What more can you expect?
You donated a 40. What the hell more can you expect? Did you think you would have a great date being cheap?
Having a champagne taste with a beer budget can be very disappointing huh?
[QUOTE=Bobinsunnyvale; 1529352]Unfortunately I agree with everything here.
She was great on the phone and the set up, I had to change time at the last minute and she was fine with it.
We met at side door and went to her room.
I went for the 40 special and opted for BJ only, I tried to play with her tits and she was not into that.
The price is right but I left smelling like an ashtray and I don't plan on going back.[/QUOTE]
I'm a skeptic for what it's worth
I can't quite believe that you are really a "hobby"-ist and not a plant.
First off, '4 in a 30 day period'? Or even '10 dates at 100 each in a 30 day period'?
Are you serious? 4 is not realistic. 10 is probably not either. Sounds like you're trying to inflate the rates really. What do you suggest. $250 per date? That is f-ing nonsense.
No one expects the best experience ever for 40. Posting an accurate but poor review (whether the donation was 20 or 500) no matter what the rate does not mean that the reviewer expected more than he was willing to contribute for. Yes, you might (MIGHT) get treated more nicely if you pay more, but she can't change her appearance radically no matter what the donation amount. And IMHO, a "hobbyist" would have to be wealthy with money to waste in order to pay $100 (or more) for something that while totally enjoyable, is fleeting to say the least, lasting minutes usually. In a post-orgasmic daze, most males would probably rather just fall asleep than try to get their money's worth by going at it until the full time has lapsed. Providers know this, which explains the incentive to want more $ for a longer date than is going to be needed. Or am I crazy?
[QUOTE=MrSmithwick; 1530095]I have to laugh at the people who post on some of the other review boards complaining about bad experiences. Partly because it's their own stupidity, secondly because they are cheapskates.
Here's the figures. If you have 10 dates in a 30 day period at 100 and 1 of them might be worth writing home about. The rest, are either a waste of time, be&s or just plain and boring. Why are you cheating yourself?
Do your research, find 4 good providers to see in a 30 day period and have a stellar time dropping the same wad of cash.
You'll be happier, feel better about your investment and have realistic big fish stories to tell.
It's quite amusing that I see other hobbyist write about how bad their experience was and that they were out the dough. Even better, they arrive and realize it wasn't the girl in the photo, several things are wrong, the girls attitude sucks but (wait for it). They stay anyway!
Get off this track record, only see reputable providers and enjoy yourself!
Another word of advice. If the donation requested is a low ball rate. Run! No respectable lady is going to show you a stellar time with a few twenties.
Just my two cents from years of Hobbying.[/QUOTE]
What I was suggesting is.
Put a stop to seeing low end providers that have NO CLUE what they are doing or how to treat a gent.
Been there and done that in my early days. Had seen enough low end ladies that were a waste of $$.
Now I do my homework and only see verified, reputable ladies. I donate the same in a month, but see less ladies however, I am much more satisfied. With the results.
[QUOTE=Some Fool; 1530829]I can't quite believe that you are really a "hobby"-ist and not a plant.
First off, '4 in a 30 day period'? Or even '10 dates at 100 each in a 30 day period'?
Are you serious? 4 is not realistic. 10 is probably not either. Sounds like you're trying to inflate the rates really. What do you suggest. $250 per date? That is f-ing nonsense.
No one expects the best experience ever for 40. Posting an accurate but poor review (whether the donation was 20 or 500) no matter what the rate does not mean that the reviewer expected more than he was willing to contribute for. Yes, you might (MIGHT) get treated more nicely if you pay more, but she can't change her appearance radically no matter what the donation amount. And IMHO, a "hobbyist" would have to be wealthy with money to waste in order to pay $100 (or more) for something that while totally enjoyable, is fleeting to say the least, lasting minutes usually. In a post-orgasmic daze, most males would probably rather just fall asleep than try to get their money's worth by going at it until the full time has lapsed. Providers know this, which explains the incentive to want more $ for a longer date than is going to be needed. Or am I crazy?[/QUOTE]
