Has anyone been to the AMP in Ipswich listed on Cityxguide? Thinking about taking a ride over this weekend. Thanks, AMP.
Printable View
Has anyone been to the AMP in Ipswich listed on Cityxguide? Thinking about taking a ride over this weekend. Thanks, AMP.
Any recent experiences at Salisbury AMP?? Name of girl to ask for?? Any help would be appreciated.
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4098953]Has anyone been to the AMP in Ipswich listed on Cityxguide? Thinking about taking a ride over this weekend. Thanks, AMP.[/QUOTE]Location is very conspicuous.
I entered and saw Merry. Last time I saw her was at Conifer and I wasn't happy with the mtg as I wanted more than standard.
She remembered me and gave me a tour. She has a TAble shower. She told me to come back when one of her touring rotators was there and perhaps I could get what I was seeking. Have not been back.
[QUOTE=BigMick54;4121390]Any recent experiences at Salisbury AMP?? Name of girl to ask for?? Any help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE]I stopped in 2 weeks ago, had Wei Ni, great massage, great tease, standard HE, there was more on the menu with her before they got busted, there is another one that rotates through named Lisa, she is full menu and a ton of fun, really gets into it, especially 69. Enjoy, AMP.
Stopped in Monday morning after calling to make an apt, got there and was greeted by a younger, fit and attractive Tiffany. Told her an hour and gave her the 60, she said "take off all cloths, I be right back. " I had seen a post from another monger about putting a $100 and a condom on the table so she knows as soon as she comes in what your looking for, so I did this then got on the table. When she came in she asked, are you _ (my name) and I said yes, they have me in their phone there, I guess bad if they get busted, good that new girls know I'm a regular. (No mention of the $100 or condom) I said medium and she started right in, was a decent massage, not the best, it was more like a very slow, sensual rub down, lots of ass touching, inner thighs and after about 15 min, touching my balls. I was rubbing her ass OTC while she was rubbing me and she seemed to enjoy it. At the half way point she had me turn over and right away started stroking my dick and balls, she started to go for the oil and I asked if we could have sex? She said no, the boss says no sex, just hand, I asked, no blowjobs? She said no, boss says if girls have sex he sends them back to NY. She asked me if I had sex here before and I said yes, she asked me who and I gave her one name (not Wei ni) she said oh, she gone. Boss no like her, send her back. I then asked her if he sent Wei Ni back and she said yes, Wei Ni gone now, back to NY. She oiled up junior and the boys and she gave me the slowest, longest most sensual HJ I had ever had, she would do it for a cpl of minutes and then concentrate on the balls for awhile, then back to junior, repeat, she said, you like long and slow? I said yes, she said most girls go fast and two minutes all done. I tried to go UTC and she said NO! Not allowed. The HJ lasted a solid 15/20 min until I said. I need to cum and she went at it until I did. She did the hot towel clean up followed by a quick scalp massage. I tipped her 40, I would not repeat, although the slow, sensual stuff is great, I really am there for BJ or FS. On my way out she said if I come back and see her on Sunday she would, and pointed to her mouth. As in, I guess she will blow me, I think my next AMP is going to be Andover or Chelmsford, Lowell, I just want more.
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4121911]I stopped in 2 weeks ago, had Wei Ni, great massage, great tease, standard HE, there was more on the menu with her before they got busted, there is another one that rotates through named Lisa, she is full menu and a ton of fun, really gets into it, especially 69. Enjoy, AMP.[/QUOTE]Stopped by today. Door locked with cease and desist notice posted.
Anyone know what happened?
[QUOTE=TRex69;4133273]Stopped by today. Door locked with cease and desist notice posted.
Anyone know what happened?[/QUOTE]Everyone's been saying it from the beginning, a really stupid location: [URL]https://www.newburyportnews.com/news/local_news/salisbury-selectmen-vote-to-order-spa-closed-again/article_1c669b66-7b43-5063-86c8-0db978d14bb2.html[/URL].
I really had no intentions of going back anyway, Its close and that was nice but wasn't getting what I really wanted, FS or BJ so I had intended on traveling to others either Andover, Chelmford or maybe even Danvers. Be safe out there.
