Stupid is as stupid does.
Be careful out there. Two more in Boston that will be looking for another place to stay for the night.
[url]http://www.thebostonchannel.com/new...711/detail.html[/url]
Not Massachusetts but close enough
Be careful.
[url]http://newsblog.projo.com/2010/02/4-women-charged-in-prostitutio.html[/url]
Update on March 31st arrests in Quincy and NY
[url]http://www.patriotledger.com/news/cops_and_courts/x905413582/3-Quincy-defendants-in-Asian-prostitution-case-freed-after-hearing[/url]
3 Quincy defendants in Asian prostitution case freed after hearing
Two others accused in Asian prostitution case could be extradited from New York to Massachusetts
By John P. Kelly
The Patriot Ledger
Posted Apr 02, 2010 @ 05:52 AM
BOSTON —
Three defendants in a federal sex-trafficking case were freed on bail after detention hearings, and New York prosecutors are attempting to extradite two others to Massachusetts.
U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin on Thursday released Jing Liang Chen, 30, of 91 Hollis Ave., Quincy, and Dong Kai Chen, 41, of 60 Russell Park, Quincy, on unsecured bonds of $100,000 and $10,000, respectively, according to the office of U.S. Attorney Carmen Ortiz. Yu En Jin, 26, of 133 Commander Shea Boulevard, Quincy, was released Wednesday on a $10,000 unsecured bond.
All three are scheduled to be arraigned in U.S. District Court in Boston on Monday, April 12.
Unsecured bond means the defendants were released without posting any cash but agreed to be held responsible for the amount of the bond if they fail to appear for future court dates. In the case of Chen, his parents backed the $100,000 unsecured bond, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney’s office said.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents arrested the men Wednesday, alleging that they helped run a lucrative sex-trafficking operation from rented apartments in Quincy and 11 nearby communities. According to an indictment, the group forced Asian immigrants – including at least two women in the country illegally – to prostitute themselves by threatening to harm loved-ones if they disobeyed. They allegedly advertised in the escort section of the Boston Phoenix and on Craigslist.
Hong Wei, a 37-year-old New Yorker nicknamed “Ms. Chen,” and Xiang Hua “Darren” Zhang, 27, also of Queens, were arrested there and are facing extradition to Massachusetts.
Included in the 14-count indictment are charges of sex trafficking by force or coercion, harboring or concealing aliens, and interstate travel in aid of racketeering.
The indictment refers to unnamed co-conspirators who apparently have not been arrested. Christina Sterling, a spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney’s office, said the investigation remains open.
The indictment says Wei ran a brothel at 18 Newbury Ave. in North Quincy.
Judge Sorokin ordered the Quincy defendants not to contact one another and to report weekly to the court. They were ordered to surrender their passports and told not to travel outside the state.
Chen, known as “Mike,” could get a sentence as harsh as life in prison if found guilty of the sex-trafficking charge.
Now, to figure a way to not get stung like that
[QUOTE=MeatMan][url]http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/04/chelmsford_prie.html[/url]
A Chelmsford priest was one of eight men arrested in Nashua during a weekend prostitution sting.
xxxxxx,xxxxxxx 31, the parochial vicar at St. John’s Parish in Chelmsford, faces a misdemeanor prostitution charge after Nashua police say he responded to a fake posting on Craigslist and was planning to pay a woman for sex.
xxxxxxx was immediately placed on a voluntarily leave of absence by the Boston Archdiocese, during which he will not be allowed to conduct ministry.
“The archdiocese is cooperating fully with law enforcement’s investigation,” said xxxxxxx xxxxxxx, a spokesman for the archdiocese.
Six New Hampshire men and one from New Jersey were also caught up in the sting. They were all released on bail and will be arraigned April 23. xxxxxxx will be arraigned separately on April 22.
Each faces fines and up to a year in prison if convicted.[/QUOTE]Amazing. Why isn't LE action like that considered entrapment?
Guess it's time to figure out a way to hook up on CL without getting stung. Any ideas?
How explicitnand specific were their words?
[QUOTE=Blazer5]It's not considered entrapment because, they are not encouraging you.
It's like fishing you bait the hook and hope you get a bit.
You call their set up phone, You make the deal, You show up and get arrested.[/QUOTE]I wonder if there any specific details exchanged rather just making an appointment for a date or response to an explicit ad shows intent?