Korean Agency BB

[QUOTE=GG1234;5495611]I'm not a fan of KBliss' use of fake pics. I don't think they've ever used real pics. It's not like these girls need fake pics anyway. These rebranded SFK girls can all stand on their own merits. I suppose the game they're playing is to make supply look larger than it actually is, but I think that's unnecessary and deceptive.

[B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5449926&viewfull=1#post5449926]So far[/url][/B], we know that KBliss Jessica is SFK Viki and KBliss Angela is SFK Dana. We don't yet know who KBliss Cara, Laura, or Sarah are. Both Viki and Dana are great girls, but I don't like how KBliss advertises for them.[/QUOTE]Read somewhere here that Laura = Nicole.

Was able to see Jinnie again after her short break. Always a good time. She is a sweetheart type girl. Looks fairly young. She is fairly short, but her proportions are long and thin. Her BBBJ gets better every time. No DT, but she delivers well with no hint of teeth. Her new pics are actually her, but there is a lot of photoshop. The one with her leg on the car is pretty accurate for her face. But don't expect the curves you see in those pics. She has smallish A / B tits and a small but perky ass. Overall very nice in looks, body, attitude and service.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5495620]Read somewhere here that Laura = Nicole.[/QUOTE]Her website review from the other 3 letter board is now unknown. Is that where she moved to Kbliss?

[QUOTE=GG1234;5495611]I'm not a fan of KBliss' use of fake pics. I don't think they've ever used real pics. It's not like these girls need fake pics anyway. These rebranded SFK girls can all stand on their own merits. I suppose the game they're playing is to make supply look larger than it actually is, but I think that's unnecessary and deceptive.

[B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5449926&viewfull=1#post5449926]So far[/url][/B], we know that KBliss Jessica is SFK Viki and KBliss Angela is SFK Dana. We don't yet know who KBliss Cara, Laura, or Sarah are. Both Viki and Dana are great girls, but I don't like how KBliss advertises for them. I'd rather book through SFK, because they advertise more honestly.[/QUOTE]Another guy wrote a mini review of Sarah and he said that after the date, the booker told him Sarah's other name is Nina. That leaves the only unknown as Cara.

[QUOTE=SsStuntCock;5495620]Read somewhere here that Laura = Nicole.[/QUOTE][B][url=http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/showthread.php?26373-Korean-Agency-BB&p=5409439&viewfull=1#post5409439]That's right.[/url][/B] Even before KBliss existed, M Nicole briefly used the name Laura when SFK started to book for her. That didn't last long, and she reverted back to just using Nicole. Now she's M Nicole, SFK Nicole, and KBliss Laura. That seems plausible.

[QUOTE=Bulak;5495742]Her website review from the other 3 letter board is now unknown. Is that where she moved to Kbliss?[/QUOTE]I still see [B][url=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/nicole-3104866866-360658]Nicole's reviews[/url][/B]. Also, I have a feeling that KBliss isn't a main booker for any girl. My theory is that they only provide supplementary booking services, but don't lease any apartments for girls to work out of. I don't know that for sure, but that's my theory.

[QUOTE=Cochese;5495873]Another guy wrote a mini review of Sarah and he said that after the date, the booker told him Sarah's other name is Nina. That leaves the only unknown as Cara.[/QUOTE]We'll go with that for now. KBliss Sarah is probably SFK Nina. I'm going to start a document to keep track of this.

[URL]https://rentry.co/kbliss[/URL]

[QUOTE=Kaamper;5475420]Haven't tried her this visit. But those pics were used a few years ago by a girl named Cherry. Pretty sure [URL=https://www.theeroticreview.com/reviews/cherry-2134109700-340930]<this>[/URL] was her. She was fun enough.[/QUOTE]I read the TER reviews that were attached to the link provided and all the reviewers said they used a jimmy. She is listed on SA as PSE. No up-charge was listed for BB unlike some of the other ladies on the website that explicitly say it.

Going to preface this with the good: good BBBJ, pretty good / sloppy DFK (which is a big turn on for me), service oriented and shower preview.

With that said: Heavier than expected. Again. I think I was expecting too much after older good reviews. Can confirm a little too much Botox on lips, flat / drooping D's, didn't allow FIV, nor CIP (which is advertised on bookergray's site), nor let me stick it in the shower which she wasted more time as I told her I already took a shower. Used too much lube, and probably the worst CG I've experienced; just sat there and wiggled and did a circular motion and I went soft. First time for everything I guess. She kept complimenting on my body, saying how sexy I was, acting GFE but it was way too over the top with her smooching and pecking at me, and she didn't read the signals and didn't shut up. I don't know if it's a psychological thing, but when she didn't swallow when she said she would after CIM, I almost wanted to walk out. I also had to wait 10+ minutes for her to clean up from previous session. What a waste of time / money.

Needless to say, that's the end of my rant.

[QUOTE=EasyPeasyDong;5495474]Yep. Kimmi. 200, BBFS back in the day. San Jose was paradise around the time she was working there. Countless gems for 200 BBFS.