AMP.
[QUOTE=Zimmm33;4133805]Everyone's been saying it from the beginning, a really stupid location: [URL]https://www.newburyportnews.com/news/local_news/salisbury-selectmen-vote-to-order-spa-closed-again/article_1c669b66-7b43-5063-86c8-0db978d14bb2.html[/URL].[/QUOTE]Except for apartment AMPs what are good storefront locations? Office suites? Theses are all in commercial areas. Salisbury along that stretch is a dump with other seedy stuff so not so sure why that place stands out.
New on in Ipswich called Merrys is in a very conspicuous area. I went there yesterday only to be told they were closed by the hair salon owner next store.
What makes for a good place?
[QUOTE=TRex69;4134247]Except for apartment AMPs what are good storefront locations? Office suites? Theses are all in commercial areas. Salisbury along that stretch is a dump with other seedy stuff so not so sure why that place stands out.
New on in Ipswich called Merrys is in a very conspicuous area. I went there yesterday only to be told they were closed by the hair salon owner next store.
What makes for a good place?[/QUOTE]I'd love to get paid as a consultant for these places picking decent locations.
1. Avoid tiny towns. Everybody knows everything.
2. Avoid small plazas with small parking lots. All of the other stores can't help but notice a steady stream of males going in and out of their cramped lot into just one store.
3. Avoid places where there will be a lot of eyes. See#2. The place in Salisbury had an all lady barber shop next door. People just sitting in chairs looking out the window.
In the case of Rochester, NH closing, it might help to not be right across from the courthouse. Duh.
In the case of Exeter, NH closing, it's probably got the biggest PD per capita in the state, due to the private school there. Bored cops = eventual bust.
The best locations, in my opinion, are in medium to large sized cities in a building where there are lots of businesses and a big parking lot. The foot traffic of a bunch of males entering will be lost in the overall volume of cars / people. For my locale and work, the safest cities for AMPs are Danvers and Methuen.
Z.
[QUOTE=Zimmm33;4134540]I'd love to get paid as a consultant for these places picking decent locations.
1. Avoid tiny towns. Everybody knows everything.
2. Avoid small plazas with small parking lots. All of the other stores can't help but notice a steady stream of males going in and out of their cramped lot into just one store.
3. Avoid places where there will be a lot of eyes. See#2. The place in Salisbury had an all lady barber shop next door. People just sitting in chairs looking out the window.
In the case of Rochester, NH closing, it might help to not be right across from the courthouse. Duh.
In the case of Exeter, NH closing, it's probably got the biggest PD per capita in the state, due to the private school there. Bored cops = eventual bust.
The best locations, in my opinion, are in medium to large sized cities in a building where there are lots of businesses and a big parking lot. The foot traffic of a bunch of males entering will be lost in the overall volume of cars / people. For my locale and work, the safest cities for AMPs are Danvers and Methuen.
Z.[/QUOTE]From what I have seen over the years, areas with a large percentage of the population being Asian seems to work. Quincy being a prime example. AMPs at every street corner and except for a couple high profile places all have been around for many years.
[QUOTE=Zimmm33;4134540]I'd love to get paid as a consultant for these places picking decent locations.
1. Avoid tiny towns. Everybody knows everything.
2. Avoid small plazas with small parking lots. All of the other stores can't help but notice a steady stream of males going in and out of their cramped lot into just one store.
3. Avoid places where there will be a lot of eyes. See#2. The place in Salisbury had an all lady barber shop next door. People just sitting in chairs looking out the window.
In the case of Rochester, NH closing, it might help to not be right across from the courthouse. Duh.
In the case of Exeter, NH closing, it's probably got the biggest PD per capita in the state, due to the private school there. Bored cops = eventual bust.
The best locations, in my opinion, are in medium to large sized cities in a building where there are lots of businesses and a big parking lot. The foot traffic of a bunch of males entering will be lost in the overall volume of cars / people. For my locale and work, the safest cities for AMPs are Danvers and Methuen.
Z.[/QUOTE]Excellent post. The only thing I could ad is what HappyDave all ready added.
