks compare to the photos on the xoxo website?
Thanks.
-TJNiko.
[QUOTE=Tijuaniko;6898282]Hello IkeBuny. Could you give your opinion on how Hera's actual looks compare to the photos on the xoxo website?
Thanks.
-TJNiko.[/QUOTE]You know,
That is her in the photos. The weird thing is that she looks a lot better in person. Whoever does her photoshop makes her look weird. The one with pigtails and a blue bra and panties set probably looks more like her in real life.
Also, the only thing they photoshopped is her face. Her body is exactly like that. She's amazing. I would put her in her mid 20's or late 20's. I'm Asian, so I'm pretty brutally honest about Asian people's ages.
She also has a very cute demeanor. Oh man, you are making me miss her already.
[QUOTE=Nydru90;6898278]Well damn finally had my first Asian agency provider. Screening and set up was a breeze with sandra99. There was a bit of a wait before I got the door code and unit number for the mission valley apartment incall but no biggie. Had a 10 AM appointment. From researching I found out its best to go early as possibly while the lady is still fresh and during the weekday early when the neighbors are gone for school / work. Anyways once inside honey greeted with a hug and kiss. She is definitely the girl in the pics but I can't guess age. She was sexy AF regardless. Hit the room more hugs and kiss while I took care of the paperwork (240 for 45 minutes). I undressed and helped her take off her black panties and bra kissing her body sucking on her big man mades with dark brown eraser nipples as she stood naked in front of me. Now to the shower had my first ever blue toast LOL. In the shower we groped and washed each other. No BJ in the shower but she did give a HJ while DFK and soaping my already stiff cock. Back in the room we layed down she applied some lube or lotion to my dick I'm guessing flavored and started a nice BJ and Toung flicking the head. Rubber applied and started in doggy, loved her sweet moans while I was beating it up. Then we moved to mish with plenty of DFK and neck kissing. She claimed she had an O but I'm not sure, I blasted in the rubber shortly after. I'm spent and she is Cuddling with me giving me kisses telling me that she likes how soft my lips are and my dick was the perfect size for her. We also talked about how much longer she would be in SD (2 more days), she even taught me how to say hello in Thai she was so sweet and affectionate. Before time was up back to the bathroom for another blue toast and shower. Plenty of kisses in the shower. Upon leaving she gave me water, candy and one last DFK as she wished me a great day and asked me to see her if she comes back to SD. Damn the session was fire! Haven't had GFE like that in a while. I know sandra99 gets a lot of mixed reviews but the whole experience was great and I will use them again. The incall was very clean, the bed / towels were very clean, and I really like how sanitized everything was with the 2 blue toast (with disposable cups) and 2 showers. I also got screened into diamonds88 so will try them next in north county SD. Be safe monger on.[/QUOTE]Nice bro. My experience with her was similar to yours, however, someone on TER had not so great an experience so I feel it's YMMV with her. I hope Sandra99 continue to have girls like her and Ellie.
I've seen her twice in the Bay when she was at LSC 3 years ago. Never repeated since she came to SoCal; nothing against her, Im just not one to repeat, as new nookie is what draws me to the Hobby. But I digress. I'd recommend for any spinner lover. SD rarely gets girls her size so lift her up. Literally and figuratively haha. Just lower your expectations regarding age. The P.S. Is doing heavy lifting on that regard, as she could be easily in her 40's, despite having the silhouette of a HS cheerleader. Plenty of intel on TER. Not sure what her most recent reviews go, but this is her original one (TER: 356419).
For the record, I never thought SD could support an all-in business model like WLA, parts of KTown, OC, or 99% of the Bay. And now look at us. That were 20 bucks cheaper than WLA could be a testament to the second-tier talent that we’re getting, comparatively speaking. It also could be our korgs giving us incentive to stay local.
I'm posting her old photos to help dudes make informed decisions. If she looked this old 3 years ago, do the math when you may be erroneously expecting a HYA.
[QUOTE=RogOne;6897440]Those pics are def touched up and reflect probably 50% of her. The photos don't show her tattoos on her left shoulder, belly, and tramp stamp.
Service was decent as she aims to please, although I'd say she does talk a lot. Her English is above average for a K-provider.
Overall, I'd say it was a good session, with LFK, BBBJ, CG, ACG, missionary & doggy.[/QUOTE]Whoa wait a fkn minute! If she had a left-shoulder tat of a fanged snake with fork tongue about to strike then Ms. Aruko is rebranded Ms. Koi. In fact, I know it is based on the ad pics that they are using, which are definitely doing some heavy lifting. Either way she's still cute. Tight snatch. Seems to be multiorgasmic from having her cervix pummeled in DG. Jacked up teeth. Pancake titties that droop, unless she got MMs since she debuted in SD two years ago.
