Thanks for introducing Angella
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2096785]I was beginning to believe I was the only one who recognized Angela's seemly obvious charms.
Unfortunately I am not a collector of phone numbers. Streetwalker numbers seldom work for me. It would help if I had a reliable phone I could use that was not directly connected to me. But, I don't! Besides, when I go down to the avenue, I am usually looking for somebody new and exciting. On those few rare occasions when I have tried to call a streetwalker using the number she had given me, the number never work.
On the upside, I have noticed that a lot more of the girls are trying to hold on to their phones. Some of the luckier girls have sponsors or sugar daddies that either make the payments or supply minutes. As of our last meeting Angela did had a phone without minutes. She said she would be able to accept calls in a few days.
I cannot believe that a sweet girl like Angela can have gone unnoticed by the entire USASG membership. Maybe another member will share with you.
CookyJar.
P.S.: Angela is an alias![/QUOTE]She is stunning. A must see. I hope I can find her. Would appreciate any solid leads. I'm not familiar with the area. Where does one hang out near the Huntington station. And where do I park? I do to want to just ride art ound and raise LE suspicion. Thanks.
5 photos
Girl on Girl. A survey. What's YOUR opinion?
[size=4][color=orange][b]Question: [/b][/color][/size] What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?
As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.
I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.
What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion?
CookyJar.
P.S.: Once again, just to keep it straight, [POST=2118087][b]Deena & Stacey[/b][/POST] are two girls from the Camden side of the Delaware.
Re: Girl on Girl. A survey. What's YOUR opinion?
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2119184] What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?
As long as I'm getting mine, it doesn't bother me.
I have always thought that girl on girl action shots showed how willing a lady was to approach the freaky side of her nature. Freakiness may not be a desirable feature for some guys. Wholesome girls, wifey types and girls who wouldn't do that kind of stuff, maybe what some guys want.
What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion?
CookyJar.
P.S.: Once again, just to keep it straight, [POST=2118087][b]Deena & Stacey[/b][/POST] are two girls from the Camden side of the Delaware.[/QUOTE]Cookie, I find girl on girl action to be a turn on and I would like to thank you for your postings on the subject. If I lived in your area I would certainly partake of the treasures that these two lovely ladies have to offer.
Nothing wrong with freaky.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2119184]What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion?[/QUOTE]If two chicks are willing to work themselves into a frenzy with each other before jumping my bones, I'm perfectly OK with it. Even if I'm just sitting on the sidelines and watching. Wink wink nudge nudge.
Even the wifey-types should have a freak flag somewhere.
Re" Your Girl on Girl photos
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2119184] What is the forums opinion on Girl or Girl action photos? Are they a, "Turn on," or a "Turn off?" Do they make a difference? What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion? Does a girl kissing, fondling, and getting it on with another girl turn you on or off?
...
What's [B]YOUR[/B] opinion?
CookyJar.
P.S.: Once again, just to keep it straight, [POST=2118087][b]Deena & Stacey[/b][/POST] are two girls from the Camden side of the Delaware.[/QUOTE]I think tattoos and body piercings make women look cheap and slutty. [B]I love cheap and slutty women![/B] Those pictures make me want to get on the first thinks smokin' to Camden!
3 photos
OK! OK! Before I tally up the votes.
I would like to give my reason for requesting your participation. And! I would like to address an issue that may have been lost in the jumping back and forth between this and the Southern Jersey, General Thread.
My participation was not only welcomed, but insisted upon. Selfies of my involvement do exist. However, they shall remain on file, in my possession, to be view at shuck time as my retirement as a monger.
The observant viewer ought not to have any problem determining the menu. Neither girl offered everything, but between the two the menu was complete. There was very little that both girls were not willing to do. And, whatever one was not willing to do the other did. When one of the girls bought up the subject of analingus, although it is not my thing, the party took on a whole new glow. DATY, DFK, BBBJ and all of the basic freaky sucking and fucking positions can be conferred simply by viewing the pictures. Which brings me back to the question: Are Girl on Girl Pictures a Turn On or Turn Off?
On the 1 oth, in the Southern Jersey, General thread, I posted a photo set of 10 pictures. On the 11th, I posted another set of 10 Girl on Girl photos. In both sets the pictures viewed most often are the ones with the two girls sitting or kneeling side by side. The more intimate the two girls are with each other the lesser the views.
There are a lot of variable to be considered, the size of the thumbnails, the fact that most of the viewers are lurkers and visitors who visit the forum for the free porn and etc. Whatever the reason, the most viewed tend to be the less intimate, followed by those showing the most ass or pussy. (I always expect the pussy and ass shots to be popular.).
So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?
CookyJar.
Re: OK! OK! Before I tally up the votes.
[QUOTE=CookyJar;2120681]...
So I have to ask, why do pictures where the girl are not touching or barely touching get the most views?
CookyJar.[/QUOTE]I am also a little concerned that there was / is not at least one dissenting vote. I know not everyone likes the Girl on Girl photo. I for one am not fond of the hardcore butch types with strap-ons.
CookyJar.