HappyDave, Quite perceptive with your comment. As I understand it, Asians are very quiet and keep to themselves, and what happens in the community stays in the community. I remember an Asian team in an apartment building in a primarily Asian residential area in Arlington. When I said it was not comfortable to walk up the street with so many residents around, the handler said not to worry because the neighborhood (paraphrasing) don't snitch.
[QUOTE=HappyDave;4134675]From what I have seen over the years, areas with a large percentage of the population being Asian seems to work. Quincy being a prime example. AMPs at every street corner and except for a couple high profile places all have been around for many years.[/QUOTE].
[QUOTE=HandDeliver;4138878]HappyDave, Quite perceptive with your comment. As I understand it, Asians are very quiet and keep to themselves, and what happens in the community stays in the community. I remember an Asian team in an apartment building in a primarily Asian residential area in Arlington. When I said it was not comfortable to walk up the street with so many residents around, the handler said not to worry because the neighborhood (paraphrasing) don't snitch.
.[/QUOTE]It's not about not snitching, it's about culture. We live in one of the most puritanical society's when it comes to sex, in other countries sex and sex workers are an accepted part of society. It's not about keeping their mouth shut, it's about being accepted.
It seems that most Asian massage parlors offer services beyond legit massages. Well, Izumi in Burlington appears to be the exception. All of their providers are Chinese and provide real skilled massages. There is no house fee and I don't believe any additional menu offerings beyond a straight massage.
So look elsewhere if you're looking for any extras. Having said that please speak up if you've experienced otherwise.
[URL]https://cityxguide.co/body-rubs/call-me-781-333-0804-enjoy-your-day-real-young-14824538[/URL]
Another monger on here had PM'd me to try the AMP in Danvers that he always gets FS there so I stopped in there yesterday, Was greeted at the door by an ok looking 50 ish looking woman, brought me to the room, the place is very professional looking by the way, I told her one hour and paid the house. She left and I folded up my cloths very neatly on the chair putting a nice gold foil condom on the top with a $100 bill so she could see when she came back. I got on the very nice heated table and waited, she came in and asked med or strong? I said strong, she asked if any places were sore, I said my neck and shoulders, she started with the blanket over me massaging my neck, back, shoulders, I was really tight, she took the blanket off and put this tiger balm on, almost like Ben gay, but not as strong. She gave a fantastic massage. A dog came in and licked my hand, I only mention this in case someone has allergies. About half way through a second lady came in, they were both rubbing me while talking in Chinese, the first one soon told me she had to go and the second one took over, she was the same, probably 50, ok looking, great body. I was rubbing her legs as she was rubbing me, she finally went to get the hot towel, cleaned me up, then started with light touch tease for about 5 min, had me turn over, I asked for sex, she whispered. Quiet. We have neighbors. Then said No, I whispered BJ? She said no, and started to oil up the little guy. She positioned herself so tight against the table that I couldn't get into the front of her pants so I went down the back and rubbed her ass while she was jerking me, took me awhile since I wasn't super turned on, finally finished, she cleaned me up and finished with the scalp massage. I got dressed and tipped $40, she hugged me and whispered in my ear. Next time more. I take that she was saying she would do more next time, not, next time I tip more, but in any case, there won't be a next time, the massage was outstanding but for an hours drive one way. I have to have FS or at least a BJ. There was never any mention of my condom or the 100 bill, too bad, I had a pocket full of money and was ready to pay for the full monte.
