Seeking Arrangements (SA)

[QUOTE=Rrayr;3522256]If I could put Fortuna's sex drive performance and bolts on in Dakota we would have a complete red maned Pegasus.

Giddy up.

Rrayr.[/QUOTE]I don't think Fortuna's sex drive can be matched. If anyone finds one, please let me know.

[QUOTE=Lemonader;3522280]I don't think Fortuna's sex drive can be matched. If anyone finds one, please let me know.[/QUOTE]Only one I've experienced that ever got close is long gone. On my how I miss Mickey.

Playing catch up from the last week or so. Trying to take advantage of premium SA membership before it expires. LOL.

The Mind Blowing: Fortuna. OMFG! Words do no justice.

The Disappointing: BlndeBabyKnox88 - Had a morning meeting at her request since I had to cancel on her the week before. Pretty, but not as pretty as pictures. Very robotic / lifeless. I wasn't expecting amazing, but this was a let down. Maybe I'm wrong, but I expect more from SA than BP or CL, and this would have been a bad BP or CL experience.

The No Show: Tequila Rose1 - Had been exchanging messages for about 3 weeks. Tried to meet for lunch one week but couldn't make it work. Met for lunch the next week. Not skinny, has some weight on her, but not as much as I was expecting from her pics. She looks younger in person. She is a very pretty and sweet girl with incredible eyes. I enjoyed lunch tremendously. We were at the restaurant an hour and a half to 2 hours, continuing to talk after we finished eating. I left the next step up to her. Told her to text me if she wanted to get together that night or another. If not, I had enjoyed having lunch and getting to know her. Within an hour, she texted and wanted to get together after she got off work that night. We exchanged several texts after that to arrange everything. Last text gave me time she expected to leave work & said she would text when she clocked out. Then, nothing. I sent one text that night and got no reply. She was on SA early the next morning. Sent her message, but she hasn't viewed it (I don't expect she will view it, much less reply). Honestly, this was even more disappointing than BlndeBabyKnox88. LOL

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3522102]You lost me on this. Guys throw each other under the bus all the time for pussy. Nothing new. Women are going to find out about these threads again nothing new. Guys get blocked all the time, nothing new. If your posting a profile name and pic any girl that knows and reads the threads will still know. So they get mad, new ones by the numbers are joining daily. Find new ones if they want to get mad.

[blue]Preach, the only shortage in this part of the hobby is guys with money, there are no shortage of chicks who want to take it. I will never understand these drama queens that are forever begging to give all their power away. I honestly don't think they are here for the pussy, I think they are here because they miss being abused by their ex-wives.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]Oh damn snap A2, never viewed it through that lense, but totally makes sense to me now!!

Your right, who cares if these bitches get mad at their reviews. Good service is king. Next!
It's crazy how some mongors fight amongst ourselves. This sight for us, not them. They can go make their own.
Good one!

Rrayr.

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3522102]You lost me on this. Guys throw each other under the bus all the time for pussy. Nothing new. Women are going to find out about these threads again nothing new. Guys get blocked all the time, nothing new. If your posting a profile name and pic any girl that knows and reads the threads will still know. So they get mad, new ones by the numbers are joining daily. Find new ones if they want to get mad.

[blue]Preach, the only shortage in this part of the hobby is guys with money, there are no shortage of chicks who want to take it. I will never understand these drama queens that are forever begging to give all their power away. I honestly don't think they are here for the pussy, I think they are here because they miss being abused by their ex-wives.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]For ever chick I've been ratted out on there's more waiting in line so many I can't get to them all it's irritating but that's all. The rent is always due somewhere.

Had to have this one verify age but she is indeed legal. This was a very quick visit she wasn't rushing me I had to hit while I could very tight nice body tits smallish but ass is great. She is coachable decent head game. Haven't heard from her in a bit not really looking for this young but if I had more time I might work with her.

[QUOTE=JohnHandCock;3522102]You lost me on this. Guys throw each other under the bus all the time for pussy. Nothing new. Women are going to find out about these threads again nothing new. Guys get blocked all the time, nothing new. If your posting a profile name and pic any girl that knows and reads the threads will still know. So they get mad, new ones by the numbers are joining daily. Find new ones if they want to get mad.

