Printable View
[QUOTE=HardHat69;6107812]That is sad to hear and why I had to take her out of rotation. In her heyday she was one of the best.[/QUOTE]You aren't talking about Britney that works at MM are you? I think she lives in or near Titusville. She is so sweet.
Anyone try the new Royal since she moved? Anything changed?
New nicer location but the same women are working there. I stopped in recently for an hour. 70/40 and left happy.
[QUOTE=Florida2469;6109514]Anyone try the new Royal since she moved? Anything changed?[/QUOTE]
Has anyone been to Kang Fa off Hibiscus or King Spa down on Babcock lately? Seen them driving around yesterday and couldn't find any reviews.
Thank you.
[quote=johnnysable;6109841]has anyone been to kang fa off hibiscus or king spa down on babcock lately? Seen them driving around yesterday and couldn't find any reviews.
Thank you.[/quote]l1 service but good.
Kang Fa offers an above average massage with possible L1. YMMV
[QUOTE=JohnnySable;6109841]Has anyone been to Kang Fa off Hibiscus or King Spa down on Babcock lately? Seen them driving around yesterday and couldn't find any reviews.
Thank you.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=ToyotaVon;6109821]New nicer location but the same women are working there. I stopped in recently for an hour. 70/40 and left happy.[/QUOTE]Anything extra besides a massage?
I was thinking of going there.
(u can send me a private message if you wish).
Standard Finish is available with the owner but she can be a little reserved. Not sure about the other therapist.
[QUOTE=WawaMan;6109990]Anything extra besides a massage?
I was thinking of going there.
(u can send me a private message if you wish).[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=ToyotaVon;6110048]Standard Finish is available with the owner but she can be a little reserved. Not sure about the other therapist..[/QUOTE]Yeah know the owner from the original place and agree. Just hoping maybe a little younger worker is there now naw mean. If you book online you save $10 on the house fee. Cheers!
I hear ya. I was hoping the same. Good info about the online booking.
Much appreciated.
[QUOTE=Florida2469;6110273]Yeah know the owner from the original place and agree. Just hoping maybe a little younger worker is there now naw mean. If you book online you save $10 on the house fee. Cheers![/QUOTE]
Before planning a visit you should read "Kayla's" recently served arrest warrant.
If this place wasn't on the radar and HOT, it is now.
[QUOTE=DougStamper;6111430]Before planning a visit you should read "Kayla's" recently served arrest warrant.
If this place wasn't on the radar and HOT, it is now.[/QUOTE]Ok so the affidavit to support arrest stats nothing about anything happened inside Mm it was discussed only in text to do cd in parking lot there. So I would almost think it's all good in Mm now but use caution I guess.
I agree BS, and I would stay away from that place. In the affidavit, it says they were doing surveilance at the location so who knows how many people they saw go in and out which only leads to the suspicion something is going on. Also her saying she works there and has rooom with a lock. It is just a matter of time.
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111448]Ok so the affidavit to support arrest stats nothing about anything happened inside Mm it was discussed only in text to do cd in parking lot there. So I would almost think it's all good in Mm now but use caution I guess.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111613]I agree BS, and I would stay away from that place. In the affidavit, it says they were doing surveilance at the location so who knows how many people they saw go in and out which only leads to the suspicion something is going on. Also her saying she works there and has rooom with a lock. It is just a matter of time.[/QUOTE]I read nothing about surveillance? They contacted her from her stg ads!
[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111613]I agree BS, and I would stay away from that place. In the affidavit, it says they were doing surveilance at the location so who knows how many people they saw go in and out which only leads to the suspicion something is going on. Also her saying she works there and has rooom with a lock. It is just a matter of time.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111655]I read nothing about surveillance? They contacted her from her stg ads![/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=DougStamper;6111430]Before planning a visit you should read "Kayla's" recently served arrest warrant.
If this place wasn't on the radar and HOT, it is now.[/QUOTE]So are we taking about the affidavit filed 8/24/222? I see the part about the surveillance etc on that one. That was apparently for an incident on 6/30/2022. And the arrest was 9/7/2022? Or is it an additional more recent event at the same place again?
[QUOTE=HardHat69;6111693]So are we taking about the affidavit filed 8/24/222? I see the part about the surveillance etc on that one. That was apparently for an incident on 6/30/2022. And the arrest was 9/7/2022? Or is it an additional more recent event at the same place again?[/QUOTE]Ok I didn't finish reading that but note they only were there because of the texts between her and the agent she gave them that address otherwise they would have never been there in the first place. No agents went inside. I'm sure they drilled her to get her to roll on mm but as you can see that didn't happen.