[QUOTE=Amppro95;4158466][URL]https://cityxguide.co/body-rubs/call-me-781-333-0804-enjoy-your-day-real-young-14824538[/URL]
Another monger on here had PM'd me to try the AMP in Danvers that he always gets FS there so I stopped in there yesterday, Was greeted at the door by an ok looking 50 ish looking woman, brought me to the room, the place is very professional looking by the way, I told her one hour and paid the house. She left and I folded up my cloths very neatly on the chair putting a nice gold foil condom on the top with a $100 bill so she could see when she came back. I got on the very nice heated table and waited, she came in and asked med or strong? I said strong, she asked if any places were sore, I said my neck and shoulders, she started with the blanket over me massaging my neck, back, shoulders, I was really tight, she took the blanket off and put this tiger balm on, almost like Ben gay, but not as strong. She gave a fantastic massage. A dog came in and licked my hand, I only mention this in case someone has allergies. About half way through a second lady came in, they were both rubbing me while talking in Chinese, the first one soon told me she had to go and the second one took over, she was the same, probably 50, ok looking, great body. I was rubbing her legs as she was rubbing me, she finally went to get the hot towel, cleaned me up, then started with light touch tease for about 5 min, had me turn over, I asked for sex, she whispered. Quiet. We have neighbors. Then said No, I whispered BJ? She said no, and started to oil up the little guy. She positioned herself so tight against the table that I couldn't get into the front of her pants so I went down the back and rubbed her ass while she was jerking me, took me awhile since I wasn't super turned on, finally finished, she cleaned me up and finished with the scalp massage. I got dressed and tipped $40, she hugged me and whispered in my ear. Next time more. I take that she was saying she would do more next time, not, next time I tip more, but in any case, there won't be a next time, the massage was outstanding but for an hours drive one way. I have to have FS or at least a BJ. There was never any mention of my condom or the 100 bill, too bad, I had a pocket full of money and was ready to pay for the full monte.[/QUOTE]I would be very surprised if you could get FSU there. I know one woman I have seen there provided elective FSU at another location years ago. But when I saw her she was very concerned about the neighbors. Maybe your buddy went on a weekend or after hours.
Had lunch at Nick's sub. (IMHO. Food not that good).
Need I say more??
Have fun.
Tony.
[URL]https://cityxguide.co/body-rubs/best-service-60-hr-must-try-978-972-5068-12914058.[/URL]
I've seen a lot of posts since the Kraft bust and I think a lot of guys have the wrong mindset, instead of being nervous and laying low we should be supporting our favorites AMPs and flooding the board with reviews, fuck Uncle LEO, fuck the Government, this business should be legal just like alcohol, weed, gambling. I have as much to lose as anyone, I'm married with kids, own a very popular business in my town and am very well known, but I'm going to keep living my best life and if that means hitting AMPs once or twice a week then so be it. Now I'll get off my soap box and review the AMP in Middleton.
I've been going to this one for the last month, there are always two girls there, they are both young and IMHO very pretty, nice bodies. I have gotten "Amy" each time, I think that she gives a very good massage, she does some back walking, allows and enjoys plenty of OTC touching, on the flip, lots of UTC touching both upstairs and downstairs, I have only gotten the standard HE, which she does very well, I would like more but I enjoy her very much so if it happens, great, if not, not a deal breaker. The other girl looks like a Vietnamese Janet Jackson, pretty hot. When I was in the other day she came in and joined Amy for 4 hands for a few minutes, then when Amy got up on my back she got down in front of me, held my hands out straight and talked to me while Amy walked.
Very nice, good location, easy parking, clean place, walls don't go up to the ceiling but they are high and rooms are very private.
Any info on La Bella or Lina spa on rt1.
Any Thai Massage places that offer HE?
Thanks.
Five arrested in prostitution sting in Norton.
[URL]https://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/five-arrested-in-prostitution-sting-in-norton/article_8790422d-b205-5e4e-9068-8a31647b0671.html[/URL]
[URL]https://whdh.com/news/5-arrested-in-norton-prostitution-sting/[/URL]
Got 1/2 hour massage was great but girl was older otc roaming and great flip 40/40.
Interesting. The article indicated that "most of the women involved (sex trade) suffer from drug addiction, mental health or other problems. Also, many prostitutes are involved in human trafficking, they said. ".
Thus, women are free to do what they will with their bodies, so long as its having abortions, but charge a fee for intimate encounters, the women must be suffering from drug addition, mental health, or "other problems".
[QUOTE=LittleTonyII;4271070]Five arrested in prostitution sting in Norton.
