CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[QUOTE=CookyJar]CookyJar

Ashley and Alexis were both off the hook. Ashley spoke fluent dirty mouth. Alexis has a tongue that has moved her up to first place on my To Do Again List. Ashley’s service was beyond belief but I have to believe it was drug induced and not likely to be easily repeated. On the other hand, Alexis was a natural, you cannot fake tongue action like hers. In some of the pictures you can see Alexis tongue out and she wasn’t even trying.


CookyJar[/QUOTE]

It is not easy to compare one date with another. My date with Alexus and Aundrea was certainly one of the best. I remember thinking at the time that no one was going to be able to surpass Alexus’s performance. I would have to admit, Ashley came close to if not surpasses Aundrea in freakiness. Without a side by side comparison it seems impossible to decide which threesome was the better.

Alexis is likely the more consistent between herself and Alexus. And I doubt whether Ashley could perform as well without the aid of drugs. Then again; who knows.

YMMV

CookyJar

Ashley’s choice of words were purely her own. She tended to repeat the same phrase. I am certain that this was learned behavior.

While I do like dirty talk, I never use degrading names. On the other hand, I didn’t tell her to stop either.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]...
2. Is Ashley actually [SIZE=3][B][POST=920793]Kate[/POST][/b][/SIZE]. Click on the link and tell me. Are they the same girl or are my eye fooling me.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

CJ,

I'll tell you it would be difficult to tell, but I saved a couple of pics from your 06 and current posts, did some cut and paste and I would say no they aren't. Close, very close and I wouldn't want to testify in court one way or the other.

In set 1, her back, the photos on the left are from the current set. The two on the right from 06. The main thing I looked at there were the moles on her back, especially in the middle of her back and the one by her right shoulder.

The shoulder mole may be the same, though I think it is not quite the same location and I don't see the one in the middle of her back.

The other set, the two on the left are your 06 photos the one on the right from the current post. The one thing I'd like to have seen from 06 is if the mole (or is that not a mole?) on her lower right part of the jaw.

Even facially I would say no. Again very close, but the hair color is a bit different, the eyebrows are too, even the lips seem different. But the blue eyes and general features again make a tough call.

Just doing a comparison by the photos I'd say no, but if you have others of Kate from 06 you may want to look for other 'distinguishing marks' (to borrow a line from LE).

As for the 06 pictures, when in doubt, err on the safe side.

What will be, will be. But, I will not help.

[QUOTE=CookyJar] I have deleted the worst of the pictures and replaced them with what I hope are less offensive pictures.

My deleting these pictures probably will make no difference in this girl’s life. Still, I did what I could do. Even if she is 18, she deserves a break. I do not regret posting the original pictures; they caused a nice discussion and may have gotten some of us to think.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

Thanks Davey, Cephlapod Love and the rest who PM’d me. I will stand-by my original decision to not post the nudes.

However, I must say this; I will keep haunting Alexis until she can provide me with proof of her age back in 06. I will even offer to pay her just for proving proof. Why? Because her pictures have haunted me since the day I first viewed them.

IMHO, none of her pictures taken in 06 are pornographic. Even the nudes have a pathetic, simplistic nature to them that confirms the difficulties of the runaway on the streets of Kensington. I often wondered whatever had happened to her. I thought maybe my not posting the original pictures had somehow worked in the long scheme of things to help save her. On the one hand I am saddened to know she is still out on the streets, but, on the other hand it is nice to know that she is alive and the streets haven’t claimed her – yet.

Ainsi va la vie, pour que les gens disent les vieux.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]There are two facets to this report that go unanswered. I left them unanswered mainly because I am not sure of the answers. I would like some help from the general membership.

1. Can I safely post Alexis's pictures taken back in 06? I have no real way of knowing exactly how old she is now. She is obviously of age and she did give me permission to post her 06 pictures as well as the newer 2010 pictures.

2. Is Ashley actually [SIZE=3][b][POST=920793]Kate[/POST][/b]. Click on the link and tell me. Are they the same girl or are my eye fooling me.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]WOW what a report CJ. I love that pic #65 with alexis sitting on ashleys face. To answer your questions, 1. Don't post the 06 photos. Alexis has the potential for more Hot photos and encounters to come in 2010. 2. Ashley isn't that little b*tch Kate. I Kate a few days ago on looking a hot mess & acting like a little b*tch as usual arguing with some guy on letterly.

[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love]Uh, if it were me I would NEVER get near anything that even smelled of under-aged! [/QUOTE]I agree, 100%

[QUOTE=Cephlapod Love] [i]§ 2257. Record keeping requirements

[b](a)[/b] Whoever produces any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, digital image, digitally- or computer-manipulated image of an actual human being, picture, or other matter which—
(1) contains one or more visual depictions made after November 1, 1990 of [b] actual sexually explicit conduct [/b]
...
(b) Any person to whom subsection [b](a)[/b] applies shall, with respect to every performer portrayed in a visual depiction of actual sexually explicit conduct—
(1) ascertain, by examination of an identification document containing such information, the performer’s name and date of birth, and require the performer to provide such other indicia of his or her identity as may be prescribed by regulations;
...
(c) Any person to whom subsection [b](a)[/b] applies shall maintain the records required by this section at his business premises, or at such other place as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe and shall make such records available to the Attorney General for inspection at all reasonable times. [/i]

Again, all FWIW and IMHO.[/QUOTE]Thanks for the link, I will keep it and use it in the future.