Bs.
Pg 4 of the affidavit. Says muilpide agents coducted surveilance prior ot undercovers arrival. They did contact her via STG and she gave them the address of MM and stated that was her place of work and would meet him outside at his vehicle.
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111655]I read nothing about surveillance? They contacted her from her stg ads![/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=JohnnyShakes;6090051]Yes, I have but wait for 2 or 3 day's.[/QUOTE]Did anything happen in the mean time? I'm still not seeing any availability.
[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111710]Pg 4 of the affidavit. Says muilpide agents coducted surveilance prior ot undercovers arrival. They did contact her via STG and she gave them the address of MM and stated that was her place of work and would meet him outside at his vehicle.
.[/QUOTE]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.
[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]The arrest was due to texts from ad on stg they got her in parking lot of mm agents never went inside.
She's the only one arrested.
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111775]The arrest was due to texts from ad on stg they got her in parking lot of mm agents never went inside.
She's the only one arrested.[/QUOTE]Exactly, that's what I thought. The affidavit also points to her previous 2 guilty convictions so they had to make a point with her. Waited over 2 months to book her too. Court date is today. Looks like SA is the way to go for now.
I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.
[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Also, the location of arrest was in Cocoa. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111797]I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.[/QUOTE]Yup. Looks like she was the target and not MM. Read her previous affidavits too, being a habitual offender does get you more attention. You are right about playing safe, no arguments there. Will keep my distance from MM for some time.
I agree they were not there for the establishment but it like fruit of the crime so the speak. Any decent cop doing surveillance would put two and two together. Addtionally, as with most cities, if they go after MM then it will be the workers there getting hit up in a sting.
[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111784]Exactly, that's what I thought. The affidavit also points to her previous 2 guilty convictions so they had to make a point with her. Waited over 2 months to book her too. Court date is today. Looks like SA is the way to go for now.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cdmail32;6111797]I would read AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF ARREST WARRANT. It literaly says she was approaced and questioned in the parking lot of MM. She asked the undercover to come inside instead of conducting business in his vehicle. I am just saying from what I read, not going near that place. Her arrest also does not make sense as the case is linked all the way back to like Jun 2022. So not sure it shows up in Sep. Play safe.[/QUOTE]Her questioning happened on 06/30 at MM. I was referring to her location of arrest which took place on 09/07.
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6111707]Ok I didn't finish reading that but note they only were there because of the texts between her and the agent she gave them that address otherwise they would have never been there in the first place. No agents went inside. I'm sure they drilled her to get her to roll on mm but as you can see that didn't happen.
Bs.[/QUOTE]She did offer to have him come in to her massage place which she said had a lockable door so the services could be performed there, which he declined. That was really dumb on her part.
[QUOTE=DruidMage;6111740]Not sure if the surveillance was for MM. I think it was specifically for Kayla. Not sure where they arrested her - Location of arrest says Cocoa, but the address is of the jail. They'd have busted the MM door otherwise for the arrest to make a point if MM was the target. Just my 2 cents.[/QUOTE]They trailed her rideshare driver after she was picked up from MM yesterday afternoon. Waited until they got to Minton to make the stop.
I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.
[QUOTE=SoupBean;6112202]I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.[/QUOTE]I know nothing! That said, I do find it hard to understand why LEO would go to all that trouble to nab a hooker for her 4th or 5th time. Lots of low hanging fruit around here for that. I'm guessing there is more to come out of all this.
[QUOTE=SoupBean;6112202]I same thing happened at Paradise men's club, I knew the owner of the club, if you remember how things went down. First they came in and arrested one girl, that was Sue. I think most of you remember her, cute little blonde spinner, who is now sadly deceased. But I was told by the owner that they had a talk with him and they knew what was going on and basically there was a new sheriff in town at the time and he didn't like what was going on. He was given the choice of shutting down or being taken down. That's the way I understand things went down. Maybe that will happen in this place, maybe not. Time will tell. Just my two cents.[/QUOTE]Yep, although I wasn't sure of the exact details until your report reminded me! Back in the 90's, I was a frequent flyer there and when I went to Massage Matters, it was Deja vu all over again! Of course, you could throw a rock and hit that old back building off 192 where I enjoyed myself many times over those years with many very nice women who I saw off campus as well, but their names escape me. Unfortunately, I think you're post may have hit the nail right on the head of what very well might be the consequences to come for this place! Too bad! Now, I'll just may give Mila a shot based on what I've read here or just keep seeing Liberty or Krys!