[URL]https://www.thesunchronicle.com/news/local_news/five-arrested-in-prostitution-sting-in-norton/article_8790422d-b205-5e4e-9068-8a31647b0671.html[/URL]
[URL]https://whdh.com/news/5-arrested-in-norton-prostitution-sting/[/URL][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4295653]Interesting. The article indicated that "most of the women involved (sex trade) suffer from drug addiction, mental health or other problems. Also, many prostitutes are involved in human trafficking, they said. ".
Thus, women are free to do what they will with their bodies, so long as its having abortions, but charge a fee for intimate encounters, the women must be suffering from drug addition, mental health, or "other problems".[/QUOTE]You nailed it.
Got to bald st and got two girls this time 1/2 -- 80 massage great 4 hands roaming and the flip was awesome with both working it another 80 and I was super happy.
Just saw that the AMP in Greenfield is advertising again. Before they shut down the reports were of a 1 older lady show. Has anyone been back since they've re-opened?
[URL]https://cityxguide.com/ads/asian-beautiful-girls-413-512-1236-new-store-opening-23065310[/URL]
The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.
From Newburyport paper.
SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.
Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.
Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.
In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.
"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".
Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.
In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.
A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.
When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.
The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.
Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.
During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.
When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.
The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.
"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.
In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.
McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".
[QUOTE=Zimmm33;4457676]The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.
From Newburyport paper.
SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.
Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.
Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.
In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.
"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".
Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.
In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.
A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.
When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.
The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.
Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.
During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.
When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.
The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.
"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.
In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.
McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".[/QUOTE]Imagine being the guy in the room during the raid. If it was me, they would have taken me out in a hearse. Looks like good news for the ladies but bad news for us moving forward.
I stopped in once this summer, forget her name, late 40's woman, okay massage, decent shape, accessed her nice sized tits, left happy. Didn't ask for extras beyond HJ. I would repeat if in the area again.
ARG.
[QUOTE=FooooBar420;4379531]Just saw that the AMP in Greenfield is advertising again. Before they shut down the reports were of a 1 older lady show. Has anyone been back since they've re-opened?
[URL]https://cityxguide.com/ads/asian-beautiful-girls-413-512-1236-new-store-opening-23065310[/URL][/QUOTE]
It is easier to get a conviction against the ladies. That is the simple reason for only charging the ladies. Not sure what evidence they got on ladies. Generally, you send in undercover, and have the ladies offer to do sexual favors for fee. Much harder to convict the guys unless you get masseuses to testify against them, and given the speech difficulties (wink. Wink.), they can never get a conviction based on testimony alone. Competent defense attorney would shred their testimony. Thus, they would need video and testimony, IMHO.
Not crime to go into massage parlor to get massage. Of course, charging someone results in public shaming and their legal cost of fighting criminal charges, even if not found guilty.
This female judge is basically telling the District Attorney who to charge and for what, by dismissing the ladies charges for unequal application of the law. LOL. Undoubtibly, McCabe won't face judicial inquiry. (See Judge (male) Sinnott)
Contrary to what you think, this will DISCOURAGE the POLICE from pursuing these cases, since they won't end in convictions, even if heard by Judge (I am a feminist & Progressive Resistance Fighter) Mary McCabe, ex-criminal defense attorney and appointed by Deval Patrick to the bench. McCabe is married to an ex-judge.
In fact, if police just bring charges against the guys, McCabe has set precedent in her own court to dismiss for unequal application of the law, which of course she won't follow in regards to charging males with. What a farce.
Thank you Judge McCabe for discouraging the police from enforcing these law. Progressives always think their actions have no unintended consequences.
McCabe may be overturned on appeal, since the actual charges are "providing sex for a fee". The male customers would have been charges with solicitation, etc. Not sure if its the same statute or different one, and not inclined to research. If same statute, then I think, strictly construed, unequal application would apply, but if different statute and thus different criminal offense, unequal application theory would fail.
[QUOTE=Zimmm33;4457676]The good news is the ladies charges are dismissed. (Though a DA motion will be filed Oct 3rd.) The bad news is the message is out there you have to include and take down male customers when doing an investigation like this.
From Newburyport paper.