Tiny Leah, etc, etc.[/QUOTE]Well back then even LA was 220 and while no one advertised BBFS, it could be had easily. Times changed with these booker / kgirls openly advertising BBFS which to me is bit boring and a turnoff to the hobby LOL. I really only see CFS ad girls still mostly and just get them to open up BBFS. It's just a lot more fun.

[QUOTE=GardenBae;5496125]I read the TER reviews that were attached to the link provided and all the reviewers said they used a jimmy. She is listed on SA as PSE. No up-charge was listed for BB unlike some of the other ladies on the website that explicitly say it.[/QUOTE]BBFS wasn't openly advertised when she was here last time, but it was available. Pretty sure all the SA girls include BBFS with the listed price. I still haven't seen her this trip, so interested to know how she looks these days.

[QUOTE=StopTheMonger;5496184]Going to preface this with the good: good BBBJ, pretty good / sloppy DFK (which is a big turn on for me), service oriented and shower preview.

With that said: Heavier than expected. Again. I think I was expecting too much after older good reviews. Can confirm a little too much Botox on lips, flat / drooping D's, didn't allow FIV, nor CIP (which is advertised on bookergray's site), nor let me stick it in the shower which she wasted more time as I told her I already took a shower. Used too much lube, and probably the worst CG I've experienced; just sat there and wiggled and did a circular motion and I went soft. First time for everything I guess. She kept complimenting on my body, saying how sexy I was, acting GFE but it was way too over the top with her smooching and pecking at me, and she didn't read the signals and didn't shut up. I don't know if it's a psychological thing, but when she didn't swallow when she said she would after CIM, I almost wanted to walk out. I also had to wait 10+ minutes for her to clean up from previous session. What a waste of time / money.

Needless to say, that's the end of my rant.[/QUOTE]Anyone else had a similar experience.

[QUOTE=Francescoo;5496692]Anyone else had a similar experience.[/QUOTE]I had the same experience. She's stockier than in the pics. Might be okay for some, but too heavy for me. Her "D" cups (more like Cs) are droopy. Continual, over the top comments on my attractiveness, coupled with weird displays of affection, E. G, pecking, petting, etc. She also set an alarm that went off 15 minutes before the end of the session as a reminder that it was time to shower.

On the positive side, I agree with Francesco that she provides a very sensual BBBJ, and she does try to be a pleaser as I tossed her around in every position I could think of in an unsuccessful effort to complete a second pop.

I took 18 months off of the game due to Covid. Since I've been back, I've been really disappointed with the Kgirl scene. Kgirls aren't a value if you're disappointed every time. Thinking about jumping into the non-Kgirl escort pool despite the higher cost for quality.

[QUOTE=NsaforFunTimes;5494006]I was in the mood for some last minute fun. Aster being verified, the booker offered Sarah, or Angela. Being new to them, I decided to give them dealer's choice. It was a good choice. After the appt, the booker mentioned her "real name" is Nina.

Anyways, here's the fun stuff.

She has a great petite body, nice tits, smaller ass.

Attitude-wise she's fun, flirty, and giggly.

No real shower preview, but once we were out, she gave a great BBBJ until I CIM / COF. I rested for a little and then onto round two. She slid on cowgirl and grinded and bounced up and down. After, I told her to get on her back. She has a wonderful pussy and when she came, she got super juicy. I wound up CIP. Apparently I was supposed to do a facial, but no one told me LOL. She just laughed it off though.

Will I repeat with this booker? Yes. It was fairly easy to get verified, even though my refs were fairly outdated.

[URL]https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/HotNWetKGirls[/URL][/QUOTE]I don't see Nina on the HX or kbliss site. Does she look like either Sarah or Angela?

[QUOTE=GhtTwentyK;5496807]I don't see Nina on the HX or kbliss site. Does she look like either Sarah or Angela?[/QUOTE]Right, she won't be listed as Nina. That was the booker's inside info. As far as I can tell, I believe she is Sarah — granted pics are always deceiving w / these orgs.

[QUOTE=GhtTwentyK;5496807]I don't see Nina on the HX or kbliss site. Does she look like either Sarah or Angela?[/QUOTE]Don't use kbliss for pictures. All pictures are fake, it's more of a dummy double post site. Just use sexyfunkgirls org. Those are all the real girls that are available.

Looking to the council of elders to drop some wisdom. I tried RTFT but some things I just don't get.

Me: longtime hobbyist. 2 decades. International travel. Fave spots: London and Montreal.

Here in LA, been doing the AMP thing for a long time. It sucks. It's hit or miss, usually miss. A few reliable places (decent girls, not hags) but they're inconveniently located (Downey and Van Nuys).

Found this Kgirl thing on these boards. Looked at sites and saw Kgirls.

I really want to know 2 things.

1. Are they real? They can't be. 5 foot tall 20 year old girls with d-cup naturals? There's got to be a catch.

2. How does one get into this game? Some say they want your driver license and linked in profile. That seems unreasonable. I get it's for their safety to know who you are but that's some incriminating sh* Can you get into this world without being so revealing of your personal info?