BTW, her TER profile as Ms. Koi was taken down as a result of TER cracking down on SDAG's nefarious ways of cherry picking positive reviews and threatening to blacklist any dudes giving with less than 8's because they allegedly "kill business. " Don't you guys remember? The olden days when SDAG was both password protected and not only were there girls ad pics fake is all hell, but they still blurred out their faces. Oh how we've come along way.
The good news is, you can still find some reviews of her as Lizzie BGC in the Bay (TER: 381491).
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6898484]I'm posting her old photos to help dudes make informed decisions. If she looked this old 3 years ago, do the math when you may be erroneously expecting a HYA.[/QUOTE]Dang. I was hoping for the HYA the previous poster was alluding to. Oh well, if the body is still there, good enough for me. Thanks for the info.
This is probably old news, how do people feel about the TER rating system. IMHO, There's no 10 out there (or is there).
What is a 10? 9 8 etc.
I would like to know what you guys think.
[QUOTE=DRaj123;6755355]Her ter I'd is TER I'd: 384595.
Pretty good ratings all above 8.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;6899093]This is probably old news, how do people feel about the TER rating system. IMHO, There's no 10 out there (or is there).
What is a 10? 9 8 etc.
I would like to know what you guys think.[/QUOTE]Ratings are subjective. Emotionally based. Post-nut clarity or lack thereof. They're as helpful as any other review / comment section.
I wouldn't rate a provider a 9 because someone else says she's pretty.
Visited xoxo again due to having an amazing initial experience, decided to go with another provider, Lucy is thin, long legs, almost like a ballerina, she is very gorgeous, enthusiastic and fun to be around. Her pictures arguably look worse than she does in real life. She was enthusiastic and beautiful, passionate, and took her time with the session. Overall I will be sprinting back while she is still there. Link below.
[URL]https://www.xoxo-club.com/lucy[/URL]
I agree, it's all subjective.
Saw this on twitter and Avamarie is on T3 R.
[QUOTE=ArrogantBstrd;6899130]Ratings are subjective. Emotionally based. Post-nut clarity or lack thereof. They're as helpful as any other review / comment section.
I wouldn't rate a provider a 9 because someone else says she's pretty.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6898713]Whoa wait a fkn minute! If she had a left-shoulder tat of a fanged snake with fork tongue about to strike then Ms. Aruko is rebranded Ms. Koi. In fact, I know it is based on the ad pics that they are using, which are definitely doing some heavy lifting. Either way she's still cute. Tight snatch. Seems to be multiorgasmic from having her cervix pummeled in DG. Jacked up teeth. Pancake titties that droop… (TER: 381491).[/QUOTE]Yes to the snake tats, yes to the teeth, and yes to the tight poon. Never got around to trying Koi, but nice to know they're one and the same.
There seems to be lots of good reviews. The last Asian I got was Mali and for me, the whole ordeal was a 3 out of 10. Too weird, attitude was like she didn't give a fuck. Anyway, is there any recommendations for a provider that's tight and petite? Mid 30's at most unless she looks young and is tight it can be an exception LOL.
[QUOTE=DrPornDawger;6899093]This is probably old news, how do people feel about the TER rating system. IMHO, There's no 10 out there (or is there).
What is a 10? 9 8 etc.
I would like to know what you guys think.[/QUOTE]I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:
Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.
Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.
Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.
I generally believe the worst reviews.
[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;6898713]Whoa wait a fkn minute! If she had a left-shoulder tat of a fanged snake with fork tongue about to strike then Ms. Aruko is rebranded Ms. Koi. In fact, I know it is based on the ad pics that they are using, which are definitely doing some heavy lifting. Jacked up teeth. Pancake titties that droop, unless she got MMs since she debuted in SD two years ago.[/QUOTE]Yep goofy teeth first thing noticed, and still the saggy B-cup titties was disappointing on looks. Good service, but no repeat.
It was nice to catch up with a past flame here in the SD LJ area, saw Eden before in the oc and she remembered the fun we had there and gave me a warm welcome.
She looked good in a form fitting dress with heels on, smiled when she saw me and it was a sweet surprise to see her again. Fairly ok English, korean gal with a happy personality. Petite tight body flirty girl Attractive face and open for a good time.
