General Reports

[QUOTE=Norman2759; 1550302]Re: the note below and other recent traffic on JJ or Jenny Juice. Below is the JJ I saw a few weeks ago – am I correct that this is not the same girl being described elsewhere?

The JJ below is a lovely girl who at the time was staying on Xenia but has since moved off-site. I've texted with her since these pictures, but she was away for a while and I'm not sure about her current availability. To me it's rare enough to find an attractive black provider, JJ is exceptional. Good skills overall, though most of the appeal to me was her smooth dark skin and overall appearance.

As always, try to be good to these young ladies –

Norm.[/QUOTE]I haven't seen her in a couple years. She used to ride my bus when I worked transit. I never knew for sure that she worked, or I'd have tried to snatch her up.

[QUOTE=Cartog; 1551274]I'm not sure myself, but did want to comment that the website does say that Chase is 19 when she allowed the 12 guys to cum all over her. So the 2007 copyright stamp on the images could support her being 19.

I would like to view the video, but don't think I'll join a site with reccuring fees.[/QUOTE]Does anyone remember Marianne as having a small tramp stamp? The girl in these photos does. It has been a few years since I last saw her but I do not think she had a stamp.

I have her contact. Info if anyone its interested.

[QUOTE=Cartog; 1551274]I'm not sure myself, but did want to comment that the website does say that Chase is 19 when she allowed the 12 guys to cum all over her. So the 2007 copyright stamp on the images could support her being 19.

I would like to view the video, but don't think I'll join a site with reccuring fees.[/QUOTE]

I've also been with Marianne, have made a report that hasn't been posted yet. Could be wrong, but I also don't believe this is the same girl. The girl in the photo below is not as lean as Marianne, which might have an impact on face appearance, but I still don't believe it's her face.

I got probably 3 numbers from Marianne during the time frame I was seeing her, two burned up almost immediately and the third soon after. She seems a nice girl, would like to see her get a handle on her issues.

Norm

[QUOTE=Beavercr; 1551237]Picture is not definitive.

And.

1. The images of Chase are copywrite 2007 when Maianne was 18-19 years old, she is 23 now.

2. Look at the vegitation just in back of her. It is vegitation from a tropical environment, such as southern California or Florida, not Ohio of anywhere close.

Withou someone can claim thathe really knows she did it years ago down south, I will say. NO, its not her.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Beavercr; 1551237]Picture is not definitive.

And.

1. The images of Chase are copywrite 2007 when Maianne was 18-19 years old, she is 23 now.

2. Look at the vegitation just in back of her. It is vegitation from a tropical environment, such as southern California or Florida, not Ohio of anywhere close.

Withou someone can claim thathe really knows she did it years ago down south, I will say. NO, its not her.[/QUOTE]It is her. The shoot was in Dayton at the hotel behind the BP station at Needmore and Wadsworth that is now closed.

She was stripping at Flamingo's Showclub on North Dixie at the time.

The pictures were taken inside of the hotel where it is common place to see tropical plants.

If you look closely you can see the scar on her right cheek appears in the photo shoot pics as well as the mugshots.

I know all of this because I was there!

I think we can call this one. Bullshit.

[QUOTE=Cartog; 1551274]I'm not sure myself, but did want to comment that the website does say that Chase is 19 when she allowed the 12 guys to cum all over her. So the 2007 copyright stamp on the images could support her being 19.

I would like to view the video, but don't think I'll join a site with reccuring fees.[/QUOTE]

Chase use to work at flamingos back in the day I have her contact info if anyone wants it.

[QUOTE=JakeJay83; 1551142]She was ok, not much enthusiasm, felt rushed, she is not into kissing.