SALISBURY A judge dismissed charges last month against two women accused of offering sex for a fee at a local spa and questioned why seven police departments and the USA Homeland Security Department "were unable to investigate" and charge customers or the business owner, according to court records.
Newburyport District Court Judge Mary McCabe ruled in favor of motions to dismiss charges against Fudi Fan, 50, and Yuhua Li, 62 Chinese nationals living in Salisbury who were charged in June 2018 after police raided Yoga Spa at 111 Lafayette Road, No. 2, in Salisbury.
Police said the raid followed a three-month undercover operation involving seven police departments and the federal Department of Homeland Security.
In her ruling, McCabe questioned the actions of law enforcement officials for not investigating or charging anyone but the women.
"To suggest that seven police departments and a federal agency were unable to further investigate the customers who were supporting this business is not credible or is an indication of discriminatory choices and selective prosecution of these women," McCabe wrote. "The complaints brought against the two female defendants were the product of an arbitrary or unequal application of the law, based upon the sex (gender) of the defendants. ".
Salisbury police were tipped off in April 2018 by a concerned citizen regarding young Asian workers at the spa providing sex for a fee and living inside the business, according to court records.
In the weeks to follow, police posed as customers and were offered sex acts for a fee.
A Salisbury police detective obtained a warrant and organized a raid of the business with help from Seabrook, Amesbury, Newbury, Georgetown and Newburyport officers and detectives. When police entered the building, there was one customer inside but he said he wasn't receiving illegal sexual services.
When Li and Fan were asked by a Homeland Security agent whether they were being forced to work there or forced to perform sexual acts on customers, both said no.
The dismissals by McCabe came after the two women nearly reached a plea deal with an Essex County prosecutor in April. At the last moment, they changed their minds when they were told their pleas could lead to them being deported.
Attorneys Jack Humphries and John Bjorlie, however, are not done with the cases.
During the women's appearances in court Wednesday for a final status hearing, Essex County prosecutor Michelle Belmonte told Judge Allen Swan she had filed a motion to amend McCabe's decision. That prompted Swan to schedule a motion hearing in the same courthouse Oct. 3.
When asked what she hoped to accomplish by filing the motion, Belmonte referred a reporter to the Essex County District Attorney's Office.
The spokeswoman Carrie Kimball said she couldn't comment.
"Until the motion is filed, I cannot speak to its purpose," Kimball said in an email.
In their motions to dismiss, Humphries and Bjorlie successfully argued that police officers charged only Fan and Li and not the male customer discovered there during the raid nor the owner of Yoga Spa. They argued that such selective targeting ran contrary to established precedent dating back to the 1970's.
McCabe agreed with their interpretation, writing, "To allow one male customer found in the massage room with money displayed to go uncharged, or it appears investigated, and according to the untested-to assertion of the Commonwealth, multiple other customers not to be charged, and to allow the male owner of the business which employed the two defendants, to go uncharged, leads the court only to believe that the target of the police was only the two female masseuses who performed the prostitution or sex work, and not the customers who kept them in business nor the business owner who employed them. ".[/QUOTE]
I don't disagree with your points, and it's definitely the way it all could play out. My point was, IF they want convictions, they have to have males and / or owners.
[QUOTE=Longjblues;4467090]It is easier to get a conviction against the ladies. That is the simple reason for only charging the ladies. Not sure what evidence they got on ladies. Generally, you send in undercover, and have the ladies offer to do sexual favors for fee. Much harder to convict the guys unless you get masseuses to testify against them, and given the speech difficulties (wink. Wink.), they can never get a conviction based on testimony alone. Competent defense attorney would shred their testimony. Thus, they would need video and testimony, IMHO.
Not crime to go into massage parlor to get massage. Of course, charging someone results in public shaming and their legal cost of fighting criminal charges, even if not found guilty.
This female judge is basically telling the District Attorney who to charge and for what, by dismissing the ladies charges for unequal application of the law. LOL. Undoubtibly, McCabe won't face judicial inquiry. (See Judge (male) Sinnott)
Contrary to what you think, this will DISCOURAGE the POLICE from pursuing these cases, since they won't end in convictions, even if heard by Judge (I am a feminist & Progressive Resistance Fighter) Mary McCabe, ex-criminal defense attorney and appointed by Deval Patrick to the bench. McCabe is married to an ex-judge.