Lfk to start warm kisses throughout, Happy Dfk, Daty FIV Dato DT 69 BBBJ Light spanking, Face sitting in 69, Russian play in between those nice titties, i enjoyed the way she stuffed her panties in my mouth and stroked me with her panties wrapped around my Jr to get me back up for second serving , open for a good time , multi positions all the ones I can think of, passionate play. In conclusion I enjoyed myself very much I did not get a chance to write about her before; just happy to see her.
She is at a different number from what is on her ter, in town with [URL] www.cakdolls.net/product/eden-options-avail/[/URL] which is the new site for Fec.
Ter 337910.
[QUOTE=Lion1;6899537]I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:
Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.
Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.
Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.
I generally believe the worst reviews.[/QUOTE]Don't believe any of them. I keep telling myself going in that this will be the one. I always end up leaving disappointed. Majority of the reviews on TER and here are fake.
[QUOTE=SmallPenis14;6899156]Visited xoxo again due to having an amazing initial experience, decided to go with another provider, Lucy is thin, long legs, almost like a ballerina, she is very gorgeous, enthusiastic and fun to be around. Her pictures arguably look worse than she does in real life. She was enthusiastic and beautiful, passionate, and took her time with the session. Overall I will be sprinting back while she is still there. Link below.
[URL]https://www.xoxo-club.com/lucy[/URL][/QUOTE]I have seen Lucy when she came to LV. She have nice boobs, speak English. Very submissive pretty face tall. Always drop two creampies when I see her. Very pretty girl.
[QUOTE=GG1234;6888796]While browsing the OC forums, I [B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31130-Korean-Agency-BB&p=6887327&highlight=skparadise#post6887327]noticed[/url][/B] a new k-org serving both OC and SD: SKParadise.
[B][url=https://www.skparadise.com/]https://www.skparadise.com/[/url][/B][/QUOTE]Is this a new booker / agency or a rebrand? Do they have ads or a presence on HX? Anyone know?
Also, couldn't find any posts on the OC forum about them. They are organized a little different, but searched Paradise with no results. If someone has a link to any one review from OC it would help.
Thanks
They are not on hx (yet). Another booker for some of the SAG ladies.
[URL] http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31130-Korean-Agency-BB&p=6887327&viewfull=1#post6887327[/URL]
[QUOTE=Lion1;6900071]Is this a new booker / agency or a rebrand? Do they have ads or a presence on HX? Anyone know?
Also, couldn't find any posts on the OC forum about them. They are organized a little different, but searched Paradise with no results. If someone has a link to any one review from OC it would help.
Thanks[/QUOTE]
Thanks, and I completely missed Wally's info posted on 5/5.
[QUOTE=BrainLara;6900102]They are not on hx (yet). Another booker for some of the SAG ladies.
[URL] http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?31130-Korean-Agency-BB&p=6887327&viewfull=1#post6887327[/URL][/QUOTE]
Met her when I was up in OC. Pics are real and recent. I was quite pleased with her statuesque beauty. She is quite new to this still and has this civvie vibe that I prefer over the one from a more seasoned pro. She literally jumped my bones at the door as if I had just returned from overseas deployment LOL. Very authentic, unjaded and dtf. Speaks surprisingly good English. Some real winners from this org lately.
Pics are not her but I knew that going in as reverse image search yields some improbable hits. But she is very pretty, young, tall and slender. Would definitely turn heads. Service is decent but it is her beauty that will leave a lasting impression.
[QUOTE=FryingPanAss;6897779]Anyone have intel on Drea? Particularly interested in more info about her looks. Is she as skinny as her pics? Is her face pretty?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Lion1;6899537]I could go on and on about their system, but some of the lowest lowlights:
Profile is generally set by first review, which is often a shill or agency fanboy. Pics accurate, body type, age, services offered.
Performance scores are max 7 UNLESS she either BBBJ, LFK / DFK, or greek or some combo. Just plain stupid system.
Guys let bookers and escorts know their TER handle so they can get discounts or references after a good review, so incentive to drive up scores.
I generally believe the worst reviews.[/QUOTE]Hi, I'd like to provide an alternate view. If a girl has a few TER reviews, it's fair to assume many are shills or fanboys. But I have also created new reviews for several girls and sometimes reading the reviews right after me it's clear they are accurate even if I have different criteria. I can tell that another reviewer saw her because of unique things about her they mention. So it does happen where a girl is mainly real reviews, and other guys are not going to give her the same number as me. This is clear when a popular girl works for just 2 months and gets several pages of reviews. A shilled girl won't even fill a page despite working just as long, for the same agency.