I doubt I will repeat.[/QUOTE]Who really wants to have their mouth on someone elses that just had another mans dong in it anyways. I don't know what happen with you guys but I know of 2 other members on here that was very satisfied. Don't know if you guys are trying to pay like she is a SW or what. I mean who wants to hang out its well thats my own opinion though my moto is bust one off and get lost. They get paid to be of service not to kick it with after done. So maybe you guys should pay the provider rate and get provider service and not something like you would pick up on 3, 5, x and m that stinks and is a druggie

[QUOTE=GspotMan;1551838]Who really wants to have their mouth on someone elses that just had another mans dong in it anyways. I don't know what happen with you guys but I know of 2 other members on here that was very satisfied. Don't know if you guys are trying to pay like she is a SW or what. I mean who wants to hang out its well thats my own opinion though my moto is bust one off and get lost. They get paid to be of service not to kick it with after done. So maybe you guys should pay the provider rate and get provider service and not something like you would pick up on 3, 5, x and m that stinks and is a druggie[/QUOTE]Are you stacey?

I'm 95% certain that that's the girl who now goes as tatianna at harem. She's been well discussed recently on the club site. I knew she was easy, but didn't expect THAT! .

[QUOTE=JustLookInSW;1551213]Is that her? I can't tell.[/QUOTE]

Yes thanks, I received PM's after my post to clarify that my JJ below is not JennyJuice3. I kinda didn't think so in the first place but wondered. JennyJuice sounds nice, perhaps I'll meet her sometime soon.

Change of subject. I'm also, BTW, assuming JennyJuice is not Jenn of the North, as profiled in many other postings. I've had the pleasure of knowing that Jenn (repeatedly, since mid-June). As we all know she recently retired briefly, and she's also been having phone issues too. She voicemail'd me earlier this week to give me a new phone, but when I've tried that new # I only get some guy who's not sure who / where Jenn is. Hopefully that will clear up soon, and I hope she's ok.

Norm.

[QUOTE=Mw Jrp;1550884]This JJ below in post 2061 is definitely not JennyJuice3. Not even close. Nothing meant in a bad way. They just don't resemble each other a bit; except they both have giners.[/QUOTE]

Rolyat asks a good question. I haven't looked at this bukkake site myself (probably won't if it costs money) , but below is a picture of Marianne that shows her tramp stamp fairly clearly. This would have been current as of mid-May of this year. Rolyat says the girl in the bukkake site photos has a small stamp; the one here is rather large. If there's a difference, one would have to judge if the small one could have been turned into the larger one shown in my photo. Anyway, for what it's worth.

Norm

[QUOTE=Rolyat;1551358]Does anyone remember Marianne as having a small tramp stamp? The girl in these photos does. It has been a few years since I last saw her but I do not think she had a stamp.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Norman2759; 1552674]Rolyat asks a good question. I haven't looked at this bukkake site myself (probably won't if it costs money) , but below is a picture of Marianne that shows her tramp stamp fairly clearly. This would have been current as of mid-May of this year. Rolyat says the girl in the bukkake site photos has a small stamp; the one here is rather large. If there's a difference, one would have to judge if the small one could have been turned into the larger one shown in my photo. Anyway, for what it's worth.

Norm[/QUOTE]I believe we can put this to rest. The stamp makes it clear it was not Marianne in the bukkake special. Thanks Norman2759 for the clarification.

Rolyat

[QUOTE=Rolyat; 1552924]I believe we can put this to rest. The stamp makes it clear it was not Marianne in the bukkake special. Thanks Norman2759 for the clarification.

Rolyat[/QUOTE]If the date on the stanp below is May 2011, you need to consider the following. You can very easily tattoo over a smaller tattoo making it part of a larger tattoo. So that if it was Marianne in 2007 with a small tattoo, then she could have had that tattoo made into a larger tatoo by 2011. THE DEFINITIVE EVEDENCE would be that the large tattoo was on Marianne before the time of the 2007 video.

[QUOTE=Beavercr;1552999]If the date on the stanp below is May 2011, you need to consider the following. You can very easily tattoo over a smaller tattoo making it part of a larger tattoo. So that if it was Marianne in 2007 with a small tattoo, then she could have had that tattoo made into a larger tatoo by 2011. THE DEFINITIVE EVEDENCE would be that the large tattoo was on Marianne before the time of the 2007 video.[/QUOTE]Marianne's stamp is much lower than Chase's. In other words covering would not work. My apologies, I should have said that in my morning post.

Rolyat.