Tiny. 4'11" Natural 34 B. Young Starts today.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/infolist.php?c=JkxaakTTOEEawHQN[/URL]
Printable View
Tiny. 4'11" Natural 34 B. Young Starts today.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/infolist.php?c=JkxaakTTOEEawHQN[/URL]
M.
Newtopasian. [URL]http://newtopasia.cuties-sites.com/models/...[/URL].
Pink Angels. [URL]https://pinkangels.site/.................[/URL].
Sexy Angels. [URL]https://sexyangels.site/[/URL] Jenny.
SFK. [URL]https://sexyfunkgirls.escortbook.com/[/URL] Dana.
PKL [URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL] Pink, Eunji. Saki. Tiny (new).
Angels of Ktown (AKT) [URL]http://angelsofktown.cuties-sites.com/home[/URL] Dayoung.
KGLA. [URL]https://kgirlsinla.wordpress.com/...............[/URL].
In these days of chaos in K-girl land PKL seems to have the best all around combination of looks, service and donations. The girls are pretty with nice bodies and the service is always above par. They don't try to gouge you with upcharges and stipulations in their service. BBFS, CIM, MSOG and with some Swallow is part of the basic menu. Now they have four new girls starting this week with Tiny starting today. Check my post or the website. The agency with the best bang for the buck.
[QUOTE=Slim129;5540660]They just added a new girl named tiny, looks promising anyone try yet?[/QUOTE]I'm booked with Tiny today so will report back. Below what I prefer in height and tits but was sold on her by booker. I will try Sierra too next as her tits look delicious.
Darlina I saw maybe maybe 3 years ago under another name in NorCal so she'll be next later in the week. From what I remember good service and a nice slender body. She wasn't fat and seemed to work out. Those are definitely her pics. I will confirm it's her.
Two new PKL girls starting tomorrow.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/infolist.php?c=JwOOTETaaTwaKHQ3[/URL]
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/info.php?id=iOwxSaSwTTawQQpF[/URL]
[QUOTE=GoldDust58;5540858]I'm booked with Tiny today so will report back. Below what I prefer in height and tits but was sold on her by booker. I will try Sierra too next as her tits look delicious.
Darlina I saw maybe maybe 3 years ago in NorCal so she'll be next later in the week. From what I remember good service and a nice slender body. She wasn't fat and seemed to work out. Those are definitely her pics. I will confirm it's her.[/QUOTE]Thanks for TOFTT. Awaiting your updates. I don't have much to add to the discussion but I did enjoy my time with Miso despite 1 shot only and no doppio.
Mina was an upcharge girl and I found her to v cute and sensual. But she is definitely one of the types to pretend that she likes you and is all sweet to get you to come back. I would see her regularly but 480 every time is quite fiscally irresponsible considering my hobbies outside of this hobby.
[QUOTE=Ramen25;5538183]I know this has probably been mentioned dozens of times over the years and I recall this was talked about some months ago but you always have to keep in mind that everyone's standards are different. Everyone has an their own idea of what a "model" looks like which could differ from someone else's definition. Some people have a very narrow window / criteria of what that is and some people have a wide idea of what that would be (in terms of Kgirl standards).
Does a Kgirl have to look like Hyuna or Lisa from BlackPink or Nancy from Momoland to be considered model material? But what if their service sucked and they were dead fishes in the bedroom?
And what if a "not so hot" looking girl, lets say like, IU, gave unforgettable PSE pornstar-like experience with BB everything CIP, CIA, CIM, CIE (ear), CIN (nose), CIE (eye) every orfice you can think of. Does that make them hotter in a sense more so than Hyuna, Lisa, or Nancy over their shitty service?[/QUOTE]Even in your k-pop examples of "hot" versus "not so hot" some commonalities have surfaced.
I have never seen any of these celebrities naked but it is reasonable to assume that Hyuna, Lisa, Nancy AND Iu all have slim / spinner bodies. We would all be disappointed if any of those girls took off their clothes and we saw belly rolls, love handles or cottage cheese thighs.
Even for guys that prefer "big" girls. They know that the generally accepted definition of "model" means lack of belly rolls, love handles, or cottage cheese thighs.
Similarly, even for slim / spinner bodies, some sort of cleavage-- B cups or so-- Is necessary. That's why people that like Pocketgirl generally don't describe her as a model. She definitely has a slim / spinner body but her small A cup breasts-- While expected given her small size-- Sort of disqualifies her from the "model" designation.