Read the reviews more than the rating. Skip the ones that are generic or all positive unless they contain factual useful info (detailed physical description of the girl, her routine, English skills, etc.) that aren't useful for shilling.
Personal preference makes review numbers not that useful. There are several girls I'd rate a 6 and other people will rate an 8. Girls who have no looks but are amazing service, often milfs. I believe that other people find her an 8, but I am not interested. So that number doesn't help me. What I want to say here is that 90% of the time other people have a much higher or lower rating than me, it is not because they are shilling or being a fanboy. Having talked with some of them here on USAG, they want something that I really don't want, and vice versa. I do not want service oriented milfs. Other people do not want my young fresh girls who are just learning. I love to teach those girls, most people don't. So I say we can all get along, by honestly describing a girl so each type of person picks the type they want.
I think I'm the minority when I'd rate a girl high if she looks amazing, because I can make it work. She just needs a good attitude and be beautiful. Maybe I'd rate her an 8. Other people will rate her a 6. There are two different groups of people rating the same girls, you see it all the time. You see it here. So when I recommend a girl I always clarify I am in group 2, I like a girl on looks and attitude, not how many crazy things she knows how to do. So I will give a girl an 8, and other people will give her a 6. There is no contradiction, it's a limit of the system. The system shines when you see independents from HX, because there are a few girls bad enough to get 1-6's consistently as a warning to others.
I have written many reviews and never gotten paid or a discount. After all, the very last thing I'd want is for the booker to know my handle. I wait a randomly 1-3 days before reviewing even now. I will give out lower reviews to girls that deserve it if I bother making the review. What you can always do is click on a reviewers name and see a long list of who they reviewed and the ratings they gave. I always do this. Surprisingly, there are reviews that say a girl is beautiful, wonderful, great, then the rating is a 6. You click on that guys reviews, and they're all 5 and 6's! Every one! And this is the only 6 in pages of a girl's reviews. More often, there are guys that only give 7's and 8's. So the number is meaningless.
My motivation of writing reviews is to remember a girl and enjoy her again. I write about women a lot as a hobby in itself. If a girl was memorable (good or bad) and has few reviews, I might write a review just to contribute. It also helps that 20 years ago other people showed me the way online through their writings. Saved me a bit of time.
Was in the UTC area so decided to reach out to xoxo's booker. Booker is very prompt and recommended Lucy. Drove over to the spot and Lucy greeted me at the door. She was not the girl in the photos but she is very beautiful in person. Tall about 5'10" (my height or just a bit shorter). Huge natural tits I was not expecting that. Paid the fee for hhr and she rushed me into the shower. Quickly cleaned me off and rushed me to the room where she went quickly to BBBJ. Lfk only she didn't like DFK or her tits touched. Got on and rode me really fast. I was trying to tell her to slow down as I wanted a nice slow hhr session but she kept going and I busted so fast LOL. We got back in the shower to clean off. Overall, the session was really rushed. Was in and out in 15 minutes compared to the hhr I paid and only 5 minutes was fun the rest was just cleaning and talking. Lucy was beautiful but I wish the session was more intimate like other girls I've seen. Would see again just because she's so beautiful but I hope the next session wouldn't be as rushed.
Sounds awful. Do you have the right name though? Lucy is about 5'2 on a good day and does not have a huge rack. Babylove who was there recently is 5'10 but she Caucasian.
[QUOTE=MjWilliams;6900546]Was in the UTC area so decided to reach out to xoxo's booker. Booker is very prompt and recommended Lucy. Drove over to the spot and Lucy greeted me at the door. She was not the girl in the photos but she is very beautiful in person. Tall about 5'10" (my height or just a bit shorter). Huge natural tits I was not expecting that. Paid the fee for hhr and she rushed me into the shower. Quickly cleaned me off and rushed me to the room where she went quickly to BBBJ. Lfk only she didn't like DFK or her tits touched. Got on and rode me really fast. I was trying to tell her to slow down as I wanted a nice slow hhr session but she kept going and I busted so fast LOL. We got back in the shower to clean off. Overall, the session was really rushed. Was in and out in 15 minutes compared to the hhr I paid and only 5 minutes was fun the rest was just cleaning and talking. Lucy was beautiful but I wish the session was more intimate like other girls I've seen. Would see again just because she's so beautiful but I hope the next session wouldn't be as rushed.[/QUOTE]