[blue]Preach, the only shortage in this part of the hobby is guys with money, there are no shortage of chicks who want to take it. I will never understand these drama queens that are forever begging to give all their power away. I honestly don't think they are here for the pussy, I think they are here because they miss being abused by their ex-wives.

A2[/blue][/QUOTE]I agree with you completely. Nothing I said conflicts with your statement. I should have been clearer. Was only remarking on one more area of where mongers should be mindful of safety.

There is a finite set of eyes here clicking links. Knox SA is a finite pool also, both on SB and SD sides. My remark was that it is possible for someone to post a "Anyone heard of this one? <link" and also be the person that created that SB profile (Ex: uncle, or some nefarious actor).

Apologies if I wasn't clear enough.

[QUOTE=HitAndQuit63;3523561]Had to have this one verify age but she is indeed legal. This was a very quick visit she wasn't rushing me I had to hit while I could very tight nice body tits smallish but ass is great. She is coachable decent head game. Haven't heard from her in a bit not really looking for this young but if I had more time I might work with her.[/QUOTE]Didn't find a profile with that screen name. Anyone else can find it?

[QUOTE=CkLove;3524790]Didn't find a profile with that screen name. Anyone else can find it?[/QUOTE]It's honeysuckle18.

Fit.

[QUOTE=CkLove;3524790]Didn't find a profile with that screen name. Anyone else can find it?[/QUOTE]Try Honeysuckle18 ([URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/12639818-474c-4160-b5bf-46795047d2e5[/URL]). Her FB info seems to match that pic.

Stay safe,

Milfman.

[QUOTE=Skboy;3521783]Very very good point, Makes me think about it.
Would be best not to post a link just a profile handle and maybe a photo of the girl in question.
Just go straight to the SA site to log in for now on.
Once again this is what this site is all about passing info and keeping one another safe.
Thanks RR.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=FitDaddy3;3521877]The best Argument I know for posting the screen name instead of a profile link is that you can use the search for a name. Not a link.

Fit.[/QUOTE]If concerned about clicking a link and someone getting notified (whether through an email based on their settings or in "Viewed Me"), you should be able to adjust your activity to hide "When You View Someone" (trusting that it works and you are accessing profiles in more of a stealth mode). I'm having trouble understanding why it would matter if you clicked on the link or searched for her handle manually since it would merely indicate "Viewed me XX ago" in her profile (not the way in which it was accessed - whether directly from the link posted on USASG or the handle someone cut-and-pasted from USASG or elsewhere). That's a discussion for you more tech savvy users.


Considering that you're not using the same handle on USASG as on SA (or other sites), not flat out revealing your USASG handle and SA handle as a cross-reference, and not providing any personally identifiable photos on SA, hiding that level of activity should help a little. We all have different risk tolerances and I definitely respect the additional measures some must take.

BTW - it is a certainty that dudes have profiles masquerading as females on SA (whether it be for catfishing or otherwise).

Stay safe,

Milfman.

There's been much talk of her on these forums but I've never seen Sam Clover. The username caught my eye. The same one? [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/159d7edf-f717-4933-a6da-3060e0cef892[/URL].

[QUOTE=RazorXX;3525562]There's been much talk of her on these forums but I've never seen Sam Clover. The username caught my eye. The same one? [URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/159d7edf-f717-4933-a6da-3060e0cef892[/URL].[/QUOTE]That's her. Dark hair pic is close to her look now. Getting thinner, almost too thin.

[QUOTE=CkLove;3524790]Didn't find a profile with that screen name. Anyone else can find it?[/QUOTE]I forget how awful search on SA is.

[QUOTE=MilfMan865;3525069]Try Honeysuckle18 ([URL]https://www.seekingarrangement.com/member/12639818-474c-4160-b5bf-46795047d2e5[/URL]). Her FB info seems to match that pic.

Stay safe,

Milfman.[/QUOTE]You are correct sir. I had her send me a copy of her DL to verify.