In fact, if police just bring charges against the guys, McCabe has set precedent in her own court to dismiss for unequal application of the law, which of course she won't follow in regards to charging males with. What a farce.
Thank you Judge McCabe for discouraging the police from enforcing these law. Progressives always think their actions have no unintended consequences.
McCabe may be overturned on appeal, since the actual charges are "providing sex for a fee". The male customers would have been charges with solicitation, etc. Not sure if its the same statute or different one, and not inclined to research. If same statute, then I think, strictly construed, unequal application would apply, but if different statute and thus different criminal offense, unequal application theory would fail.[/QUOTE]
Any AMP therapy available in WMass? Usually go to Bennington but Place was raided.
Med.
Just saw a new massage place in the Great Road Associates plaza, 481 Great Rd, Acton. It's on the Nonset path side. Does anyone have any info?
(Cross posted in the Lowell forum.).
[QUOTE=Victorth;4472698]Just saw a new massage place in the Great Road Associates plaza, 481 Great Rd, Acton. It's on the Nonset path side. Does anyone have any info?
(Cross posted in the Lowell forum.).[/QUOTE]Went here today, had a good time. Place is very quiet and the parking area near their door has a high retaining wall so it felt like a pretty good parking setup.
Walked in and met "sunny" from Taiwan. .6 for the hour, so-so massage, not much teasing, but full access top and bottom on flip.
Received standard finish (with the UTC roaming) I did not ask if more was available, but will likely repeat to find out. Left. 6 on the way out. No haggle at all, and TBH I don't think she even looked at how much I left.
[QUOTE=Goose7334;4478690]Went here today, had a good time. Place is very quiet and the parking area near their door has a high retaining wall so it felt like a pretty good parking setup.
Walked in and met "sunny" from Taiwan. .6 for the hour, so-so massage, not much teasing, but full access top and bottom on flip.
Received standard finish (with the UTC roaming) I did not ask if more was available, but will likely repeat to find out. Left. 6 on the way out. No haggle at all, and TBH I don't think she even looked at how much I left.[/QUOTE]Thanks for trying it out and reporting. I was going to venture there tomorrow, but your indication of just a so-so massage will keep me away. I have serious pain that requires a good quality hard massage for relief, and that's much more important than any other services.
[URL]https://bodyrubshop.com/ads/best-service-60-hr-must-try-978-972-5068-12914058.[/URL] After the last two trips, I had a "reaction" and there was no FS. 1st trip; I was scratching, 2nd trip; hospital for Staph or Strep infection. Had good time but I think I'll go elsewhere from now on.
I almost headed over that way Tuesday. I hope you are well on the mend. Z.
[QUOTE=Barry136;4495241][URL]https://bodyrubshop.com/ads/best-service-60-hr-must-try-978-972-5068-12914058.[/URL] After the last two trips, I had a "reaction" and there was no FS. 1st trip; I was scratching, 2nd trip; hospital for Staph or Strep infection. Had good time but I think I'll go elsewhere from now on.[/QUOTE]
Went last week, real good massage. She made the ending last a while. Sweet little girl 60/40.
Methuen
I love AMP's and enjoy a really great massage and leaving happy. So far I have visited two spots:
At Elite Touch Massage in Framingham I met Coco who provided a solid medium pressure massage, some teasing, and a wonderful end to the massage. I'm going to try and see her again before I leave.
At Rose Day Spa in Hopedale I met Natasha (and yes she is Chinese) who is very pretty with a nice body. Massage was OK with a little bit of teasing, some sweet little kisses, and a little mutual touch. I knew fun was to be had here when as soon as I walked in the door, both ladies there were grabbing my ass. The menu there goes from HE to FS. Just depends on how deep your pockets are. I'm not a fan of negotiations but I sprung for a bit of B2 B, Russian, a Saran Wrap BJ, and a HE finish. Was an interesting session, but not one I would repeat. The SWBJ was interesting, felt good, but just kinda weirded me out.