That narrows down the field but now we're stuck with outliers: Is Pink slightly too "thick" to be a model? Is Joanne "too skinny"? I like both Pink and Joanne so I'm more willing to trust posters that also like them. I've avoided Eunji because it seems even the people that like her allude to the fact she is "thicker" than Pink. I've similarly avoided Emma because enough people have said she is "too skinny".
At some point I'll have to see both Eunji and Emma myself to calibrate the reviews and ignore / block people that have different tastes than mine.
PS: Personality/service should never be a factor in the "model" designator. That's why most reviewers-- Regardless of body preference-- Give separate grades/impressions on looks/service.
Anyone have any info on Marina from 2 Pop? Tried to look her up but couldn't find nothing.
[QUOTE=JustALil;5539916]Ok. So every year I decide on a theme for my little hobby.
This year I'm thinking ATF MILF / GILF, so I'm soliciting feedback from the collective mind LOL.
I've seen MistressX and Pepsi, they are great, and are in my normal rotation. Becky is my favorite at PP and I book every week when she's available. Sofia from SAF and Candygirl was fun.
I heard good things about Nana (losAngelesAsian), Yoco (MilknHoney? Sera (Just to let you know. It is all about the experience / fantasy for me. I can deal with age, extra pounds, GND faces etc. My only no's are hygiene, one of the reasons I like the korean houses, all think all ladies should shower and scrub up with you, and of course the blue toast.
Thanks to Nobserver, I definitely have Allie at M's on my list.
Any feedback is appreciated..[/QUOTE]What's your review of Mistress X? In terms of her riding skill, DFK, and taking doggystyle? I've been thinking about trying her for a while even though I like 'them younger.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5540862]Two new PKL girls starting tomorrow.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/infolist.php?c=JwOOTETaaTwaKHQ3[/URL]
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/show/info.php?id=iOwxSaSwTTawQQpF[/URL][/QUOTE]Thank you boss man will update this week who I see.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5540833]In these days of chaos in K-girl land PKL seems to have the best all around combination of looks, service and donations. The girls are pretty with nice bodies and the service is always above par. They don't try to gouge you with upcharges and stipulations in their service. BBFS, CIM, MSOG and with some Swallow is part of the basic menu. Now they have four new girls starting this week with Tiny starting today. Check my post or the website. The agency with the best bang for the buck.[/QUOTE]Forget to post the website.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL]
How do you guys keep up with all the new sites / bookers?
She only started working in May but already has 93 total reviews. I wonder how many customers she has seen already to accumulate that many reviews in such a short time frame. Talk about high volume. I wonder if she is starting to suffer from burn out or if service is still really good as when she first started.
[QUOTE=Toungsten;5541601]Forget to post the website.
[URL]http://preciousklove.com/[/URL][/QUOTE]I agree with Tounsten. PKL is a new addition to my go-to list. Their pricing is reasonable IMO for the current market situation. Just visited Tiny earlier today and I was happy. I had an avg visit with Saki in the past so didn't return to them for awhile, but they changed my mind now. Will be back to check out the two new addition.
[QUOTE=Bince33;5541264]What's your review of Mistress X? In terms of her riding skill, DFK, and taking doggystyle? I've been thinking about trying her for a while even though I like 'them younger.[/QUOTE]Mistress X is one of the MILFs that must be sampled at least once by every monger. Her riding skill is decent. One time she blew all others out of the water by pounding me hard in cowgirl as I was coming. Being so sensitive already during orgasm, she made me scream at the top of my lungs with pleasure with every thrust of that vintage pussy. I swear I could feel every molecule of her hot box.
Doggy style is pretty damn fine with that big, smooth ass to slam against, but what really gets me going is her BBBJ and make out skills.
She was gifted by the sex gods with the other-worldly talent to hit all my spots with those lips and that tongue during BBBJ. Her suction skills cannot be outdone, even by Dyson, and her eye contact is great. She did this thing one time where she pulled my foreskin as far back as it could go and flicked my glans with her serpent tongue. I goddamned hit the ceiling!
She lets me basically go to town during make out sessions. Our lips form a seal so tight, you'd need a combination to unlock us and our tongues hit areas of our mouths we never even knew existed. She's a gem.