There is no[b] actual sexually explicit conduct [/b] being portrayed in the 06 photos.

Still, I wouldn’t think that they are safe to post – especially on a site where men come to find girls to pick-up. Intent is a valid defense in many Art vs. Porn debates. They (the 06 pictures) might be safe to post on an art site or a site where the setting is different.

If there is some hard-up cop or agent out there who wants to waste taxpayer money chasing me down for a few questionable pictures taken in 06; while real pedophiles, murders, thieves and loser law breakers run free – so be it. Believe me; I would not put it pass them. It would certainly be easier and a whole lot safer to come after me than to go after the real pedophiles, pimps and drug dealers.

CookyJar

PS: I hope I haven't put my foot in it.

[QUOTE=Seva Lurker]CJ,

I'll tell you it would be difficult to tell, but I saved a couple of pics from your 06 and current posts, did some cut and paste and I would say no they aren't. Close, very close and I wouldn't want to testify in court one way or the other.[/QUOTE]Thank you, Seva Lurker, yours is always a valued opinion.

But, first I need to make one minor correction to your report. Kate’s pictures were posted in January of 2010.

I want to agree with you, it may be to close to call. In appearance, if they are not the same girl; they are twins. (Wouldn’t that be a hoot?) While I don’t have more pictures of Kate, I do have something. Their attitude was different. Maybe the drugs had something to do with that. Also the voices were not the same. That to may have been caused by the drugs. And, she didn’t seem to recognize me at all. Another effect of the drugs?

I was hoping that someone else, who has dates either girl recently might be able to help. There is a little more to the story of Ashley, Alexis and I, which I will add to my next post.

CookyJar

I am not sure about Ashley. Help me! Isn’t Ashley, little [B][POST=920793]Kate[/POST][/b] with some weight?

As always I envy your reports CJ, great JOB!

I think Ashley & Kate are different person, Ashley is taller than kate.

[QUOTE=Freaklikdat] 2. Ashley isn't that little b*tch Kate. I Kate a few days ago on looking a hot mess & acting like a little b*tch as usual arguing with some guy on letterly.[/QUOTE]

Thanks Freaklikdat, you should have heard the slurping and moaning. Ashley is a serious little freak. I don’t think she is a true dike. She is bi, no doubt about it. She put the same energy in to it while I was trying to face fuck her. This girl was off the hook.

I am actually happy to hear about Kate. I was just about to post some information for verification. The word I got was that little Kate who worked for Bishop is no longer with us. I heard this from another girl, who had no reason to lie. [b]Can anyone vary this.[/b]

Davey, you always have you ear to the ground. Any word on Kate who was/may still be with Bishop. I’d sure like to know whether the girl who passed the information on to me was telling me the truth or lying.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]...if they are not the same girl; they are twins. (Wouldn’t that be a hoot?)

CookyJar[/QUOTE]If Ashley isn’t Kate (and I no longer believe she is), then she is a new and exciting find. Ashley is a worth looking for, and, I would not wait for my next review.

If you need more information check out my original report - [post=984405] Ashley & Alexis - The Best Threesome To Date. [/post]

CookyJar

I don’t like posting pictures out of turn. Ashley is hot and running wild. She is being introduced to drugs by the company she is keeping. Ashley was trying to look out for her; Maria is trying to take advantage of the situation.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]I don’t like posting pictures out of turn. Ashley is hot and running wild. She is being introduced to drugs by the company she is keeping. Ashley was trying to look out for her; Maria is trying to take advantage of the situation.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]You are the shisnet dude! I am in KC and I always look forward to your posts. Just dreamin that KC had that much action. Still, I want to come to Philly because of your posts. You always track em out. Keep it up man.

[QUOTE=CookyJar]…The word I got was that little Kate who worked for Bishop is no longer with us. I heard this from another girl, who had no reason to lie. [b]Can anyone vary this.[/b]

Davey, you always have you ear to the ground. Any word on Kate who was/may still be with Bishop. I’d sure like to know whether the girl who passed the information on to me was telling me the truth or lying.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]

Was a girl recently killed with a torch, in Kensington? Seems like I vaguely remember reading about an incident on the Avenue were a girl was killed (or burned) with a blow torch.

CookyJar

[QUOTE=CookyJar]Was a girl recently killed with a torch, in Kensington? Seems like I vaguely remember reading about an incident on the Avenue were a girl was killed (or burned) with a blow torch.

CookyJar[/QUOTE]Why would anybody want to something like that to a girl?

[QUOTE=Martinisshy]Why would anybody want to something like that to a girl?[/QUOTE]

Sends a hell of a message. Either to her (if she was just burned) or to everyone if she was murdered.