[QUOTE=Willie24;6112445]Yep, although I wasn't sure of the exact details until your report reminded me! Back in the 90's, I was a frequent flyer there and when I went to Massage Matters, it was Deja vu all over again! Of course, you could throw a rock and hit that old back building off 192 where I enjoyed myself many times over those years with many very nice women who I saw off campus as well, but their names escape me. Unfortunately, I think you're post may have hit the nail right on the head of what very well might be the consequences to come for this place! Too bad! Now, I'll just may give Mila a shot based on what I've read here or just keep seeing Liberty or Krys![/QUOTE]I was going to pull the trigger and go there, I think I'll wait until things settle down and consider my options. Maybe it's my lucky week, never know how things could of turned out if I went.
Willie is right, PMC and MM are scary close together, I also was a frequent flyer there. I remember double dipping in the same day. LOL.
[QUOTE=MrdTheOne;6112385]I know nothing! That said, I do find it hard to understand why LEO would go to all that trouble to nab a hooker for her 4th or 5th time. Lots of low hanging fruit around here for that. I'm guessing there is more to come out of all this.[/QUOTE]Of course there is. On June 30th they discreetly cuffed her inside the UC truck and moved to a more discreet location to interview her. Why? To not spook an ongoing investigation. Then the let her walk away. Read the report, there were already two other investigators with surveillance on MM prior to take down. There was just over 35 minutes between when the address was given to the UC and the take down but multiple other investigators are on scene? Not to mention, the UC tried to get her to meet him down the road, closer to the mall, not in the parking lot. Lastly when they decide to charge her they waited until she was far enough from MM that no one would notice.
These things that make me go hmm.
[QUOTE=DougStamper;6113227]Of course there is. On June 30th they discreetly cuffed her inside the UC truck and moved to a more discreet location to interview her. Why? To not spook an ongoing investigation. Then the let her walk away. Read the report, there were already two other investigators with surveillance on MM prior to take down. There was just over 35 minutes between when the address was given to the UC and the take down but multiple other investigators are on scene? Not to mention, the UC tried to get her to meet him down the road, closer to the mall, not in the parking lot. Lastly when they decide to charge her they waited until she was far enough from MM that no one would notice.
These things that make me go hmm.[/QUOTE]I read the report and it states the surveillance started at mm after she insisted on meeting in parking lot. That's the way I read it.
Bs.
[QUOTE=BigStud47;6113233]I read the report and it states the surveillance started at mm after she insisted on meeting in parking lot. That's the way I read it.
Bs.[/QUOTE]"Multiple agents were conducting surveillance prior to Agent (name omitted) arrival. ".
I guess there's really no point worrying about the minute details of the report. Everyone can decide for themselves their risk tolerance. For me, its not worth it. Honestly, I think they probably got whatever they needed between June 30th and when they decided to pick her up the other day.
It's always a huge news day when something like this happens. When I lived there I used to absolutely love PMC. I'm not a huge fan of pump and dumps, but man the variety was great. Some of them were students trying to make ends meet or single mothers. A few memorable ones and sad that it was closed down. One of the girls told me the owner had a special form of "immunity" from police meddling, but as said management does change from time to time to clean house.
I did try MM right before I moved and didn't find it spectacular- just a HE place but it looks like the menu was opened. Always wanted to see the owner (J.) and reached out to her a few times since I wanted to schedule before I made a long trip there but that never happened as she never responded to me.
Anyway I know how to read the funny papers, but I don't know where to see the affidavit. If someone can PM me, I'd appreciate it. I'm down south now but this info would be helpful for our in the business.
[QUOTE=DougStamper;6113245]I guess there's really no point worrying about the minute details of the report. Everyone can decide for themselves their risk tolerance. For me, its not worth it. Honestly, I think they probably got whatever they needed between June 30th and when they decided to pick her up the other day.[/QUOTE]I also noticed that they are not advertising the last couple of days! Hmm.
[QUOTE=Willie24;6113375]I also noticed that they are not advertising the last couple of days! Hmm.[/QUOTE]Good catch, Willie. Last ad was on 09/07. Thanks for pointing out the arrest details Doug. Fully agree with maintaining my distance. Just hope Kayla doesn't give up any mongers.
[QUOTE=DougStamper;6113245]I guess there's really no point worrying about the minute details of the report. Everyone can decide for themselves their risk tolerance. For me, its not worth it. Honestly, I think they probably got whatever they needed between June 30th and when they decided to pick her up the other day.[/QUOTE]Well said.
I visited there today for my first time, and I drew Winnie. I think someone else mentioned, massage was just OK. She is a cute little spinner, and her English isn't all that great. But she is good looking. Today it was just a standard finish, but the way she did it was something special, kind a hard to explain. But I would repeat.